Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux

Thomas E. Marler
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2023, 49 (3) 137-143; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2023.010
Thomas E. Marler
Bagong Kaalaman Botanikal Institute, 15 Rizal Street, Barangay Malabañas, Angeles City, Philippines, P.O. Box 23893, Barrigada, Guam, 671-777-5068
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Literature Cited

  1. ↵
    1. Bloemen J,
    2. Agneessens L, Van
    3. Meulebroek L,
    4. Aubrey DP,
    5. McGuire MA,
    6. Teskey RO,
    7. Steppe K.
    2014. Stem girdling affects the quantity of CO2 transported in xylem as well as CO2 efflux from soil. New Phytologist. 201(3):897–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12568
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bloemen J,
    2. McGuire MA,
    3. Aubrey DP,
    4. Teskey RO,
    5. Steppe K.
    2013. Transport of root-respired CO2 via the transpiration stream affects aboveground carbon assimilation and CO2 efflux in trees. New Phytologist. 197(2):555–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04366.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Bužková R,
    2. Acosta M,
    3. Dařenová E,
    4. Pokorný R,
    5. Pavelka M.
    2015. Environmental factors influencing the relationship between stem CO2 efflux and sap flow. Trees. 29(2):333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-1113-z
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Czaja M,
    2. Kołton A,
    3. Muras P
    . 2020. The complex issue of urban trees—Stress factor accumulation and ecological service possibilities. Forests. 11(9):932. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090932
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Egerer M,
    2. Buchholz S.
    2021. Reframing urban “wildlife” to promote inclusive conservation science and practice. Biodiversity Conservation. 30:2255–2266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02182-y
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Ford CR,
    2. Wurzburger N,
    3. Hendrick RL,
    4. Teskey RO.
    2007. Soil DIC uptake and fixation in Pinus taeda seedlings and its C contribution to plant tissues and ectomycorrhizal fungi. Tree Physiology. 27(3):375–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/27.3.375
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Geider RJ,
    2. Delucia EH,
    3. Falkowski PG,
    4. Finzi AC,
    5. Grime JP,
    6. Grace J,
    7. Kana TM,
    8. LaRoche J,
    9. Long SP,
    10. Osborne BA,
    11. Platt T,
    12. Prentice IC,
    13. Raven JA,
    14. Schlesinger WH,
    15. Smetacek V,
    16. Stuart V,
    17. Sath-yendranath S,
    18. Thomas RB,
    19. Vogelmann TC,
    20. Williams P,
    21. Woodward FI.
    2001. Primary productivity of planet earth: Biological determinants and physical constraints in terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Global Change Biology. 7(8):849–882. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00448.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Kunert N.
    2018. A case study on the vertical and diurnal variation of stem CO2 effluxes in an Amazonian forest tree. Trees. 32:913–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-018-1680-5
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Kunert N,
    2. Edinger J.
    2015. Xylem sap flux affects conventional stem CO2 efflux measurements in tropical trees. Biotropica. 47(6):650–653.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Kuzyakov Y
    . 2006. Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 38(3):425–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.020
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Marler TE.
    2022. Stem carbon dioxide efflux of lignophytes exceeds that of cycads and arborescent monocots. Agronomy. 12(1):159. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010159
    OpenUrl
    1. Marler TE,
    2. Lindstrom AJ.
    2020. Diel patterns of stem CO2 efflux vary among cycads, arborescent monocots, and woody eudicots and gymnosperms. Plant Signaling and Behavior. 15(3):1732661. https://doi.org/10.1080/15592324.2020.1732661
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Moore DJ,
    2. Gonzalez-Meler MA,
    3. Taneva L,
    4. Pippen JS,
    5. Kim HS,
    6. DeLucia EH.
    2008. The effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on apparent stem respiration from Pinus taeda L. is confounded by high levels of soil carbon dioxide. Oecologia. 158(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1118-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Salomón RL, De
    2. Roo L,
    3. Oleksyn J,
    4. Steppe K.
    2022. Mechanistic drivers of stem respiration: A modelling exercise across species and seasons. Plant, Cell & Environment. 45(4):1270–1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.14246
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Salomón RL, De
    2. Schepper V,
    3. Valbuena-Carabaña M,
    4. Gil L,
    5. Steppe K.
    2018. Daytime depression in temperature-normalised stem CO2 efflux in young poplar trees is dominated by low turgor pressure rather than by internal transport of respired CO2. New Phytologist. 217(2):586–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14831
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Tarvainen L,
    2. Wallin G,
    3. Lim H,
    4. Linder S,
    5. Oren R,
    6. Löfvenius MO,
    7. Räntfors M,
    8. Tor-ngern P,
    9. Marshall J.
    2018. Photosynthetic refixation varies along the stem and reduces CO2 efflux in mature boreal Pinus sylvestris trees. Tree Physiology. 38(4): 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx130
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Trumbore S.
    2006. Carbon respired by terrestrial ecosystems—Recent progress and challenges. Global Change Biology. 12(2): 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01067.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Mao Z,
    3. McGuire MA,
    4. Teskey RO.
    2019. Stem radial CO2 conductance affects stem respiratory CO2 fluxes in ash and birch trees. Journal of Forestry Research. 30:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0737-z
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Yang Q,
    2. Xu M,
    3. Chi Y,
    4. Zheng Y,
    5. Shen R,
    6. Li P,
    7. Dai H.
    2012. Temporal and spatial variations of stem CO2 efflux of three species in subtropical China. Journal of Plant Ecology. 5(2):229–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtr023
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 49 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 49, Issue 3
May 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
Thomas E. Marler
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2023, 49 (3) 137-143; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2023.010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
Thomas E. Marler
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2023, 49 (3) 137-143; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2023.010
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Background
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conflicts of Interest
    • Acknowledgments
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Carbon Cycle
  • Philippines
  • Stem Respiration

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire