The Influence of Chitin- and Chitosan-Based Soil Amendments on Pathogen Severity of Apple and Pear Scab

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Aćimović SG,
   2. VanWoerkom AH,
   3. Garavaglia T,
   4. Vandervoort C,
   5. Sundin GW,
   6. Wise JC

   . 2016. Seasonal and cross-seasonal timing of fungicide trunk injections in apple trees to optimize management of apple scab. Plant Disease. 100(8):1606-1616. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-09-15-1061-RE

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Banks JM

   . 2017. Continuous excitation chlorophyll fluorescence parameters: A review for practitioners. Tree Physiology. 37(8):1128-1136. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpx059

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Bell AA,
   2. Hubbard JC,
   3. Liu L,
   4. Davis RM,
   5. Subbarao KV

   . 1998. Effects of chitin and chitosan on the incidence and severity of Fusarium yellows of celery. Plant Disease. 82(3):322-328. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.3.322

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Benhamou N,
   2. Lafontaine PJ,
   3. Nicole M

   . 1994. Induction of systemic resistance to Fusarium crown and root rot in tomato plants by seed treatment with chitosan. Phytopathology. 84:1432-1444. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-84-1432

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Bevan J,
   2. Knight S

   . 2001. Organic apple production. 1st Ed. Kenilworth (UK): HDRA, Emmerson Press. 36 p.
6. ↵
   1. Butt DJ,
   2. Swait AA,
   3. Robinson JD

   . 1990. Evaluation of fungicides against apple powdery mildew and scab. Annals of Applied Biology. 116(11):34-35.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Cuthbertson AGS,
   2. Murchie AK

   . 2003. The impact of fungicides to control apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) on the predatory mite Anystis baccarum and its prey Aculus schlechtendali (apple rust mite) in Northern Ireland Bramley orchards. Crop Protection. 22(9):1125-1130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(03)00147-9

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. D’Addabbo T

   . 1995. The nematicidal effect of organic amendments: A review of the literature, 1982-1994. Nematologia Mediterranea. 23(2):299-305. https://journals.flvc.org/nemamedi/article/view/63272/0

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Deising HB,
   2. Reimann S,
   3. Pascholati SF

   . 2008. Mechanisms and significance of fungicide resistance. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 39(2):286-295. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-838220080002000017

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. El Hadrami A,
    2. Adam LR,
    3. El Hadrami I,
    4. Daayf F

    . 2010. Chitosan in plant protection. Marine Drugs. 8(4):968-987. https://doi.org/10.3390/md8040968

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Escudero N,
    2. Lopez-Moya F,
    3. Ghahremani Z,
    4. Zavala-Gonzalez EA,
    5. Alaguero-Cordovilla A,
    6. Ros-Ibañez C,
    7. Lacasa A,
    8. Sorribas FJ,
    9. Lopez-Llorca LV

    . 2017. Chitosan increases tomato root colonization by Pochonia chlamydosporia and their combination reduces root-knot nematode damage. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01415

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Hailey LE,
    2. Percival GC

    . 2014. Comparative assessment of phosphite formulations for apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) control. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 40(4):237-243. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2014.024

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Ilhan K,
    2. Arslan U,
    3. Karabulut OA

    . 2006. The effect of sodium bicarbonate alone or in combination with a reduced dose of tebuconazole on the control of apple scab. Crop Protection. 25(9):963-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.01.002

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Jørgensen LN,
    2. Thygesen K

    . 2006. Fungicide resistance and its impact on recommendations to farmers—Experiences from Denmark. Aspects of Applied Biology. 78:65-70.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Kuchitsu K,
    2. Kikuyama M,
    3. Shibuya N

    . 1993. N-Acetylchitooligosaccharides, biotic elicitor for phytoalexin production, induce transient membrane depolarization in suspension-cultured rice cells. Protoplasma. 174:79-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01404046

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Kulikov SN,
    2. Chirkov SN,
    3. Il’ina AV,
    4. Lopatin SA,
    5. Varlamov VP

    . 2006. Effect of the molecular weight of chitosan on its antiviral activity in plants. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 42(2):224-228. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683806020165

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. ↵
    1. Laflamme P,
    2. Benhamou N,
    3. Bussiéres G,
    4. Dessureault M

    . 2000. Differential effect of chitosan on root rot fungal pathogens in forest nurseries. Canadian Journal of Botany. 77(10):1460-1468. https://doi.org/10.1139/b99-111

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Lafontaine PJ,
    2. Benhamou N

    . 1996. Chitosan treatment: An emerging strategy for enhancing resistance of greenhouse tomato plants to infection by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. radicislycopersici. Biocontrol Science and Technology. 6(1):111-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583159650039575

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Lainsbury MA

    . 2020. The UK pesticide guide 2020. 33rd Ed. Cambridge (UK): British Crop Protection Council. 721 p. https://ukpesticideguide.co.uk
20. ↵
    1. Li K,
    2. Xing R,
    3. Liu S,
    4. Li P

    . 2020. Chitin and chitosan fragments responsible for plant elicitor and growth stimulator. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 68(44):12203-12211. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05316

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Murphy JG,
    2. Rafferty SM,
    3. Cassells AC

    . 2000. Stimulation of wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca) arbuscular mycorrhizas by addition of shellfish waste to the growth substrate: Interaction between mycorrhization, substrate amendment and susceptibility to red core (Phytophthora fragariae). Applied Soil Ecology. 15(2):153-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00091-3

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Muzzarelli R,
    2. Tarsi R,
    3. Filippini O,
    4. Giovanetti E,
    5. Biagini G,
    6. Varaldo PE

    . 1990. Antimicrobial properties of N-carboxybutyl chitosan. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 34(10): 2019-2023. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.34.10.2019

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
23. ↵
    1. O’Herlihy EA,
    2. Duffy EM,
    3. Cassells AC

    . 2003. The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and chitosan sprays on yield and late blight resistance in potato crops from microplants. Folia Geobotanica. 38:201-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803152

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Ozbay N,
    2. Newman SE

    . 2004. Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato and control methods. Plant Pathology. 3(1):9-18. https://doi.org/10.3923/ppj.2004.9.18

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Percival GC

    . 2018. Evaluation of silicon fertilizers and a resistance inducing agent for control of apple and pear scab under field conditions. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 44(5):205-214. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2018.017

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Percival GC,
    2. Boyle S

    . 2005. Evaluation of microcapsule trunk injections for the control of apple scab and powdery mildew. Annals of Applied Biology. 147(1):119-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1744-7348.2005.00019.X

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Percival GC,
    2. Graham S

    . 2021. Evaluation of inducing agents and synthetic fungicide combinations for management of foliar pathogens of urban trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 47(2):85-95. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2021.008

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Percival GC,
    2. Noviss K,
    3. Haynes I

    . 2009. Field evaluation of systemic inducing resistance chemicals at different growth stages for the control of apple (Venturia inaequalis) and pear (Venturia pirina) scab. Crop Protection. 28(8):629-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.03.010

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Rabea EI,
    2. Badawy ME,
    3. Rogge TM,
    4. Stevens CV,
    5. Höfte M,
    6. Steurbaut W,
    7. Smagghe G

    . 2005. Insecticidal and fungicidal activity of new synthesized chitosan derivatives. Pest Management Science. 61(10):951-960. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1085

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
30. ↵
    1. Rabea EI,
    2. Badawy ME,
    3. Stevens CV,
    4. Smagghe G,
    5. Steurbaut W

    . 2003. Chitosan as antimicrobial agent: Applications and mode of action. Biomacromolecules. 4(6):1457-1465. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034130m

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. Radwan MA,
    2. Farrag SAA,
    3. Abu-Elamayem MM,
    4. Ahmed NS

    . 2012. Extraction, characterization, and nematicidal activity of chitin and chitosan derived from shrimp shell wastes. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 48:463-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0632-7

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Reglinski T,
    2. Taylor JT,
    3. Dick MA

    . 2004. Chitosan induces resistance to pitch canker in Pinus radiata. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science. 34(1):49-58. https://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/59178/04_REGLINSKI.pdf

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Scortichini M

    . 2014. Field efficacy of chitosan to control Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae, the causal agent of kiwifruit bacterial canker. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 140:887-892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-014-0515-5

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Sharif R,
    2. Mujtaba M,
    3. Rahman MU,
    4. Shalmani A,
    5. Ahmad H,
    6. Anwar T,
    7. Tianchan D,
    8. Wang X

    . 2018. The multifunctional role of chitosan in horticultural crops; A review. Molecules. 23(4):872. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040872

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Sharp RG

    . 2013. A review of the applications of chitin and its derivatives in agriculture to modify plant-microbial interactions and improve crop yields. Agronomy. 3(4):757-793. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3040757

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Swait AAJ,
    2. Butt DJ

    . 1990. Fungicides as antisporulants against apple powdery mildew and scab. Annals of Applied Biology. 116(11):36-37.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Vasyukova NI,
    2. Zinov’eva SV,
    3. Il’inskaya LI,
    4. Perekhod EA,
    5. Chalenko GI,
    6. Gerasimova NG,
    7. Il’ina AV,
    8. Varlamov VP,
    9. Ozeretskovskaya OL

    . 2001. Modulation of plant resistance to diseases by water-soluble chitosan. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology. 37:103-109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002865029994

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Villalta ON,
    2. Washington WS,
    3. McGregor G

    . 2004. Susceptibility of European and Asian pears to pear scab. Plant Protection Quarterly. 19(1):2-4. https://caws.org.nz/PPQ1819/PPQ%2019-1%20pp002-4%20Villalta.pdf

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Volpe V,
    2. Carotenuto G,
    3. Berzero C,
    4. Cagnina L,
    5. Puech-Pages V,
    6. Genre A

    . 2020. Short chain chito-oligosaccharides promote arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization in Medicago truncatula. Carbohydrate Polymers. 229:115505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115505

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Walker R,
    2. Morris S,
    3. Brown P,
    4. Gracie A

    . 2004. Evaluation of potential for chitosan to enhance plant defence. Devonport (Tasmania, Australia): Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. RIRDC Publication No. 04/RIRDC Project No. RSAG-4A. 55 p.
41. ↵
    1. Wojdyla AT

    . 2004. Chitosan (biochikol 020 PC) in the control of some ornamental foliage diseases. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences. 69(4):705-715.

    OpenUrlPubMed
42. ↵
    1. Xu J,
    2. Zhao X,
    3. Han X,
    4. Du Y

    . 2007. Antifungal activity of oligochitosan against Phytophthora capsici and other plant pathogenic fungi in vitro. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 87(3):220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2006.07.013

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Zhang M,
    2. Tan T,
    3. Yuan H,
    4. Rui C

    . 2003. Insecticidal and fungicidal activities of chitosan and oligo-chitosan. Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers. 18(5):391-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911503039019

    OpenUrl