Citizen Science and Tree Health Assessment: How Useful Are the Data?

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Au, J.,
   2. P. Bagchi,
   3. B. Chen,
   4. R. Martinez,
   5. S.A. Dudley, and
   6. G.J. Sorger

   . 2000. Methodology for public monitoring of total coliforms, Escherichia coli and toxicity in waterways by Canadian high school students. Journal of Environmental Management 58:213–230. <doi:10.1006/jema.2000.0323>

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Belanger, J.,
   2. J. Rushing Mills,
   3. C. Holmes, and
   4. M. Oakleaf

   . 2015. Project RAILS: Lessons Learned about Rubric Assessment of Information Literacy Skills. portal Libraries and the Academy 15:623–644. <doi:10.1353/pla.2015.0050>

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Bloniarz, D.V., and
   2. H.D.P. Ryan

   . 1996. The use of volunteer initiatives in conducting urban forest resource inventories. Journal of Arboriculture 22:75–82.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Conrad, C.T., and
   2. T. Daoust

   . 2008. Community-based monitoring frameworks: Increasing the effectiveness of environmental stewardship. Environmental Management 41:358–366. <doi:10.1007/s00267-007-9042-x>

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Cox, T.E.,
   2. J. Philippoff,
   3. E. Baumgartner, and
   4. C.M. Smith

   . 2012. Expert variability provides perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of citizen driven intertidal monitoring program. Ecological Applications 1201–1212. <doi:10.1890/11-1614.1>

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Cozad, S.,
   2. E. McPherson, and
   3. J. Harding

   . 2005. STRATUM Case Study Evaluation in Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.
7. Emerald Ash Borer Information Network. 2017. <www.emeraldashborer.info>
8. ↵
   1. Engel, S.R., and
   2. J.R. Voshell

   . 2002. Volunteer biological monitoring: Can it accurately assess the ecological condition of streams? American Entomologist 48:164–177.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
9. ↵
   1. Green, R.

   , 1979. Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, U.S.
10. ↵
    1. Herms, D.,
    2. D.G. Mccullough,
    3. D.R. Smitley,
    4. C.S. Sadof, and
    5. W. Cranshaw

    . 2014. Insecticide Options for Protecting Ash Trees from Emerald Ash Borer. North Central IPM Center Bulletin, second edition, 1–16.
11. ↵
    1. HTHC

    . 2018. Healthy Trees, Healthy Cities Tree Health Initiative. The Nature Conservancy. <www.conservationgateway.org/ConservationPractices/cities/hthc/Pages/default.aspx>
12. ↵
    1. Kosmala, M.,
    2. A. Wiggins,
    3. A. Swanson, and
    4. B. Simmons

    . 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14:551–560. <doi:10.1002/fee.1436>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
13. ↵
    1. Kovacs, K.F.,
    2. R.G. Haight,
    3. D.G. McCullough,
    4. R.J. Mercader,
    5. N.W. Siegert, and
    6. A.M. Liebhold

    . 2010. Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. Communities, 2009–2019. Ecological Economics 69:569–578. <doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.004>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Lamprecht, M.,
    2. D. Sabatini, and
    3. A. Carpenter

    . 2007. CellProfiler: Free, versatile software for automated biological image analysis. Biotechniques 42:71–75. <doi:10.2144/000112257>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Lukyanenko, R.,
    2. J. Parsons, and
    3. Y.F. Wiersma

    . 2016. Emerging problems of data quality in citizen science. Conservation Biology 30:447–449. <doi:10.1111/cobi.12706>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Nielsen, A.B.,
    2. J. Östberg, and
    3. T. Delshammar

    . 2014. Review of urban tree inventory methods used to collect data at single-tree level. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40:96–111.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Oakleaf, M.

    2009. Using rubrics to assess information literacy: An examination of methodology and interrater reliability. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 60:969–983.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Poland, T., and
    2. D. McCullough

    . 2006. Emerald Ash Borer: Invasion of the Urban Forest and the Threat to North Americas Ash Resource. Journal of Forestry 1990:118–124.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Pollock, R.M., and
    2. G.S. Whitelaw

    . 2005. Community-based monitoring in support of local sustainability. Local Environment 10:211–228.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Pontius, J., and
    2. R. Hallett

    . 2014. Comprehensive methods for earlier detection and monitoring of forest decline. Forest Science 60:1156–1163. <doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5849/forsci.13-121>
21. ↵
    1. Preston, C.C., and
    2. A.M. Colman

    . 2000. Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica (Amst) 104:1–15. <doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. R Core Team

    . 2013. A language and environment for statistical computing.
23. ↵
    1. Roman, L.A.,
    2. B.C. Scharenbroch,
    3. J.P.A. Östberg,
    4. L.S. Mueller,
    5. J.G. Henning,
    6. A.K. Koeser,
    7. J.R. Sanders,
    8. D.R. Betz, and
    9. R.C. Jordan

    . 2017. Data quality in citizen science urban tree inventories. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 22:124–135. <doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.02.001>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Sall, J.,
    2. A. Lehman, and
    3. L. Creighton

    . 2001. JMP Start Statistics: A Guide to Statistics and Data Analysis Using JMP and JMP IN Software. SAS Institute Duxbury Thomas Learning, Pacific Grove, California, U.S.
25. ↵
    1. Siegert, N.W.,
    2. D.G. McCullough,
    3. A.M. Liebhold, and
    4. F.W. Telewski

    . 2007. Resurrected from the ashes: A historical reconstruction of emerald ash borer dynamics through dendrochronological analysis. Emerald ash borer Asian longhorned beetle Res. Dev. Rev. Meet. Cincinnati, OH. FHTET 2007-04. Morgantown, WV U.S. For. Serv. For. Heal. Technol. Enterp. Team 18–19.
26. ↵
    1. Stokes, P.,
    2. M. Havas, and
    3. T. Brydges

    . 1990. Public participation and volunteer help in monitoring programs: An assessment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 15:225–229. <doi:10.1007/BF00394889>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
27. ↵
    1. Vaughan, H.,
    2. T. Brydges,
    3. A. Fenech, and
    4. A. Lumb

    . 2001. Monitoring long-term ecological changes through the ecological monitoring and assessment network: Science-based and policy relevant. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 67:3–28. <doi:10.1023/A:1006423432114>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
28. ↵
    1. Whitelaw, G.,
    2. H. Vaughan, and
    3. B. Craig

    . 2003. Establishing the Canadian Community Network. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 88:409–418. <doi:10.1023/A:1025545813057>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Wulff, S.

    2002. The accuracy of forest damage assessments—experiences from Sweden. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 74:295–309.

    OpenUrlPubMed