Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Why Count Trees? Volunteer Motivations and Experiences with Tree Monitoring in New York City

Michelle L. Johnson, Lindsay K. Campbell, Erika S. Svendsen and Philip Silva
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 2018, 44 (2) 59-72; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2018.006
Michelle L. Johnson
Michelle L. Johnson (corresponding author), USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Lindsay K. Campbell
Lindsay K. Campbell, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Erika S. Svendsen
Erika S. Svendsen, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Philip Silva
Philip Silva, The Nature Conservancy, New York City, New York, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Asah, S.T., and
    2. D.J. Blahna
    . 2012. Motivational functionalism and urban conservation stewardship: Implications for volunteer involvement. Conservation Letters 5(6):470–477.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Asah, S.T., and
    2. D.J. Blahna
    . 2013. Practical implications of understanding the influence of motivations on commitment to voluntary urban conservation stewardship. Conservation Biology 27(4):866–875.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Austin, M.E.
    2002. Partnership opportunities in neighborhood tree planting initiatives: Building form local knowledge. Journal of Arboriculture 28(4):178–186.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Bell, S.,
    2. M. Marzano,
    3. J. Cent,
    4. H. Kobierska,
    5. D. Podjed,
    6. D. Vandzinskaite, and
    7. H. Reinert, et al.
    2008. What counts? Volunteers and their organizations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 17(14):3443–3454.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Boyle, M.P., and
    2. J.K. Sawyer
    . 2010. Defining volunteering for community campaigns: An exploration of race, self perceptions, and campaign practices. Journal of Community Practice 18(1):40–57.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Bramston, P.,
    2. G. Pretty, and
    3. C. Zammit
    . 2011. Assessing environmental stewardship motivation. Environment and Behavior 43:776–788.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Bruyere, B., and
    2. S. Rappe
    . 2007. Identifying the motivations of environmental volunteers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50(4):503–516.
    OpenUrl
    1. Caldwell, L.L., and
    2. K.L. Andereck
    . 1994. Motives for initiating and continuing membership in a recreation-related voluntary association. Leisure Sciences 16(1):33–44.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Cerasoli, C.P.,
    2. J.M. Nicklin, and
    3. M.T. Ford
    . 2014. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 140(4):980.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. R.M. Emerson
    1. Charmaz, K.
    2001. Grounded theory. In: R.M. Emerson (Ed.). Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations. Waveland Press, Long Grove, Illinois, U.S. 443 pp.
  10. ↵
    1. Clary, E.G., and
    2. M. Snyder
    . 1999. The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science 8(5):156–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Clary, E.G.,
    2. M. Snyder, and
    3. A.A. Stukas
    . 1996. Volunteers’ motivations: Findings from a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25(4):485–505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Clary, E.G.,
    2. M. Snyder,
    3. R.D. Ridge,
    4. A.A. Stukas,
    5. J. Copeland,
    6. J. Haugen, and
    7. P.K. Miene
    . 1998. Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: A functional approach. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 74:1516–1530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. ↵
    1. Deci, E.L., and
    2. R.M. Ryan
    . 1985. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality 19(2):109–134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Domroese, M.C., and
    2. E.A. Johnson
    . 2017. Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project. Biological Conservation 208:40–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Finkelstein, M.A.
    2008. Volunteer satisfaction and volunteer action: A functional approach. Social Behavior and Personality 36(1):9–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Fisher, D.R.,
    2. E.S. Svendsen, and
    3. J. Connolly
    . 2015. Urban Environmental Stewardship and Civic Engagement: How Planting Trees Strengthens the Roots of Democracy. Routledge Press, New York, New York, U.S. 132 pp.
  17. ↵
    1. Fisher, D.R.,
    2. L.K. Campbell, and
    3. E.S. Svendsen
    . 2012. The organizational structure of urban environmental stewardship. Environmental Politics 21(1):26–48.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Foster-Bey,
    2. J.
    2008. Do Race, Ethnicity, Citizenship and Socioeconomic Status Determine Civic-Engagement? CIRCLE Working Paper# 62. Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE). College Park, Maryland, U.S.
  19. ↵
    1. Geoghegan, H.,
    2. A. Dyke,
    3. R. Pateman,
    4. S. West, and
    5. G. Everett
    . 2016. Understanding Motivations for Citizen Science. Final Report on behalf of the UK Environmental Observation Framework (May), 124. <www.ukeof.org.uk/resources/citizen-science-resources/MotivationsforCSREPORTFINALMay2016.pdf>
  20. ↵
    1. Gobster, P.H., and
    2. B. Hull
    (Eds.). 2000. Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., U.S. 269 pp.
  21. ↵
    1. P.H. Gobster and
    2. R. Hull
    1. Grese, R.E.,
    2. R. Kaplan,
    3. R.L. Ryan, and
    4. J. Buxton
    . 2000. Psychological benefits of volunteering in stewardship programs. pp. 265–280. In: P.H. Gobster and R. Hull (Eds.). Restoring Nature: Perspectives from the Social Sciences and Humanities. Island Press, Washington, D.C., U.S. 269 pp.
  22. ↵
    1. Groves, R.M.
    2006. Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 70(5):646–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Jordan, R.C.,
    2. H.L. Ballard, and
    3. T.B. Phillips
    . 2012. Key issues and new approaches for evaluating citizen-science learning outcomes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6):307–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. F.S. Chapin,
    2. G.P. Kofinas, and
    3. C. Folke
    1. Kofinas, G.P.
    2009. Adaptive co-management in social-ecological governance. pp. 77–101. In: F.S. Chapin, G.P. Kofinas, and C. Folke (Eds.). Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship: Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, U.S. 401 pp.
  25. ↵
    1. Lepper, M.R.,
    2. D. Greene, and
    3. R.E. Nisbett
    . 1973. Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28(1):129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Lofland, J.,
    2. D.A. Snow,
    3. L. Anderson, and
    4. L.H. Lofland
    . 2005. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, U.S. 304 pp.
  27. ↵
    1. Lu, J.W.,
    2. E.S. Svendsen,
    3. L.K. Campbell,
    4. J. Greenfeld,
    5. J. Braden,
    6. K.L. King, and
    7. N. Falxa-Raymond
    . 2010. Biological, social, and urban design factors affecting young street tree mortality in New York City. Cities and the Environment 3(1):1–15.
    OpenUrlWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    1. Measham, T.G., and
    2. G.B. Barnett
    . 2008. Environmental volunteering: Motivations, modes, and outcomes. Australian Geographer 39(4):537–552.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. Merenlender, A.M.,
    2. A.W. Crall,
    3. S. Drill,
    4. M. Prysby, and
    5. H. Ballard
    . 2016. Evaluating environmental education, citizen science, and stewardship through naturalist programs. Conservation Biology 30(6):1255–1265.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Miller-Rushing,
    2. A.,
    3. R. Primack, and
    4. R. Bonne
    . 2012. The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 10(6):285–290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Moskell, C.,
    2. S.B. Allred, and
    3. G. Ferenz
    . 2010. Examining motivations and recruitment strategies for urban forestry volunteers. Cities and the Environment 3(1):article 9.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Musick, M.A., and
    2. J. Wilson
    . 2007. Volunteers: A Social Profile. Indiana University Press, Indiana University-Bloomington. 680 pp.
  33. ↵
    1. Neuman, W.L.
    2003. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, fifth edition. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.
  34. ↵
    1. Promberger, M., and
    2. T.M. Marteau
    . 2013. When do financial incentives reduce intrinsic motivation? Comparing behaviors studied in psychological and economic literatures. Health Psychology 32(9):950–957.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. QSR International Pty Ltd
    . 2015. NVivo qualitative data analysis software, Version 11.
  36. ↵
    1. R Core Team
    2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <https://www.R-project.org>
  37. ↵
    1. Roman, L.A.,
    2. E.G. McPherson,
    3. B.C. Scharenbroch, and
    4. J. Bartens
    . 2013. Identifying common practices and challenges for local urban tree monitoring programs across the United States. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39(6):292–299.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Ryan, G.W., and
    2. H.R. Bernard
    . 2003. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 15(1):85–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Ryan, R.L.,
    2. R. Kaplan, and
    3. R.E. Grese
    . 2001 Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programs. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44(5):629–648.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Ryan, R.M., and
    2. E.L. Deci
    . 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25:54–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. ↵
    1. Still, D.T., and
    2. H.D. Gerhold
    . 1997. Motivations and task preferences of urban forestry volunteers. Journal of Arboriculture 23(1):116–129.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Strauss, A., and
    2. J. Corbin
    . 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, California, U.S. 272 pp.
  43. ↵
    1. Svendsen, E.S., and
    2. L.K. Campbell
    . 2008. Urban ecological stewardship: Understanding the structure, function, and management. Cities and the Environment 1(1):1–32.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Taniguchi, H.
    2012. The determinants of formal and informal volunteering: Evidence from the American time use survey. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 23(4):920–939.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Vogt, J.M., and
    2. B.C. Fischer
    . 2014. A protocol for citizen science monitoring of recently-planted urban trees a protocol for citizen science monitoring of recently-planted urban. Cities and the Environment 7(2):article 4.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. P.H. Gobster
    1. Westphal, L.M.
    1993. Why trees? Urban forestry volunteers values and motivations. pp. 19–23. In: P.H. Gobster (Ed.). Managing Urban and High-use Recreation Settings. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-163. North Central Experiment Station, St. Paul.
  47. ↵
    1. Wilson, J.
    2012. Volunteerism research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 41:176–212.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  48. ↵
    1. Wright, D.R.,
    2. L.G. Underhill,
    3. M. Keene, and
    4. A.T. Knight
    . 2015. Understanding the motivations and satisfactions of volunteers to improve the effectiveness of citizen science programs. Society & Natural Resources 28(9):1013–1029.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 44 (2)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 44, Issue 2
March 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Why Count Trees? Volunteer Motivations and Experiences with Tree Monitoring in New York City
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Why Count Trees? Volunteer Motivations and Experiences with Tree Monitoring in New York City
Michelle L. Johnson, Lindsay K. Campbell, Erika S. Svendsen, Philip Silva
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2018, 44 (2) 59-72; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2018.006

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Why Count Trees? Volunteer Motivations and Experiences with Tree Monitoring in New York City
Michelle L. Johnson, Lindsay K. Campbell, Erika S. Svendsen, Philip Silva
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2018, 44 (2) 59-72; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2018.006
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Urban Trees and Cooling: A Review of the Recent Literature (2018 to 2024)
  • Aerial Imagery as a Tool for Monitoring Urban Tree Retention: Applications, Strengths and Challenges for Backyard Tree Planting Programs
  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Citizen Science
  • Civic Engagement
  • New York City
  • Stewardship
  • Tree Monitoring
  • urban forest

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire