Applications of Defense Elicitors to Roots of Containerized Eastern White Pine (Pinus strobus) Stimulate Increased Defensive Enzyme Activities of Fine Roots

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Aziz A,
   2. Poinssot B,
   3. Daire X,
   4. Adrian M,
   5. Bézier A,
   6. Lambert B,
   7. Joubert JM,
   8. Pugin A.

   2003. Laminarin elicits defense responses in grapevine and induces protection against Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 16(12):1118–1128. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.12.1118

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Barto K,
   2. Enright S,
   3. Eyles A,
   4. Wallis C,
   5. Chorbadjian R,
   6. Hansen R,
   7. Herms DA,
   8. Bonello P,
   9. Cipollini D.

   2008. Effects of fertilization and fungal and insect attack on systemic protein defenses of Austrian pine. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 34:1392–1400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-008-9550-z

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
3. ↵
   1. Benhamou N,
   2. Thériault G.

   1992. Treatment with chitosan enhances resistance of tomato plants to the crown and root rot pathogen Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 41(1):33–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-5765(92)90047-Y

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bradford MM.

   1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 72(1-2): 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Cerqueira A,
   2. Alves A,
   3. Berenguer H,
   4. Correia B,
   5. Gómez-Cadenas A,
   6. Diez JJ,
   7. Monteiro P,
   8. Pinto G.

   2017. Phosphite shifts physiological and hormonal profile of Monterey pine and delays Fusarium circinatum progression. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 114:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.02.020

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Cipollini D,
   2. Wang Q,
   3. Whitehill JGA,
   4. Powell JR,
   5. Bonello P,
   6. Herms DA.

   2011. Distinguishing defensive characteristics in the phloem of ash species resistant and susceptible to emerald ash borer. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 37:450–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-9954-z

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
7. ↵
   1. Van Loon LC

   1. Conrath U.

   2009. Chapter 9: Priming of induced plant defense responses. In: Van Loon LC, editor. Advances in botanical research. Volume 51. Cambridge (MA, USA): Academic Press (Elsevier). p. 361–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2296(09)51009-9

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Dalio RJD,
   2. Fleischmann F,
   3. Humez M,
   4. Osswald W.

   2014. Phosphite protects Fagus sylvatica seedlings towards Phytophthora plurivora via local toxicity, priming and facilitation of pathogen recognition. PLoS ONE. 9(1):e87860. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087860

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Dobrowolski MP,
   2. Shearer BL,
   3. Colquhoun IJ,
   4. O’Brien PA,
   5. Hardy GEStJ.

   2008. Selection for decreased sensitivity to phosphite in Phytophthora cinnamomi with prolonged use of fungicide. Plant Pathology. 57(5):928–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2008.01883.x

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. El Ghaouth A,
    2. Arul J,
    3. Grenier J,
    4. Benhamou N,
    5. Asselin A,
    6. Bélanger R.

    1994. Effect of chitosan on cucumber plants: Suppression of Pythium aphanidermatum and induction of defense reactions. Phytopathology. 84(3):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-84-313

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Eyles A,
    2. Bonello P,
    3. Ganley R,
    4. Mohammed C.

    2010. Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees. New Phytologist. 185(4):893–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03127.x

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Felipini RB,
    2. Boneti JI,
    3. Katsurayama Y,
    4. Neto ACR,
    5. Veleirinho B,
    6. Maraschin M,
    7. Di Piero RM.

    2016. Apple scab control and activation of plant defence responses using potassium phosphite and chitosan. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 145:929–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-016-0881-2

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Fossdal CG,
    2. Hietala AM,
    3. Kvaalen H,
    4. Solheim H.

    2006. Changes in host chitinase isoforms in relation to wounding and colonization by Heterobasidion annosum: Early and strong defense response in 33-year-old resistant Norway spruce clone. Tree Physiology. 26(2):169–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/26.2.169

    OpenUrlPubMed
14. ↵
    1. Fossdal CG,
    2. Nagy NE,
    3. Johnsen Ø,
    4. Dalen LS.

    2007. Local and systemic stress responses in Norway spruce: Similarities in gene expression between a compatible pathogen interaction and drought stress. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 70(4-6):161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2007.09.002

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Frampton J,
    2. Pettersson M,
    3. Braham AM.

    2018. Genetic variation for resistance to Phytophthora root rot in Eastern white pine seedlings. Forests. 9(4):161. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9040161

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Franceschi VR,
    2. Krokene P,
    3. Christiansen E,
    4. Krekling T.

    2005. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist. 167(2):353–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01436.x

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Garbelotto M,
    2. Schmidt DJ,
    3. Harnik TY.

    2007. Phosphite injections and bark application of phosphite + Pentrabark^TM control sudden oak death in coast live oak. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 33(5):309–317. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2007.035

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Gillman JH,
    2. Zlesak DC,
    3. Smith JA.

    2003. Applications of potassium silicate decrease black spot infection in Rosa hybrida ‘Meipelta’ (Fuschia Meidiland^TM). HortScience. 38(6):1144–1147. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.38.6.1144

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Gozzo F,
    2. Faoro F.

    2013. Systemic acquired resistance (50 years after discovery): Moving from the lab to the field. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 61(51):12473–12491. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf404156x

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Harada T,
    2. Fujimori K,
    3. Hirose S,
    4. Masada M.

    1966. Growth and β-glucan 10C3K production by a mutant of Alcaligenes faecalis var. myxogenes in defined medium. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry. 30(8):764–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/00021369.1966.10858682

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Hodge A,
    2. Alexander IJ,
    3. Gooday GW.

    1995. Chitinolytic activities of Eucalyptus pilularis and Pinus sylvestris root systems challenged with mycorrhizal and pathogenic fungi. New Phytologist. 131(2): 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb05727.x

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Islam MA,
    2. Sturrock RN,
    3. Williams HL,
    4. Ekramoddoullah AKM.

    2010. Identification, characterization, and expression analyses of class II and IV chitinase genes from Douglas-fir seedlings infected by Phellinus sulphurascens. Phytopathology. 100(4): 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-100-4-0356

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    1. Jøhnk N,
    2. Hietala AM,
    3. Fossdal CG,
    4. Collinge DB,
    5. Newman MA.

    2005. Defense-related genes expressed in Norway spruce roots after infection with the root rot pathogen Ceratobasidium bicorne (anamorph: Rhizoctonia sp.). Tree Physiology. 25(12): 1533–1543. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.12.1533

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. ↵
    1. Kamenidou S,
    2. Cavins TJ,
    3. Marek S.

    2008. Silicon supplements affect horticultural traits of greenhouse-produced ornamental sunflowers. HortScience. 43(1):236–239. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.1.236

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    1. Kamenidou S,
    2. Cavins TJ,
    3. Marek S.

    2010. Silicon supplements affect floricultural quality traits and elemental nutrient concentrations of greenhouse produced gerbera. Scientia Horticulturae. 123(3):390–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.09.008

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Kasuga T,
    2. Hayden KJ,
    3. Eyre CA,
    4. Croucher PJP,
    5. Schechter S,
    6. Wright JW,
    7. Garbelotto M.

    2021. Innate resistance and phosphite treatment affect both the pathogen’s and host’s transcriptomes in the tanoak-Phytophthora ramorum pathosystem. Journal of Fungi. 7(3):198. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030198

    OpenUrlPubMed
27. ↵
    1. Keeling CI,
    2. Bohlmann J.

    2006. Diterpene resin acids in conifers. Phytochemistry. 67(22):2415–2423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2006.08.019

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Kersten PJ,
    2. Kopper BJ,
    3. Raffa KF,
    4. Illman BL.

    2006. Rapid analysis of abietanes in conifers. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 32:2679–2685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9191-z

    OpenUrlPubMed
29. ↵
    1. LaFontaine PJ,
    2. Benhamou N.

    1996. Chitosan treatment: An emerging strategy for enhancing resistance of greenhouse tomato plants to infection by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicislycopersici. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 6(1):111–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583159650039575

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Latunde-Dada AO,
    2. Lucas JA.

    2001. The plant defence activator acibenzolar-S-methyl primes cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] seedlings for rapid induction of resistance. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology. 58(5):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmpp.2001.0327

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Llorens E,
    2. García-Agustín P,
    3. Lapeña L.

    2017. Advances in induced resistance by natural compounds: Towards new options for woody crop protection. Scientia Agricola. 74(1):90–100. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2016-0012

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Martín-García J,
    2. Zas R,
    3. Solla A,
    4. Woodward S,
    5. Hantula J,
    6. Vainio EJ,
    7. Mullett M,
    8. Morales-Rodríguez C,
    9. Vannini A,
    10. Martínez-Álvarez P,
    11. Pinto G,
    12. Alves A,
    13. Amaral J,
    14. Wingfield MJ,
    15. Fourie G,
    16. Steenkamp ET,
    17. Ahumada R,
    18. Šerá B,
    19. Sanz-Ros AV,
    20. Raposo R,
    21. Elvira-Recuenco M,
    22. Iturritxa E,
    23. Gordon TR,
    24. Diez JJ.

    2019. Environmentally friendly methods for controlling pine pitch canker. Plant Pathology. 68(5):843–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13009

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Mason CJ,
    2. Villari C,
    3. Keefover-Ring K,
    4. Jagemann S,
    5. Zhu J,
    6. Bonello P,
    7. Raffa KF.

    2017. Spatial and temporal components of induced plant responses in the context of herbivore life history and impact on host. Functional Ecology. 31(11):2034–2050. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12911

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Mauch-Mani B,
    2. Baccelli I,
    3. Luna E,
    4. Flors V.

