Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Influence of Different Protected Environments and Reflector Material on Cultivated Oiti (Licania tomentosa [Benth.] Fritsch) Seedlings

Vitória Carolina Dantas Alves, Abimael Gomes da Silva, Edilson Costa, Thaise Dantas, Flávio Ferreira da Silva Binotti, Murilo Battistuzzi Martins, Eduardo Pradi Vendruscolo and Gustavo Haralampidou da Costa Vieira
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 2023, 49 (4) 159-169; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2023.015
Vitória Carolina Dantas Alves
Agronomy, University of State of Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS), Cassilândia-MS, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Abimael Gomes da Silva
Agronomy, Paulista State University (UNESP), Ilha Solteira-SP, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Edilson Costa
Agronomy, University of State of Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS), Cassilândia-MS, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Thaise Dantas
Agronomy, University of State of Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS), Cassilândia-MS, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Flávio Ferreira da Silva Binotti
Agronomy, University of State of Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS), Cassilândia-MS, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Murilo Battistuzzi Martins
Agronomy, University of State of Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS), Cassilândia-MS, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Eduardo Pradi Vendruscolo
Agronomy, University of State of Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS), Cassilândia-MS, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Gustavo Haralampidou da Costa Vieira
Agronomy, University of State of Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS) Cassilândia-MS, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) incidence in protected environments and full sun. Averages followed by equal lower-case letters do not differ from each other by the Tukey test at 5% probability. CV = coefficient of variation. Vertical bars correspond to standard error.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Distribution of shoot (SDM) and root (RDM) dry matter in the greenhouse on a bench with reflective material (GHR) and without reflective material (GH); in the environment with aluminized screen on a bench with reflective material (ALR) and without reflective material (AL); in the screenhouse with a black screen of 30% shading on a bench with reflective material (S30R) and without reflective material (S30); and in the screen house with a black screen of 18% shading on a bench with reflective material (S18R) and without reflective material (S18).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Mean square error (MSE) and ratio between the largest and smallest mean square error (RMSE) for the variables of seedling height (SH), number of leaves (NL), and stem diameter (SD) at 40, 55, and 70 days after sowing (1, 2, and 3, respectively), shoot dry matter (SDM), root dry matter (RDM), ratio between SDM and RDM (S:R), total dry mass (TDM), ratio between SH and SD (H:D) at 40, 55, and 70 days after sowing (1, 2, and 3, respectively), ratio between SH and SDM (H:S), Dickson quality index (DQI), absolute growth rate between SH1 and SH2 (AGR12), absolute growth rate between SH2 and SH3 (AGR23), and absolute growth rate between SH1 and SH3 (AGR13) of oiti seedlings.

    MSE
    EnvironmentSH1SH2SH3NL1NL2NL3SD1SD2
    Greenhouse 42%/50%15.28111.7508.0200.8130.9830.3860.0530.030
    Aluminized screen 35%16.94823.78610.5530.2470.8202.5990.0080.066
    Screenhouse 30%22.1157.4606.0580.5090.6280.5730.1000.090
    Screenhouse 18%60.4171.9731.4300.5311.0531.8030.1430.131
    RMSE3.9512.067.383.291.686.7318.004.44
    EnvironmentSD3SDMRDMS:RTDMH:D1H:D2H:D3
    Greenhouse 42%/50%0.0130.7430.2090.0871.4870.8470.4650.388
    Aluminized screen 35%0.0610.4350.0420.1220.5170.9410.4580.347
    Screenhouse 30%0.0850.2590.1470.0410.7501.0250.0680.194
    Screenhouse 18%0.0300.6610.1290.3670.9763.8590.4700.113
    RMSE6.562.864.959.012.884.566.943.45
    EnvironmentH:SDQIAGR12AGR23AGR13
    Greenhouse 42%/50%2.440.0150.0450.0170.013
    Aluminized screen 35%1.250.0050.0760.0240.012
    Screenhouse 30%0.290.0070.1030.0270.044
    Screenhouse 18%2.160.0090.3120.0100.075
    RMSE7.502.966.962.646.29
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Analysis of variance for seedling height at 40 (SH1) days after sowing (DAS), number of leaves at 40 (NL1), 55 (NL2), and 70 (NL3) DAS, stem diameter at 55 (SD2) and 70 (SD3) DAS, shoot dry matter (SDM), root dry matter (RDM), total dry matter (TDM), ratio between seedling height and stem diameter at 40 (H:D1), 55 (H:D2), and 70 (H:D3) DAS, Dickson quality index (DQI), absolute growth rate between seedling height at 40 DAS and 55 DAS (AGR12), absolute growth rate between seedling height at 55 and 70 DAS (AGR23), and absolute growth rate between seedling height at 40 and 70 DAS (AGR13) of oiti seedlings. A = environment; B = cultivation bench; A × B = interaction between environment and cultivation bench; ns = not significant; * = significant at 5%; ** = significant at 1%; CV = coefficient of variation.

    SH1NL1NL2NL3SD2SD3SDMRDM
    A*nsnsns*nsns**
    Bnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
    A × Bnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
    CV (%)35.653.911.211.36.24.413.916.6
    TDMH:D1H:D2H:D3DQIAGR12AGR23AGR13
    A*ns***********
    Bnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
    A × Bnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
    CV (%)13.135.07.75.914.426.727.920.23
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Seedling height at 40 days after sowing (SH1), number of leaves at 40, 55, and 70 days after sowing (NL1, NL2, and NL3, respectively), stem diameter at 55 and 70 days after sowing (SD2 and SD3, respectively), shoot dry matter (SDM), root dry matter (RDM), total dry matter (TDM), ratio between seedling height and stem diameter at 40, 55, and 70 days after sowing (H:D1, H:D2, and H:D3, respectively), Dickson quality index (DQI), absolute growth rate between SH1 and SH2 (AGR12), absolute growth rate between SH2 and SH3 (AGR23), and absolute growth rate between SH1 and SH3 (AGR13) of oiti seedlings. CV = coefficient of variation.

