Modeling the Shading Effect of Vancouver’s Urban Tree Canopy in Relation to Neighborhood Variations

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Akbari H,
   2. Davis S,
   3. Dorsano S,
   4. Huang J,
   5. Winnett S

   . 1992. Cooling our communities: A guidebook on tree planting and light-colored surfacing. Washington (DC, USA): US Environmental Protection Agency. 264 p.
2. ↵
   1. Akbari H,
   2. Taha H

   . 1992. The impact of trees and white surfaces on residential heating and cooling energy use in four Canadian cities. Energy. 17(2):141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(92)90063-6

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Aksamija A

   . 2018. Methods for integrating parametric design with building performance analysis. EAAE/ARCC International 2018 Conference; 2018 May 16–18; Philadelphia, PA, USA. ARCC Conference Repository. https://www.arcc-journal.org/index.php/repository/article/view/459
4. ↵
   1. Alexandri E,
   2. Jones P

   . 2008. Temperature decreases in an urban canyon due to green walls and green roofs in diverse climates. Building and Environment. 43(4):480–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.055

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Aminipouri M,
   2. Rayner D,
   3. Lindberg F,
   4. Thorsson S,
   5. Knudby AJ,
   6. Zickfeld K,
   7. Middel A,
   8. Krayenhoff ES

   . 2019. Urban tree planting to maintain outdoor thermal comfort under climate change: The case of Vancouver’s local climate zones. Building and Environment. 158:226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.05.022

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. BC Assessment

   . 2021. Check your property with assessment search and compare it to others. [Accessed 2019 December 20]. https://www.bcassessment.ca
7. ↵
   1. BC Hydro

   . 2018. Cold comfort: The rising use (and cost) of air conditioning in B.C. Vancouver (BC, Canada): BC Hydro Power Smart. BCH18-712. https://www.bchydro.com/content/dam/BCHydro/customer-portal/documents/news-and-features/air-conditioning-report-july-2018.pdf
8. ↵
   1. Berry R,
   2. Livesley SJ,
   3. Aye L

   . 2013. Tree canopy shade impacts on solar irradiance received by building walls and their surface temperature. Building and Environment. 69:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.009

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Bowler DE,
   2. Buyung-Ali L,
   3. Knight TM,
   4. Pullin AS

   . 2010. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: A systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning. 97(3): 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.05.006

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Chance CM,
    2. Coops NC,
    3. Plowright AA,
    4. Tooke TR,
    5. Christen A,
    6. Aven N

    . 2016. Invasive shrub mapping in an urban environment from hyperspectral and LiDAR-derived attributes. Frontiers in Plant Science. 7:1528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01528
11. ↵
    1. City of Vancouver Open Data Portal

    . 2013. LiDAR 2013. [Accessed 2021 May 27]. https://opendata.vancouver.ca/explore/dataset/lidar-2013/information
12. ↵
    1. Czekajlo A,
    2. Coops NC,
    3. Wulder MA,
    4. Hermosilla T,
    5. Lu Y,
    6. White JC,
    7. van den Bosch M

    . 2020. The urban greenness score: A satellite-based metric for multi-decadal characterization of urban land dynamics. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 93:102210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102210
13. ↵
    1. EnergyPlus

    . 2016. Weather data for simulation. Washington (DC, USA): US Department of Energy Building Technologies Office, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. [Accessed 2021 May 27]. https://energyplus.net/weather/simulation
14. ↵
    1. Environment and Climate Change Canada

    . 2021. Temperature—Monthly data for Vancouver. Vancouver (BC, Canada): Environment and Climate Change Canada. [Accessed 2021 May 27]. https://vancouver.weatherstats.ca/charts/temperature-monthly.html
15. ↵
    1. Erlwein S,
    2. Pauleit S

    . 2021. Trade-offs between urban green space and densification: Balancing outdoor thermal comfort, mobility, and housing demand. Urban Planning. 6(1):5–19. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i1.3481

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Estrada F,
    2. Botzen WJW,
    3. Tol RSJ

    . 2017. A global economic assessment of city policies to reduce climate change impacts. Nature Climate Change. 7(6):403–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3301

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. GitHub

    . 2021. Computer generated building footprints for Canada. [Accessed 2021 May 27]. https://github.com/microsoft/CanadianBuildingFootprints
18. ↵
    1. Gould KA,
    2. Lewis TL

