Intelligent Survey Technologies and Applications for Urban Forests in Taiwan

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Alonzo M,
   2. McFadden JP,
   3. Nowak DJ,
   4. Roberts DA

   . 2016. Mapping urban forest structure and function using hyperspectral imagery and lidar data. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 17:135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.04.003

   OpenUrl
2. 1. American Public Works Association (APWA)

   . [date unknown]. Urban forestry best management practices for public works managers: Urban forest management plan. Kansas City (MO, USA): APWA Press. https://www2.apwa.net/Documents/About/CoopAgreements/UrbanForestry/UrbanForestry-4.pdf
3. ↵
   1. Bjork A,
   2. Erlandsson M,
   3. Hakli J,
   4. Jaakkola K,
   5. Nilsson A,
   6. Nummila K,
   7. Puntanen V,
   8. Sirkka A

   . 2010. Monitoring environmental performance of the forestry supply chain using RFID. Computers in Industry. 62:830–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2011.08.001

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Blum J

   . 2016. Urban forests: Ecosystem services and management. New York (NY, USA): Apple Academic Press. 316 p.
5. ↵
   1. Calders K,
   2. Adams J,
   3. Armston J,
   4. Bartholomeus H,
   5. Bauwens S,
   6. Bentley LP,
   7. Chave J,
   8. Danson FM,
   9. Demol M,
   10. Disney M,
   11. Gaulton R,
   12. Moorthy SMK,
   13. Levick SR,
   14. Saarinen N,
   15. Schaaf C,
   16. Stovall A,
   17. Terryn L,
   18. Wilkes P,
   19. Verbeeck H

   . 2020. Terrestrial laser scanning in forest ecology: Expanding the horizon. Remote Sensing of Environment. 251:112102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112102
6. ↵
   1. Ciesielski M,
   2. Sterenczak K

   . 2019. Accuracy of determining specific parameters of the urban forest using remote sensing. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry. 12(6):498–510. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3024-012

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. City of Kirkland

   . 2013. Urban forestry strategic management plan. Kirkland (WA, USA): City of Kirkland. R-4986. https://www.kirklandwa.gov/files/sharedassets/public/planning-amp-building/urban-forest-management-plan.pdf
8. ↵
   1. Climate Action Reserve

   . 2019. Urban forest management project protocol. Version 1.1. Los Angeles (CA, USA): Climate Action Reserve. https://www.climateactionreserve.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Urban_Forest_Management_Project_Protocol_V1.1.pdf
9. ↵
   1. Coelho-Duarte AP,
   2. Daniluk-Mosquera G,
   3. Gravina V,
   4. Vallejos-Barra O,
   5. Ponce-Donoso M

   . 2021. Tree risk assessment: Component analysis of six visual methods applied in an urban park, Montevideo, Uruguay. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 59:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127005

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Estornell J,
    2. Velázquez-Martí B,
    3. Fernández-Sarría A,
    4. Martí J

    . 2018. Lidar methods for measurement of trees in urban forests. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing. 12(4):046009. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.12.046009

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Farve R

    . 2014. Using radio frequency identification (RFID) for monitoring trees in the forest: State-of-the-technology investigation. Washington (DC, USA): USDA Forest Service, National Technology & Development Center, Inventory and Monitoring Program. https://www.fs.fed.us/t-d/pubs/pdfpubs/pdf14191805/pdf14191805dpi100.pdf
12. ↵
    1. Goh CL,
    2. Rahim RA,
    3. Rahiman MHF,
    4. Talib MTM,
    5. Tee ZC

    . 2018. Sensing wood decay in standing trees: A review. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 269:276–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2017.11.038

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Hakli J,
    2. Jaakkola K,
    3. Pursula P,
    4. Huusko M,
    5. Nummila K

    . 2010. UHF RFID based tracking of logs in the forest industry. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on RFID (IEEE RFID 2010). IEEE RFID 2010; 2010 April 14–16; Orlando, FL, USA. Piscataway (NJ, USA): IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. p. 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1109/RFID.2010.5467272
14. ↵
    1. Iqbal SPA,
    2. Adi W,
    3. Eko K,
    4. Satria I,
    5. Ronni A,
    6. Budi PN

    . 2017. Urban forest topographical mapping using UAV LIDAR. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 98(1):012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/98/1/012034

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Johnstone D,
    2. Moore G,
    3. Tausz M,
    4. Nicolas M

    . 2010. The measurement of wood decay in landscape trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 36(3):121–127. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2010.016

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Johnstone DM,
    2. Ades PK,
    3. Moore GM,
    4. Smith IW

    . 2007. Predicting wood decay in eucalypts using an expert system and the IML-Resistograph drill. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 33(2):76–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2018.1500676

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Kamaguchi A,
    2. Nakao T,
    3. Nakai T

    . 2001. Non-destructive diagnosis of internal defects of the living trees by the lateral impact vibration method. Tree and Forest Health. 5(2):59–63. https://doi.org/10.18938/treeforesthealth.5.2_59

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Kwong IHY,
    2. Fung T

    . 2019. Tree height mapping and crown delineation using LiDAR, large format aerial photographs, and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry in subtropical urban forest. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 41(14):5228–5256. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2020.1731002

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Li GH,
    2. Wang XP,
    3. Feng HL,
    4. Wiedenbeck J,
    5. Ross RJ

    . 2014. Analysis of wave velocity patterns in black cherry trees and its effect on internal decay detection. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 104:32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.03.008

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Lilly SJ

    . 2010. Arborists’ certification study guide. Champaign (IL, USA): International Society of Arboriculture. 362 p.
21. ↵
    1. Luvisi A,
    2. Lorenzini G

    . 2014. RFID-plants in the smart city: Applications and outlook for urban green management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 13(4):630–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2014.07.003

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Mattheck C,
    2. Breloer H

    . 1996. The body language of trees: A handbook for failure analysis. London (UK): Stationery Office Books. 320 p.
23. ↵
    1. Ordóñez C,
    2. Kendal D,
    3. Threlfall CG,
    4. Hochuli DF,
    5. Davern M,
    6. Fuller RA,
    7. Livesley SJ

    . 2020. How urban forest managers evaluate management and governance challenges in their decision-making. Forests. 11(9):963. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090963

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Pirti A

    . 2007. Performance analysis of the real time kinematic GPS (RTK GPS) technique in a highway project (stake-out). Survey Review. 39(303):43–53. https://doi.org/10.1179/003962607X164989

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
25. ↵
    1. Ponneth D,
    2. Vasu AE,
    3. Easwaran JC,
    4. Mohandass A,
    5. Chauhan SS

    . 2014. Destructive and non-destructive evaluation of seven hardwoods and analysis of data correlation. Holzforschung. 68(8):951–956. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2013-0193

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Konijnendijk C,
    2. Nilsson K,
    3. Randrup T,
    4. Schipperijn J

    1. Schipperijn J,
    2. Pillmann W,
    3. Tyrväinen L,
    4. Mäkinen K,
    5. O’Sullivan K

    . 2005. Information for urban forest planning and management. In: Konijnendijk C, Nilsson K, Randrup T, Schipperijn J, editors. Urban forest trees. Berlin/Heidelberg (Germany): Springer. p. 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27684-X_15
27. ↵
    1. Shortle WC,
    2. Dudzik KR

    . 2012. Wood decay in living and dead trees: A pictorial overview. Newtown Square (PA, USA): USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station. General Technical Report NRS-97. https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-GTR-97
28. ↵
    1. Suyama H,
    2. Kirita R,
    3. Monobe H

    . 2013. Effect of weight of hammers on detection of resonance frequency by the lateral impact vibration method for large living trees of 9 species. Journal of Wood Society. 59(2):105–111. https://doi.org/10.2488/jwrs.59.105

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Suyama H,
    2. Tetsuya N,
    3. Tomimatsu Y

    . 2010. Non-destructive diagnosis of the butt heart rot in Chamaecyparis obtusa by the lateral impact vibration method. Tree and Forest Health. 14(3):83–91. https://doi.org/10.18938/treeforesthealth.14.3_83

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Tasoulas E,
    2. Varras G,
    3. Tsirogiannis I,
    4. Myriounis C

    . 2013. Development of a GIS application for urban forestry management planning. Procedia Technology. 8:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11.011

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Town of Wake Forest

    . 2013. Urban forest management plan. Wake Forest (NC, USA): Town of Wake Forest. https://www.wakeforestnc.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/urban_forestry/uf-mgt-plan-final.pdf
32. ↵
    1. von Döhren P,
    2. Haase D

    . 2019. Risk assessment concerning urban ecosystem disservices: The example of street trees in Berlin, Germany. Ecosystem Services. 40:101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101031
33. ↵
    1. Wang X

    . 2013. Acoustic measurements on trees and logs: A review and analysis. Wood Science and Technology. 47(5):965–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-013-0552-9

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Guo L

    . 2015. Urban forestry management information system based on GIS—A case of Tangshan City. In: Proceedings of the 2015 2nd International Forum on Electrical Engineering and Automation (IFEEA 2015). IFEEA 2015; 2015 December 26–27; Guangzhou, China. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Atlantis Press. p. 158–161.
35. ↵
    1. Yamada T,
    2. Yamashita K,
    3. OtaYuko Y

    . 2019. Comparison between sonic tomography and lateral impact vibration method in detecting cavity using wood disk. The Japanese Forest Society Congress. 130:154–155. https://doi.org/10.11519/jfsc.130.0_457

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Zengin H,
    2. Yesil A

    . 2004. Comparing the performances of real-time kinematic GPS and a handheld GPS receiver under forest cover. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 30(2): 101–110. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273771581_Comparing_the_Performances_of_Real-Time_Kinematic_GPS_and_a_Handheld_GPS_Receiver_under_Forest_Cover

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Zhang C,
    2. Qiu F

    . 2012. Mapping individual tree species in an urban forest using airborne lidar data and hyperspectral imagery. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 78(10):1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.78.10.1079

    OpenUrl