Business Outlook of Private Urban Forestry in the Northeast-Midwest Region of the United States

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Austin ME

   . 2002. Partnership opportunities in neighborhood tree planting initiatives: Building from local knowledge. Journal of Arboriculture. 28(4):178–186. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2002.026

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Brant R

   . 1990. Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression. Biometrics. 46(4):1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.2307/2532457

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Brethour C,
   2. Watson G,
   3. Sparling B,
   4. Bucknell D,
   5. Moore T

   . 2007. Literature review of documented health and environmental benefits derived from ornamental horticulture products: Final report. Executive Summary. Ottawa (Ontario, Canada): George Morris Centre. 69 p. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://www.agrireseau.net/horticulture-arbresdenoel/documents/Reports_Ornamentals_Health_Benefits.pdf
4. ↵
   1. CARES Act

   2019-2020, S.3548, 116th Congress, 2nd Session. June 3, 2020. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3548/text
5. ↵
   1. Cleary M,
   2. Joshi O,
   3. Fairbanks WS

   . 2021a. Mapping and modeling the components of human tolerance for black bears in eastern Oklahoma. Journal of Environmental Management. 288:112378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112378
6. ↵
   1. Cleary M,
   2. Joshi O,
   3. Fairbanks WS

   . 2021b. Factors that determine human acceptance of black bears. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 85(3):582–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21999

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Crompton J

   . 2004. The proximate principle: The impact of parks, open space and water features on residential property values and the property tax base. 2nd Ed. Ashburn (VA, USA): National Recreation and Park Association. 203 p. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316090725_THE_PROXIMATE_PRINCIPLE_The_Impact_of_Parks_Open_Space_and_Water_Features_on_Residential_Property_Values_and_the_Property_Tax_Base
8. ↵
   1. Dillman DA,
   2. Smyth JD,
   3. Christian LM

   . 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. 4th Ed. Indianapolis (IN, USA): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 528 p. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED565653
9. ↵
   1. Donovan GH

   . 2017. Including public-health benefits of trees in urban-forestry decision making. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 22:120–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.010

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Elmendorf W,
    2. Cotrone VJ,
    3. Mullen JT

    . 2003. Trends in urban forestry practices, programs, and sustainability: Contrasting a Pennsylvania, U.S., study. Journal of Arboriculture. 29(4):237–248. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2003.028

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Exact Data

    . 2022. Exact Data: Mailing Lists and Leads. Chicago (IL, USA): Exact Data, Powered by Data Axle, USA. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://www.exactdata.com
12. ↵
    1. Falxa-Raymond N,
    2. Svendsen E,
    3. Campbell LK

    . 2013. From job training to green jobs: A case study for a young adult employment program centered on environmental restoration in New York City, USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 12(3):287–295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.003

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. FFCR (Families First Coronavirus Response) Act 2019-2020

    , H.R.6201, Public Law No. 116-127, 134 Stat. 178, 116th Congress. March 18, 2020. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6201/text
14. ↵
    1. François DR,
    2. Marius T,
    3. Yan K,
    4. Villeneuve P

    . 2002. Landscaping and house values: An empirical investigation. Journal of Real Estate Research. 23(1-2):139–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2002.12091072

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Gibbons KH,
    2. Ryan CM

    . 2015. Characterizing comprehensiveness of urban forest management plans in Washington state. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(3):615–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.06.003

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Gimeno J,
    2. Folta TB,
    3. Cooper AC,
    4. Woo CY

    . 1997. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly. 42(4):750–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393656

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Hall CR,
    2. Dickson MW

    . 2011. Economic, environmental, and health/well-being benefits associated with green industry products and services: A review. Journal of Environmental Horticulture. 29(2):96–103. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-29.2.96

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Hall CR,
    2. Hodges AW,
    3. Haydu JJ

    . 2005. Economic impacts of the green industry in the United States: Final report to the National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Committee. Gainesville (FL, USA): University of Florida, IFAS Extension. 88 p. [Accessed 2022 February 23]. https://fred.ifas.ufl.edu/pdf/economic-impact-analysis/FE56600.pdf
19. ↵
    1. Hall CR,
    2. Hodges AW,
    3. Khachatryan H,
    4. Palma MA