    2017. Defense priming: An adaptive part of induced resistance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 68:485–512. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-041132

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
35. ↵
    1. Monteiro ACA,
    2. de Resende MLV,
    3. Valente TCT,
    4. Ribeiro PM Jr.,
    5. Pereira VF,
    6. da Costa JR,
    7. da Silva JAG.

    2016. Manganese phosphite in coffee defence against Hemileia vastatrix, the coffee rust fungus: Biochemical and molecular analyses. Journal of Phytopathology. 164(11-12):1043–1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12525

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Moreira X,
    2. Sampedro L,
    3. Zas R,
    4. Pearse IS.

    2016. Defensive traits in young pine trees cluster into two divergent syndromes related to early growth rate. PLoS ONE. 11(3):e0152537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152537

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. ↵
    1. Nagy NE,
    2. Fossdal CG,
    3. Dalen LS,
    4. Lönneborg A,
    5. Heldal I,
    6. Johnsen Ø.

    2004. Effects of Rhizoctonia infection and drought on peroxidase and chitinase activity in Norway spruce (Picea abies). Physiologia Plantarum. 120(3):465–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.00265.x

    OpenUrlPubMed
38. ↵
    1. Niere JO,
    2. Deangelis G,
    3. Grant BR.

    1994. The effect of phosphonate on the acid-soluble phosphorus components in the genus Phytophthora. Microbiology. 140(7):1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-140-7-1661

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Oostendorp M,
    2. Kunz W,
    3. Dietrich B,
    4. Staub T.

    2001. Induced disease resistance in plants by chemicals. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 107:19–28. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008760518772

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Percival GC.

    2001. Induction of systemic acquired disease resistance in plants: Potential implications for disease management in urban forestry. Journal of Arboriculture. 27(4):181–192. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2001.020

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Pilbeam RA,
    2. Howard K,
    3. Shearer BL,
    4. Hardy GEStJ.

    2011. Phosphite stimulated histological responses of Eucalyptus marginata to infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Trees. 25:1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0587-1

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [computer software]. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org
43. ↵
    1. Raaymakers TM,
    2. Van den Ackerveken G.

    2016. Extracellular recognition of oomycetes during biotrophic infection of plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00906

    OpenUrlPubMed
44. ↵
    1. Reglinski T,
    2. Taylor JT,
    3. Dick MA.

    2004. Chitosan induces resistance to pitch canker in Pinus radiata. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science. 34(1):49–58. https://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/59178/04_REGLINSKI.pdf

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Rigsby CM,
    2. Herms DA,
    3. Bonello P,
    4. Cipollini D.

    2016. Higher activities of defense-associated enzymes may contribute to greater resistance of Manchurian ash to emerald ash borer than a closely related and susceptible congener. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 42:782–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0736-5

    OpenUrlPubMed
46. ↵
    1. Rigsby CM,
    2. Villari C,
    3. Peterson DL,
    4. Herms DA,
    5. Bonello P,
    6. Cipollini D.

    2018. Girdling increases survival and growth of emerald ash borer larvae on Manchurian ash. Agricultural and Forest Entomology. 21(1):130–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/afe.12292

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Xu Z

    1. Roy JC,
    2. Salaün F,
    3. Giraud S,
    4. Ferri A.

    2017. Solubility of chitin: Solvents, solution behaviors and their related mechanisms. In: Xu Z, editor. Solubility of polysaccharides. London (United Kingdom): InTech. 138 p. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.71385
48. ↵
    1. Trowbridge AM,
    2. Bowers MD,
    3. Monson RK.

    2016. Conifer monoterpene chemistry during an outbreak enhances consumption and immune response of an eruptive folivore. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 42:1281–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-016-0797-5

    OpenUrlPubMed
49. ↵
    1. Wang M,
    2. Gao L,
    3. Dong S,
    4. Sun Y,
    5. Shen Q,
    6. Guo S.

    2017. Role of silicon on plant-pathogen interactions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8:701. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00701

    OpenUrlPubMed
50. ↵
    1. Zheng K,
    2. Lu J,
    3. Li J,
    4. Yu Y,
    5. Zhang J,
    6. He Z,
    7. Ismail OM,
    8. Wu J,
    9. Xie X,
    10. Li X,
    11. Xu G,
    12. Dou D,
    13. Wang X.

    2021. Efficiency of chitosan application against Phytophthora infestans and the activation of defence mechanisms in potato. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 182:1670–1680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.05.097

    OpenUrlPubMed
51. ↵
    1. Zwart DC,
    2. Kim S-H.

    2012. Biochar amendment increases resistance to stem lesions caused by Phytophthora spp. in tree seedlings. HortScience. 47(12):1736–1740. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.47.12.1736

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text