The Potential of Yellow Gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon F. Muell.) as an Urban Street Tree: An Assessment of Species Performance in the City of Greater Melbourne, Australia

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Beardsell DV,
   2. O’Brien SP,
   3. Williams EG,
   4. Knox RB,
   5. Calder DM

   . 1993. Reproductive biology of Australian Myrtaceae. Australian Journal of Botany. 41(5):511-526. https://doi.org/10.1071/bt9930511

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Behrens FM

   . 2011. Selecting public street and park trees for urban environments: The role of ecological and biogeographical criteria [doctoral thesis]. Lincoln (Canterbury, New Zealand): Lincoln University. 266 p. https://researcharchive.lincoln.ac.nz/handle/10182/4183
3. ↵
   1. Brooker MIH,
   2. Kleinig DA

   . 2006. Field guide to eucalypts, volume 1: South-eastern Australia. Melbourne (Victoria, Australia): Bloomings Books. 356 p.
4. ↵
   1. Chippendale GM,
   2. Johnston RD

   . 1983. Eucalypts, volume 1. Ringwood (Victoria, Australia): Viking O’Neil. 368 p.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Conway TM,
   2. Vander Vecht J

   . 2015. Growing a diverse urban forest: Species selection decisions by practitioners planting and supplying trees. Landscape and Urban Planning. 138:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.01.007

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Day SD,
   2. Watson GW,
   3. Wiseman PE,
   4. Harris JR

   . 2009. Causes and consequences of deep structural roots in urban trees: From nursery production to landscape establishment. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 35(4):182-190. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.031

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Day SD,
   2. Wiseman PE,
   3. Dickinson SB,
   4. Harris JR

   . 2010. Tree root ecology in the urban environment and implications for a sustainable rhizosphere. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 36(5): 193-205. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2010.026

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Esperon-Rodriguez M,
   2. Power SA,
   3. Tjoelker MG,
   4. Beaumont LJ,
   5. Burley H,
   6. Caballero-Rodriguez D,
   7. Rymer PD

   . 2019. Assessing the vulnerability of Australia’s urban forests to climate extremes. Plants, People, Planet. 1(4):387-397. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10064

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Fazio JR,
   2. Krumpe EE

   . 1999. Underlying beliefs and attitudes about topping trees. Journal of Arboriculture. 25(4):193-199. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1999.028

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Frank S,
    2. Waters G,
    3. Beer R,
    4. May PB

    . 2006. An analysis of the street tree population of greater Melbourne at the beginning of the 21st century. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 32(4): 155-163. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2006.021

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Gilman EF,
    2. Harchick C,
    3. Paz M

    . 2010. Effect of container type on root form and growth of red maple. Journal of Environmental Horticulture. 28(1):1-7.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Hall N

    . 1972. The use of trees and shrubs in the dry country of Australia. Canberra (Australia): Australian Government Publishing Service. 558 p.
13. ↵
    1. Harris RW,
    2. Clark JR,
    3. Matheny NP

    . 2004. Arboriculture: Integrated management of landscape trees, shrubs, and vines. 4th Ed. Hoboken (NJ, USA): Prentice Hall. 592 p.
14. ↵
    1. Helletsgruber C,
    2. Gillner S,
    3. Gulyas A,
    4. Junker RR,
    5. Tanacs E,
    6. Hof A

    . 2020. Identifying tree traits for cooling urban heat islands— A cross-city empirical analysis. Forests. 11(10):1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11101064

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Hilbert DR,
    2. Roman LA,
    3. Koeser AK,
    4. Vogt J,
    5. van Doorn NS

    . 2019. Urban tree mortality: A literature review. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 45(5):167-200. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2019.015

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Kendal D,
    2. Williams NSG,
    3. Williams KJH

    . 2012. A cultivated environment: Exploring the global distribution of plants in gardens, parks and streetscapes. Urban Ecosystems. 15:637-652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0215-2

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Leers M,
    2. Moore GM,
    3. May PB

    . 2018. Assessment of six indicators of street tree establishment in Melbourne, Australia. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 44(1):12-22. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2018.002

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. McPherson EG

    . 2003. A benefit-cost analysis of ten street tree species in Modesto, California, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture. 29(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2003.001

    OpenUrl
19. 1. Melways

    . 2001. Greater Melbourne street directory. 28 Ed. Melbourne (Australia): Melways. http://www.street-directory.com.au
20. ↵
    1. Montagu KD,
    2. Kearney DE,
    3. Smith RGB

    . 2003. The biology and silviculture of pruning planted eucalypts for clear wood production—A review. Forest Ecology and Management. 179(1-3): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00579-0

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Moore GM

    . 2003. Native trees: The value of selection. In: Proceedings of the 4th national street tree symposium. 4th National Street Tree Symposium; 2003 September 4–5; Adelaide University, Waite Campus. Glen Osmond (Adelaide, South Australia): Adelaide University. p. 44-52.
22. ↵
    1. Moore GM

    . 2015. The role of lignotubers (basal burls) in the stress recovery of messmate stringybark, Eucalyptus obliqua L’Herit. seedlings and its arboricultural implications. Arboricultural Journal. 37(2):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2015.1066559

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Moore GM

    . 2021a. Root tip growth and presence of leaves affect epicormic and lignotuberous shoot development and survival of stressed Eucalyptus obliqua L’Herit. seedlings. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 47(4):133-149. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2021.014

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Moore GM

    . 2021b. Tree speciation and hybridisation: Its arboricultural implications. Arborist News. 30(4):40-45.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Moore GM

    . 2022. Lifetime cost models for large, long-lived, street trees in Australia. Arboricultural Journal. 44(1):21-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2021.2014689

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. National Trust of Australia

    . 2022a. National Trust—Trust Trees Australia. Victoria (Australia): National Trust. [Accessed 2022 May 30]. https://trusttrees.org.au/tree/VIC/Wedderburn/Boort___Wedderburn_Rd
27. ↵
    1. National Trust of Australia

    . 2022b. National Trust—Trust Trees Australia. Victoria (Australia): National Trust. [Accessed 2022 May 30]. https://trusttrees.org.au/tree/VIC/Ararat/689_Hillside_Rd
28. ↵
    1. Nicolle D

    . 2006. Eucalypts of Victoria and Tasmania. Melbourne (Victoria, Australia): Bloomings Books. 310 p.
29. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Stein SM,
    3. Randler PB,
    4. Greenfield EJ,
    5. Comas SJ,
    6. Carr MA,
    7. Alig RJ

    . 2010. Sustaining America’s urban trees and forests: A forests on the edge report. Newtown Square (PA, USA): USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report NRS-62. 27 p. https://www.fs.usda.gov/pnw/publications/sustaining-americas-urban-trees-and-forests-forests-edge-report
30. 1. Núñez-Florez R,
    2. Pérez-Gómez U,
    3. Fernández-Méndez F

    . 2019. Functional diversity criteria for selecting urban trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 38:251-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.01.005

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Roman LA,
    2. Walker LA,
    3. Martineau CM,
    4. Muffly DJ,
    5. MacQueen SA,
    6. Harris W

    . 2015. Stewardship matters: Case studies in establishment success of urban trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(4):1174-1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.11.001

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Ryder CM,
    2. Moore GM

    . 2013. The arboricultural and economic benefits of formative pruning street trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 39(1):17-24. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2013.004

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Sæbø A,
    2. Benedikz T,
    3. Randrup TB

    . 2003. Selection of trees for urban forestry in the Nordic countries. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2(2):101-114. https://doi.org/10.1078/1618-8667-00027

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Sanusi R,
    2. Johnstone D,
    3. May P,
    4. Livesley SJ

    . 2017. Microclimate benefits that different street tree species provide to sidewalk pedestrians relate to differences in Plant Area Index. Landscape and Urban Planning. 157:502-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.010

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Soares AL,
    2. Rego FC,
    3. McPherson EG,
    4. Simpson JR,
    5. Peper PJ,
    6. Xiao Q

    . 2011. Benefits and costs of street trees in Lisbon, Portugal. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 10(2):69-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.001

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Speak A,
    2. Montagnani L,
    3. Wellstein C,
    4. Zerbe S

    . 2020. The influence of tree traits on urban ground surface shade cooling. Landscape and Urban Planning. 197:103748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103748

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Spencer R

    . 1986. Fashions in street tree planting in Victoria. Landscape Australia. 8(4):304-309.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Williams J,
    2. Woinarski J

    1. Williams JE,
    2. Brooker MIH

    . 1997. Eucalypts: An introduction. In: Williams J, Woinarski J, editors. Eucalypt ecology: Individuals to ecosystems. Cambridge (United Kingdom): Cambridge University Press. p. 1-15.