Urban Trees and Environmental Variables: Relationships in a City of Central Chile

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Bealey WJ,
   2. McDonald AG,
   3. Nemitz R,
   4. Donovan R,
   5. Dragosits U,
   6. Duffy T,
   7. Fowler D

   . 2007. Estimating the reduction of urban PM10 concentrations by trees within an environmental information system for planners. Environmental Managements. 85:44-58.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional (BCN, CL)

   . 2013. Reportes Estadísticos Distritales y Comunales 2013. [Accessed 2014 Jan 10]. http://reportescomunales.bcn.cl
3. ↵
   1. Bowler D,
   2. Buyung-Ali L,
   3. Knight TM,
   4. Pullin AS

   . 2010. Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning. 97:147-155.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Calquín F,
   2. Ponce-Donoso M,
   3. Vallejos-Barra O,
   4. Plaza E

   . 2019. Influence of urban trees on noise levels in a central Chilean city. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. 51(1):41-53.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Colunga ML,
   2. Cambrón-Sandoval VH,
   3. Suzán-Azpiri H,
   4. Guevara-Escobar A,
   5. Luna-Soria H

   . 2015. The role of urban vegetation in temperature and heat island effects in Querétaro city, México. Atmósfera. 28:205-218.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Wenger K

   1. Cordell H,
   2. Anderson L,
   3. Berisford C,
   4. Berisfrod Y,
   5. Biles L,
   6. Black P,
   7. Degraaf R,
   8. Deneke F,
   9. Dewers R,
   10. Gallaher J,
   11. Grey G,
   12. Ham D,
   13. Herrington L,
   14. Kielbaso J,
   15. Moll G,
   16. Mulligan B

   . 1984. Urban Forestry, Section 16. In: Wenger K, editor. Forestry handbook. 2nd Edition. Washington (USA): Wiley Interscience. p. 887-983.
7. ↵
   1. Coronel AS,
   2. Feldman SR,
   3. Jozani E,
   4. Facundo K,
   5. Piacentini RD,
   6. Dubbeling M,
   7. Escobedo FJ

   . 2015. Effects of urban green areas on air temperature in a medium-sized Argentinian city. Environmental Science. 2:803-826.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. De Groot R,
   2. Wilson MA,
   3. Boumans RM

   . 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem function, goods and services. Ecological Economics. 41:393-408.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Delshammar T,
   2. Östberg J,
   3. Öxell C

   . 2015. Urban trees and ecosystem disservices—a pilot study using complaints records from three Swedish cities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 41:187-193.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Dirección General de Aguas (DGA), Ministerio de Obras Públicas (CL)

    . 2004. Diagnóstico y clasificación de los cursos y cuerpos de agua según objetivos de calidad. Cuenca del río Maule. 152 p.
11. ↵
    1. Dwyer JF,
    2. Nowak DJ,
    3. Noble MH

    . 2003. Sustaining urban forests. Journal of Arboriculture. 29:49-55.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Escobedo FJ,
    2. Nowak DJ,
    3. Wagner JE,
    4. de La Maza CL,
    5. Rodríguez M,
    6. Crane DE,
    7. Hernández J

    . 2006. The socioeconomics and management of Santiago de Chile’s public urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 4:105-114.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Escobedo FJ,
    2. Nowak DJ

    . 2009. Spatial heterogeneity and air pollution removal by an urban forest. Landscape and Urban Planning. 90:102-110.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Escobedo FJ,
    2. Kroeger T, and
    3. Wagner J

    . 2011. Urban forest and pollution: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environmental Pollution. 159:2078-2087.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Escobedo FJ,
    2. Adams D,
    3. Timilsina N

    . 2014. Urban forest structure effects on property value. Ecosystem Services. 12:209-217.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Fang C,
    2. Ling D

    . 2003. Investigation of the noise reduction provided by tree belts. Landscape and Urban Planning. 63:187-195.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
17. ↵
    1. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A,
    2. Öhrström E

    . 2007. Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning. 83:115-126.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Grant RH,
    2. Heisler GM,
    3. Gao W

    . 2002. Estimation of pedestrian level UV exposure under trees. Photochemistry and Photobiology. 75:369-376.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. ↵
    1. Haase D,
    2. Larondelle N,
    3. Andersson E,
    4. Artmann M,
    5. Borgström S,
    6. Breuste J,
    7. Gomez-Baggethum E,
    8. Gren A,
    9. Hamstead A,
    10. Hansen R,
    11. Kabish N,
    12. Kremer P,
    13. Langemeyer J,
    14. Lorance E,
    15. McPhearson T,
    16. Pauleit S,
    17. Qureshi S,
    18. Schwarz N,
    19. Voigt A,
    20. Wurster D,
    21. Elmqvist T

    . 2014. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio. 43:413-433.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Hamstead Z,
    2. Kremer P,
    3. Larondelle N,
    4. McPherson T

    . 2016. Classification of the heterogeneous structure of urban landscapes (STURLA) as an indicator of landscape function applied to surface temperature in New York City. Ecological Indicators. 70:574-585.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Hernández J

    . 2008. La situación del arbolado en Santiago. Revista de Urbanismo. 18:1-8.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Irga PJ,
    2. Burchett MD,
    3. Torpy FR

    . 2015. Does urban forestry have a quantitative effect on ambient air quality in an urban environment? Atmospheric Environment. 120:173-181.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Kaplan R

    . 1993. The role of nature in the context of the workplace. Landscape and Urban Planning. 26:193-201.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Konijnendijk C,
    2. Kjell N,
    3. Randrup T,
    4. Schipperijn L

    . 2005. Urban Forest and Trees. Amsterdam (Holland): Springer Verlag. 520 p.
25. ↵
    1. Kuo FE,
    2. Sullivan WC

    . 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: does vegetation reduce crime? Journal of Environment and Behavior. 33:343-367.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Ouyang Z

    . 2013. Relationship between land surface temperature and spatial pattern of greenspace: what are the effects of spatial resolution? Landscape and Urban Planning. 114:1-8.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Litschke T,
    2. Kuttler W

    . 2008. On the reduction of urban particle concentration by vegetation—a review. Meteorologische Zeitschrift. 17:229-240.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Liu X,
    2. Yu X,
    3. Zhang Z

    . 2015. PM2.5 Concentration differences between various forest types and its correlation with forest structure. Atmosphere. 6:1801-1815.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Lyytimäki J,
    2. Sipilä M

    . 2009. Hopping on one leg—the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 8:309-315.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. McDonald AG,
    2. Bealey WJ,
    3. Fowler D,
    4. Dragosits U,
    5. Skiba U,
    6. Smith RI,
    7. Donovan RG,
    8. Brett HE,
    9. Hewitt CN,
    10. Nemitz E

    . 2007. Quantifying the effect of urban tree planting on concentrations and depositions of PM10 in two UK conurbations. Atmospheric Environment. 41:8455-8467.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
31. ↵
    1. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente (MMA, CL)

    . 2011. Capítulo 1: Contaminación del aire. Informe del Estado del Medio Ambiente 2011: Riesgo para la Salud y Calidad de Vida de la Población. 47 p.
32. ↵
    1. Na HR,
    2. Heisler GM,
    3. Nowak DJ,
    4. Grant RH

    . 2014. Modelling of urban trees’ effects on reducing human exposure to UV radiation in Seoul, Korea. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 13:785-792.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Northrop RJ,
    2. Beck K,
    3. Irving R,
    4. Shawn M, and
    5. Andreu I

    . 2013. City of Tampa Urban Forest Management Plan. November 2013. City of Tampa, Florida. 64 p.
34. ↵
    1. Nowak D,
    2. Crane D,
    3. Stevens J

    . 2006. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 4:115-123.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
35. ↵
    1. Pataki DE,
    2. Carreiro MM,
    3. Cherrier J,
    4. Grulke NE,
    5. Jennings V,
    6. Pincetl S,
    7. Pouyat RV,
    8. Withlow TH,
    9. Zipperer WC

    . 2011. Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, green solution, and misconceptions. Frontier in Ecology and the Environment. 9:27-36.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Petralli M,
    2. Prokopp A,
    3. Morabito M,
    4. Bartolini G,
    5. Torrigiani T,
    6. Orlandini S

    . 2006. Ruolo delle aree verdi nella mitigazione dell’ isola di calore urbana: uno studio nella cittá di Firenze. Rivista Italiana di Agrometerologia. 1:51-58.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Ponce-Donoso M,
    2. Vallejos-Barra O,
    3. Daniluk-Mosquera G

    . 2012. Comparación de fórmulas chilenas e internacionales para valorar el arbolado urbano. Bosque. 33:69-81.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Ponce-Donoso M,
    2. Vallejos-Barra O,
    3. Escobedo FJ

    . 2017. Appraisal of urban trees using twelve valuation formulas and two appraiser groups. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 43:72-82.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Posada M,
    2. Arroyave M,
    3. Fernández L

    . 2009. Influencia de la vegetación en los niveles de ruido urbano. Revista EIA. 12:79-89.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Préndez M,
    2. Carvajal V,
    3. Corada K,
    4. Morales L,
    5. Alarcón F,
    6. Peralta H

    . 2013. Biogenic volatile organic compounds from the urban forest of the Metropolitan Region, Chile. Environmental Pollution. 183:143-150.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Pudjiwati UR,
    2. Yanuwiyadi B,
    3. Sulistiono R,
    4. Suyadi

    . 2013. Estimation of noise reduction by different vegetation type as a noise barrier: a survey in highway along Waru-Sidoarjo in East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering and Science. 2:20-25.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Reyes J,
    2. Ponce-Donoso M,
    3. Vallejos-Barra O,
    4. Daniluk-Mosquera G,
    5. Coelho AP

    . 2018. Comparación de cuatro métodos de evaluación visual del riesgo de árboles urbanos. Colombia Forestal. 21:161-173.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Russo A,
    2. Escobedo FJ,
    3. Zerbe S

    . 2016. Quantifying the local-scale ecosystem services provided by urban treed streetscapes in Bolzano, Italy. AIMS Environmental Science. 3:58-76.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Samara TH,
    2. Tsitsoni TH

    . 2007. Road traffic noise reduction by vegetation in the ring road of a big city. Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmental Management, Engineering, Planning and Economics. June 24-28. Skiathos (Greece). p. 2591-2596.
45. ↵
    1. Scott KI,
    2. Simpson JR,
    3. McPherson RG

    . 1999. Effects of tree cover on parking lot microclimate and vehicle emissions. Journal of Arboriculture. 25:129-142.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Smargiassi A,
    2. Goldberg MS,
    3. Plante C,
    4. Fournier M,
    5. Baudouin Y,
    6. Kosatsky T

    . 2009. Variation of daily warm season mortality as a function of micro-urban heat islands. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 63:659-664.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
47. ↵
    1. Speak A,
    2. Escobedo FJ,
    3. Russo A,
    4. Zerbe S

    . 2018. Na ecosystem service-disservice ratio: using composite indicators to assess the net benefits of urban trees. Ecological Indicators. 95:544-553.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Tiwary A,
    2. Sinnett D,
    3. Peachey C,
    4. Chaladi Z,
    5. Vardoulakis S,
    6. Fletcher T,
    7. Leonardi G,
    8. Grundy C,
    9. Azapagic A,
    10. Hutchings R

    . 2009. An integrated tool to assess the role of new planting in PM10 capture and the human health benefits: a case study in London. Environmental Pollution. 157:2645-2653.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
49. ↵
    1. Ulrich R

    . 1984. View through a window may influence recovery. Science. 224:224-225.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Van Renterghem T,
    2. Attenborough K,
    3. Maennel M,
    4. Defrance J,
    5. Horoshenkov K,
    6. Kang J,
    7. Bashir I,
    8. Taherzadeh S,
    9. Altreuther B,
    10. Khan A,
    11. Smyrnova Y,
    12. Yang H

    . 2013. Measured light vehicle noise reduction by hedges. Applied Acoustics. 78:19-27.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Vos PEJ,
    2. Maiheu B,
    3. Vankerkom J,
    4. Janssen S

    . 2013. Improving local air quality in cities: to tree or not to tree? Environmental Pollution. 183:113-122.

    OpenUrlPubMed
52. ↵
    1. Weng Q,
    2. Lu D,
    3. Schubring J

    . 2004. Estimation of land surface temperature-vegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies. Remote Sensing of Environment. 89:467-483.

    OpenUrlCrossRef