Selection of Tree-Size Variables for Appraisal Methods for Urban Trees According to Their Collinearity

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Abd-Elrahman,
   2. A.H.,
   3. M.E. Thornhill,
   4. M.G. Andreu, and
   5. F. Escobedo

   . 2010. A community-based urban forest inventory using online mapping services and consumer-grade digital images. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 12(4):249–260.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Ayuga-Téllez,
   2. E.,
   3. C. González-García,
   4. S. Martín,
   5. J.E. Martínez-Falero

   . 2013. Estadística: Guía Práctica y Ejercicios. Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar, E.T.S.I.M. (UPM), Madrid, España. 378 pp.
3. ↵
   1. Ayuga-Téllez,
   2. E.,
   3. M.L. Contato-Carol,
   4. C. González-García,
   5. M.A. Grande-Ortiz, and
   6. J. Velázquez

   . 2011. Applying multivariate data analysis as objective method for calculating the location index for use in urban tree appraisal. Journal of Urban Planning and Development-ASCE 137(3):230–237.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bernatzky, A.

   1978. Tree ecology and preservation. Development in Agricultural and Management Forest Ecology, 2. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., New York, New York, U.S.
5. ↵
   1. Brack, C.L., and
   2. C.B. Wood

   . 1998. Measuring Trees, Stands and Forests for Effective Forest Management. Tree Growth and Increment. Forest Mensuration. Accessed 20 February 2014. <http://sres.anu.edu.au>
6. ↵
   1. Caballer, V.

   1989. Modelos para la valoración de plantas ornamentales. Investigación Agraria. Serie Económica Volume 4.
7. ↵
   1. Cabrera, J.,
   2. M.T. Lamelas,
   3. A.L. Montealegre, and
   4. J. de la Riva

   . 2014. Estimación de variables dasométricas a partir de datos LIDAR PNOA en masas regulares de Pinus halepensis Mill. In: XVI Congreso Nacional de Tecnologías de la Información Geográfica. Alicante (Spain). 7 pp. <http://congresotig.ua.es/index.php/tig/tig2014/paper/view/52/102>
8. ↵
   1. G. Mery,
   2. R. Alfaro,
   3. M. Kanninen, and
   4. M. Lobovikov

   1. Campos, J.J.,
   2. F. Alpizar,
   3. B. Louman,
   4. J. Parrotta, and
   5. R. Madrigal

   . 2005. An integrated approach to forest ecosystem services. pp. 17–26. In: G. Mery, R. Alfaro, M. Kanninen, and M. Lobovikov (Eds.). IUFRO World Series. Forest in the Global Balance e Changing Paradigms.
9. ↵
   1. Constable, J.V.H., and
   2. A.L. Friend

   . 2000. Suitability of process-based tree growth models for addressing tree response to climate change. Environmental Pollution 110:47–59.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    1. Contato-Carol,
    2. M.L.,
    3. E. Ayuga-Téllez, and
    4. M.A. Grande-Ortiz

    . 2005. Análisis comparativo de Métodos de Valoración del arbolado urbano. Aplicación a Santiago del Estero (Argentina). Actas del III Congreso Nacional de Agroingeniería. 21–24 de Septiembre. León, España.
11. 1. Contato-Carol,
    2. M.L.,
    3. E. Ayuga-Téllez, and
    4. M.A. Grande-Ortiz

    . 2008. A comparative analysis of methods for the valuation of urban trees in Santiago del Estero, Argentina. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6(3):314–352.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. CTLA

    . 1992. Guide for Plant Appraisal, eighth edition. International Society of Arboriculture, Savoy, Illinois, U.S. 103 pp.
13. ↵
    1. CTLA

    . 2000. Guide for Plant Appraisal, ninth edition. International Society of Arboriculture, Savoy, Illinois, U.S. 143 pp.
14. ↵
    1. Delgado-Bueno,
    2. I.,
    3. M.J. García-García,
    4. C. González-García, and
    5. R.M. Cámara Hurtado

    . 2013. Design of an opinion questionnaire about urban trees: Case study of a well-known street of Madrid. 16th European Forum on Urban Forestry Conference, Milano, Italy. <www.emonfur.eu/public/pub_files/Efuf/presentazioni/venerdi/S2/EFUF_2013_Delgado_Gonzalez_Garcia.pdf>
15. ↵
    1. Escobedo, F., and
    2. M. Andreu

    . 2015. A Community Guide to Urban Forest Inventories. <http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/fr232>
16. ↵
    1. European Environment Agency (EEA)

    . 2012. Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion: The concept of green infrastructure and its integration into policies using monitoring systems. Technical Report No. 18/2011. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg. 139 pp. <www.upv.es/contenidos/CAMUNISO/info/U0632842.pdf>
17. ↵
    1. Fabbri, M.

