Numerical Analysis of Branch Mechanical Response to Loading

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI)

   . 2011. American National Standard for Tree Care Operations. Tree Risk Assessment a. Tree Structure Assessment. (A300, Part 9) Londonderry: Tree Care Industry Association.
2. ↵
   1. Brudi, E., and
   2. P. Van Wassenaer

   . 2001. Trees and Statics: Non-Destructive Failure Analysis. 1–17.
3. ↵
   1. Buza, A.K., and
   2. F. Divos

   . 2016. Root Stability Evaluation with Non-Destructive Techniques. ActaSilv Lign Hung 12(2):125–134.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Cannell, M.G.R., and
   2. J. Morgan

   . 1987. Young’s modulus of sections of living branches and tree trunks. Tree Physiology 3(4):355–364.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Coutand, C.,
   2. J. Mathias, and
   3. G. Jeronimidis

   . 2011. TWIG: A model to simulate the gravitropic response of a tree axis in the frame of elasticity and viscoelasticity, at intra-annual time scale. Journal of Theoretical Biology 273:115–129.

   OpenUrlPubMed
6. ↵
   1. Dahle, G.A., and
   2. J.C. Grabosky

   . 2010. Variation in modulus of elasticity (E) along Acer platanoides L. (Aceraceae) branches. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 9(3):227–233.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Detter, A.

   2012. Handout for presentation at ISA Tree Biomechanics Research Symposium Chicago 2012. Accessed 05/20/2017. <http://www.tree-consult.org/index.php/171/tree-statics-and-pulling-test-method.html>
8. ↵
   1. Dupuy, L.X.,
   2. T. Fourcaud,
   3. P. Lac, and
   4. A. Stokes

   . 2007. A Generic 3D Finite Element Model of Tree Anchorage Integrating Soil Mechanics and Real Root System Architecture. American Journal of Botany 94(9):1506–1514.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
9. ↵
   1. Ellison, M.

   2005. Quantified Tress Risk Assessment Used in the Management of Amenity Trees. Journal of Arboriculture 31(2):57–65.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Ennos, A.R., and
    2. A. Van Casteren

    . 2010. Transverse stresses and modes of failure in tree branches and other beams. Proc. R. Soc. B.. 277(1685):1253–1258.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
11. ↵
    1. Evans, L.S.,
    2. Z. Kahn-Jetter,
    3. J. Torres,
    4. M. Martinez, and
    5. P. Tarsia

    . 2008. Mechanical stresses of primary branches: a survey of 40 woody tree and shrub species. Trees 22(3):283–289.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Fourcaud, T.,
    2. F. Blaise,
    3. P. Lac,
    4. P. Castéra, and
    5. P. De Reffye

    . 2003. Numerical modelling of shape regulation and growth stresses in trees: II. Implementation in the AMAPpara software and simulation of tree growth. Trees- Structure and Function 17(1):31–39.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.

    2003. Branch-to-stem diameter ratio affects strength of attachment. Journal of Arboriculture 29(5):291–293.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.

    2015. Pruning Severity and Crown Position Influence Aspect Ratio Change. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 41(2):69–74.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. J.W. Miesbauer, and
    3. F.J. Masters

    . 2015. Structural pruning effects on stem and trunk strain in wind. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 41(1):3–10.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Guillon, T.,
    2. Y. Dumont, and
    3. T. Fourcaud

    . 2012. Conference paper: Simulation of tree branch motion. In: 2012 IEEE 4th International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications. Accessed 10/30/2015. <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260733544_Simulation_of_tree_branch_motion>
17. ↵
    1. Jungnikl, K.,
    2. J. Goebbels,
    3. I. Burgert, and
    4. P. Fratzl

    . 2009. The role of material properties for the mechanical adaptation at branch junctions. Trees 23(3):605–610.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Kane, B.

    2007. Branch strength of Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana var. ‘Bradford’). Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33(4):283–291.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Kane, B., and
    2. R. Farrell

    . 2008. Failure mode and prediction of the strength of branch attachments. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34(5):308–316.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. King, D., and
    2. O.L. Loucks

    . 1978. The theory of tree bole and branch form. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 15(2):141–165.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. Kretschmann, D.E.

    2010. Mechanical Properties of Wood. In: Wood Handbook—Wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. Forest Products Laboratory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. Madison. 508 p.
22. ↵
    1. Lavers, G.M.

    1983. The strength properties of timber. Building Research Establishment. HMSO, Watford. UK.
23. ↵
    1. Lundström,
    2. T.,
    3. M.J. Jonsson, and
    4. M. Kalberer

    . 2007. The root-soil system of Norway spruce subjected to turning moment: Resistance as a function of rotation. Plant and Soil 300(1–2):35–49.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Maly, P.

    2012. Distribuce vlastností dřeva lípy po poloměru kmene. M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology. Mendel University in Brno. Brno, Czech Republic. 72 pp.
25. ↵
    1. Mattheck, C., and
    2. H. Breloer

    . 1994. The Body Language of Trees. Research for Amenity Trees, number 4. TSO – The Stationery Office. Great Britain. 239 pp.
26. ↵
    1. Mattheck, C.

    2004. The Face of Failure in Nature and Engineering. Forzschungszentrum Karlsruhe. Karlsruhe. Germany. 196 pp.
27. ↵
    1. Mickovski, S.B.,
    2. A. Stokes, and
    3. L.P.H. Van Beek

    . 2005. A decision support tool for windthrow hazard assessment and prevention. Forest Ecology and Management 216(1–3):64–76.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Morgan, J., and
    2. M.G. Cannell

    . 1987. Structural analysis of tree trunks and branches: tapered cantilever beams subject to large deflections under complex loading. Tree Physiology 3(4):365–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Neild, S., and
    2. A.C.J. Wood

    . 1999. Estimating stem and root-anchorage flexibility in trees. Tree Physiology 19:141–151.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Niklas, K.J., and
    2. H.C. Spatz

    . 2010. Worldwide correlations of mechanical properties and green wood density. American Journal of Botany 97(10):1587–1594.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
31. ↵
    1. Norris, M.

    2007. Tree Risk Assessments—What Works—What Does Not—Can We Tell? In: ISAAC Conference Perth. 31 pp.
32. ↵
    1. Praus, L.,
    2. A. Szórádová,
    3. J. Kolařík,
    4. P. Horáček, and
    5. P. Koňas

    . 2006. Metodika hodnocení stability stromů WLA. AOPK ČR. Praha. Czech Republic.
33. ↵
    1. Rahardjo, H.,
    2. F.R. Harnas,
    3. I.G.B. Indrawan,
    4. E.C. Leong,
    5. P.Y. Tan,
    6. Y.K. Fing,
    7. L.F. Ow

    . 2014. Understanding the stability of Samanea saman trees through tree pulling, analytical calculations and numerical models. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening. 13: 355-364.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Sarmiento, C.,
    2. S. Patiño,
    3. C.E.T. Paine,
    4. J. Beauchêne,
    5. A. Thibaut, and
    6. C. Baraloto

    . 2011. Within-individual variation of trunk and branch xylem density in tropical trees. American Journal of Botany 98(1):140–149.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    1. Sebera, V.,
    2. J. Kunecký,
    3. L. Praus,
    4. J. Tippner, and
    5. P. Horáček

    . 2016. Strain transfer from xylem to bark surface analyzed by digital image correlation. Wood Science and Technology 50(4):773–787.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Sebera, V.,
    2. L. Praus,
    3. J. Tippner,
    4. J. Kunecky,
    5. J. Cepela, and
    6. R. Wimmer

    . 2014. Using optical full-field measurement based on digital image correlation to measure strain on a tree subjected to mechanical load. Trees 28:1173–1184.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Shahbazi, Z.,
    2. A. Kaminski, and
    3. L. Evans

    . 2015. Mechanical Stress Analysis of Tree Branches. American Journal of Mechanical Engineering 3(2):32–40.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Sutton, A.M.,
    2. J. Orteu,
    3. H.W. Schreier

    . 2009. Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements. Springer. Heidelberg. 321 pp.
39. ↵
    1. Swenson, N.G., and
    2. B.J. Enquist

    . 2008. The relationship between stem and branch wood specific gravity and the ability of each measure to predict leaf area. American Journal of Botany 95(4):516–519.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
40. ↵
    1. Van Wassenaer, P., and
    2. M. Richardson

    . 2009. A Review of Tree Risk Assessment Using Minimally Invasive Technologies and Two Case Studies. Arboricultural Journal 32(4):275–292.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Wessolly, L., and
    2. M. Erb

    . 1998. Handbuch der Baumstatik und Baumkontrolle. Patzer Verlag. Berlin. 270 pp.