    . 2020. Economic contributions of the green industry in the United States in 2018. Journal of Environmental Horticulture. 38(3):73–79. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-38.3.73

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Hardy J,
    2. Behe BK,
    3. Barton SS,
    4. Page TJ,
    5. Schutzki RE,
    6. Muzii K,
    7. Fernandez RT,
    8. Haque MT,
    9. Brooker J,
    10. Hall CR,
    11. Hinson R,
    12. Knight P,
    13. McNiel R,
    14. Rowe DB,
    15. Safley C

    . 2000. Consumers preferences for plant size, type of plant material and design sophistication in residential landscaping. Journal of Environmental Horticulture. 18(4):224–230. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-18.4.224

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Hodges AW,
    2. Hall CR,
    3. Palma MA

    . 2011. Economic contributions of the green industry in the United States in 2007-08. Hort-Technology. 21(5):628–638. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.21.5.628

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Hodges AW,
    2. Hall CR,
    3. Palma MA,
    4. Khachatryan H

    . 2015. Economic contributions of the green industry in the United States in 2013. HortTechnology. 25(6):805–814. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.25.6.805

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Konijnendijk CC,
    2. Ricard RM,
    3. Kenney A,
    4. Randrup TB

    . 2006. Defining urban forestry—A comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 4(3-4):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2005.11.003

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Kotler P

    . 1997. Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control. Englewood Cliffs (NJ, USA): Prentice Hall International. 334 p.
25. ↵
    1. Lall R,
    2. Campbell MJ,
    3. Walters SJ,
    4. Morgan K

    . 2002. A review of ordinal regression models applied on health-related quality of life assessments. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 11(1):49–67. https://doi.org/10.1191/0962280202sm271ra

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Lindholst AC

    . 2017. A review of the outcomes from contracting out urban green space maintenance: What we know, don’t know and should know. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 27:50–58. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.012

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Manfreda KL,
    2. Bosnjak M,
    3. Berzelak J,
    4. Haas I,
    5. Vehovar V

    . 2008. Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research. 50(1):79–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530805000107

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Mbachu J,
    2. Nkado R

    . 2006. Conceptual framework for assessment of client needs and satisfaction in the building development process. Construction Management and Economics. 24(1):31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500126866

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. National Urban and Community Forestry Advisory Council

    . 2015. Ten-year urban forestry action plan: 2016-2026. Charlottesville (VA, USA): University of Virginia Institute of Environmental Negotiation. 260 p. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://urbanforestplan.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/FinalActionPlan_Complete_11_17_15.pdf
30. ↵
    1. New Hampshire Landscape Association

    . 2022. What is the green industry? Nashua (NH, USA): New Hampshire Landscape Association. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://nhlaonline.org/what-is-the-green-industry
31. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Hoehn RE III,
    3. Crane DE,
    4. Stevens JC,
    5. Walton JT

    . 2007. Assessing urban forest effects and values: New York City’s urban forest. Newtown Square (PA, USA): USDA Forest Service. Resource Bulletin NRS-9. 26 p. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/rb/rb_nrs009.pdf
32. ↵
    1. O’Brien M

    . 2020. 4 types of business structures—And their tax implications. Austin (TX, USA): Oracle Netsuite. [Updated 2022 February 17; Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://www.netsuite.com/portal/resource/articles/business-strategy/business-structure.shtml
33. ↵
    1. O’Neil-Dunne J

    . 2019. Tree canopy assessment: Philadelphia, PA. Burlington (VT, USA): University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Lab. 16 p. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://treephilly.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Tree-Canopy-Assessment-Report-Philadelphia-2018.pdf
34. ↵
    1. Palma MA,
    2. Hall CR

    . 2016. Economic contributions of the green industry to the Texas economy. Report to the Texas Nursery and Landscape Association. Austin (TX, USA): Texas Nursery and Landscape Association. 16 p. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. http://www.tnlaonline.org/uploads/7/7/5/3/77532106/15_economic_impact_of_the_green_industry_in_texas.pdf
35. ↵
    1. Parajuli R,
    2. Chizmar S,
    3. Hoy M,
    4. Joshi O,
    5. Gordon J,
    6. Mehmood S,
    7. Henderson JE,
    8. Poudel J,
    9. Witthun O,
    10. Buntrock L

    . 2022. Economic contribution analysis of urban forestry in Northeastern and Midwest states of the United States in 2018. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 69:127490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127490

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Peck R,
    2. Olsen C,
    3. Devore JL

    . 2012. Introduction to statistics and data analysis. 4th Ed. Boston (MA, USA): Cengage Learning. 944 p.
37. ↵
    1. Pérez-Urrestarazu L,
    2. Kaltsidi MP,
    3. Nektarios PA,
    4. Markakis G,
    5. Loges V,
    6. Perini K,
    7. Fernández-Cañero R

    . 2021. Particularities of having plants at home during the confinement due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 59:126919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126919

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Peterson B,
    2. Harrell FE Jr.

    . 1990. Partial proportional odds models for ordinal response variables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Applied Statistics). 39(2):205–217. https://doi.org/10.2307/2347760

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. StataCorp LLC

    . 2022. Stata: Software for Statistics and Data Science. College Station (TX, USA): StataCorp LLC. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://www.stata.com
40. ↵
    1. Szumilas M

    . 2010. Explaining odds ratios. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 19(3):227–229. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938757

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. Templeton SR,
    2. Goldman G

    . 1996. Estimating economic activity and impacts of urban forestry in California with multiple data sources from the early 1990s. Journal of Arboriculture. 22(3):131–143. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.1996.020

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Torres-Reyna O

    . 2008. Getting started in logit and ordered logit regression. 3.1 Ed. Princeton (NJ, USA): Princeton University. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://www.princeton.edu/~otorres/Logit.pdf
43. ↵
    1. Tree Care Industry Association

    . 2021. TCIA Member Pulse Survey Quarter One—January, 2021 Results. Manchester (NH, USA): Tree Care Industry Association, Inc. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://tcia.org/TCIA/News/Business/TCIA_Member_Pulse_Survey_Results_Now_Available.aspx
44. ↵
    1. Ugolini F,
    2. Massetti L,
    3. Calaza-Martínez P,
    4. Cariñanos P,
    5. Dobbs C,
    6. Ostoic SK,
    7. Marin AM,
    8. Pearlmutter D,
    9. Saaroni H,
    10. Šaulienė I,
    11. Simoneti M,
    12. Verlič A,
    13. Vuletić D,
    14. Sanesi G

    . 2020. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and perceptions of urban green space: An international exploratory study. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 56:126888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126888

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. United Nations Industrial Development Organization

    . 2022. Green industry initiative. Vienna (Austria): UNIDO. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://www.unido.org/our-focus-cross-cutting-services-green-industry/green-industry-initiative
46. ↵
    1. USDA Forest Service

    . 2021a. 2020 urban and community forestry challenge cost share grant program. Washington (DC, USA): Urban and Community Forestry Program (USFS). [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/urban-forests/ucf/2020-nufrigp
47. ↵
    1. USDA Forest Service

    . 2021b. Urban and community forestry program. Washington (DC, USA): Urban and Community Forestry Program (USFS). [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/urban-forests/ucf
48. ↵
    1. Williams R

    . 2021. Ordered logit models—Basic & intermediate topics. 16 p. https://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/stats3/Ologit01.pdf
49. ↵
    1. Wolf KL

    . 2004a. Economics and public value of urban forests. Urban Agriculture Magazine. 13:31–33. https://www.naturewithin.info/Policy/Urban_Ag.pdf

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Wolf KL

    . 2004b. Nature in the retail environment: Comparing consumer and business response to urban forest conditions. Landscape Journal. 23(1):40–51. https://www.doi.org/10.3368/lj.23.1.40

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
51. ↵
    1. World Green Economy Council

    . 2021. Green industry. Greater Banjul (Gambia): World Green Economy Council. [Accessed 2021 November 2]. https://wgeco.org/green-industry