Improved Model Estimates of Tree Debris Following Ice Storms

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Bloniarz DV,
   2. Ryan HDP III.,
   3. Luley CJ,
   4. Bond J,
   5. Hawkins DC

   . 2001. An initial storm damage assessment protocol for urban and community forests. Amherst (MA, USA): USDA Forest Service, Northeast Center for Urban and Community Forestry, University of Massachusetts, Amherst; Naples (NY, USA): Davey Resource Group. [Accessed 2022 October 9]. 35 p. www.umass.edu/urbantree/icestorm/pages/StormAssessProtocol.doc
2. ↵
   1. Bond J

   . 2005. Final report: 2003 storm damage protocol implementation (OH-03-346). Naples (NY, USA): Davey Resource Group. [Accessed 2022 October 9]. 20 p. www.itreetools.org/storm/resources/2003%20SDAP%20Implementation.pdf
3. ↵
   1. Call DA

   . 2010. Changes in ice storm impacts over time: 1886–2000. Weather, Climate, and Society. 2(1):23-35. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009WCAS1013.1

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Changnon SA

   . 2003. Characteristics of ice storms in the United States. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 42(5):630-639. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(2003)042<0630:COISIT>2.0.CO;2

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Coder KD

   . 2017. Tree damage from major ice storms. Arborist News. 26(1):20-23.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Conway TM,
   2. Yip V

   . 2016. Assessing residents’ reactions to urban forest disservices: A case study of a major storm event. Landscape and Urban Planning. 153:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.04.016

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Degelia SK,
   2. Christian JI,
   3. Basara JB,
   4. Mitchell TJ,
   5. Gardner DF,
   6. Jackson SE,
   7. Ragland JC,
   8. Mahan HR

   . 2016. An overview of ice storms and their impact in the United States. International Journal of Climatology. 36(8):2811-2822. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4525

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Escobedo FJ,
   2. Luley CJ,
   3. Bond J,
   4. Staudhammer C,
   5. Bartel C

   . 2009. Hurricane debris and damage assessment for Florida urban forests. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 35(2):100-106. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.018

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. FEMA

   . 2018. Fact sheet: Navigating your recovery: Debris removal. Hyattsville (MD, USA): Federal Emergency Management Agency. R4 DR-4400-GA FS 001. [Accessed 2022 October 9]. 2 p. https://www.fema.gov/press-release/20210318/fact-sheet-navigating-your-recovery-debris-removal
10. ↵
    1. Johnson EA,
    2. Miyanishi K

    1. Greene DF,
    2. Jones KF,
    3. Proulx OJ

    . 2007. The effect of icing events on the death and regeneration of North American trees. In: Johnson EA, Miyanishi K. Plant disturbance ecology: The process and the response. Cambridge (MA, USA): Academic Press. p. 181-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012088778-1/50008-X
11. ↵
    1. Hauer RJ,
    2. Dawson JO,
    3. Werner LP

    . 2006. Trees and ice storms: The development of ice storm–resistant urban tree populations. 2nd Ed. Joint Publication 06-1. Wausau (WI, USA): College of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin–Stevens Point; Urbana (IL, USA): Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences and the Office of Continuing Education, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 20 p. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdafsfacpub/295
12. ↵
    1. Hauer RJ,
    2. Hauer AJ,
    3. Hartel DR,
    4. Johnson JR

    . 2011. Rapid assessment of tree debris following urban forest ice storms. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 37(5):236-246. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2011.031

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Hauer RJ,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Dawson JO

    . 1993. Ice storm damage to urban trees. Journal of Arboriculture. 19(4):187-194. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1993.031

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. King DJ,
    2. Olthof I,
    3. Pellikka PKE,
    4. Seed ED,
    5. Butson C

    . 2005. Modeling and mapping damage to forests from an ice storm using remote sensing and environmental data. Natural Hazards. 35:321-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-004-1795-4

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Klein RW,
    2. Koeser AK,
    3. Kane B,
    4. Landry SM,
    5. Shields H,
    6. Lloyd S,
    7. Hansen G

    . 2020. Evaluating the likelihood of tree failure in Naples, Florida (United States) following Hurricane Irma. Forests. 11(5):485. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11050485

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Klopčič M,
    2. Poljanec A,
    3. Dolinar M,
    4. Kastelec D,
    5. Bončina A

    . 2020. Ice-storm damage to trees in mixed Central European forests: Damage patterns, predictors and susceptibility of tree species. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research. 93(3): 430-443. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpz068

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Kraemer MJ,
    2. Nyland RD

    . 2010. Hardwood crown injuries and rebuilding following ice storms: A literature review. Newtown Square (PA, USA): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. General Technical Report NRS-60. 29 p. https://www.nrs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/34892
18. ↵
    1. Luley CJ,
    2. Bond J

    . 2006. Evaluation of the fate of ice storm–damaged urban maple (Acer) trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 32(5):214-220. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2006.027

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Greenfield EJ

    . 2010. Evaluating the National Land Cover Database tree canopy and impervious cover estimates across the conterminous United States: A comparison with photo-interpreted estimates. Environmental Management. 46:378-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9536-9

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Greenfield EJ,
    3. Ash RM

    . 2019. Annual biomass loss and potential value of urban tree waste in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 46:126469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126469

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Greenfield EJ,
    3. Ellis A

    . 2022. Assessing urban forest threats across the conterminous United States. Journal of Forestry. 120(6):676-692. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvac019

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Rahman MT,
    2. Rashed T

    . 2015. Urban tree damage estimation using airborne laser scanner data and geographic information systems: An example from 2007 Oklahoma ice storm. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(3):562-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.05.008

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Salisbury AB,
    2. Koeser AK,
    3. Hauer RJ,
    4. Hilbert DR,
    5. Abd-Elrahman AH,
    6. Andreu MG,
    7. Britt K,
    8. Landry SM,
    9. Lusk MG,
    10. Miesbauer JW,
    11. Thorn H

    . 2022. The legacy of hurricanes, historic land cover, and municipal ordinances on urban tree canopy in Florida (United States). Frontiers in Forest and Global Change. 5:742157. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.742157

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Schmitt-Harsh ML,
    2. Wiseman E

    . 2020. Household perceptions and practices of recycling tree debris from residential properties. Sustainability. 12(16):6476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166476

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Shortle WC,
    2. Smith KT,
    3. Dudzik KR

    . 2003. Tree survival and growth following ice storm injury. Newtown Square (PA, USA): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. Research Paper NE-723. 4 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/NE-RP-723
26. ↵
    1. Staudhammer CL,
    2. Escobedo F,
    3. Luley C,
    4. Bond J

    . 2009. Technical note: Patterns of urban forest debris from the 2004 and 2005 Florida hurricane seasons. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 33(4):193-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/33.4.193

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Wu J

    . 2019. Developing general equations for urban tree biomass estimation with high-resolution satellite imagery. Sustainability. 11(16):4347. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164347

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Zipperer WC,
    2. Sisinni SM,
    3. Bond J,
    4. Luley C,
    5. Pleninger AG

    . 2004. An assessment of management history of damaged and undamaged trees 8 years after the ice storm in Rochester, New York, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture. 30(2):92-100. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2004.011

    OpenUrl