    1989. Metodi di stima del valore delle piante ornamentali. Acer 5(2):15–19.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Grahn, P., and
    2. U.K. Stigsdotter

    . 2010. The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and Urban Planning 94(3):264–275.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. Grande-Ortiz,
    2. M.A.,
    3. E. Ayuga-Téllez, and
    4. M.L. Contato-Carol

    . 2012. Methods of tree appraisal: A review of their features and application possibilities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 38(4):130–140.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Hammitt, W.E.

    2002. Urban forests and parks as privacy refuges. Journal of Arboriculture 28(1):19–26.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Hegedüs,
    2. A.,
    3. M. Gaál, and
    4. R. Bérces

    . 2011. Tree appraisal methods and their application-first results in one of Budapest’s districts. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 9(4):411–423.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Heynen, N.C., and
    2. G. Lindsey

    . 2003. Correlates of urban forest canopy cover: Implications for local public works. Public Works Management and Policy 8(1):33–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
23. ↵
    1. Jensen, R.R.,
    2. J.D. Gatrell, and
    3. D.D. McLean

    (Eds.). 2005. Geo-Spatial Technologies in Urban Environments. Springer, Berlin, Germany. 242 pp.
24. ↵
    1. Jiao, L., and
    2. Y. Liu

    . 2010. Geographic field model based hedonic valuation of urban open spaces in Wuhan, China. Landscape and Urban Planning 98(1):47–55.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Jim, C.Y.

    2006. Formulaic expert method to integrate evaluation and valuation of heritage trees in compact city. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 116:53–80.

    OpenUrlPubMed
26. ↵
    1. Jutras, P.

    2008. Modeling of Urban Tree Growth with Artificial Intelligence and Multivariate Statistics. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Bioresource. Engineering, McGill University, Canada. 395 pp.
27. ↵
    1. Jutras, P.,
    2. O. Shiv, and
    3. P. Dutilleul

    . 2009. Identification of significant street tree inventory parameters using multivariate statistical analyses. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 53(2):53–62.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Kenney, W.A.

    2008. Potential leaf area index analyses for the City of Toronto’s urban forest. pp. 336–345. In: Ecology, Planning, and Management of Urban Forests. Springer, New York, New York, U.S.
29. ↵
    1. LaPaix, R., and
    2. B. Freedman

    . 2010. Vegetation structure and composition within urban parks of Halifax Regional Municipality, Nova Scotia, Canada. Landscape and Urban Planning 98(2):124–135.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Larsen, F.K., and
    2. P. Kristoffersen

    . 2002. Tilia’s physical dimensions over time. Journal of Arboriculture 25:209–213.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Linsen, L.,
    2. B.J. Karis,
    3. G. McPherson, and
    4. B. Hamann

    . 2005. Tree growth visualization. The Journal of WSCG 13:81–88.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Lohr, V.I.,
    2. C.H. Pearson-Mims,
    3. J. Tarnai, and
    4. D.A. Dillman

    . 2004. How urban residents rate and rank the benefits and problems associated with trees in cities. Journal of Arboriculture 30(1):28–35.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Lukaszkiewicz, J., and
    2. M. Kosmala

    . 2008. Determining the age of street side trees with diameter at breast height-based multifactorial model. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34(3):137–143.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Marinidou, E.,
    2. B. Finegan,
    3. G. Jiménez-Ferrer,
    4. D. Delgado, and
    5. F. Casanoves

    . 2013. Concepts and a methodology for evaluating environmental services from trees of small farms in Chiapas, México. Journal of Environmental Management 114:115–124.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Díaz de Santos

    1. Martín Fernández,
    2. S.,
    3. E. Ayuga-Téllez,
    4. C. González García, and
    5. A. Martín Fernández

    . 2001. Guía completa de Statgraphics. Desde MS-DOS a Statgraphics Plus. Díaz de Santos (Ed.). Madrid.
36. ↵
    1. Martin, N.A.,
    2. A.H. Chappelka,
    3. G.J. Keever, and
    4. E.F. Loewenstein

    . 2011. A 100% tree inventory using i-Tree protocol: A case study at Auburn University, Alabama, U.S. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 37(5):207–212.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.

    2007. Benefit-based tree valuation. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33(1):1–11.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. McRoberts, R.E., and
    2. E.O. Tomppo

    . 2007. Remote sensing support for national forest inventories. Remote Sensing of Environment 110(4):412–419.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Mell, I.C.,
    2. J. Henneberry,
    3. S. Hehl-Lange, and
    4. B. Keskin

    . 2013. Promoting urban greening: Valuing the development of green infrastructure investments in the urban core of Manchester, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12:296–306.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Millward, A.A., and
    2. S. Sabir

    . 2011. Benefits of a forested urban park: What is the value of Allan Gardens to the City of Toronto, Canada? Landscape and Urban Planning 100(3):177–188.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Moskal, M., and
    2. G. Zheng

    . 2012. Retrieving forest inventory variables with terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) in urban heterogeneous forest. Remote Sensing 4:1–20.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Ordóñez,
    2. C., and
    3. P.N. Duinker

    . 2013. An analysis of urban forest management plans in Canada: Implications for urban forest management. Landscape and Urban Planning 116:36–47.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Östberg,
    2. J.,
    3. T. Delshammar,
    4. B. Wiström, and
    5. A.B. Nielsen

    . 2013. Grading of parameters for urban tree inventories by city officials, arborists, and academics using the Delphi method. Environmental Management 51(3):694–708.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Peña,
    2. D.

    2002. Análisis de datos multivariantes. McGraw-Hill, Madrid, España. pp. 539.
45. ↵
    1. Peper, P.J.,
    2. E.G. McPherson, and
    3. S.M. Mori

    . 2001. Equations for predicting diameter, height, crown radius, and leaf area of San Joaquin Valley street trees. Journal of Arboriculture 27:306–317.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Ponce-Donoso,
    2. M.,
    3. L. Moya, and
    4. O. Bustos-Letelier

    . 2009. Evaluation of formulas for the appraisal of urban trees in municipalities of Chile. Scientia Forestalis 37(83):321–329.

    OpenUrl
47. 1. Ponce-Donoso,
    2. M.,
    3. O. Vallejos-Barra,
    4. G. Daniluk-Mosquera, and
    5. C. Avilés-Palacios

    . 2013. Comparación de siete fórmulas chilenas para la valoración del arbolado urbano. Agrociencia 47(7):723–737.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Quigley, M.F.

    2004. Street trees and rural conspecifics: Will long-lived trees reach full size in urban conditions? Urban Ecosystems 7(1):29–39.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. ↵
    1. Redford, K.H., and
    2. W.M. Adams

    . 2009. Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature. Conservation Biology 23:785–787.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. ↵
    1. Roic, L.D., and
    2. A.A. Villaverde

    . 1998. Árboles y arbustos cultivados en la ciudad de Santiago del Estero. Revista Quebracho N°7. Facultad de Ciencias. Forestales. UNSE (ARGENTINA):79–88.
51. ↵
    1. Savva, Y.,
    2. F. Schweingruber,
    3. L. Milyutin, and
    4. E. Vaganov

    . 2002. Genetic and environmental signals in tree rings from different provenances of Pinus sylvestris L. planted in the southern taiga, central Siberia. Tree - Structure and Function 16(4):313–325.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Shrestha, R., and
    2. R.H. Wynne

    . 2012. Estimating biophysical parameters of individual trees in an urban environment using small footprint discrete-return imaging LiDAR. Remote Sensing 4:484–508.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Skoulika, F.,
    2. M. Santamouris,
    3. D. Kolokotsa, and
    4. N. Boemi

    . 2014. On the thermal characteristics and the mitigation potential of a medium size urban park in Athens, Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning 123:73–86.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. S. Liang

    1. Stenberg, P.,
    2. M. Mötus, and
    3. M. Rautiainen

    . 2008. Modelling the spectral signature of forests: Application of remote sensing models to coniferous canopies. pp. 219–243. In: S. Liang (Ed.). Advances in Land Remote Sensing: System, Modeling, Inversion and Applications. Springer, Netherlands.
55. ↵
    1. Tsunetsugu, Y.,
    2. J. Lee,
    3. B.J. Park,
    4. L. Tyrväinen,
    5. T. Kagawa, and
    6. Y. Miyazaki

    . 2013. Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning 113:90–93.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. ↵
    1. Turner, K.,
    2. L. Lefler, and
    3. B. Freedman

    . 2005. Plant communities of selected urbanized areas of Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. Landscape and Urban Planning 71:191–206.

    OpenUrl
57. 1. Vidrih, B., and
    2. S. Medved

    . 2013. Multiparametric model of urban park cooling island. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12:220–229.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Walton, J.T.

    2008. Difficulties with estimating city-wide urban forest cover change from national, remotely-sensed tree canopy maps. Urban Ecosystems 11(1):81–90.

    OpenUrl
59. ↵
    1. Wood, J.P.

    1999. Tree Inventories and GIS in Urban Forestry. M.Sc. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S. <http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-012499-141520>
60. ↵
    1. Wulder, M.A., and
    2. D. Seemann

    . 2003. Forest inventory height update through the integration of LiDAR data with segmented Landsat imagery. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 29(5):536–543.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
61. ↵
    1. Yang, J.,
    2. J. McBride,
    3. J. Zhou, and
    4. Z. Sun

    . 2005. The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 3:65–78.

    OpenUrlCrossRef