The purpose of this study was to observe the performance of several exotic pine species and one hybrid. Also, two lots each of Pinus halepensis, brutia, and eldarica were compared for habits of growth, form, and color. Insect activity became an item of major concern and was therefore noted.
The planting was made at the University of California Deciduous Fruit Field Station (DFS), San Jose, in April 1971. It was maintained under the supervision of Tom Kretchum, Superintendent of the Station. The plants had been grown from seed and transplanted into one gallon cans at U.C. Davis.
Prior to planting, the level and deep loam soil was disced, irrigated, and furrowed. The planting was made on the ridges and the furrow were irrigated as needed. No fertilizer was added at any time. Weed oil was used for weed control. The planting started with eight plants per lot and was thinned to half that number in 1975. The plants were rated for injury following the December 1972 freeze and for their recovery eight months later in August. There were no observed effects on the pines at either time. Here are summaries on habit and growth rates:
Pinus rigida Mill. Prostrate the first three years. Became erect in the fourth year and is an attractive single trunk, short needle pine.
Pinus pinaster Ait. Slow growing the first two years after planting; quadrupled in height in the third season; has spreading branches and appears well adapted (healthy, vigorous). Very distinctive tree with red buds and very long and coarse needles.
Pinus nigra Arnold. Slow growing the first three seasons, but doubled its growth in the fourth. Its width nearly equals its height.
Pinus resinosa Ait. Died of unknown causes in the first year.
Pinus jeffreyi X coulteri hybrid. Grew slowly the first three seasons; has long grey-green needles with a P. jeffreyi form.
Pinus halepensis Mill. The two lots did not noticeably differ in form or appearance and were typically P. halepensis. They grew rapidly after the second season.
Pinus brutius Ten. Lot. 69.784 grew in height and appearance very similarly to P. eldarica; grew slowly the first two seasons, then rapidly. Lot 69.372 was a typical P. halepensis.
Pinus eldarica Medwed. Both lots appeared similar in all respects; blue-dark green needle color and a compact habit of growth; ideal for Christmas tree use. They grew more rapidly after the first year than P. halepensis and P. brutia in this study. In comparison with P. halepensis, P. eldarica appears similar except for the darker green needle color and the more compact less rangy habit of growth. P. eldarica appears to be more sensitive to Sequoia pitch moth than P. halepensis.
Insect Activity
The activity of several kinds of insects was noted in this closely-spaced planting (6′ × 8′). In the first seven years, no trees died from insect damage, but on some, pitch globs were numerous from Sequoia pitch moth, Synanthedon sequoíae (Edwards), needles were discolored from mite injury and white pine needle scale, Phenacaspis pinifoliae (Fitch) and were not difficult to see.
Bark boring activity caused by dioryctria sps. was observed on the basal part of the densely foliated young tree trunks in 1973, 1974, and 1975 on the two lots each of Pinus brutia and Pinus eldarica. Attacks on Pinus halepensis in 1974 were unsuccessful. Dioryctria was not observed on any other pine in the planting.
Sequoia pitch moth infestations were observed several years after planting on P. pinaster and on all lots of P. halepensis, brutia and eldarica, but not on others.
Pine needle scale was observed on P. pinaster, P. jeffreyi X coulteri hybrid, both lots of P. halepensis, the 69.784 lot of P. brutia and both lots of P. eidarica; others were not affected.
Pine aphis was observed only on the new growth of P. jeffreyi X coulteri hybrid during the first season only.
Adelgids (pine bark aphids) were observed on P. pinaster and all lots of P. brutia and P. eidarica. They were not apparent on the others.
Oligonychus mites were observed on P. rigida and all lots of P. halepensis, P. brutia and P. eidarica.
Acknowledgments
The assistance of Andrew Leiser, Professor, Environmental Horticulture, U.C. Davis, in obtaining the plants; of Tom Kretchum, Superintendent of the research station at San Jose for maintaining the planting; C.S. Koehler, U.C. Extension Urban Entomologist for assistance of insect evaluation; and William B. Davis, U.C. Extension Environmental Horticulturist, for manuscript review, is greatly appreciated.
- © 1979, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.