Quantitative Tools for the Prediction of Pavement Damages Associated with Urban Trees

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Altdorff D,
   2. Botschek J,
   3. Honds M,
   4. van der Kruk J,
   5. Vereecken H

   . 2019. In situ detection of tree root systems under heterogeneous anthropogenic soil conditions using ground penetrating radar. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. 25(3):05019008. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000501

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Arnold MA,
   2. McDonald GV,
   3. Bryan DL

   . 2005. Planting depth and mulch thickness affect establishment of green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) and bougainvillea goldenraintree (Koelreuteria bipinnata). Journal of Arboriculture. 31(4):163–170. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2005.021

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Arnold MA,
   2. McDonald GV,
   3. Bryan DL,
   4. Denny GC,
   5. Watson WT,
   6. Lombardini L

   . 2007. Below-grade planting adversely affects survival and growth of tree species from five different families. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 33(1):64–69. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2007.008

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Barker PA,
   2. Peper PJ

   . 1995. Strategies to prevent damage to sidewalks by tree roots. Arboricultural Journal. 19(3):295–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1995.9747072

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bartens J,
   2. Day SD,
   3. Harris JR,
   4. Wynn TM,
   5. Dove JE

   . 2009. Transpiration and root development of urban trees in structural soil stormwater reservoirs. Environ Manage. 44(4):646–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9366-9

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Benson AR,
   2. Koeser AK,
   3. Morgenroth J

   . 2019a. Responses of mature roadside trees to root severance treatments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 46:126448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126448
7. ↵
   1. Benson AR,
   2. Morgenroth J,
   3. Koeser AK

   . 2019b. The effects of root pruning on growth and physiology of two Acer species in New Zealand. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 38:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.11.006

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Birdal AC,
   2. Avdan U,
   3. Türk T

   . 2017. Estimating tree heights with images from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk. 8(2):1144–1156. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1300608

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Blunt SM

   . 2008. Trees and pavements—Are they compatible? Arboricultural Journal. 31(2):73–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2008.9747522

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Census and Statistics Department

    . 2018. 2016 Population By-census. Wan Chai (Hong Kong): The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. [Accessed 2021 July 5]. https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/en/scode459.html
11. ↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Jiang B,
    4. Wen Z,
    5. Yang N,
    6. Li L

    . 2017. Tree survival and growth are impacted by increased surface temperature on paved land. Landscape and Urban Planning. 162:68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.001

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Cheung PK,
    2. Jim CY

    . 2018. Comparing the cooling effects of a tree and a concrete shelter using PET and UTCI. Building and Environment. 130:49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.013

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. D’Amato NE,
    2. Sydnor TD,
    3. Knee M,
    4. Hunt R,
    5. Bishop B

    . 2002. Which comes first, the root or the crack? Journal of Arboriculture. 28(6):277–282. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2002.041

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Day SD,
    2. Harris JR

    . 2008. Growth, survival, and root system morphology of deeply planted Corylus colurna 7 years after transplanting and the effects of root collar excavation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 7(2):119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.12.004

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Day SD,
    2. Watson G,
    3. Wiseman PE,
    4. Harris JR

    . 2009. Causes and consequences of deep structural roots in urban trees: From nursery production to landscape establishment. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 35(4):182–191. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.031

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Ebrahimian A,
    2. Gulliver JS,
    3. Wilson BN

    . 2018. Estimating effective impervious area in urban watersheds using land cover, soil character and asymptotic curve number. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 63(4):513–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1440562

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Gilman EF,
    2. Grabosky J

    . 2011. Quercus virginiana root attributes and lateral stability after planting at different depths. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 10(1):3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.09.005

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Giuliani F,
    2. Autelitano F,
    3. Degiovanni E,
    4. Montepara A

    . 2017. DEM modelling analysis of tree root growth in street pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 18(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2015.1019495

