Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Numerical Analysis of Branch Mechanical Response to Loading

Barbora Vojáčková, Jan Tippner, Petr Horáček, Luděk Praus, Václav Sebera and Martin Brabec
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 2019, 45 (4) 120-131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2019.011
Barbora Vojáčková
Barbora Vojáčková (corresponding author), Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Jan Tippner
Jan Tippner, Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Petr Horáček
Petr Horáček, Department of Water Operation and the Creation and Allocation of Biomass, CzechGlobe CAS, Bělidla 4a, 60300, Brno, Czech Republic,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Luděk Praus
Luděk Praus, Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Václav Sebera
Václav Sebera, Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00, Brno, Czech Republic,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Martin Brabec
Martin Brabec, Department of Wood Science Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Measured branches: a) branch no. 1; b) branch no. 2; c) branch no. 3; d) branch no 4.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Measurement setup: markers at the neutral axis, direction of loading, and inclinometer location.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    FE model of branch no. 2, non-deformed and in vertical displacement: SEC1…8 number of cross-section, uy is vertical displacement [m], ux is horizontal displacement, ϴ0 is rotation of branch anchorage, and F is applied force.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    The variability of deflections along branches during loading: the mean value of deflection with minimum and maximum values along the branch during the loading phase.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    The calculated MOE : MOEvar_L1..4 is variable MOE along branch no. 1 to 4; MOEx_L1..4 is average value of the modulus of elasticity without extreme values for branch no. 1 to 4.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Comparison of deflection obtained experimentally and numerically: Model_Ex is model with average E, Model_Evar is model with variable E along the branch length; a) branch no. 1; b) branch no. 2; c) branch no. 3; d) branch no 4.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    The correlation between the input and output parameters—Analysis I. (Spearman correlation coefficients, p = 0.05).

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    The correlations between the input and output parameters—Analysis II. (Spearman correlation coefficients, p = 0.05).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    General branch parameters: dbasell is branch base diameter in the direction of pulling, dbase_ is branch base diameter vertically to the direction of pulling, α is the angle of branch attachment.

    LimedbaseIIdbase_taperingαcross-sectionshape
    151 cm36 cm0.20°ellipseconvex
    228 cm29 cm0.1-circleconcave
    321 cm23 cm0.0533°circleslightly concave
    421 cm15 cm0.0345°ellipseslightly concave
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    The input and output parameters of sensitivity analysis: ymax is maximum deflection, y1…5 are deflections at the points, θ3,5 are rotations at the points 3 and 5.

    DescriptionAnalysis IAnalysis II
    Input parametersExtensionOutput parametersInput parametersExtensionOutput parameters
    branch lengthL2-4 mymaxL2-2.5 my1
    base diameterdbase_10-50 cmθ3dbase_20-26 cmy2
    taperingdtopdtop = 1 dbase_ – 1/2 dbase_θ5dtopdtop = 1 dbase_ – 1/2 dbase_y3
    ellipsee1 dbase_ – 2 dbase_e1 dbase_ – 1.6 dbase_y4
    curvatureR1-1000 mR2-1000 my5
    attachment angleα0-60°α0-30°θ3
    elastic moduliE8e9 ± 30%E8e9 ± 30%θ5
    anchorage rotationθ00-0.1°θ00-0.06°
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Experiment result: Fmax is the maximum force, ymax is the maximum deflection, θ1_2 is the inclination between point 1 and 2 (branch base), d_2II is the diameter at point 2 (with the elimination of branch collar), MOEx is the average MOE value.

    LimeFmaxymaxθ1_2d_2IIMOEx
    12023 N12.6 mm0.057°30 cm2.98 GPa
    2350 N25.2 mm0.13°13 cm7.69 GPa
    3231 N33.7 mm0.35°11 cm7.85 GPa
    41193 N18.55 mm0.23°21 cm6.51 GPa
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Mean relative errors of simulation: Ex is model with mean E, Evar is model with variable E along branch.

    LimeExRE [%] ExRE [%] Evar
    12.98 GPa−24−26
    27.69 GPa−11−19
    37.85 GPa16−0.5
    46.51 GPa−4−7
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 45 (4)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 45, Issue 4
July 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Numerical Analysis of Branch Mechanical Response to Loading
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Numerical Analysis of Branch Mechanical Response to Loading
Barbora Vojáčková, Jan Tippner, Petr Horáček, Luděk Praus, Václav Sebera, Martin Brabec
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2019, 45 (4) 120-131; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2019.011

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Numerical Analysis of Branch Mechanical Response to Loading
Barbora Vojáčková, Jan Tippner, Petr Horáček, Luděk Praus, Václav Sebera, Martin Brabec
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2019, 45 (4) 120-131; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2019.011
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Arboriculture
  • Deflection Curve
  • Digital Image Correlation
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Pulling Test

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire