Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Growth and Physiology Vary Little Among North American, an Asian, and a North American x Asian Hybrid Ash in a Common Garden in Ohio, U.S.A

Laurel J. Haavik and Daniel A. Herms
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2019, 45 (3) 85-99; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2019.008
Laurel J. Haavik
Laurel J. Haavik (corresponding author), Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, Ohio 44691, U.S.A., Forest Health Protection, U.S. Forest Service, 1992 Folwell Ave, St Paul, Minnesota 55108, U.S.A.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Daniel A. Herms
Daniel A. Herms, Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, Ohio 44691, U.S.A., The Davey Tree Expert Company, 1500 N Mantua St., Kent, Ohio 44240, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Precipitation (gray bars) and minimum (dotted line) and maximum (solid line) temperatures during the 2015 growing season in Wooster, Ohio. Arrows indicate dates on which gas exchange physiological measurements of ash trees were taken.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    (a) Diameter (at breast height), (b) Specific leaf area (SLA), and (c) N per unit leaf area (LA) by ash taxa. Dots represent means of eight trees (seven for Man x black), and error bars are one standard error from the mean. Different letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey’s HSD. Man × black = Manchurian × black ash.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Mean (a) CO2 assimilation rate (A), (b) stomatal conductance (gs), (c) photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (PNUE), and (d) efficiency of photosystem II (ɸPSII) for six ash taxa by sampling date. Key for taxa is located in (b). Dots represent means of eight trees, and error bars are one standard error from the mean. Man x black = Manchurian x black ash.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Ash (Fraxinus) species, cultivar, and diameter at breast height (dbh ± standard error) of trees at the start of the 2015 growing season in Wooster, Ohio, U.S.A.

    Ash speciesCultivarSample Meansize dbh (cm)
    Green, F. pennsylvanicaPatmore83.91 ± 0.71
    White, F. americanaAutumn Purple81.38 ± 0.07
    Black, F. nigraFall Gold84.02 ± 0.31
    Blue, F. quadrandgulataseedling origin81.98 ± 0.16
    Manchurian × black, F. mandshurica × F. nigraNorthern Treasure81.56 ± 0.16
    Manchurian, F. mandshuricaseedling origin81.90 ± 0.10
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Pearson’s correlation coefficients for leaf traits, growth, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and fluorescence among all trees on June 22, 2015 (=wet).

    BlueSLAdia grAPNUEgsCiFv’/Fm’ΦPSII
    N0.93***  0.46−0.45−0.92**−0.24−0.04−0.56−0.69
    SLA  0.31−0.63−0.95***−0.54−0.28−0.77*−0.66
    dia gr−0.14−0.48−0.11−0.18  0.33−0.40
    A  0.72*  0.75*  0.16  0.57  0.77*
    PNUE  0.53  0.20  0.60  0.79*
    gs  0.74*  0.60  0.27
    Ci  0.30−0.28
    Fv’/Fm’  0.31
    White
    N0.99***−0.58−0.57−0.82*  0.16  0.46−0.64−0.37
    SLA−0.54−0.61−0.84**  0.16  0.51−0.67−0.44
    dia gr  0.12  0.36  0.07  0.11  0.20−0.03
    A  0.78*  0.21−0.60  0.50  0.71*
    PNUE  0.31−0.30  0.77*  0.41
    gs  0.63  0.36−0.22
    Ci−0.06−0.78*
    Fv’/Fm’  0.04
    Green
    N0.99***−0.12−0.55−0.88**−0.57  0.24−0.05−0.01
    SLA−0.20−0.56−0.85**−0.57  0.25−0.06  0.02
    dia gr−0.07−0.56  0.19  0.02−0.47−0.43
    A  0.82*  0.67−0.75*  0.08  0.71*
    PNUE  0.73*−0.46  0.02  0.41
    gs−0.04  0.38  0.41
    Ci  0.20−0.59
    Fv’/Fm’  0.35
    Black
    N0.98***−0.40  0.26−0.60  0.23−0.05  0.37  0.31
    SLA−0.31  0.08−0.73*  0.06−0.21  0.21  0.15
    dia gr−0.14  0.29−0.41−0.23−0.14  0.08
    A  0.54  0.85**  0.63  0.93***  0.80*
    PNUE  0.44  0.50  0.40  0.31
    gs  0.87**  0.91**  0.42
    Ci  0.74*  0.27
    Fv’/Fm’  0.65
    Man × Black
    N  0.67−0.31−0.28−0.72  0.01  0.36  0.09  0.05
    SLA−0.09−0.59−0.76*−0.25  0.43−0.38−0.27
    dia gr−0.01−0.01−0.15−0.24−0.27−0.45
    A  0.85*  0.77*−0.13  0.63  0.81*
    PNUE  0.54−0.27  0.42  0.60
    gs  0.53  0.91**  0.85**
    Ci  0.54  0.23
    Fv’/Fm’  0.77*
    Manchurian
    N  0.83**  0.74*  0.44−0.21  0.23  0.11  0.69−0.18
    SLA  0.43  0.01−0.57−0.01−0.05  0.48−0.43
    dia gr  0.52  0.06  0.15−0.10  0.52−0.18
    A  0.78*  0.79*  0.57  0.53  0.55
    PNUE  0.74*  0.60  0.14  0.71*
    gs  0.94***  0.66  0.48
    Ci  0.63  0.41
    Fv’/Fm’−0.20
    • ↵*P < 0.05,

    • ↵**P < 0.01,

    • ↵***P < 0.001; N = leaf nitrogen (μmol mol−2 s−1); SLA = specific leaf area (m2g−1); dia gr = diameter growth in 2015 (cm); A = net assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1); gs = stomatal conductance (mol m−2 s−1); PNUE = photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (μmol mol−2 s−1); Ci = intercellular CO2 (μmol mol−1); Fv’/Fm’ = light-adapted variable fluorescence; ΦPSII = fraction of absorbed photons used by photosystem II.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Pearson’s correlation coefficients for leaf traits, growth, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and fluorescence among all trees on July 27, 2015 (=wet).

    BlueSLAdia grAPNUEgsCiFv’/Fm’ΦPSII
    N  0.93***  0.46  0.05−0.79*−0.03−0.11−0.48−0.09
    SLA  0.31−0.14−0.83**−0.35−0.29−0.48  0.09
    dia gr−0.19−0.57  0.16  0.29−0.28  0.04
    A  0.55  0.63−0.33  0.60  0.91**
    PNUE  0.34−0.15  0.72*  0.46
    gs  0.52  0.86**  0.46
    Ci  0.42−0.45
    Fv’/Fm’  0.37
    White
    N0.99***−0.58−0.56−0.84**  0.43  0.77*−0.51−0.35
    SLA−0.54−0.54−0.84**  0.48  0.80*−0.44−0.32
    dia gr  0.44  0.45  0.06−0.25  0.79*  0.42
    A  0.76*  0.20−0.62  0.69  0.83*
    PNUE−0.21−0.77*  0.61  0.67
    gs  0.64  0.19  0.54
    Ci−0.35−0.23
    Fv’/Fm’  0.59
    Green
    N0.99***−0.12  0.49−0.97***  0.42  0.02  0.44  0.42
    SLA−0.20  0.42−0.95***  0.37  0.01  0.45  0.45
    dia gr−0.17  0.04  0.36  0.52−0.58−0.39
    A−0.40  0.27−0.43  0.75*  0.51
    PNUE−0.39−0.06−0.37−0.29
    gs  0.74*−0.03  0.32
    Ci−0.62−0.13
    Fv’/Fm’  0.62
    Black
    N0.98***−0.40  0.19−0.77*  0.08−0.05  0.21−0.20
    SLA−0.31  0.08−0.83*−0.06−0.21  0.03−0.31
    dia gr−0.05  0.33−0.30−0.55  0.04  0.31
    A  0.38  0.91**  0.63  0.76*  0.71*
    PNUE  0.50  0.48  0.28  0.54
    gs  0.88**  0.68  0.62
    Ci  0.56  0.50
    Fv’/Fm’  0.82*
    Man × Black
    N  0.67−0.31  0.38−0.30  0.19−0.11  0.67  0.61
    SLA−0.09  0.29−0.16−0.09−0.43  0.48  0.69
    dia gr  0.54  0.80*  0.52  0.29  0.27  0.17
    A  0.76*  0.79*  0.38  0.77*  0.56
    PNUE  0.68  0.44  0.31  0.24
    gs  0.86**  0.46−0.03
    Ci  0.06−0.52
    Fv’/Fm’  0.72*
    Manchurian
    N  0.83**  0.74*  0.40−0.08−0.10−0.45  0.44  0.25
    SLA  0.43  0.21−0.22−0.36−0.50  0.12  0.18
    dia gr  0.41  0.09  0.34  0.14  0.77*  0.03
    A  0.88**  0.76*  0.11  0.60  0.75*
    PNUE  0.88**  0.34  0.42  0.70
    gs  0.65  0.63  0.47
    Ci  0.46−0.16
    Fv’/Fm’  0.01
    • ↵*P < 0.05,

    • ↵**P < 0.01,

    • ↵***P < 0.001; N = leaf nitrogen (μmol mol−2 s−1); SLA = specific leaf area (m2g−1); dia gr = diameter growth in 2015 (cm); A = net assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1); gs = stomatal conductance (mol m−2 s−1); PNUE = photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (μmol mol−2 s−1); Ci = intercellular CO2 (μmol mol−1); Fv’/Fm’ = light-adapted variable fluorescence; ΦPSII = fraction of absorbed photons used by photosystem II.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Pearson’s correlation coefficients for leaf traits, growth, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and fluorescence among all trees on August 24, 2015 (=dry).

    BlueSLAdia grAPNUEgsCiFv’/Fm’ΦPSII
    N0.93***  0.46  0.25  0.62  0.34  0.52−0.31  0.28
    SLA  0.31−0.04  0.23  0.17  0.71−0.40−0.08
    dia gr−0.31  0.25−0.39−0.10−0.62  0.33
    A  0.60  0.92**  0.21  0.60  0.60
    PNUE  0.40−0.10−0.19  0.66
    gs  0.56  0.70  0.30
    Ci  0.29−0.31
    Fv’/Fm’−0.06
    White
    N0.99***−0.58  0.06  0.14−0.31−0.25  0.24−0.15
    SLA−0.54  0.12  0.13−0.23−0.28  0.32−0.14
    dia gr  0.52  0.47  0.70−0.29  0.30  0.51
    A  0.15  0.53−0.92**  0.33  0.63
    PNUE  0.29−0.04  0.08  0.15
    gs−0.17  0.47  0.07
    Ci−0.24−0.68
    Fv’/Fm’−0.10
    Green
    N0.99***−0.12−0.39  0.06−0.26  0.06  0.32  0.16
    SLA−0.20−0.39  0.03−0.31−0.03  0.29  0.21
    dia gr−0.09−0.01  0.46  0.77*−0.19−0.66
    A  0.84**  0.73*  0.12  0.61  0.47
    PNUE  0.75*  0.29  0.80*  0.43
    gs  0.75*  0.44−0.08
    Ci  0.07−0.46
    Fv’/Fm’  0.32
    Black
    N0.98***−0.40−0.50−0.33−0.59−0.17−0.68−0.57
    SLA−0.31−0.73−0.59−0.77*−0.39−0.67−0.78*
    dia gr−0.60−0.42−0.47−0.36  0.48−0.51
    A  0.84*  0.97***  0.75  0.31  0.91**
    PNUE  0.85*  0.86*  0.56  0.58
    gs  0.87*  0.39  0.88**
    Ci  0.28  0.44
    Fv’/Fm’  0.15
    Man × Black
    N  0.67−0.31−0.48−0.21−0.34−0.60  0.04−0.02
    SLA−0.09  0.03  0.17−0.10−0.43  0.43  0.57
    dia gr  0.65  0.41  0.61  0.67−0.30  0.36
    A  0.78*  0.88**  0.77*  0.47  0.59
    PNUE  0.93**  0.78*  0.72  0.31
    gs  0.90**  0.50  0.30
    Ci  0.21  0.12
    Fv’/Fm’  0.20
    Manchurian
    N  0.83**  0.74*  0.65  0.80*  0.34−0.23−0.20  0.67
    SLA  0.43  0.27  0.61  0.01−0.30  0.12  0.28
    dia gr  0.71*  0.79*  0.64  0.10  0.13  0.48
    A  0.86**  0.61−0.19−0.40  0.70
    PNUE  0.68−0.04−0.08  0.51
    gs  0.63−0.10  0.40
    Ci  0.22−0.09
    Fv’/Fm’−0.74*
    • ↵*P < 0.05,

    • ↵**P < 0.01,

    • ↵***P < 0.001; N = leaf nitrogen (μmol mol−2 s−1); SLA = specific leaf area (m2g−1); dia gr = diameter growth in 2015 (cm); A = net assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1); gs = stomatal conductance (mol m−2 s−1); PNUE = photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (μmol mol−2 s−1); Ci = intercellular CO2 (μmol mol−1); Fv’/Fm’ = light-adapted variable fluorescence; ΦPSII = fraction of absorbed photons used by photosystem II.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Pearson’s correlation coefficients for leaf traits, growth, photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and fluorescence among all trees on September 7, 2015 (=dry).

    BlueSLAdia grAPNUEgsCiFv’/Fm’ΦPSII
    N0.93***  0.46  0.31−0.34  0.24−0.07  0.03−0.02
    SLA  0.31−0.01−0.58−0.08−0.30−0.27−0.21
    dia gr  0.64  0.33  0.39−0.11  0.50  0.68
    A  0.76*  0.92**  0.62  0.93***  0.74*
    PNUE  0.68  0.54  0.88**  0.81*
    gs  0.85**  0.87**  0.48
    Ci  0.66  0.13
    Fv’/Fm’  0.71*
    White
    N0.99***−0.58  0.16−0.77*  0.62  0.45  0.59  0.50
    SLA−0.54  0.12−0.79*  0.63  0.48  0.64  0.45
    dia gr−0.54  0.10−0.48−0.15−0.32−0.78*
    A  0.39  0.49−0.17  0.03  0.80*
    PNUE−0.31−0.48−0.63  0.10
    gs  0.74*  0.56  0.40
    Ci  0.42−0.19
    Fv’/Fm’  0.18
    Green
    N0.99***−0.12−0.18−0.78*−0.03  0.24−0.11  0.14
    SLA−0.20−0.26−0.81*−0.06  0.33−0.15  0.06
    dia gr  0.73*  0.57  0.35−0.53  0.22  0.64
    A  0.70  0.79*−0.22  0.80*  0.80*
    PNUE  0.52−0.20  0.50  0.38
    gs  0.40  0.76*  0.48
    Ci  0.07−0.38
    Fv’/Fm’  0.65
    Black
    N0.98***−0.40  0.12−0.50  0.20  0.29−0.16  0.08
    SLA−0.31  0.03−0.57  0.10  0.22−0.16−0.07
    dia gr  0.08  0.30  0.11  0.28  0.08  0.12
    A  0.75*  0.99***−0.03  0.09  0.92**
    PNUE  0.69−0.22  0.20  0.71*
    gs  0.13  0.11  0.91**
    Ci  0.14  0.03
    Fv’/Fm’−0.20
    Man × Black
    N  0.67−0.31−0.43−0.67−0.19  0.21−0.02−0.14
    SLA−0.09−0.16−0.39  0.44  0.68−0.17  0.11
    dia gr−0.19−0.14−0.09−0.08−0.35−0.58
    A  0.94**  0.85**  0.13  0.26  0.74*
    PNUE  0.57−0.29  0.14  0.70
    gs  0.58  0.23  0.55
    Ci−0.14  0.18
    Fv’/Fm’−0.04
    Manchurian
    N  0.83**  0.74*  0.64  0.51  0.47−0.72*  0.56  0.62
    SLA  0.43  0.50  0.40  0.36−0.67  0.71*  0.26
    dia gr  0.72*  0.62  0.51−0.71*  0.47  0.73*
    A  0.98***  0.95***−0.75*  0.70  0.88**
    PNUE  0.96***−0.70  0.67  0.87**
    gs−0.52  0.65  0.82*
    Ci−0.57−0.66
    Fv’/Fm’  0.38
    • *P < 0.05,

    • **P < 0.01,

    • ***P < 0.001; N = leaf nitrogen (μmol mol−2 s−1); SLA = specific leaf area (m2g−1); dia gr = diameter growth in 2015 (cm); A = net assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1); gs = stomatal conductance (mol m−2 s−1); PNUE = photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (μmol mol−2 s−1); Ci = intercellular CO2 (μmol mol−1); Fv’/Fm’ = light-adapted variable fluorescence; ΦPSII = fraction of absorbed photons used by photosystem II.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 45 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 45, Issue 3
May 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Growth and Physiology Vary Little Among North American, an Asian, and a North American x Asian Hybrid Ash in a Common Garden in Ohio, U.S.A
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Growth and Physiology Vary Little Among North American, an Asian, and a North American x Asian Hybrid Ash in a Common Garden in Ohio, U.S.A
Laurel J. Haavik, Daniel A. Herms
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2019, 45 (3) 85-99; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2019.008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Growth and Physiology Vary Little Among North American, an Asian, and a North American x Asian Hybrid Ash in a Common Garden in Ohio, U.S.A
Laurel J. Haavik, Daniel A. Herms
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2019, 45 (3) 85-99; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2019.008
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • emerald ash borer
  • North American x Asian Ash Hybrid
  • Plant Performance
  • Tree Ecophysiology

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire