Abstract
Loam-over-compacted-clay and loam soil profiles were created in 10 cm × 10 cm × 25 cm containers. Containers were placed in trays of water to simulate poor subsoil drainage in the landscape. Four urban tolerant species, Acer negundo, Catalpa speciosa, Gleditsia triacanthos, Ulmus americana, and two less tolerant species, Quercus rubra and Acer saccharum, were direct seeded in the containers. Soil volumetric water content and oxygen diffusion rate were monitored. At the conclusion of the study, length of fine roots (< 2 mm diameter) was measured throughout the soil profile. Oxygen decreased and moisture increased with soil depth. Fine root density of all species decreased with depth except Ulmus Americana. Catalpa speciosa was the only species showing a difference in root growth between soil types throughout the profile and had up to seven times the root density of other species at the surface and up to four times at the bottom. Root growth of most species seemed to be reduced more by high soil moisture and reduced aeration than soil texture and compaction.
INTRODUCTION
Urban soils can be very compacted, poorly drained, and challenging for tree roots. Conditions become less favorable for root growth with increasing depth (Craul 1992). The situation for tree root systems may be even more challenging when tap root pruning during nursery field propagation replaces the natural root flare with a deeper adventitious root flare at the end of the primary root that is pruned as a seedling (Hewitt and Watson 2009). Tolerance of species to difficult soil conditions varies. This contributes to their tolerance of poor soils on urban planting sites (Roloff et al. 2009). Greater knowledge of species ability to cope with difficult soil conditions is needed to determine how critical it is to position the adventitious root flare as shallowly as possible.
METHODS
Two soil profiles were created in 10 cm × 10 cm × 25 cm containers (Figure 1). Loam-over-compacted-clay profiles were created by adding clay in 100-ml lifts and compacted by dropping a 1.33 kg weight 16 times (four times at each edge); the corners were compacted with square wooden rods placed in the corners and hammered flat to a final height of 12.5 cm (+/− 0.5 cm). The upper half of the pot was loosely filled with sifted (2 mm screen) loam soil. The loam profiles were filled only with sifted loam soil.
Containers with the two soil profiles were placed in trays of water to simulate the poor drainage common in urban soils.
Containers were placed in trays to hold water to simulate poor subsoil drainage in the landscape (10 pots per tray, 14 trays). Each tray had holes drilled 2.5 cm from the bottom to maintain a consistent water level. Containers were also watered from the top.
Four species considered to be urban tolerant, Acer negundo, Catalpa speciosa, Gleditsia triacanthos, Ulmus americana, and two less tolerant species, Quercus rubra and Acer saccharum, were direct seeded in the containers. There were ten containers with loam profiles and ten containers with loam-over-compacted-clay profiles for each species.
An additional ten unplanted containers of each soil profile were used to monitor moisture levels and oxygen levels. Volumetric water content was measured through holes in the side of the container using a time domain reflectometer (TDR). Between measurements, holes were covered to prevent soil and moisture loss. In loam-over-compacted-clay profiles, measurements at 5 cm from the bottom were in clay, at 13 cm were just above the clay, and at 19 cm were in loam. Measurements taken in loam profiles were in the same positions.
Oxygen diffusion rate (ODR) was measured in the same ten unplanted containers of each soil profile. The ODR instrument is designed to average the measurements of ten probes taken at the same depth simultaneously, since conditions in the small pockets of soil around the 2 mm platinum needles can be so variable. It was not possible to get multiple sets of probes into each small container for measurements at different depths at the same time, so measurements were taken at 2.5 cm intervals as the probes were inserted progressively deeper. This could only be done once, and had to be done after the soil moisture measurements were complete, since it created holes for air and moisture to penetrate.
At the conclusion of the study, the soil and roots were removed from each container and divided into six equal parts from top to bottom. The soil was washed from the roots. Length of fine roots (< 2 mm diameter) was measured and converted to fine-root volume density with a WinRhizo system (Regent Instruments, Quebec, Canada).
One-way ANOVA (P ≤ 0.05) with separation of means by the Tukey HSD method was used to compare soil moisture, soil oxygen, and fine-root density across soil depths. T-tests were used to compare fine root density between the two soil profiles at the same depth (JMP®, Version 14. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989-2017).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Soil Conditions
The soil conditions created in the containers were similar to the compacted poorly drained soils that exist on many urban sites. Soil moisture was greater deeper in the container, as would be expected with them standing in water (Figure 2). Moisture increased consistently with soil depth in the loam profile. Moisture at the deepest position in the container was at, or near, the saturation point, where all pore spaces are filled with water. In the loam-over-compacted-clay profile, moisture was highest in the loam just above the compacted clay layer, also very near the saturation point, and likely due to poor infiltration into the compacted clay. The moisture level in the compacted clay was somewhat lower, but also at or near saturation, given the reduced pore space resulting from the compaction (Brady and Weil 1996).
Soil moisture increased with depth and above the loam/compacted clay soil interface.
ODR decreased with soil depth and increasing moisture levels in both soil profiles, as would be expected with fewer air-filled pores (Figure 3). The only significant difference between the two soil profiles was higher ODR in the loam soil at 7.5 to 12.5 cm depth. The lower ODR in the loam-over-compacted-clay profile at this level may have been due to a perched water table over the loam/compacted clay interface.
Oxygen in the soil atmosphere decreased with soil depth and increasing moisture levels.
Root Growth Response
Root growth generally decreased with soil depth (Figure 4). The increased moisture and reduced aeration conditions deeper in the container soil profiles are the factors most likely responsible. In the loam profile, there was a gradual reduction in root density with depth in Acer negundo, Catalpa speciosa, Gledetsia triacanthos, and Quercus rubra (Figure 4a-d). A similar trend was apparent in Acer saccharum (Figure 4e), but the very low level of root growth throughout the profile impeded the development of significant differences. Root growth of Ulmus Americana (Figure 4f) was consistent throughout the profile with no significant differences.
Root growth response to reduced soil oxygen and increased soil moisture deeper in the profile varied with species: (a) Acer negundo, (b) Catalpa speciosa, (c) Geldetsia triacanthos, (d) Quercus rubra, (e) Acer saccharum, (f) Ulmus Americana. Bars of the same color with different letters (x,y,z) are significantly different. Different letters (a,b) within the bars pairs indicate a significant difference.
In the loam-over-compacted-clay profile, there was a gradual reduction in root density with depth in Catalpa speciosa (Figure 4b) and Quercus rubra (Figure 4d), and an abrupt reduction at the loam/clay interface in Acer negundo (Figure 4a) and Gleditsia triacanthos (Figure 4c). Root density did seem to decrease with depth in Acer saccharum (Figure 4e) as well, but again the very low level of root growth impeded the development of significant differences. Ulmus americana (Figure 4f) root density was consistent throughout the profile, similar to the loam soil.
Catalpa speciosa (Figure 4b) was the only species showing a difference in root growth between soil types throughout the profile. The other species showed no difference at any level, with the one exception of the uppermost layer of Acer negundo (Figure 4f).
Root growth seemed to be reduced more by high soil moisture and reduced aeration than soil texture and compaction. Seasonally high moisture levels have been associated with reduced root development throughout the year (Watson 2012). Day et al. (2000) found that the underlying mechanism of tolerance of some species to compacted soil was that their roots are able to grow under conditions of high soil moisture when soil strength is reduced.
Implications for Urban Tree Growth and Longevity
Three of the four urban soil tolerant species showed a significant reduction in root growth with increased depth and reduced aeration. Though generally considered “tough” species, they do still seem to be affected by challenging urban soil conditions. Ulmus americana showed no decrease and may be the most truly urban soil tolerant.
The very low densities of Acer saccharum roots may be a characteristic of the species, since growth in the upper well-drained layers of the loam soil was also low. Slower growth may explain this species difficulty in adapting to urban soils.
Catalpa speciosa had up to seven times the root density of other species at the surface and up to four times at the bottom. This species may be a good prospect for more frequent use in urban landscapes, despite concerns over fruit production.
With perhaps the exception of Ulmus americana, all of the species tested showed reduced root growth deeper in the soil profile and would likely be affected if the adventitious root flare was too deep. It supports pruning the seedling taproot no more than 10 cm deep when preparing them for replanting in liner production.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors acknowledge the J. Frank Schmidt Family Charitable Foundation for support for this and other related projects
Footnotes
↵* Current affiliation
- © 2019, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.