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Grabosky J,
    2. Bassuk N

    . 2016. Seventeen years’ growth of street trees in structural soil compared with a tree lawn in New York City. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 16:103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.002

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Grabosky J,
    2. Gucunski N

    . 2019. Modelling the influence of root position and growth on pavement tensile crack failure when occurring under three thicknesses of asphaltic concrete. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 41:238–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.006

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Grabosky J,
    2. Haffner E,
    3. Bassuk N

    . 2009. Plant available moisture in stone-soil media for use under pavement while allowing urban tree root growth. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 35(5):271–278. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.041

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Greening, Landscape & Tree Management Section Development Bureau

    . 2021. Planting Record. Wan Chai (Hong Kong): The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. [Updated 2021 December 10; Accessed 2021 July 5]. https://www.greening.gov.hk/en/greening-landscape/planting-record/index.html
23. ↵
    1. Hilbert DR,
    2. North EA,
    3. Hauer RJ,
    4. Koeser AK,
    5. McLean DC,
    6. Northrop RJ,
    7. Andreu M,
    8. Parbs S

    . 2020. Predicting trunk flare diameter to prevent tree damage to infrastructure. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 49:126645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126645
24. ↵
    1. Islam MN,
    2. Rahman KS,
    3. Bahar MM,
    4. Habib MA,
    5. Ando K,
    6. Hattori N

    . 2012. Pollution attenuation by roadside greenbelt in and around urban areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 11(4):460–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.004

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Jim CY

    . 2003. Protection of urban trees from trenching damage in compact city environments. Cities. 20(2):87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(02)00096-3

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Johnson T,
    2. Moore G,
    3. Cameron D,
    4. Brien C

    . 2019. An investigation of tree growth in permeable paving. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 43:126374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126374
27. ↵
    1. Keith TZ

    . 2019. Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling. 3rd Ed. New York (NY, USA): Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315162348
28. ↵
    1. Krainyukov A,
    2. Lyaksa I

    . 2016. Detection of tree roots in an urban area with the use of ground penetrating radar. Transport and Telecommunication Journal. 17(4):362–370. https://doi.org/10.1515/ttj-2016-0032

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Kwong IHY,
    2. Fung T

    . 2020. Tree height mapping and crown delineation using LiDAR, large format aerial photographs, and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry in subtropical urban forest. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 41(14): 5228–5256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1731002

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Lee LS,
    2. Cheung PK,
    3. Fung CK,
    4. Jim CY

    . 2020. Improving street walkability: Biometeorological assessment of artificial-partial shade structures in summer sunny conditions. International Journal of Biometeorology. 64(4):547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01840-9

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Lee LSH,
    2. Zhang H,
    3. Jim CY

    . 2021. Serviceable tree volume: An alternative tool to assess ecosystem services provided by ornamental trees in urban forests. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 59:127003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127003
32. ↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Guo L

    . 2017. Field investigation and numerical analysis of residential building damaged by expansive soil movement caused by tree root drying. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 31(1):D4016003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000908

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Loprencipe G,
    2. Pantuso A

    . 2017. A specified procedure for distress identification and assessment for urban road surfaces based on PCI. Coatings. 7(5):65. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings7050065

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Lucke T,
    2. Beecham S

    . 2019. An infiltration approach to reducing pavement damage by street trees. Science of the Total Environment. 671:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.357

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Mann PS

    . 2007. Introductory statistics. 6th Ed. Hoboken (NJ, USA): John Wiley & Sons.
36. ↵
    1. Marziliano PA,
    2. Lafortezza R,
    3. Colangelo G,
    4. Davies C,
    5. Sanesi G

    . 2013. Structural diversity and height growth models in urban forest plantations: A case-study in northern Italy. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 12(2):246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.006

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Morgenroth J,
    2. Buchan GD

    . 2009. Soil moisture and aeration beneath pervious and impervious pavements. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry. 35(3):135–141. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2009.024

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Mullaney J,
    2. Lucke T,
    3. Trueman SJ

    . 2015. A review of benefits and challenges in growing street trees in paved urban environments. Landscape and Urban Planning. 134:157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.013

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. North EA,
    2. Johnson GR,
    3. Burk TE

    . 2015. Trunk flare diameter predictions as an infrastructure planning tool to reduce tree and sidewalk conflicts. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.11.009

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Oldfield EE,
    2. Felson AJ,
    3. Auyeung DSN,
    4. Crowther TW,
    5. Sonti NF,
    6. Harada Y,
    7. Maynard DS,
    8. Sokol NW,
    9. Ashton MS,
    10. Warren RJ II.,
    11. Hallett RA,
    12. Bradford MA

    . 2015. Growing the urban forest: Tree performance in response to biotic and abiotic land management. Restoration Ecology. 23(5):707–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12230

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. O’Sullivan OS,
    2. Holt AR,
    3. Warren PH,
    4. Evans KL

    . 2017. Optimising UK urban road verge contributions to biodiversity and ecosystem services with cost-effective management. Journal of Environmental Management. 191:162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.062

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Ow LF,
    2. Ghosh S

    . 2017. Urban tree growth and their dependency on infiltration rates in structural soil and structural cells. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 26:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.06.005

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Ozer S,
    2. Irmak MA,
    3. Yilmaz H

    . 2008. Determination of roadside noise reduction effectiveness of Pinus sylvestris L. and Populus nigra L. in Erzurum, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 144(1-3):191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9978-6

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
44. ↵
    1. Panagiotidis D,
    2. Abdollahnejad A,
    3. Surový P,
    4. Chiteculo V

    . 2017. Determining tree height and crown diameter from high-resolution UAV imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 38(8-10):2392–2410. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1264028

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Planning Department

    . 2020. Land Utilization in Hong Kong 2020. Wan Chai (Hong Kong): The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. [Accessed 2021 July 5]. https://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_en/info_serv/statistic/landu.html
46. ↵
    1. Rahardjo H,
    2. Gofar N,
    3. Amalia N,
    4. Leong EC,
    5. Ow LF

    . 2016. Structural cell contribution to resistance of trees to uprooting. Trees. 30(5):1843–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1417-2

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Rotherham ID

    . 2010. Thoughts on the politics and economics of urban street trees. Arboricultural Journal. 33(2):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2010.9747596

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Semenzato P,
    2. Cattaneo D,
    3. Dainese M

    . 2011. Growth prediction for five tree species in an Italian urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 10(3):169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.05.001

    OpenUrl
49. ↵
    1. Smiley ET

    . 2008. Comparison of methods to reduce sidewalk damage from tree roots. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 34(3):179–183. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2008.024

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Stovin VR,
    2. Jorgensen A,
    3. Clayden A

    . 2008. Street trees and stormwater management. Arboricultural Journal. 30(4):297–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2008.9747509

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Timm A,
    2. Kluge B,
    3. Wessolek G

    . 2018. Hydrological balance of paved surfaces in moist mid-latitude climate–A review. Landscape and Urban Planning. 175:80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.03.014

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Torresan C,
    2. Berton A,
    3. Carotenuto F,
    4. Di Gennaro SF,
    5. Gioli B,
    6. Matese A,
    7. Miglietta F,
    8. Vagnoli C,
    9. Zaldei A,
    10. Wallace L

    . 2017. Forestry applications of UAVs in Europe: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 38(8-10):2427–2447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2016.1252477

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Watson GW,
    2. Hewitt AM,
    3. Custic M,
    4. Lo M

    . 2014. The management of tree root systems in urban and suburban settings II: A review of strategies to mitigate human impacts. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 40(5):249–271. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2014.025

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Zheng B,
    2. Myint SW,
    3. Fan C

    . 2014. Spatial configuration of anthropogenic land cover impacts on urban warming. Landscape and Urban Planning. 130:104–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.001.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science