    EnvironmentSH1 (cm)NL1NL2NL3SD2 (mm)SD3 (mm)
    Greenhouse 42%/50%14.1 ab1.38 a8.70 a10.51 a4.56 ab4.93 a
    Aluminized screen 35%18.7 a1.60 a8.30 a9.88 a4.64 a4.93 a
    Screenhouse 30%17.2 ab1.60 a8.46 a9.63 a4.61 ab5.09 a
    Screenhouse 18%10.3 b0.81 a7.83 a10.99 a4.24 b4.86 a
    Cultivation bench
    Without reflective material15.7 a1.39 a8.27 a10.23 a4.57 a4.95 a
    With reflective material14.4 a1.30 a8.38 a10.26 a4.46 a4.95 a
    CV (%)35.653.911.211.36.24.4
    EnvironmentSDM (g)RDM (g)TDM (g)H:D1H:D2H:D3
    Greenhouse 42%/50%5.46 a2.53 a8.00 a3.36 a8.43 a9.58 a
    Aluminized screen 35%4.97 a2.00 bc6.97 ab4.47 a7.02 b8.38 b
    Screenhouse 30%5.55 a2.44 ab7.99 a4.19 a8.29 a8.46 b
    Screenhouse 18%4.85 a1.678 c6.62 b2.77 a7.82 ab8.49 b
    Cultivation bench
    Without reflective material5.18 a2.18 a7.35 a3.90 a7.93 a8.75 a
    With reflective material5.24 a2.19 a7.43 a3.49 a7.85 a8.71 a
    CV (%)13.916.613.135.07.75.9
    EnvironmentDQIAGR12 (cm day−1)AGR23 (cm day−1)AGR13 (cm day−1)
    Greenhouse 42%/50%0.68 ab1.63 a0.58 a1.10 a
    Aluminized screen 35%0.64 ab0.94 b0.57 a0.75 b
    Screenhouse 30%0.74 a1.40 ab0.33 b0.86 ab
    Screenhouse 18%0.59 b1.51 a0.55 a1.03 a
    Cultivation bench
    Without reflective material0.66 a1.37 a0.47 a0.92 a
    With reflective material0.67 a1.38 a0.54 a0.96 a
    CV (%)14.426.727.920.23
    • Equal lowercase letters in the column for each variable do not differ by Tukey test at 5% probability for cultivation environments and F-test for cultivation benches.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Seedling height at 55 and 70 days after sowing (SH2 and SH3, respectively), stem diameter at 40 days after sowing (SD1), ratio between shoot and root dry matter (S:R), and ratio between seedling height and shoot dry matter (H:S) of oiti seedlings on benches with (RM) and without (WRM) reflective material (Aluminet®) in different cultivation environments. CV = coefficient of variation.

    SH2 (cm)SH3 (cm)SD1 (mm)S:RH:S
    Agricultural greenhouse with 42%/50% shading screen under the film
    WRM38.22 a47.02 a4.30 a2.20 a9.30 a
    RM38.75 a47.35 a4.10 a2.16 a8.35 a
    CV (%)8.916.005.5013.5217.71
    Aluminized screen with 35% shading
    WRM34.57 a41.17 a4.17 a2.40 a8.0 a
    RM31.07 a41.42 a4.20 a2.63 a9.0 a
    CV (%)14.867.872.1213.8813.26
    Black screen with 30% shading
    WRM37.55 a42.60 a3.90 a2.30 a8.27 a
    RM38.77 a43.47 a4.30 a2.28 a7.35 a
    CV (%)7.165.727.718.796.7
    Black screen with 18% shading
    WRM34.07 a42.25 a3.67 a2.72 a8.48 a
    RM37.87 a40.07 b3.62 a2.87 a8.91 a
    CV (%)7.162.9010.3421.6616.91
    • Equal lowercase letters in the column for each variable do not differ from each other by the F-test at 5% probability.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 49 (4)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 49, Issue 4
July 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Influence of Different Protected Environments and Reflector Material on Cultivated Oiti (Licania tomentosa [Benth.] Fritsch) Seedlings
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Influence of Different Protected Environments and Reflector Material on Cultivated Oiti (Licania tomentosa [Benth.] Fritsch) Seedlings
Vitória Carolina Dantas Alves, Abimael Gomes da Silva, Edilson Costa, Thaise Dantas, Flávio Ferreira da Silva Binotti, Murilo Battistuzzi Martins, Eduardo Pradi Vendruscolo, Gustavo Haralampidou da Costa Vieira
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2023, 49 (4) 159-169; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2023.015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Influence of Different Protected Environments and Reflector Material on Cultivated Oiti (Licania tomentosa [Benth.] Fritsch) Seedlings
Vitória Carolina Dantas Alves, Abimael Gomes da Silva, Edilson Costa, Thaise Dantas, Flávio Ferreira da Silva Binotti, Murilo Battistuzzi Martins, Eduardo Pradi Vendruscolo, Gustavo Haralampidou da Costa Vieira
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2023, 49 (4) 159-169; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2023.015
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
  • Energy Potential of Urban Tree Pruning Waste
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Chrysobalanaceae
  • Greenhouse
  • Luminosity
  • Screenhouse

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire