Training Volunteers to Prune Recently Planted, Small Street Trees

Literature Cited

1. ↵
   1. Arthur Jr. W,
   2. Bennett Jr. W,
   3. Stanush PL,
   4. McNelly TL.

   1998. Factors that influence skill decay and retention: A quantitative review and analysis. Human Performance. 11(1):57–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1101_3

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Bancks N,
   2. North EA,
   3. Johnson GR.

   2018. An analysis of agreement between volunteer- and researcher-collected urban tree inventory data. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 44(2):73–86. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2018.007

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bloniarz DV,
   2. Ryan HDP.

   1996. The use of volunteer initiatives in conducting urban forest resource inventories. Journal of Arboriculture. 22(2):75–82. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1996.010

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Craney TA,
   2. Surles JG.

   2002. Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Quality Engineering. 14(3):391–403. https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120001878

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Cribari-Neto F,
   2. Zeileis A.

   2010. Beta regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software. 34(2):1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v034.i02

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Ferrari S,
   2. Cribari-Neto F.

   2004. Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics. 31(7): 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Gholami M,
   2. Changaee F,
   3. Karami K,
   4. Shahsavaripour Z,
   5. Veiskaramian A,
   6. Birjandi M.

   2021. Effects of multiepisode case-based learning (CBL) on problem-solving ability and learning motivation of nursing students in an emergency care course. Journal of Professional Nursing. 37(3):612–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.02.010

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Gilman EF.

   2011. An illustrated guide to pruning. 3rd Ed. Clifton Park (NY, USA): Delmar. 476 p
9. ↵
   1. Gilman EF,
   2. Grabosky JC.

   2009. Growth partitioning three years following structural pruning of Quercus virginiana. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 35(6):281–286. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.042

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Grabosky JC,
    2. Gilman EF.

    2007. Response of two oak species to reduction pruning cuts. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 33(5):360–366. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2007.041

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Hallett R,
    2. Hallett T.

    2018. Citizen science and tree health assessment: How useful are the data? Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 44(6):236–247. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2018.021

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Hauer RJ,
    2. Peterson W.

    2016. Municipal tree care and management in the United States: A 2014 urban and community forestry census of tree activities. Stevens Point (WI, USA): University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, College of Natural Resources. Special publication 16-1. 71 p.
13. ↵
    1. Hauer RJ,
    2. Timilsina N,
    3. Vogt J,
    4. Fischer BC,
    5. Wirtz Z.

    2018. A volunteer and partnership baseline for municipal forestry activity in the United States. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 44(2):87–100. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2018.008

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Lilly SJ,
    2. Gilman EF,
    3. Smiley ET.

    2019. Best Management Practices: Pruning. 3rd Ed. Atlanta (GA, USA): International Society of Arboriculture. 63 p.
15. ↵
    1. Mincey SK,
    2. Vogt JM.

    2014. Watering strategy, collective action, and neighborhood-planted trees: A case study of Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 40(2):84–95. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2014.010

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Nowak D.

    2017. Assessing the benefits and economic value of trees. In: Ferrini F, Konijnendijk van den Bosch CC, Fini A, editors. Routledge Handbook of Urban Forestry. London (United Kingdom): Routledge. p. 152–162.
17. ↵
    1. Roman LA,
    2. Scharenbroch BC,
    3. Ostbeig JPA,
    4. Mueller LS,
    5. Henning JG,
    6. Koeser AK,
    7. Sanders JR,
    8. Betz DR,
    9. Jordan RC.

    2017. Data quality in citizen science urban tree inventories. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 22:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.001

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Roman LA,
    2. Walker LA,
    3. Martineau CM,
    4. Muffly DJ,
    5. MacQueen SA,
    6. Harris W.

    2015. Stewardship matters: Case studies in establishment success of urban trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(4):1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.001

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Ryder CM,
    2. Moore GM.

    2013. The arboricultural and economic benefits of formative pruning street trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 39(1):17–24. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2013.004

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Wei T,
    2. Simko V,
    3. Levy M,
    4. Xie Y,
    5. Jin Y,
    6. Zemla J.

    2017. Package ‘corrplot’. Version 0.84. Statistician. 56(316):e24. https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Yoo MS,
    2. Park HR.

    2015. Effects of case-based learning on communication skills, problem-solving ability, and learning motivation in nursing students. Nursing & Health Sciences. 17(2):166–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12151

    OpenUrlCrossRef