    . 2016. Green gentrification: Urban sustainability and the struggle for environmental justice. 1st Ed. London (UK): Taylor & Francis. 192 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315687322
19. ↵
    1. Grimm NB,
    2. Faeth SH,
    3. Golubiewski NE,
    4. Redman CL,
    5. Wu J,
    6. Bai X,
    7. Briggs JM

    . 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science. 319(5864):756–760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
20. ↵
    1. Guo T,
    2. Morgenroth J,
    3. Conway T

    . 2018. Redeveloping the urban forest: The effect of redevelopment and property-scale variables on tree removal and retention. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 35:192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.08.012

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Guo T,
    2. Morgenroth J,
    3. Conway T,
    4. Xu C

    . 2019. City-wide canopy cover decline due to residential property redevelopment in Christchurch, New Zealand. Science of the Total Environment. 681:202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.122

    OpenUrlPubMed
22. ↵
    1. Haaland C,
    2. van den Bosch CK

    . 2015. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(4):760–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.07.009

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Huang YJ,
    2. Akbari H,
    3. Taha H,
    4. Rosenfeld AH

    . 1987. The potential of vegetation in reducing summer cooling loads in residential buildings. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology. 26(9):1103–1116. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1987)026<1103:tpovir>2.0.co;2

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Jim C

    . 2017. Constraints to urban trees and their remedies in the built environment. In: Routledge handbook of urban forestry. 1st Ed. London (UK): Routledge. p. 273–290. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315627106-19
25. ↵
    1. Jin J,
    2. Gergel SE,
    3. Lu Y,
    4. Coops NC,
    5. Wang C

    . 2020. Asian cities are greening while some North American cities are browning: Long-term greenspace patterns in 16 cities of the Pan-Pacific region. Ecosystems. 23:383–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00409-2

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Krayenhoff ES,
    2. Jiang T,
    3. Christen A,
    4. Martilli A,
    5. Oke TR,
    6. Bailey BN,
    7. Nazarian N,
    8. Voogt JA,
    9. Giometto MG,
    10. Stastny A,
    11. Crawford BR

    . 2020. A multi-layer urban canopy meteorological model with trees (BEP-Tree): Street tree impacts on pedestrian-level climate. Urban Climate. 32:100590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2020.100590
27. ↵
    1. Kweon BS,
    2. Sullivan WC,
    3. Wiley AR

    . 1998. Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior. 30(6):832–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000605

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Lafortezza R,
    2. Carrus G,
    3. Sanesi G,
    4. Davies C

    . 2009. Benefits and well-being perceived by people visiting green spaces in periods of heat stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 8(2):97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.02.003

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Li D,
    2. Bou-Zeid E

    . 2013. Synergistic interactions between urban heat islands and heat waves: The impact in cities is larger than the sum of its parts. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. 52(9):2051–2064. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-02.1

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Lin CH,
    2. Chen BR,
    3. Tsay YS

    . 2019. Study on the applicability of building energy simulation graphic user interfaces in the design process. 2018 Conference on Innovative Low-Carbon and Green Buildings in Subtropical Area; 2018 October 14–17; Taipei, Taiwan. p. 99–105. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333616628
31. ↵
    1. Matasci G,
    2. Coops NC,
    3. Williams DAR,
    4. Page N

    . 2018. Mapping tree canopies in urban environments using airborne laser scanning (ALS): A Vancouver case study. Forest Ecosystems. 5:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-018-0146-y
32. ↵
    1. Metro Vancouver

    . 2014. Land cover classification 2014. Burnaby (BC, Canada): Metro Vancouver. [Accessed 2021 May 27]. http://www.metrovancouver.org/data/regional-planning/Land Cover Classification 2014 - 2m LiDAR (Raster)
33. ↵
    1. Metro Vancouver

    . 2019. Regional tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces: Analysis of tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces in Metro Vancouver. Burnaby (BC, Canada): Metro Vancouver. 44 p. http://www.metrovancouver.org/services/regional-planning/PlanningPublications/EcologicalHealth-TreeCanopyCoverImperviousSurfaces.pdf
34. ↵
    1. Metselaar K

    . 2012. Water retention and evapotranspiration of green roofs and possible natural vegetation types. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 64:49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.12.009

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Middel A,
    2. Alkhaled S,
    3. Schneidr FA,
    4. Hagen B,
    5. Coseo P

    . 2021. 50 grades of shade. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 102(9):E1805–E1820. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0193.1

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Middel A,
    2. Chhetri N,
    3. Quay R

    . 2015. Urban forestry and cool roofs: Assessment of heat mitigation strategies in Phoenix residential neighborhoods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(1):178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.010

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Morakinyo TE,
    2. Kong L,
    3. Lau KKL,
    4. Yuan C,
    5. Ng E

    . 2017. A study on the impact of shadow-cast and tree species on in-canyon and neighborhood’s thermal comfort. Building and Environment. 115:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.01.005

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory

    . 2020. National Solar Radiation Database. Typical meteorological year (TMY). Washington (DC, USA): US Department of Energy. [Accessed 2021 May 27]. https://nsrdb.nrel.gov/about/tmy.html
39. ↵
    1. Nesbitt L,
    2. Hotte N,
    3. Barron S,
    4. Cowan J,
    5. Sheppard SRJ

    . 2017. The social and economic value of cultural ecosystem services provided by urban forests in North America: A review and suggestions for future research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 25:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.05.005

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Nesbitt L,
    2. Meitner MJ,
    3. Girling C,
    4. Sheppard SRJ,
    5. Lu Y

    . 2019. Who has access to urban vegetation? A spatial analysis of distributional green equity in 10 US cities. Landscape and Urban Planning. 181:51–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDURBPLAN.2018.08.007

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Norton BA,
    2. Coutts AM,
    3. Livesley SJ,
    4. Harris RJ,
    5. Hunter AM,
    6. Williams NSG

    . 2015. Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning. 134:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018

    OpenUrlCrossRef
42. ↵
    1. Palme M,
    2. Privitera R,
    3. La Rosa D

    . 2020. The shading effects of Green Infrastructure in private residential areas: Building Performance Simulation to support urban planning. Energy and Buildings. 229:110531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110531
43. ↵
    1. Brotas L,
    2. Roaf S,
    3. Fergus N

    1. Peronato G,
    2. Kämpf JH,
    3. Rey E,
    4. Andersen M

    . 2017. Integrating urban energy simulation in a parametric environment: A Grasshopper interface for CitySim. In: Brotas L, Roaf S, Fergus N, editors. Design to Thrive—PLEA 2017 Conference Proceedings, Volume II. Passive Low Energy Architecture 2017 Edinburgh—Design to Thrive; 2017 July 2–5; Edinburgh, Scotland. Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings. p. 2124–2131. https://plea2017.net
44. ↵
    1. Pigliautile I,
    2. Pisello AL,
    3. Bou-Zeid E

    . 2020. Humans in the city: Representing outdoor thermal comfort in urban canopy models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 133:110103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110103
45. ↵
    1. Plowright AA,
    2. Coops NC,
    3. Chance CM,
    4. Sheppard SRJ,
    5. Aven NW

    . 2017. Multi-scale analysis of relationship between imperviousness and urban tree height using airborne remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment. 194:391–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.045

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Plowright AA,
    2. Coops NC,
    3. Eskelson BNI,
    4. Sheppard SRJ,
    5. Aven NW

    . 2016. Assessing urban tree condition using airborne light detection and ranging. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 19:140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.026

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Radiance

    . 2021. Setting rendering options. [Accessed 2021 May 31]. https://floyd.lbl.gov/radiance/refer/Notes/rpict_options.html
48. ↵
    1. Robinson D,
    2. Stone A

    . 2004. Irradiation modelling made simple: The cumulative sky approach and its applications. In: Plea2004—The 21st Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture; 2004 September 19–22; Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 5 p.
49. ↵
    1. Rosenfeld AH,
    2. Akbari H,
    3. Bretz S,
    4. Fishman BL,
    5. Kurn DM,
    6. Sailor D,
    7. Taha H

    . 1995. Mitigation of urban heat islands: Materials, utility programs, updates. Energy and Buildings. 22(3):255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(95)00927-P

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
50. ↵
    1. Roudsari MS,
    2. Pak M

    . 2013. Ladybug: A parametric environmental plugin for Grasshopper to help designers create an environmentally-conscious design. In: Proceedings of BS2013. 13th Conference of the International Building Performance Simulation Association; 2013 August 26–28; Chambery, France. Toronto (Canada): IBPSA. p. 3128–3135. http://www.ibpsa.org/proceedings/BS2013/p_2499.pdf
51. ↵
    1. Sabrin S,
    2. Karimi M,
    3. Nazari R,
    4. Pratt J,
    5. Bryk J

    . 2021. Effects of different urban-vegetation morphology on the canopy-level thermal comfort and the cooling benefits of shade trees: Case-study in Philadelphia. Sustainable Cities and Society. 66:102684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102684
52. ↵
    1. Sailor DJ,
    2. Pavlova AA

    . 2003. Air conditioning market saturation and long-term response of residential cooling energy demand to climate change. Energy. 28(9):941–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00033-1

    OpenUrlCrossRef
53. ↵
    1. Shahtahmassebi AR,
    2. Li C,
    3. Fan Y,
    4. Wu Y,
    5. lin Y,
    6. Gan M,
    7. Wang K,
    8. Malik A,
    9. Blackburn GA

    . 2021. Remote sensing of urban green spaces: A review. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 57:126946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126946
54. ↵
    1. Stone B,
    2. Hess JJ,
    3. Frumkin H

    . 2010. Urban form and extreme heat events: Are sprawling cities more vulnerable to climate change than compact cities? Environmental Health Perspectives. 118(10):1425–1428. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0901879

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
55. ↵
    1. Stone B,
    2. Vargo J,
    3. Habeeb D

    . 2012. Managing climate change in cities: Will climate action plans work? Landscape and Urban Planning. 107(3):263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.014

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. ↵
    1. Tan PY,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Sia A

    . 2013. Perspectives on five decades of the urban greening of Singapore. Cities. 32:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.02.001

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
57. ↵
    1. Tan Z,
    2. Lau KKL,
    3. Ng E

    . 2016. Urban tree design approaches for mitigating daytime urban heat island effects in a high-density urban environment. Energy and Buildings. 114:265–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.031

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Tooke TR,
    2. Coops NC,
    3. Christen A,
    4. Gurtuna O,
    5. Prévot A

    . 2012. Integrated irradiance modelling in the urban environment based on remotely sensed data. Solar Energy. 86(10):2923–2934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.06.026

    OpenUrl
59. ↵
    1. Torrie R

    . 2015. Low carbon futures in Canada—The role of urban climate change mitigation: Briefing on urban energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Seattle (WA, USA): Stockholm Environment Institute. www.sei-international.org
60. ↵
    1. Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation

    . 2020. Park Board Meeting: December 7, 2020. Vancouver (BC, Canada). https://parkboardmeetings.vancouver.ca/2020/20201207/REPORT-UrbanForestStrategyUpdate-20201207.pdf
61. ↵
    1. Ward GJ

    . 1994. The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. In: SIGGRAPH 94: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. SIGGRAPH 94; 1994 July 24–29; Orlando, Florida. New York (NY, USA): Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. p. 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1145/192161.192286
62. ↵
    1. Wong NH,
    2. Kwang Tan AY,
    3. Chen Y,
    4. Sekar K,
    5. Tan PY,
    6. Chan D,
    7. Chiang K,
    8. Wong NC

    . 2010. Thermal evaluation of vertical greenery systems for building walls. Building and Environment. 45(3):663–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.005

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Yu Q,
    2. Ji W,
    3. Pu R,
    4. Landry S,
    5. Acheampong M,
    6. O’Neil-Dunne J,
    7. Ren Z,
    8. Tanim SH

    . 2020. A preliminary exploration of the cooling effect of tree shade in urban landscapes. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 92:102161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2020.102161
64. ↵
    1. Yu X,
    2. Wu Z,
    3. Zheng H,
    4. Li M,
    5. Tan T

    . 2020. How urban agglomeration improve the emission efficiency? A spatial econometric analysis of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration in China. Journal of Environmental Management. 260:110061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110061
65. ↵
    1. Ziter CD,
    2. Pedersen EJ,
    3. Kucharik CJ,
    4. Turner MG

    . 2019. Scale-dependent interactions between tree canopy cover and impervious surfaces reduce daytime urban heat during summer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 116(15):7575–7580. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817561116

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text