Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Species Variation in Root Tolerance of Soil Compaction and Poor Drainage

Angela Hewitt, Frank Balestri, Marvin Lo and Gary Watson
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 2019, 45 (6) 254-258; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2019.021
Angela Hewitt
Angela Hewitt, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Balestri
Frank Balestri, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, U.S.A., College of DuPage, Glen Ellyn, Illinois, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Marvin Lo
Marvin Lo, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary Watson
Gary Watson (corresponding author), The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Listen

Loam-over-compacted-clay and loam soil profiles were created in 10 cm × 10 cm × 25 cm containers. Containers were placed in trays of water to simulate poor subsoil drainage in the landscape. Four urban tolerant species, Acer negundo, Catalpa speciosa, Gleditsia triacanthos, Ulmus americana, and two less tolerant species, Quercus rubra and Acer saccharum, were direct seeded in the containers. Soil volumetric water content and oxygen diffusion rate were monitored. At the conclusion of the study, length of fine roots (< 2 mm diameter) was measured throughout the soil profile. Oxygen decreased and moisture increased with soil depth. Fine root density of all species decreased with depth except Ulmus Americana. Catalpa speciosa was the only species showing a difference in root growth between soil types throughout the profile and had up to seven times the root density of other species at the surface and up to four times at the bottom. Root growth of most species seemed to be reduced more by high soil moisture and reduced aeration than soil texture and compaction.

Keywords
  • Root Growth
  • Oxygen
  • Waterlogging

INTRODUCTION

Listen

Urban soils can be very compacted, poorly drained, and challenging for tree roots. Conditions become less favorable for root growth with increasing depth (Craul 1992). The situation for tree root systems may be even more challenging when tap root pruning during nursery field propagation replaces the natural root flare with a deeper adventitious root flare at the end of the primary root that is pruned as a seedling (Hewitt and Watson 2009). Tolerance of species to difficult soil conditions varies. This contributes to their tolerance of poor soils on urban planting sites (Roloff et al. 2009). Greater knowledge of species ability to cope with difficult soil conditions is needed to determine how critical it is to position the adventitious root flare as shallowly as possible.

METHODS

Listen

Two soil profiles were created in 10 cm × 10 cm × 25 cm containers (Figure 1). Loam-over-compacted-clay profiles were created by adding clay in 100-ml lifts and compacted by dropping a 1.33 kg weight 16 times (four times at each edge); the corners were compacted with square wooden rods placed in the corners and hammered flat to a final height of 12.5 cm (+/− 0.5 cm). The upper half of the pot was loosely filled with sifted (2 mm screen) loam soil. The loam profiles were filled only with sifted loam soil.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Containers with the two soil profiles were placed in trays of water to simulate the poor drainage common in urban soils.

Containers were placed in trays to hold water to simulate poor subsoil drainage in the landscape (10 pots per tray, 14 trays). Each tray had holes drilled 2.5 cm from the bottom to maintain a consistent water level. Containers were also watered from the top.

Four species considered to be urban tolerant, Acer negundo, Catalpa speciosa, Gleditsia triacanthos, Ulmus americana, and two less tolerant species, Quercus rubra and Acer saccharum, were direct seeded in the containers. There were ten containers with loam profiles and ten containers with loam-over-compacted-clay profiles for each species.

An additional ten unplanted containers of each soil profile were used to monitor moisture levels and oxygen levels. Volumetric water content was measured through holes in the side of the container using a time domain reflectometer (TDR). Between measurements, holes were covered to prevent soil and moisture loss. In loam-over-compacted-clay profiles, measurements at 5 cm from the bottom were in clay, at 13 cm were just above the clay, and at 19 cm were in loam. Measurements taken in loam profiles were in the same positions.

Oxygen diffusion rate (ODR) was measured in the same ten unplanted containers of each soil profile. The ODR instrument is designed to average the measurements of ten probes taken at the same depth simultaneously, since conditions in the small pockets of soil around the 2 mm platinum needles can be so variable. It was not possible to get multiple sets of probes into each small container for measurements at different depths at the same time, so measurements were taken at 2.5 cm intervals as the probes were inserted progressively deeper. This could only be done once, and had to be done after the soil moisture measurements were complete, since it created holes for air and moisture to penetrate.

At the conclusion of the study, the soil and roots were removed from each container and divided into six equal parts from top to bottom. The soil was washed from the roots. Length of fine roots (< 2 mm diameter) was measured and converted to fine-root volume density with a WinRhizo system (Regent Instruments, Quebec, Canada).

One-way ANOVA (P ≤ 0.05) with separation of means by the Tukey HSD method was used to compare soil moisture, soil oxygen, and fine-root density across soil depths. T-tests were used to compare fine root density between the two soil profiles at the same depth (JMP®, Version 14. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989-2017).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Listen

Soil Conditions

The soil conditions created in the containers were similar to the compacted poorly drained soils that exist on many urban sites. Soil moisture was greater deeper in the container, as would be expected with them standing in water (Figure 2). Moisture increased consistently with soil depth in the loam profile. Moisture at the deepest position in the container was at, or near, the saturation point, where all pore spaces are filled with water. In the loam-over-compacted-clay profile, moisture was highest in the loam just above the compacted clay layer, also very near the saturation point, and likely due to poor infiltration into the compacted clay. The moisture level in the compacted clay was somewhat lower, but also at or near saturation, given the reduced pore space resulting from the compaction (Brady and Weil 1996).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Soil moisture increased with depth and above the loam/compacted clay soil interface.

ODR decreased with soil depth and increasing moisture levels in both soil profiles, as would be expected with fewer air-filled pores (Figure 3). The only significant difference between the two soil profiles was higher ODR in the loam soil at 7.5 to 12.5 cm depth. The lower ODR in the loam-over-compacted-clay profile at this level may have been due to a perched water table over the loam/compacted clay interface.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Oxygen in the soil atmosphere decreased with soil depth and increasing moisture levels.

Root Growth Response

Root growth generally decreased with soil depth (Figure 4). The increased moisture and reduced aeration conditions deeper in the container soil profiles are the factors most likely responsible. In the loam profile, there was a gradual reduction in root density with depth in Acer negundo, Catalpa speciosa, Gledetsia triacanthos, and Quercus rubra (Figure 4a-d). A similar trend was apparent in Acer saccharum (Figure 4e), but the very low level of root growth throughout the profile impeded the development of significant differences. Root growth of Ulmus Americana (Figure 4f) was consistent throughout the profile with no significant differences.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Root growth response to reduced soil oxygen and increased soil moisture deeper in the profile varied with species: (a) Acer negundo, (b) Catalpa speciosa, (c) Geldetsia triacanthos, (d) Quercus rubra, (e) Acer saccharum, (f) Ulmus Americana. Bars of the same color with different letters (x,y,z) are significantly different. Different letters (a,b) within the bars pairs indicate a significant difference.

In the loam-over-compacted-clay profile, there was a gradual reduction in root density with depth in Catalpa speciosa (Figure 4b) and Quercus rubra (Figure 4d), and an abrupt reduction at the loam/clay interface in Acer negundo (Figure 4a) and Gleditsia triacanthos (Figure 4c). Root density did seem to decrease with depth in Acer saccharum (Figure 4e) as well, but again the very low level of root growth impeded the development of significant differences. Ulmus americana (Figure 4f) root density was consistent throughout the profile, similar to the loam soil.

Catalpa speciosa (Figure 4b) was the only species showing a difference in root growth between soil types throughout the profile. The other species showed no difference at any level, with the one exception of the uppermost layer of Acer negundo (Figure 4f).

Root growth seemed to be reduced more by high soil moisture and reduced aeration than soil texture and compaction. Seasonally high moisture levels have been associated with reduced root development throughout the year (Watson 2012). Day et al. (2000) found that the underlying mechanism of tolerance of some species to compacted soil was that their roots are able to grow under conditions of high soil moisture when soil strength is reduced.

Implications for Urban Tree Growth and Longevity

Three of the four urban soil tolerant species showed a significant reduction in root growth with increased depth and reduced aeration. Though generally considered “tough” species, they do still seem to be affected by challenging urban soil conditions. Ulmus americana showed no decrease and may be the most truly urban soil tolerant.

The very low densities of Acer saccharum roots may be a characteristic of the species, since growth in the upper well-drained layers of the loam soil was also low. Slower growth may explain this species difficulty in adapting to urban soils.

Catalpa speciosa had up to seven times the root density of other species at the surface and up to four times at the bottom. This species may be a good prospect for more frequent use in urban landscapes, despite concerns over fruit production.

With perhaps the exception of Ulmus americana, all of the species tested showed reduced root growth deeper in the soil profile and would likely be affected if the adventitious root flare was too deep. It supports pruning the seedling taproot no more than 10 cm deep when preparing them for replanting in liner production.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Listen

The authors acknowledge the J. Frank Schmidt Family Charitable Foundation for support for this and other related projects

Footnotes

Listen
  • ↵* Current affiliation

  • © 2019, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

LITERATURE CITED

Listen
  1. ↵
    1. Brady, N.C., and
    2. R.R. Wiel
    . 1996. The Nature and Properties of Soils. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.A. 740 pp.
  2. ↵
    1. Craul, P.J.
    1992. Urban Soil in Landscape Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, New York, U.S.A. 396 pp.
  3. ↵
    1. Day, S.D.,
    2. J.R. Seiler, and
    3. N. Persaud
    . 2000. A comparison of root growth dynamics of silver maple and flowering dogwood in compacted soil at differing soil water contents. Tree Physiology 20 257-263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Hewitt, A., and
    2. G.W. Watson
    . 2009. Bare root liner production can alter tree root architecture. J. Environ. Hort. 27: 99-104.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Roloff, A.,
    2. S. Korn, and
    3. S. Gillner
    . 2009. The climate-speciesmatrix to select tree species for urban habitats considering climate change. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8: 295-308.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Watson, G.
    2012. Establishing a relationship between soil aeration and fine root development of seven tree species using the steel rod technique. Arboricultural Journal 29: 161-171
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 45 (6)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 45, Issue 6
November 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Species Variation in Root Tolerance of Soil Compaction and Poor Drainage
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Species Variation in Root Tolerance of Soil Compaction and Poor Drainage
Angela Hewitt, Frank Balestri, Marvin Lo, Gary Watson
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2019, 45 (6) 254-258; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2019.021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Species Variation in Root Tolerance of Soil Compaction and Poor Drainage
Angela Hewitt, Frank Balestri, Marvin Lo, Gary Watson
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2019, 45 (6) 254-258; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2019.021
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • root growth
  • Oxygen
  • Waterlogging

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire