Lessons Learned from Developing Best Management Practices for Urban Tree Care and Wildlife

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Alvey AA

   . 2006. Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 5(4):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.09.003

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Arboricultural Association

   . 2015a November 24. So what actions can contractors take to ensure compliance to the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981? Stonehouse (Gloucestershire, UK): The Arboricultural Association. [Updated 2016 February 4; Accessed 2021 April 15]. https://www.trees.org.uk/Help-Advice/Public/So-what-actions-can-contractors-take-to-ensure-com
3. ↵
   1. Arboricultural Association

   . 2015b November 24. When is the bird nest season? Stonehouse (Gloucestershire, UK): The Arboricultural Association. [Updated 2018 November 8; Accessed 2021 April 15]. https://www.trees.org.uk/Help-Advice/Public/When-is-the-bird-nest-season
4. ↵
   1. Banks A

   . 2014 May 7. Baby herons mangled in woodchipper in Oakland, critics say. Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles (CA, USA): Los Angeles Times. [Accessed 2021 April 12]. https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-infant-herons-tree-oakland-20140507-story.html
5. ↵
   1. City of Portland Environmental Services

   . 2017. Protecting nesting birds: Best management practices for vegetation and construction projects. Version 3.0. Portland (OR, USA): City of Portland. 53 p. [Accessed 2021 April 12]. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/index.cfm?a=322164
6. ↵
   1. City of Poway Urban Forestry Ordinance

   . Ord. 521 § 1(B) (2000).
7. ↵
   1. Golden Gate Audubon Society

   . 2017. Healthy trees, healthy birds. Berkeley (CA, USA): Golden Gate Audubon Society. [Accessed 2021 April 12]. https://goldengateaudubon.org/wp-content/uploads/Healthy_Trees_brochure.pdf
8. ↵
   1. Griffiths SR,
   2. Lentini PE,
   3. Semmens K,
   4. Watson SJ,
   5. Lumsden LF,
   6. Robert KA

   . 2018. Chainsaw-carved cavities better mimic the thermal properties of natural tree hollows than nest boxes and log hollows. Forests. 9(5):235. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9050235

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Job JR,
   2. Kohler SL,
   3. Gill SA

   . 2016. Song adjustments by an open habitat bird to anthropogenic noise, urban structure, and vegetation. Behavioral Ecology. 27(6):1734–1744. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw105

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Kane B,
    2. Warren PS,
    3. Lerman SB

    . 2015. A broad scale analysis of tree risk, mitigation and potential habitat for cavity-nesting birds. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(4):1137–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.10.012

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Koeser A,
    2. Hauer R,
    3. Norris K,
    4. Krouse R

    . 2013. Factors influencing long-term street tree survival in Milwaukee, WI, USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 12(4):562–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.05.006

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Koeser AK,
    2. Hauer RJ,
    3. Miesbauer JW,
    4. Peterson W

    . 2016. Municipal tree risk assessment in the United States: Findings from a comprehensive survey of urban forest management. Arboricultural Journal. 38(4):218–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2016.1221178

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Krajter Ostoić S,
    2. Konijnendijk van den Bosch CC

    . 2015. Exploring global scientific discourses on urban forestry. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(1):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.01.001

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Lethlean H,
    2. Van Dongen WFD,
    3. Kostoglou K,
    4. Guay PJ,
    5. Weston MA

    . 2017. Joggers cause greater avian disturbance than walkers. Landscape and Urban Planning. 159:42–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.08.020

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Lindenmayer DB,
    2. Laurance WF,
    3. Franklin JF

    . 2012. Global decline in large old trees. Science. 338(6112):1305–1306. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231070

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Lyytimäki J,
    2. Sipilä M

    . 2009. Hopping on one leg—The challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 8(4):309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.003

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Magle SB,
    2. Hunt VM,
    3. Vernon M,
    4. Crooks KR

    . 2012. Urban wildlife research: Past, present, and future. Biological Conservation. 155:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.018

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Marlès Magre J,
    2. Boada Juncà M,
    3. Campanera JM,
    4. Bach Pagès A,
    5. Ruiz Mallén I,
    6. Maneja Zaragoza R,
    7. Sánchez Mateo S,
    8. Pallarès Barberà M,
    9. Barriocanal Lozano C

    . 2019. How urban green management is influencing passerine birds’ nesting in the Mediterranean: A case study in a Catalan city. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 41:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.012

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. McPherson EG,
    2. Kendall A,
    3. Albers S

    . 2015. Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide for different arboricultural practices in Los Angeles, CA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14(2):388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.04.004

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Nevada Department of Wildlife

    . 2020. Nevada Department of Wildlife 2019–2020. Licensed Wildlife Rehabilitators. Reno (NV, USA): Nevada Department of Wildlife. [Accessed 2021 April 12]. http://www.ndow.org/uploadedFiles/ndoworg/Content/Forms_and_Resources/2019%20-%202020%20Rehab(1).pdf
21. ↵
    1. Newbold T,
    2. Hudson LN,
    3. Hill SLL,
    4. Contu S,
    5. Lysenko I,
    6. Senior RA,
    7. Börger L,
    8. Bennett DJ,
    9. Choimes A,
    10. Collen B,
    11. Day J,
    12. De Palma A,
    13. Díaz S,
    14. Echeverria-Londoño S,
    15. Edgar MJ,
    16. Feldman A,
    17. Garon M,
    18. Harrison MLK,
    19. Alhusseini T,
    20. Ingram DJ,
    21. Itescu Y,
    22. Kattge J,
    23. Kemp V,
    24. Kirkpatrick L,
    25. Kleyer M,
    26. Pinto Correia DL,
    27. Martin CD,
    28. Meiri S,
    29. Novosolov M,
    30. Pan Y,
    31. Phillips HRP,
    32. Purves DW,
    33. Robinson A,
    34. Simpson J,
    35. Tuck SL,
    36. Weiher E,
    37. White HJ,
    38. Ewers RM,
    39. Mace GM,
    40. Scharlemann JPW,
    41. Purvis A

