Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Evaluation of Inducing Agents and Synthetic Fungicide Combinations for Management of Foliar Pathogens of Urban Trees

Glynn C. Percival and Sean Graham
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 2021, 47 (2) 85-95; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2021.008
Glynn C. Percival
Glynn C. Percival (corresponding author), Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, Reading University, Cut Bush Lane East, Shinfield, Reading, UK,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Sean Graham
Sean Graham, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, Reading University, Cut Bush Lane East, Shinfield, Reading, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Agostini JP,
    2. Bushong PM,
    3. Timmer LW
    . 2003. Greenhouse evaluation of products that induce host resistance for control of scab, melanose, and Alternaria brown spot of citrus. Plant Disease. 87(1):69-74. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.69
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Bécot S,
    2. Pajot E,
    3. Le Corre D,
    4. Monot C,
    5. Silue D
    . 2000. Phytogard (K2HPO3) induces localized resistance in cauliflower to downy mildew of crucifers. Crop Protection. 19(6):417-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00034-X
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Bevan J,
    2. Knight S
    . 2001. Organic apple production: Pest and disease management. 1st Ed. Kenilworth (UK): HDRA, Emmerson Press. 36 p.
  4. ↵
    1. British Crop Protection Council (BCPC)
    . 2019. The UK pesticide guide. Oxford (UK): CABI Publishing. 800 p.
  5. ↵
    1. Burnett AL,
    2. Lalancette N,
    3. McFarland KA
    . 2010. Effect of QoI fungicides on colonization and sporulation of Monilinia fructicola on peach fruit and blossom blight cankers. Plant Disease. 94:1000-1008. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-8-1000
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Butt DJ,
    2. Swait AAJ,
    3. Robinson JD
    . 1990. Evaluation of fungicides against apple powdery mildew and scab. Tests of agrochemicals and cultivars, 11. Wellesbourne (UK): Association of Applied Biologists.
  7. ↵
    1. Carisse O,
    2. Dewdney M
    . 2002. A review of non-fungicidal approaches for the control of apple scab. Phytoprotection. 83(1):1-29. https://doi.org/10.7202/706226ar
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Cole DL
    . 1999. The efficacy of acibenzolar-S-methyl, an inducer of systemic acquired resistance against bacterial and fungal diseases of tobacco. Crop Protection. 18:267-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(99)00026-5
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Eyles A,
    2. Bonello P,
    3. Ganley R,
    4. Mohammed C
    . 2010. Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees. New Phytologist. 185(4):893-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03127.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Fobert PR,
    2. Després C
    . 2005. Redox control of systemic acquired resistance. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 8(4):378-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Gent DH,
    2. Schwartz HF
    . 2005. Management of Xanthomonas leaf blight of onion with a plant activator, biological control agents, and copper bactericides. Plant Disease. 89:631-639. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-89-0631
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Gozzo F
    . 2003. Systemic acquired resistance in crop protection: From nature to a chemical approach. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 51(16):4487-4503. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf030025s
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Hailey LE,
    2. Percival GC
    . 2014. Comparative assessment of phosphites formulations for apple scab (Venturia inaequalis) control. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 40(4):237-243.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Hantsch L,
    2. Braun U,
    3. Haase J,
    4. Purschke O,
    5. Scherer-Lorenzen M,
    6. Bruelheide H
    . 2014. No plant functional diversity effects on foliar fungal pathogens in experimental tree communities. Fungal Diversity. 66:139-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-013-0273-2
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Hantsch L,
    2. Braun U,
    3. Scherer-Lorenzen M,
    4. Bruelheide H
    . 2013. Species richness and species identity effects on occurrence of foliar fungal pathogens in a tree diversity experiment. Ecosphere. 47(7):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00103.1
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Hersh MH,
    2. Vilgalys R,
    3. Clark JS
    . 2012. Evaluating the impacts of multiple generalist fungal pathogens on temperate tree seedling survival. Ecology. 93(3):511-520. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0598.1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Hoel BO
    . 1998. Use of a hand-held chlorophyll meter in winter wheat: Evaluation of different measuring positions on the leaves. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. 48(4):222-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064719809362502
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Ilhan K,
    2. Arslan U,
    3. Karabulut OA
    . 2006. The effect of sodium bicarbonate alone or in combination with a reduced dose of tebuconazole on the control of apple scab. Crop Protection. 25(9):963-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2006.01.002
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Ishii H
    . 2006. Impact of fungicide resistance in plant pathogens on crop disease control and agricultural environment. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly: JARQ. 40(3):205-211. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.40.205
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Kariya K,
    2. Matsuzaki A,
    3. Machida H
    . 1982. Distribution of chlorophyll content in leaf blade of rice plant. Japanese Journal of Crop Science. 51(1):134-135. https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.51.134
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Krokene P,
    2. Nagy NE,
    3. Solheim H
    . 2008. Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: Anatomically based defense responses and increased resistance against fungal infection. Tree Physiology. 28(1):29-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/28.1.29
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. LaMondia JA
    . 2009. Efficacy of fungicides and a systemic acquired resistance activator (acibenzolar-S-methyl) against tobacco blue mould. Crop Protection. 28(1):72-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2008.08.017
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. LaMondia JA
    . 2015. Management of Calonectria pseudonaviculata in boxwood with fungicides and less susceptible host species and varieties. Plant Disease. 99(3):363-369. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-14-0217-RE
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. LaMondia JA,
    2. Horvath R
    . 2001. Evaluation of sprayers and spray coverage on Connecticut cigar wrapper tobacco. Tobacco Science. 45(45):1-5. https://doi.org/10.3381/0082-4623-45.1.21
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Leskovar DI,
    2. Kolenda K
    . 2002. Strobilurin plus acibenzolar-S-methyl controls white rust without inducing leaf chlorosis in spinach. Annals of Applied Biology. 140(2):171-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2002.tb00170.x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Lichtenthaler HK,
    2. Wellburn AR
    . 1983. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions. 11(5):591-593. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Lindqvist H,
    2. Asp H
    . 2002. Effects of lifting date and storage time on changes in carbohydrate content and photosynthetic efficiency in three deciduous species. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. 77(3):346-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2002.11511504
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Lonsdale D
    . 2001. Chapter 7: Prevention of hazards. In: Principles of tree hazard assessment and management. Norwich (UK): HMSO, The Stationery Office. p. 228-273.
  29. ↵
    1. Mangel E,
    2. Einig R,
    3. Hampp R
    . 2000. Carbohydrates in trees. Developments in Crop Science. 26:317-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-519X(00)80016-1
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Martínez-Trinidad T,
    2. Watson TW,
    3. Arnold MA,
    4. Lombardini L,
    5. Appel DN
    . 2009. Carbohydrate injections as a potential option to improve growth and vitality of live oaks. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 35(3):142-147.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Oliva J,
    2. Stenlid J,
    3. Martínez-Vilalta J
    . 2014. The effect of fungal pathogens on the water and carbon economy of trees: Implications for drought-induced mortality. New Phytologist. 203(4):1028-1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12857
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Pallardy S
    . 2008. Physiology of woody plants. 3rd Ed. Burlington (MA, USA): Academic Press, Elsevier. 464 p.
  33. ↵
    1. Percival GC
    . 2018. Evaluation of silicon fertilizers and a resistance inducing agent for control of apple and pear scab under field conditions. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 44(5):205-214.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Percival GC,
    2. Haynes I
    . 2008. The influence of systemic inducing resistance chemicals for the control of oak powdery mildew (Microsphaera alphitoides) applied as a therapeutic treatment. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 34(5):191-200.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Percival GC,
    2. Noviss K,
    3. Haynes I
    . 2009. Field evaluation of systemic inducing resistance chemicals at different growth stages for the control of apple (Venturia inaequalis) and pear (V. pirina) scab. Crop Protection. 28:629-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.03.010
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Perez L,
    2. Rodriguez F,
    3. Rodriguez ME,
    4. Roson C
    . 2003. Efficacy of acibenzolar-S-methyl, an inducer of systemic acquired resistance against tobacco blue mould caused by Peronospora hyoscyami f. sp. tabacina. Crop Protection. 22(2):405-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00198-9
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Pieterse CMJ,
    2. Zamioudis C,
    3. Berendsen RL,
    4. Weller DM,
    5. Van Wees SCM,
    6. Bakker PAHM
    . 2014. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 52:347-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Ritchie GA,
    2. Dunlop JR
    . 1980. Root growth potential: Its development and expression in forest tree seedlings. New Zealand Journal of Forest Science. 10(1):218-248.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Ryley R,
    2. Bhuiyan S,
    3. Herde D,
    4. Gordan B
    . 2003. Efficacy, timing and method of application of fungicides for management of sorghum ergot caused by Claviceps africana. Australasian Plant Pathology. 32:329-338. https://doi.org/10.1071/AP03034
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Spoel S,
    2. Dong X
    . 2012. How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nature Reviews Immunology. 12:89-100. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3141
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Struve DK
    . 1990. Root regeneration in transplanted deciduous nursery stock. HortScience. 25(3):266-270. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.25.3.266
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Swait AAJ,
    2. Butt DJ
    . 1990. Fungicides as antisporulants against apple powdery mildew and scab. Tests of agrochemicals and cultivars, 11. Wellesbourne (UK): Association of Applied Biologists.
  43. ↵
    1. Tubby KV,
    2. Webber JF
    . 2010. Pests and diseases threatening urban trees under a changing climate. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research. 83(4):451-459. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpq027
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Vallad GE,
    2. Goodman RM
    . 2004. Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Science. 44(6):1920-1934. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1920
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    1. Van Loon LC,
    2. Bart PJ,
    3. Huub G,
    4. Linthorst JM
    . 2002. Ethylene as a modulator of disease resistance in plants. Trends in Plant Science. 11(4):184-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.005
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Villalta ON,
    2. Washington WS,
    3. McGregor G
    . 2004. Susceptibility of European and Asian pears to pear scab. Plant Protection Quarterly. 19(1):2-4.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Walters DR
    . 2009. Are plants in the field already induced? Implications for practical disease control. Crop Protection. 28(6):459-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.01.009
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Walters DR,
    2. Ratsep J,
    3. Havis N
    . 2013. Controlling crop diseases using induced resistance: Challenges for the future. Journal of Experimental Botany. 64(5):1263-1280. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Walters D,
    2. Walsh D,
    3. Newton A,
    4. Lyon G
    . 2005. Induced resistance for plant disease control: Maximizing the efficacy of resistance elicitors. Phytopathology. 95(12):1368-1373. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-95-1368
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Witzell J,
    2. Martin JA
    . 2008. Phenolic metabolites in the resistance of northern forest trees to pathogens – Past experiences and future prospects. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 38(11):2711-2727. https://doi.org/10.1139/X08-112
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 47 (2)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 47, Issue 2
March 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Inducing Agents and Synthetic Fungicide Combinations for Management of Foliar Pathogens of Urban Trees
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Inducing Agents and Synthetic Fungicide Combinations for Management of Foliar Pathogens of Urban Trees
Glynn C. Percival, Sean Graham
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2021, 47 (2) 85-95; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2021.008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of Inducing Agents and Synthetic Fungicide Combinations for Management of Foliar Pathogens of Urban Trees
Glynn C. Percival, Sean Graham
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2021, 47 (2) 85-95; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2021.008
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • fungicides
  • Guignardia
  • Orchard Management
  • pathogen control
  • plant health care
  • Synergism
  • urban landscapes
  • Venturia

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire