Ecosystem Service-Based Sensitivity Analyses of i-Tree Eco

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Lal R,
   2. Augustin B

   1. Aguaron E,
   2. McPherson EG

   . 2012. Comparison of methods for estimating carbon dioxide storage by Sacramento’s urban forest. In: Lal R, Augustin B, editors. Carbon sequestration in urban ecosystems. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer.
2. ↵
   1. Bernacchi CJ,
   2. Bagley JE,
   3. Serbin SP,
   4. Ruiz-Vera UM,
   5. Rosenthal DM,
   6. Vanloocke A

   . 2013. Modelling C 3 photosynthesis from the chloroplast to the ecosystem. Plant, Cell and Environment. 36(9):1641-1657.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bonan G

   . 2015. Ecological climatology: concepts and applications. New York (NY, USA): Cambridge University Press. 617 p.
4. ↵
   1. Bonan GB

   . 2016. Forests, climate, and public policy: a 500-year interdisciplinary odyssey. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 47:97-121.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Breuer L,
   2. Eckhardt K,
   3. Frede HG

   . 2003. Plant parameter values for models in temperate climates. Ecological Modelling. 169(2-3):237-293.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Calfapietra C,
   2. Fares S,
   3. Manes F,
   4. Morani A,
   5. Sgrigna G,
   6. Loreto F

   . 2013. Role of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC) emitted by urban trees on ozone concentration in cities: a review. Environmental Pollution. 183:71-80.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Campolongo F,
   2. Cariboni J,
   3. Saltelli A

   . 2007. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environmental Modelling & Software. 22(10):1509-1518.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Celik A,
   2. Makkawi A,
   3. Muneer T

   . 2010. Critical evaluation of wind speed frequency distribution functions. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy. 2(1):013102.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Chapin III F,
   2. Matson P,
   3. Vitousek P

   . 2011. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. New York (NY, USA): Springer-Verlag. p. 139.
10. ↵
    1. Duh JD,
    2. Shandas V,
    3. Chang H,
    4. George LA

    . 2008. Rates of urbanisation and the resiliency of air and water quality. Science of the Total Environment. 400(1):238-256.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    1. Guenther A

    . 1997. Seasonal and spatial variations in natural volatile organic compound emissions. Ecological applications. 7(1):34-45.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Guenther A,
    2. Hewitt CN,
    3. Erickson D,
    4. Fall R,
    5. Geron C,
    6. Graedel T,
    7. Harley P,
    8. Klinger L,
    9. Lerdau M,
    10. McKay W

    . 1995. A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 100(D5):8873-8892.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Helton JC,
    2. Davis FJ

    . 2003. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 81(1):23-69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Hirabayashi S,
    2. Kroll CN,
    3. Nowak DJ

    . 2011. Component-based development and sensitivity analyses of an air pollutant dry deposition model. Environmental Modelling & Software. 26(6):804-816.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Hirabayashi S,
    2. Kroll CN,
    3. Nowak DJ

    . 2015. i-Tree Eco Dry Deposition Model Descriptions. [Accessed 2019 July]. http://www.itreetools.org/eco/resources/iTree_Eco_Dry_Deposition_Model_Descriptions.pdf
16. ↵
    1. Iman RL,
    2. Conover WJ

    . 1982. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. 11(3):311-334.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Jones HG

    . 2013. Plants and microclimate: a quantitative approach to environmental plant physiology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. 456 p.
18. ↵
    1. Jucker T,
    2. Caspersen J,
    3. Chave J,
    4. Antin C,
    5. Barbier N,
    6. Bongers F,
    7. Dalponte M,
    8. Ewijk KY,
    9. Forrester DI,
    10. Haeni M

    . 2017. Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes. Global Change Biology. 23(1):177-190.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Lin J

    . 2020. Developing a composite indicator to prioritize tree planting and protection locations. Science of the Total Environment. 717:137269.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Lin J,
    2. Kroll CN,
    3. Nowak DJ,
    4. Greenfield EJ

    . 2019. A review of urban forest modeling: implications for management and future research. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 43:126366.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Marino S,
    2. Hogue IB,
    3. Ray CJ,
    4. Kirschner DE

    . 2008. A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 254(1): 178-196.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. McHale M,
    2. Burke I,
    3. Lefsky M,
    4. Peper P,
    5. McPherson E

    . 2009. Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees? Urban Ecosystems. 12(1):95-113.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. McPherson EG,
    2. Simpson JR,
    3. Xiao Q,
    4. Wu C

    . 2011. Million trees Los Angeles canopy cover and benefit assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning. 99(1):40-50.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. McPherson EG,
    2. van Doorn NS,
    3. Peper PJ

    . 2016. Urban tree database and allometric equations. Albany (CA, USA): US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-253. 86 p.
25. ↵
    1. McPherson EG,
    2. Xiao Q,
    3. Aguaron E

    . 2013. A new approach to quantify and map carbon stored, sequestered and emissions avoided by urban forests. Landscape and Urban Planning. 120:70-84.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Medlyn BE,
    2. Duursma RA,
    3. Eamus D,
    4. Ellsworth DS,
    5. Prentice IC,
    6. Barton CV,
    7. Crous KY,
    8. De Angelis P,
    9. Freeman M,
    10. Wingate L

    . 2011. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Global Change Biology. 17(6):2134-2144.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. Morani A,
    2. Nowak DJ,
    3. Hirabayashi S,
    4. Calfapietra C

    . 2011. How to select the best tree planting locations to enhance air pollution removal in the MillionTreesNYC initiative. Environmental Pollution. 159(5):1040-1047.

    OpenUrlPubMed
28. ↵
    1. National Climate Data Center (NCDC)

    . 2018. World’s Largest Archive of Climate Data: National Climate Data Center. Silver Spring (MD, USA): National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. [Accessed 2018 December]. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html
29. ↵
    1. McPherson EG,
    2. Nowak DJ,
    3. Rowntree RA

    1. Nowak DJ

    . 1994. Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago’s urban forest. In: McPherson EG, Nowak DJ, Rowntree RA, editors. Chicago’s urban forest ecosystem: results of the Chicago urban forest climate project. Newtown Square (PA, USA): US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. General Technical Report NE-186. p. 83-94.
30. ↵
    1. Hansen M,
    2. Burk T

    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Crane DE

    . 2000. The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: quantifying urban forest structure and functions. In: Hansen M, Burk T, editors. Proceedings: integrated tools for natural resources inventories in the 21st century. IUFRO Conference; 1998 August 16-20; Boise (ID, USA). St. Paul (MN, USA): US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station. General Technical Report NC-212. p. 714-720.
31. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Crane DE,
    3. Stevens JC

    . 2006. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 4(3):115-123.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
32. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Crane DE,
    3. Stevens JC,
    4. Ibarra M

    . 2002. Brooklyn’s urban forest. Newtown Square (PA, USA): Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. General Technical Report NE-290.
33. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Crane DE,
    3. Stevens JC,
    4. Hoehn RE,
    5. Walton JT,
    6. Bond J

    . 2008a. A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 34(6):347-358.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Greenfield EJ,
    3. Hoehn RE,
    4. Lapoint E

    . 2013. Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environmental Pollution. 178:229-236.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Nowak DJ,
    2. Walton JT,
    3. Stevens JC,
    4. Crane DE,
    5. Hoehn RE

    . 2008b. Effect of plot and sample size on timing and precision of urban forest assessments. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 34(6): 386-390.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Pace R,
    2. Biber P,
    3. Pretzsch H,
    4. Grote R

    . 2018. Modeling ecosystem services for park trees: sensitivity of i-Tree Eco simulations to light exposure and tree species classification. Forests. 9(2):89.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Poumanyvong P,
    2. Kaneko S

    . 2010. Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO₂ emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecological Economics. 70(2):434-444.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Saltelli A,
    2. Annoni P,
    3. Azzini I,
    4. Campolongo F,
    5. Ratto M,
    6. Tarantola S

    . 2010. Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index. Computer Physics Communications. 181(2):259-270.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
39. ↵
    1. Saltelli A,
    2. Ratto M,
    3. Andres T,
    4. Campolongo F,
    5. Cariboni J,
    6. Gatelli D,
    7. Saisana M,
    8. Tarantola S

    . 2008. Global sensitivity analysis: the primer. Chichester, West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd. p. 110.
40. ↵
    1. Saltelli A,
    2. Tarantola S,
    3. Campolongo F,
    4. Ratto M

    . 2004. Sensitivity analysis in practice: a guide to assessing scientific models. Chichester, West Sussex (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd. p. 49.
41. ↵
    1. Selmi W,
    2. Weber C,
    3. Rivière E,
    4. Blond N,
    5. Mehdi L,
    6. Nowak D

    . 2016. Air pollution removal by trees in public green spaces in Strasbourg city, France. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 17:192-201.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Sharkey TD,
    2. Holland EA,
    3. Mooney HA

    . 1991. Trace gas emissions by plants. New York (NY, USA): Academic Press.
43. ↵
    1. Steffens JT,
    2. Wang YJ,
    3. Zhang KM

    . 2012. Exploration of effects of a vegetation barrier on particle size distributions in a near-road environment. Atmospheric Environment. 50:120-128.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Van der Zande D,
    2. Mereu S,
    3. Nadezhdina N,
    4. Cermak J,
    5. Muys B,
    6. Coppin P,
    7. Manes F

    . 2009. 3D upscaling of transpiration from leaf to tree using ground-based LiDAR: application on a Mediterranean Holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) tree. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 149(10):1573-1583.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Van Griensven A,
    2. Meixner T,
    3. Grunwald S,
    4. Bishop T,
    5. Diluzio M,
    6. Srinivasan R

    . 2006. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. Journal of Hydrology. 324(1-4):10-23.

    OpenUrlCrossRefGeoRefWeb of Science
46. ↵
    1. Wasserman L

    . 2013. All of statistics: a concise course in statistical inference. Heidelberg (Germany): Springer Science & Business Media. p. 293.
47. ↵
    1. Will RE,
    2. Wilson SM,
    3. Zou CB,
    4. Hennessey TC

    . 2013. Increased vapor pressure deficit due to higher temperature leads to greater transpiration and faster mortality during drought for tree seedlings common to the forest–grassland ecotone. New Phytologist. 200(2):366-374.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
48. ↵
    1. Yang J,
    2. McBride J,
    3. Zhou J,
    4. Sun Z

    . 2005. The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 3(2):65-78.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. ↵
    1. Yao AY

    . 1974. A statistical model for the surface relative humidity. Journal of Applied Meteorology. 13(1):17-21.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Yu MH,
    2. Ding GD,
    3. Gao GL,
    4. Sun BP,
    5. Zhao YY,
    6. Wan L,
    7. Wang DY,
    8. Gui ZY

    . 2015. How the plant temperature links to the air temperature in the desert plant Artemisia ordosica. PloS One. 10(8).