    . 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. 520:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14324

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. ↵
    1. Nicolai M

    . 2015 June 5. ‘It was a catastrophe’: Tree with birds’ nests torn down in Newport Beach, angering neighbors. The Orange County Register. Newport Beach (CA, USA): MediaNews Group, Inc. [Accessed 2021 April 12]. https://www.ocregister.com/2015/06/05/it-was-a-catastrophe-tree-with-birds-nests-torn-down-in-newport-beach-angering-neighbors
23. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Greenfield EJ

    . 2020. The increase of impervious cover and decrease of tree cover within urban areas globally (2012–2017). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 49:126638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126638
24. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Stevens JC,
    3. Sisinni SM,
    4. Luley CJ

    . 2002. Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture. 28(3):113–122.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. O’Herrin K,
    2. Wiseman PE,
    3. Day SD,
    4. Hauer RJ

    . 2020. Professional identity of urban foresters in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 54:126741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126741
26. ↵
    1. Pena JC de C,
    2. Martello F,
    3. Ribeiro MC,
    4. Armitage RA,
    5. Young RJ,
    6. Rodrigues M

    . 2017. Street trees reduce the negative effects of urbanization on birds. PLoS ONE. 12(3):e0174484. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174484

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Angelici F,
    2. Rossi L

    1. Perry G,
    2. Boal C,
    3. Verble R,
    4. Wallace M

    . 2020. “Good” and “bad” urban wildlife. In: Angelici F, Rossi L, editors. Problematic wildlife II: New conservation and management challenges in the human-wildlife interactions. Cham (Switzerland): Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42335-3_5
28. ↵
    1. Roman LA,
    2. Conway TM,
    3. Eisenman TS,
    4. Koeser AK,
    5. Barona CO,
    6. Locke DH,
    7. Jenerette GD,
    8. Östberg J,
    9. Vogt J

    . 2020. Beyond “trees are good”: Disservices, management costs, and tradeoffs in urban forestry. Ambio. 50:615–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01396-8

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Rosenberg KV,
    2. Dokter AM,
    3. Blancher PJ,
    4. Sauer JR,
    5. Smith AC,
    6. Smith PA,
    7. Stanton JC,
    8. Panjabi A,
    9. Helft L,
    10. Parr M,
    11. Marra PP

    . 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science. 366(6461):120–124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1313

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
30. ↵
    1. Roy S,
    2. Byrne J,
    3. Pickering C

    . 2012. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 11(4):351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Seto KC,
    2. Güneralp B,
    3. Hutyra LR

    . 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(40):16083–16088. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
32. ↵
    1. Shannon G,
    2. McKenna MF,
    3. Angeloni LM,
    4. Crooks KR,
    5. Fristrup KM,
    6. Brown E,
    7. Warner KA,
    8. Nelson MD,
    9. White C,
    10. Briggs J,
    11. McFarland S,
    12. Wittemyer G

    . 2016. A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biological Reviews. 91(4):982–1005. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12207

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
33. ↵
    1. Silvera Seamans G

    . 2013. Mainstreaming the environmental benefits of street trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 12(1):2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.08.004

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Strohbach MW,
    2. Arnold E,
    3. Haase D

    . 2012. The carbon footprint of urban green space—A life cycle approach. Landscape and Urban Planning. 104(2):220–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.013

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Strohbach MW,
    2. Lerman SB,
    3. Warren PS

    . 2013. Are small greening areas enhancing bird diversity? Insights from community-driven greening projects in Boston. Landscape and Urban Planning. 114:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.007

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Threlfall CG,
    2. Mata L,
    3. Mackie JA,
    4. Hahs AK,
    5. Stork NE,
    6. Williams NSG,
    7. Livesley SJ

    . 2017. Increasing biodiversity in urban green spaces through simple vegetation interventions. Journal of Applied Ecology. 54(6):1874–1883. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12876

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Vogt J

    . 2018. “Ships that pass in the night”: Does scholarship on the social benefits of urban greening have a disciplinary crosstalk problem? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 32:195–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.03.010

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Vogt J,
    2. Fischer BC,
    3. Hauer RJ

    . 2016. Urban forestry and arboriculture as interdisciplinary environmental science: Importance and incorporation of other disciplines. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. 6(2):371–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0309-x

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Wildlife Dangerous Tree Committee of British Columbia

    . 2019. Wildlife/dangerous trees assessor’s course workbook: Parks and recreation sites course module. British Columbia (Canada): Wildlife Dangerous Tree Committee of British Columbia. 124 p. [Updated 2019 January; Accessed 2021 April 12]. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/plants-animals-and-ecosystems/conservation-habitat-management/wildlife-conservation/wildlife-tree-committee/parks_wdtac_handbook-revjan2019.pdf
40. ↵
    1. Wood EM,
    2. Esaian S

    . 2020. The importance of street trees to urban avifauna. Ecological Applications. 30(7):e02149. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2149

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Young RF

    . 2010. Managing municipal green space for ecosystem services. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 9(4):313–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.007

    OpenUrl