Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

CONTRIBUTED ABSTRACT

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) April 1979, 5 (4) 90; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1979.5.4.90
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Detection and Treatment of Girdling Roots on Selected Norway Maples

A number of trees growing in the urban environment are thought to be weakened and killed by the abnormal girdling growth habits of some of their roots. This girdling action is presumed to reduce the translocation of water and nutrients by crushing conductive tissues at the base of the truck and/or large lateral roots. This reduction of the flow of nutrients is commonly expressed in less than normal vegetative growth and symptoms of foliage nutrient deficiency. Trees affected usually do not die suddenly. They gradually weaken and die as a result of environmental stresses or attack by pests.

There are two basic types of girdling roots: Surface and subsurface. The leaves of a tree suspected to have girdling roots may appear abnormally light green in color and may abscise earlier than normal in the autumn. However, identical symptoms are associated with many other problems, and the girdling root must be observed to make a positive diagnosis.

There were seven treatments done to 480 trees in 1977-78.

Controls No girdling roots removed). (1.). Normal trees — no girdling roots present; nothing done to tree. (2.) Girdled trees — no fertilization or trimming. (3.) Girdled trees — fertilization but no trimming.

Treated (girdling roots removed). (4.) No fertilization or trimming. (5.) Fertilization but no trimming. (6.) Trimming but no fertilization. (7.) Trimming and fertilization.

The ultimate objective of this study is to gain insights into the identification, treatment and length of time required to treat girdling roots on urban street trees. Girdling root treatment is not done by the majority of urban foresters on an ongoing basis.

The specific objectives of the study are to evaluate the degree to which girdling roots are a problem on Norway maples (Acer platanoides) growing along streets in a defined area of the City of Ann Arbor, determine and describe the percentage of trees with surface girdling roots that also have subsurface girdling roots, identify and describe bole and foliage characteristics that are diagnostic of trees suffering from the effects of surface and subsurface girdling roots, identify and evaluate the effects of factors that contribute to the formation of girdling roots and to determine the extent to which trees with girdling roots are benefited the first two growing seasons after combinations of treatments including root removal, fertilization and foliage pruning.

The study will be completed during the summer of 1979 and incorporated into a doctoral dissertation available from the University of Michigan. Robert L. Tate, City Forester, Dept. of Parks and Recreation, City of Ann Arbor, Michigan.

  • © 1979, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 5, Issue 4
April 1979
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CONTRIBUTED ABSTRACT
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
CONTRIBUTED ABSTRACT
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1979, 5 (4) 90; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1979.5.4.90

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
CONTRIBUTED ABSTRACT
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Apr 1979, 5 (4) 90; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1979.5.4.90
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire