Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Physiological Response of Ash Trees, Fraxinus spp., Infested with Emerald Ash Borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to Emamectin Benzoate (Tree-Äge) Stem Injections

Ryan P. Hanavan and Molly Heuss
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 2019, 45 (4) 132-138; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2019.012
Ryan P. Hanavan
Ryan P. Hanavan (corresponding author), USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area State & Private Forestry, 271 Mast Rd., Durham, NH 03824, U.S.A.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Molly Heuss
Molly Heuss, University of Vermont, Rubenstein School, Burlington, VT 05405, U.S.A.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Baker, N.R., and
    2. E. Rosenqvist
    . 2004. Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. Journal of Experimental Botany 55: 1607–1621.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Bauer, L.R.,
    2. R.A. Haack,
    3. D.R. Miller,
    4. T.R. Petrice, and
    5. H. Liu
    . 2004. Emerald ash borer life cycle. Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Port Huron, MI.
  3. ↵
    1. Björkman,
    2. O., and
    3. B. Demmig
    . 1987. Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170(4): 489–504.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Brodribb, T., and
    2. T.S. Field
    . 2000. Stem hydraulic supply is linked to leaf photosynthetic capacity: evidence from New Caledonian and Tasmanian rainforests. Plant Cell and Environment 23(12): 1381–1988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Brodribb, T.J.,
    2. T.S. Feild, and
    3. G.J. Jordan
    . 2007. Leaf Maximum Photosynthetic Rate and Venation Are Linked by Hydraulics. Plant Physiology 144(4): 1890–1898.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Cappaert, D.L.,
    2. D.G. McCullough, and
    3. T.M. Poland
    . 2005. Emerald ash borer life cycle: a reassessment. Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Romulus, MI.
  7. ↵
    1. Christen, D.,
    2. S. Schönmann,
    3. M. Jermini,
    4. R.J. Strasser, and
    5. G. Défago
    . 2007. Characterization and early detection of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) stress responses to esca disease by in situ chlorophyll fluorescence and comparison with drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 60(3): 504–514.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Doccola, J.J.,
    2. D.R. Smitley,
    3. T.W. Davis,
    4. J.J. Aiken, and
    5. P.M. Wild
    . 2011. Tree wound responses following systemic insecticide trunk injection treatments in green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh.) as determined by destructive autopsy. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 37(1): 6–12.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Dodds, K.J.,
    2. R.P. Hanavan, and
    3. T. Wansleben
    . 2016. Enhancing stand structure through snag creation in Northeastern U.S. forests: Using ethanol injections and bark beetle pheromones to artificially stress red maple and white pine. Forests 7(6): 124–139.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Flower, C.E.,
    2. J.E. Dalton,
    3. K.S. Knight,
    4. M. Brikha, and
    5. M.A. Gonzalez-Meler
    . 2015. To treat or not to treat: Diminishing effectiveness of emamectin benzoate tree injections in ash trees heavily infested by emerald ash borer. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14(4): 790–795.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Haack, R.A. et al.
    2002. The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Newsletter of the Michigan Entomological Society 47(3 & 4): 1–5.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Herms, D.A. et al.
    2009. Insecticide options for protecting ash trees from emerald ash borer. <www.emeraldashborer.info>
  13. ↵
    1. Johnstone, D.,
    2. M. Tausz,
    3. G. Moore, and
    4. M. Nicolas
    . 2014. Bark and leaf chlorophyll fluorescence are linked to wood structural changes in Eucalyptus saligna. AoB Plants, 6.
  14. ↵
    1. Kautsky, H., and
    2. A. Hirsch
    . 1931. Neue Versuche zur Kohlensäureassimilation. Naturwissenschaften, 19: 96-4.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Klooster, W. et al.
    2014. Ash (Fraxinus spp.) mortality, regeneration, and seed bank dynamics in mixed hardwood forests following invasion by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Biological Invasions 16(4): 859–873.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Knight, K.S.,
    2. J.P. Brown, and
    3. R.P. Long
    . 2013. Factors affecting the survival of ash (Fraxinus spp.) trees infested by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis). Biological Invasions 15: 371–383.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Kovacs, K.F. et al.
    2010. Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in US communities: 2009-2019. Ecological Economics 69(2010): 569–578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Maxwell, K., and
    2. G.N. Johnson
    . 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51(345): 659–668.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. McCullough, D.G., and
    2. R.J. Mercader
    . 2012. Evaluation of potential strategies to SLow Ash Mortality (SLAM) caused by emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis): SLAM in an urban forest. International Journal of Pest Management 58(1): 9–23.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. McCullough, D.G.,
    2. T.M. Poland.
    3. A.C. Anulewicz, and
    4. D. Cappaert
    . 2009. Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Attraction to Stressed or Baited Ash Trees. Environmental Entomology 38(6): 1668–1679.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Peñuelas,
    2. J., and
    3. S. Munné-Bosch
    . 2005. Isoprenoids: an evolutionary pool for photoprotection. Trends in Plant Science 10: 166–169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Poland, T.M., and
    2. D.G. McCullough
    . 2006. Emerald Ash Borer: Invasion of the Urban Forest and the Threat to North America’s Ash Resource. Journal of Forestry 104(3): 118–124.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Richardson, A.D.,
    2. S.P. Duigan, and
    3. G.P. Berlyn
    . 2002. An evaluation of noninvasive methods to estimate foliar chlorophyll content. New Phytologist 153(1): 185–194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. J. DeEll and
    2. P.A. Toivonen
    1. Rosenqvist, E., and
    2. O. van Kooten
    . 2003. Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A General Description and Nomenclature. In: J. DeEll and P.A. Toivonen (Editors), Practical Applications of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Plant Biology. Springer U.S., pp. 31–77.
  25. ↵
    1. SAS Institute, i.
    , 2004. SAS/STAT software: the GLM Procedure, release 8.0.
  26. ↵
    1. Smitley, D.R.,
    2. J. Doccola, and
    3. D.L. Cox
    . 2010a. Multiple-year protection of ash trees from emerald ash borer with a single trunk injection of emamectin benzoate, and single-year protection with an imidacloprid basal drench. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36(5): 206–211.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Smitley, D.R.,
    2. E.J. Rebek,
    3. R.N. Royalty,
    4. T.W. Davis, and
    5. K.F. Newhouse
    . 2010b. Protection of individual ash trees from emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) with basal soil applications of imidacloprid. Journal of Economic Entomology 103(1): 119–126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Smitley, D.R.,
    2. D.A. Herms, and
    3. T.W. Davis
    . 2015. Efficacy of Soil-Applied Neonicotinoid Insecticides for Long-Term Protection against Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 108(5): 2344–2353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Strasser, R.J., and
    2. A. Srivastava
    . 1995. Polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient in plants and cyanobacteria. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 61(1): 32–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. M. Yunus,
    2. U. Pathre and
    3. P. Mohanty
    1. Strasser, R.J.,
    2. A. Srivastava, and
    3. M. Tsimilli-Michael
    . 2000. The fluorescence transient as a tool to characterize and screen photosynthetic samples. In: M. Yunus, U. Pathre and P. Mohanty (Editors), Probing Photosynthesis: Mechanism, Regulation and Adaptation. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 445–483.
  31. ↵
    1. S. Dordrecht
    1. Strasser, R.J.,
    2. M. Tsimilli-Michael, and
    3. A. Srivastava
    . 2004. Analysis of the fluorescence transient. In: S. Dordrecht (Editor), Chlorophyll fluorescence: A Signature of Photosynthesis. Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration Series, pp. 321–362.
  32. ↵
    1. Tang, J.Y. et al.
    2006. The differential effects of herbivory by first and fourth instars of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on photosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany 57(3): 527–536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Urban, L., and
    2. L. Alphonsout
    . 2007. Girdling decreases photosynthetic electron fluxes and induces sustained photoprotection in mango leaves. Tree physiology 27(3): 345–352.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    1. Vannatta, A.R.,
    2. R.H. Hauer, and
    3. N.M. Schuettpelz
    . 2012. Economic Analysis of Emerald Ash Borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) Management Options. Journal of Economic Entomology 105(1): 196–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Zangerl, A.R. et al.
    2002. Impact of folivory on photosynthesis is greater than the sum of its holes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(2): 1088–1091.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Zhu, J.,
    2. N. Tremblay, and
    3. Y. Liang
    . 2012. Comparing SPAD and atLEAF values for chlorophyll assessment in crop species. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 92(4): 645–648.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 45 (4)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 45, Issue 4
July 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physiological Response of Ash Trees, Fraxinus spp., Infested with Emerald Ash Borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to Emamectin Benzoate (Tree-Äge) Stem Injections
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Physiological Response of Ash Trees, Fraxinus spp., Infested with Emerald Ash Borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to Emamectin Benzoate (Tree-Äge) Stem Injections
Ryan P. Hanavan, Molly Heuss
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2019, 45 (4) 132-138; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2019.012

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Physiological Response of Ash Trees, Fraxinus spp., Infested with Emerald Ash Borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), to Emamectin Benzoate (Tree-Äge) Stem Injections
Ryan P. Hanavan, Molly Heuss
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2019, 45 (4) 132-138; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2019.012
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Agrilus planipennis
  • ash
  • emerald ash borer
  • Chemical Control
  • chlorophyll fluorescence
  • Plant Fitness
  • plant vitality

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire