Towards an Improved Rapid Urban Site Index

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Alvarez R,
   2. Alvarez CR

   . 2000. Soil organic matter pools and their associations with carbon mineralization kinetics. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 64(1):184-189. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.641184x

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. American National Standards Institute

   . 2018. ANSI A300 (Part 2) – Soil management a. modification, b. fertilization, and c. drainage. In: American national standard for tree care operations: Tree, shrub, and other woody plant management: Standard practices. Manchester (NH, USA): Tree Care Industry Association.
3. ↵
   1. Andrews SS,
   2. Karlen DL,
   3. Mitchell JP

   . 2002. A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 90(1):25-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00174-8

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Beck T,
   2. Joergensen RG,
   3. Kandeler E,
   4. Makeschin F,
   5. Nuss E,
   6. Oberholzer HR,
   7. Scheu S

   . 1997. An inter-laboratory comparison of ten different ways of measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 29(7):1023-1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00030-8

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Cambardella CA,
   2. Elliott ET

   . 1992. Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 56(3):777-783. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030017x

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Dane JH,
   2. Topp GC

   1. Gee GW,
   2. Or D

   . 2002. 2.4 particle-size analysis. In: Dane JH, Topp GC, editors. Methods of soil analysis: Part 4 physical methods, 5.4. Madison (WI, USA): Soil Science Society of America. p. 255-293. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c12
7. ↵
   1. Gregorich EG,
   2. Beare MH,
   3. McKim UF,
   4. Skjemstad JO

   . 2006. Chemical and biological characteristics of physically uncomplexed organic matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 70(3):975-985. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0116

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Growing Degree Days

   . 2014. Application. Coral Gables (FL, USA): iNet Solutions Group, LLC. [Accessed 2017 June 6]. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/growing-degree-days/id386655475?mt=8
9. ↵
   1. Haney RL,
   2. Brinton WF,
   3. Evans E

   . 2008. Soil CO₂ respiration: Comparison of chemical titration, CO₂ IRGA analysis and the Solvita gel system. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 23(2):171-176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174217050800224X

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Jim CY

    . 1998. Urban soil characteristics and limitations for landscape planting in Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning. 40(4):235-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00117-5

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    1. Joergensen RG,
    2. Mueller T

    . 1996. The fumigation-extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: Calibration of the k_EN value. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 28(1):33-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(95)00101-8

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Karlen DL,
    2. Ditzler CA,
    3. Andrews SS

    . 2003. Soil quality: Why and how? Geoderma. 114(3-4):145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00039-9

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Marriott EE,
    2. Wander MM

    . 2006. Total and labile soil organic matter in organic and conventional farming systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 70(3):950-959. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0241

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Moser A,
    2. Rötzer T,
    3. Pauleit S,
    4. Pretzsch H

    . 2015. Structure and ecosystem services of small-leaved lime (Tilia cordata Mill.) and black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia L.) in urban environments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(4):1110-1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.10.005

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Sparks DL,
    2. Page AL,
    3. Helmke PA,
    4. Loeppert RH,
    5. Soltanpour PN,
    6. Tabatabai MA,
    7. Johnston CT,
    8. Sumner ME

    1. Nelson DW,
    2. Sommers LE

    . 1996. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, Johnston CT, Sumner ME, editors. Methods of soil analysis: Part 3 chemical methods, 5.3. Madison (WI, USA): Soil Science Society of America. p. 961-1010. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34
16. ↵
    1. Doran JW,
    2. Jones AJ

    1. Parkin TB,
    2. Doran JW,
    3. Franco-Vizcaino E

    . 1997. Field and laboratory tests of soil respiration. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ, editors. Methods for assessing soil quality, volume 49. Madison (WI, USA): Soil Science Society of America. p. 231-244. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub49.c14
17. ↵
    1. Scharenbroch BC,
    2. Carter D,
    3. Bialecki M,
    4. Fahey R,
    5. Scheberl L,
    6. Catania M,
    7. Roman LA,
    8. Bassuk N,
    9. Harper RW,
    10. Werner L,
    11. Siewert A,
    12. Miller S,
    13. Hutyra L,
    14. Raciti S

    . 2017. A rapid urban site index for assessing the quality of street tree planting sites. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 27:279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.017

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Scharenbroch BC,
    2. Catania M

    . 2012. Soil quality attributes as indicators of urban tree performance. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 38(5):214-228. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2012.029

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Scharenbroch BC,
    2. Watson GW

    . 2014. Wood chips and compost improve soil quality and increase growth of Acer rubrum and Betula nigra in compacted urban soil. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 40(6):319-331. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2014.030

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Sharifi M,
    2. Zebarth BJ,
    3. Burton DL,
    4. Grant CA,
    5. Bittman S,
    6. Drury CF,
    7. McConkey BG,
    8. Ziadi N

    . 2008. Response of potentially mineralizable soil nitrogen and indices of nitrogen availability to tillage system. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 72(4):1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0243

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Siewert A,
    2. Miller S

    . 2011. Urban tree growth & longevity conference. 2011 September 12–13; Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, USA.
22. ↵
    1. Sjöman H,
    2. Nielsen AB

    . 2010. Selecting trees for urban paved sites in Scandinavia—A review of information on stress tolerance and its relation to the requirements of tree planners. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 9(4):281-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.04.001

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Sullivan TS,
    2. Stromberger ME,
    3. Paschke MW,
    4. Ippolito JA

    . 2006. Long-term impacts of infrequent biosolids applications on chemical and microbial properties of a semi-arid rangeland soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 42:258-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-005-0023-z

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Tirol-Padre A,
    2. Ladha JK

    . 2004. Assessing the reliability of permanganate-oxidizable carbon as an index of soil labile carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 68(3):969-978. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.9690

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. US Climate Data

    . 2018. [Accessed 2018 April 10]. http://www.usclimatedata.com
26. ↵
    1. van der Heijden MGA,
    2. Bardgett RD,
    3. van Straalen NM

    . 2008. The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecology Letters. 11:296-310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Vance ED,
    2. Brookes PC,
    3. Jenkinson DS

    . 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 19(6):703-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Weil RR,
    2. Islam KR,
    3. Stine MA,
    4. Gruver JB,
    5. Samson-Liebig SE

    . 2003. Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: A simplified method for laboratory and field use. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 18(1):3-17. https://doi.org/10.1079/AJAA200228

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Zou XM,
    2. Ruan HH,
    3. Fu Y,
    4. Yang XD,
    5. Sha LQ

    . 2005. Estimating soil labile organic carbon and potential turnover rates using a sequential fumigation–incubation procedure. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 37(10):1923-1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.02.028

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Alexander JD

    . 1971. Color chart for estimating organic carbon in mineral soils in Illinois. Champaign (IL, USA): University of Illinois Extension. AG-1941. https://pubsplus.illinois.edu/products/color-chart-for-estimating-organic-matter-in-mineral-soils-in-illinois
31. ↵
    1. Bond J

    . 2012. Urban tree health: A practical and precise estimation method. Geneva (NY, USA): Urban Forest Analytics LLC. 128 p.
32. ↵
    1. Davey Resource Group

    . 2010. Urban forest management plan, Stevens Point, Wisconsin. Kent (OH, USA): Davey Resource Group. https://stevenspoint.com/DocumentCenter/View/855/Urban-Forest-Managment-Plan
33. ↵
    1. Freberg M

    . 2016. City of Green Bay Tree Inventory. Personal Communication.
34. ↵
    1. Growing Degree Days

    . 2014. Omaha (NE, USA): iNet Solutions Group. [Accessed 2017 June 5]. https://www.gddapp.com
35. ↵
    1. i-Tree

    . 2008. i-Tree Ecosystem Analysis: Milwaukee. Urban Forest Effects and Values. https://www.itreetools.org/documents/327/Milwaukee%20Ecosystem%20Analysis.pdf
36. ↵
    1. Dane JH,
    2. Topp CG

    1. Nimmo JR,
    2. Perkins KS

    . 2002. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Dane JH, Topp CG, editors. Methods of soil analysis, Part 4: Physical methods. Madison (WI, USA): Soil Science Society of America. p. 317-328.
37. ↵
    1. Scharenbroch BC,
    2. Carter D,
    3. Bialecki M,
    4. Fahey R,
    5. Scheberl L,
    6. Catania M,
    7. Roman LA,
    8. Bassuk N,
    9. Harper RW,
    10. Werner L,
    11. Siewert A,
    12. Miller S,
    13. Hutyra L,
    14. Raciti S

    . 2017. A rapid urban site index for assessing the quality of street tree planting sites. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 27:279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.017

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Scharenbroch BC,
    2. Catania M

    . 2012. Soil quality attributes as indicators of urban tree performance. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 38(5): 214-228. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2012.030

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Scharenbroch BC,
    2. Watson GW

    . 2014. Wood chips and compost improve soil quality and increase growth of Acer rubrum and Betula nigra in compacted urban soil. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 40(6):319-331. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2014.030

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Schoeneberger PJ,
    2. Wysocki DA,
    3. Benham EC, Soil Survey Staff

    . 2012. Field book for describing and sampling soils, version 3.0. Lincoln (NE, USA): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-09/field-book.pdf
41. ↵
    1. US Census Bureau

    . 2017. Population. [Accessed 2017 January 14]. http://www.census.gov/topics/population.html
42. ↵
    1. US Climate Data

    . 2014. [Accessed 2014 January 6]. http://www.usclimatedata.com
43. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 1971. Soil survey of Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. Washington (DC, USA): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
44. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 1974. Soil survey of Brown County, Wisconsin. Washington (DC, USA): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
45. ↵
    1. USDA NRCS

    . 1978. Soil survey of Portage County, Wisconsin. Washington (DC, USA): USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.
46. ↵
    1. Webster BL

    . 1979. Guide to judging the condition of a shade tree. Journal of Arboriculture. 4(11):247-249. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1978.061

    OpenUrl