Urban Resources Initiative: A University Model for Clinical Urban Forestry Education

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Andersen F,
   2. Konijnendijk CC,
   3. Randrup TB

   . 2002. Higher education on urban forestry in Europe: An overview. Forestry. 75(5):501-511. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/75.5.501

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Andersson E,
   2. Barthel S,
   3. Borgström S,
   4. Colding J,
   5. Elmqvist T,
   6. Folke C,
   7. Gren Å

   . 2014. Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: Stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. AMBIO. 43:445-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0506-y

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Andresen JW,
   2. Johnson C

   . 1982. Is urban forestry education ready for the future? Journal of Forestry. 80(10):658-659. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/80.10.658

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Andresen JW,
   2. Williams BM

   . 1975. Urban forestry education in North America. Journal of Forestry. 73:786-790. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/73.12.786

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Bachelard EP

   . 1994. Changes to forestry education. The Commonwealth Forestry Review. 73:94-96.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Barrows HS

   . 1994. Practice-based learning: Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield (IL, USA): Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
7. ↵
   1. Baumeister CF

   . 2014. Higher education in urban forestry in North America and Europe: Profiling skills and competencies for the labor market of today and tomorrow [M.F. thesis]. Vancouver (BC, Canada): University of British Columbia.
8. ↵
   1. Boone CG

   . 2008. Environmental justice as process and new avenues for research. Environmental Justice. 1:149-154. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2008.0530

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Boone CG,
   2. Fragkias M

   . 2012. Urbanization and sustainability: Linking urban ecology, environmental justice and global environmental change. New York (NY, USA): Springer Science & Business Media.
10. ↵
    1. Bragg DC,
    2. Tappe PA

    . 2015. The many values of field-based education in forestry. Journal of Forestry. 113:592-594. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-114

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Brandt L,
    2. Derby A,
    3. Fahey R,
    4. Scott L,
    5. Darling L,
    6. Swanston C

    . 2016. A framework for adapting urban forests to climate change. Environmental Science and Policy. 66:393-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.005

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Brown N

    . 2003. A critical review of forestry education. Bioscience Education. 1:1-9. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.2003.01010004

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Bullard SH

    . 2015. Forestry curricula for the 21st century—maintaining rigor, communicating relevance, building relationships. Journal of Forestry. 113:552-556. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.15-021

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Burch WR,
    2. Grove JM

    . 1993. People, trees and participation on the urban frontier. Unasylva, FAO. 44(173):19-27.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Burch WR,
    2. Machlis GE,
    3. Force JE

    . 2017. The structure and dynamics of human ecosystems: Toward a model for understanding and action. New Haven (CT, USA): Yale University Press.
16. ↵
    1. Carmichael CE,
    2. McDonough MH

    . 2019. Community stories: Explaining resistance to street-tree planting programs in Detroit, Michigan, USA. Society & Natural Resources. 32(5):588-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2018.1550229

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Cherry D,
    2. Shefner J

    . 2004. Addressing barriers to university-community collaboration. Journal of Community Practice. 12:219-233. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v12n03_13

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Chuang W,
    2. Boone CG,
    3. Locke DH,
    4. Grove JM,
    5. Whitmer A,
    6. Zhang S

    . 2017. Tree canopy change and neighborhood stability: A comparative analysis of Washington, DC and Baltimore, MD. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 27:363-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.03.030

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Colding J,
    2. Barthel S

    . 2013. The potential of ‘Urban Green Commons’ in the resilience building of cities. Ecological Economics. 86:156-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.016

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Coles RW,
    2. Bussey SC

    . 2000. Urban forest landscapes in the UK—progressing the social agenda. Landscape and Urban Planning. 52:181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00132-8

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Creswell JW

    . 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks (CA, USA): Sage Publications.
22. ↵
    1. Day S

    . 2018. Our Findings—Urban Forestry 2020. [Accessed 2019 Feb 19]. https://uf2020.frec.vt.edu/
23. ↵
    1. Deneke FJ

    . 1978. Urban forestry education. Journal of Forestry. 76(8):499-500. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/76.8.499

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Elmendorf W,
    2. Watson T,
    3. Lilly S

    . 2005. Arboriculture and urban forestry education in the United States: Results of an educators survey. Journal of Arboriculture. 31:138-149.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Escobedo FJ,
    2. Kroeger T,
    3. Wagner JE

    . 2011. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environmental Pollution. 159:2078-2087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.01.010

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Soloviy IP and
    2. Keeton WS

    1. Farley J,
    2. Zahvoyska L,
    3. Maksymiv L

    . 2009. Transdisciplinary paths towards sustainability: New approaches for integrating research, education and policy. In: Soloviy IP and Keeton WS, editors. Ecological economics and sustainable forest management: Developing a transdisciplinary approach for the Carpathian Mountains. Lviv (Ukraine): Ukrainian National Forestry University Press. p. 55-69.
27. ↵
    1. Flint CG,
    2. Luloff AE,
    3. Finley JC

    . 2008. Where is “Community” in community-based forestry? Society & Natural Resources. 21:526-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920701746954

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Forsyth A,
    2. Lu H,
    3. McGirr P

    . 2000. Service learning in an urban context: Implications for planning and design education. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research. 17:236-259.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Grimm NB,
    2. Grove JM,
    3. Pickett STA,
    4. Redman CL

    . 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience. 50(7):571-584. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0571:IATLTO]2.0.CO;2

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Hildebrandt RE,
    2. Floyd DW,
    3. Koslowsky KM

    . 1993. A review of urban forestry education in the 1990s. Journal of Forestry. 91(3):40-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/91.3.40

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Johnston M

    . 1985. Community forestry: A sociological approach to urban forestry. Arboricultural Journal. 9:121-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.1985.9746703

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Kellert LLL,
    2. Mehta JN,
    3. Ebbin SA

    . 2000. Community natural resource management: Promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society & Natural Resources. 13:705-715. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419200750035575

    OpenUrlCrossRef
33. ↵
    1. Konijnendijk CC

    . 2000. Adapting forestry to urban demands—role of communication in urban forestry in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning. 52(2-3): 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00125-0

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Konijnendijk CC,
    2. Nilsson K,
    3. Randrup TB,
    4. Schipperijn J

    . 2005. Urban forests and trees. Berlin (Germany): Springer.
35. ↵
    1. Krasny M,
    2. Tidball K,
    3. Sriskandarajah N

    . 2009. Education and resilience: Social and situated learning among university and secondary students. Ecology and Society. 14(2):38. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03032-140238

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Krasny ME,
    2. Tidball KG

    . 2012. Civic ecology: A pathway for earth stewardship in cities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 10:267-273. https://doi.org/10.1890/110230

    OpenUrlCrossRef
37. ↵
    1. Kuehler E,
    2. Hathaway J,
    3. Tirpak A

    . 2017. Quantifying the benefits of urban forest systems as a component of the green infrastructure stormwater treatment network. Ecohydrology. 10(3):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1813

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Kuh GD

    . 2009. What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development. 50:683-706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Landry SM,
    2. Chakraborty J

    . 2009. Street trees and equity: Evaluating the spatial distribution of an urban amenity. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 41(11):2651-2670. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41236

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Machlis GE,
    2. Force JE,
    3. Burch WR

    . 1997. The human ecosystem Part I: The human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management. Society & Natural Resources. 10:347-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929709381034

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. McPherson G,
    2. Simpson JR,
    3. Peper PJ,
    4. Maco SE,
    5. Xiao Q

    . 2005. Municipal forest benefits and costs in five US cities. Journal of Forestry. 103(8):411-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/103.8.411

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
42. ↵
    1. Miller RW

    . 1994. Urban forestry education—traditions and possibilities. Journal of Forestry. 92(10):26-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/92.10.26

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Nesbitt L,
    2. Meitnet MJ,
    3. Sheppard SRJ,
    4. Girling C

    . 2018. The dimensions of urban green equity: A framework for analysis. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 34:240-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.07.009

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Newman P,
    2. Bruyere BL,
    3. Beh A

    . 2007. Service-learning and natural resource leadership. Journal of Experiential Education. 30:54-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382590703000105

    OpenUrlCrossRef
45. ↵
    1. O’Neil-Dunne J,
    2. Pelletier K

    . 2009. A report on the city of New Haven’s existing and possible urban tree canopy. [Accessed 2020 Jan 23]. https://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/utc/reports/UTC_Report_NewHaven.pdf
46. ↵
    1. Pickett STA,
    2. Cadenasso ML,
    3. Childers DL,
    4. Mcdonnell MJ,
    5. Zhou W

    . 2016. Evolution and future of urban ecological science: Ecology in, of, and for the city. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability. 2(7):12-29. http://doi.org/10.1002/ehs2.1229

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Pickett STA,
    2. Cadenasso ML,
    3. Grove JM,
    4. Nilon CH,
    5. Pouyat RV,
    6. Costanza R

    . 2001. Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 32:127-157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
48. ↵
    1. Pratt Center for Community Development

    . 2019. Our approach. [Accessed 2020 Jan 24]. https://www.prattcenter.net/our-approach
49. ↵
    1. Vreese R

    1. Randrup TB,
    2. Konijnendijk CC

    . 2004. Higher education of urban foresters in Europe: Status and prospects. In: Vreese R, editor. Proceedings of the Sixth IUFRO European Forum on Urban Forestry. 2003 May 21-23; Arnhem (The Netherlands): University of Professional Education Larenstein. p. 23-32.
50. ↵
    1. Rosenzweig C,
    2. Solecki W,
    3. Parshall L,
    4. Gaffin S,
    5. Lynn B,
    6. Goldberg R,
    7. Cox J,
    8. Hodges S

    . 2010. Mitigating New York City’s heat island with urban forestry, living roofs and light surfaces. A Report to the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority. New York (NY, USA).
51. ↵
    1. Roy S,
    2. Byrne J,
    3. Pickering C

    . 2012. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 11(4):351-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.006

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Ryan RL

    . 2015. The transformative power of engaging in urban greening projects. Cities and the Environment. 8(1):6.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Sample VA,
    2. Bixler RP,
    3. Mcdonough MH,
    4. Bullard SH,
    5. Snieckus MM

    . 2015. The promise and performance of forestry education in the United States. Journal of Forestry. 113:528-537. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-122

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Schmidt HG

    . 1983. Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education. 17:11-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1983.tb01086.x

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
55. ↵
    1. Schusler TM,
    2. Decker DJ,
    3. Pfeffer MJ

    . 2003. Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources. 16:309-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920390178874

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
56. ↵
    1. Southern University A & M

    . 2019. Urban forestry and natural resources. [Accessed 2019 Jan 29]. http://www.subr.edu/assets/subr/UrbanForestry/SU-Urban-Forestry-Program-Brouchure.pdf
57. ↵
    1. Svendsen ES,
    2. Campbell LK

    . 2008. Urban ecological stewardship: Understanding the structure, function and management. Cities and the Environment. 1(1):1-32. https://doi.org/10.15365/cate.1142008

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Taylor DE,
    2. Paul S,
    3. McCoy E

    . 2019. Diversity, equity, and inclusion and the salience of publicly disclosing demographic data in American environmental nonprofits. Sustainability. 11(19): 5491. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195491

    OpenUrl
59. ↵
    1. Taylor DE,
    2. Price K,
    3. McCoy E

    . 2018. Diversity pathways: Broadening participation in environmental organizations. A technical report from the School for the Environment and Natural Resources, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor (MI, USA).
60. ↵
    1. Tidball K,
    2. Krasny M

    . 2010. Urban environmental education from a social-ecological perspective: Conceptual framework for civic ecology education. Cities and the Environment. 3(1):1-20. https://doi.org/10.15365/cate.31112010

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
61. ↵
    1. University of Wisconsin

    . 2019. Internship program | College of Natural Resources. [Accessed 2019 Jan 29]. https://www.uwsp.edu/cnr/Internships/Pages/GeneralInformation.aspx
62. ↵
    1. Urban Resources Initiative: 20 Years of Training Yale Students to Work in the Urban Environment

    . 2009. Produced by Bill Finnegan, Tamarack Media.
63. ↵
    1. Urban Resources Initiative | About

    . 2017. [Accessed 2017 Oct 9]. http://uri.yale.edu/about
64. ↵
    1. Virginia Tech

    . 2019. Urban forestry at Virginia Tech | Work with us! [Accessed 2019 Jan 29]. https://www.urbanforestry.frec.vt.edu/work.shtml
65. ↵
    1. Vogt J,
    2. Fischer BC,
    3. Hauer RJ

    . 2016. Urban forestry and arboriculture as interdisciplinary environmental science: Importance and incorporation of other disciplines. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences. (6):371-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0309-x
66. ↵
    1. Walsh D

    . 2013. Green jobs for ex-offenders: The Urban Resource Initiative’s “GreenSkills” program. Cities and the Environment. 6(1).
67. ↵
    1. Williams M

    . 1975. Urban forestry education in North America. Journal of Forestry. 73(12):786-790. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/73.12.786

    OpenUrl