The Economic Value of Tree Preservation in a Weak Land Development Market Region

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Akbari, H.,
   2. M. Pomerantz, and
   3. H. Taha

   . 2001. Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Solar Energy 70(3):295–310.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Anderson, L., and
   2. H. Cordell

   . 1988. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape and Urban Planning 15:153–164.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bier, T.

   2001. Urban sprawl and decline: Prospects for change. Public Works Management & Policy 6(2):83–87.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
4. ↵
   1. Bowman, T.,
   2. J. Thompson, and
   3. J. Colletti

   . 2009. Valuation of open space and conservation features in residential subdivisions. Journal of Environmental Management 90(1):321–330.

   OpenUrlPubMed
5. ↵
   1. Boyle, R., and
   2. R. Mohamed

   . 2007. State growth management, smart growth and urban containment: A review of the U.S. and a study of the heartland. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management 50(5):677–697.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Des Rosiers, F.,
   2. M. Thériault,
   3. Y. Kestens, and
   4. P. Villeneuve

   . 2002. Landscaping and house values: An empirical investigation. Journal of Real Estate Research 23(1):139–161.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Dimke, K.,
   2. T. Sydnor, and
   3. D. Gardner

   . 2013. The effect of landscape trees on residential property values of six communities in Cincinnati, Ohio. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39(2):49–55.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Dwyer, J.,
   2. E. McPherson,
   3. H. Schroeder, and
   4. R. Rowntree

   . 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18(5):227–234.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Escobedo, F.,
   2. D. Adams, and
   3. N. Timilsina

   . 2015. Urban forest structure effects on property value. Ecosystem Services 12:209–217.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Gorman, J.

    2004. Residents’ opinions on the value of street trees depending on tree location. Journal of Arboriculture 30(1):36–44.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Hudson, M.

    2000. Ground work: Investigating the need for nature in the city, Evergreen. Accessed 18 December 2014. <www.evergreen.ca/downloads/html/ground-work>
12. ↵
    1. iTree

    . 2017. i-Tree Eco. Tools for assessing and managing forests and community trees. <www.itreetools.org/eco/index.php>
13. ↵
    1. Jeng, H.,
    2. A. Englande,
    3. R. Bakeer, and
    4. H. Bradford

    . 2005. Impact of urban stormwater runoff on estuarine environmental quality. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 63(4):513–526.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Jiang, B.,
    2. L. Larsen,
    3. B. Deal, and
    4. W.C. Sullivan

    . 2015. A dose–response curve describing the relationship between tree cover density and landscape preference. Landscape and Urban Planning 139:16–25. <doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.018>
15. ↵
    1. Kellogg, W.

    2007. The state role in guiding land use change in the Ohio Lake Erie basin: Key policies, programs, and incentives for the Ohio Balanced Growth Program Final report. Ohio Lake Erie Commission and EcoCity Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio. 151 pp.
16. ↵
    1. Kopits, E.,
    2. V. McConnell, and
    3. M. Walls

    . 2007. The trade-off between private lots and public open space in subdivisions at the urban-rural fringe. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 89(5):1191–1197.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Laverne, R., and
    2. G. Lewis

    . 1996. The effect of vegetation on residential energy use in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Journal of Arboriculture 22(5):234–243.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Laverne, R., and
    2. K. Winson-Geideman

    . 2003. The influence of trees and landscaping on rental rates at office buildings. Journal of Arboriculture 29(5):281–290.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Mansfield, C.,
    2. S.K. Pattanayak,
    3. W. McDow,
    4. R. McDonald, and
    5. P. Halpin

    . 2005. Shades of Green: Measuring the value of urban forests in the housing market. Journal of Forest Economics 11(3):177–199.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.,
    2. J. Simpson,
    3. P. Peper,
    4. S. Gardner,
    5. K. Vargas,
    6. S. Maco, and
    7. Q. Xiao

    . 2006. Midwest community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-199. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Albany, California, U.S. 85 pp.
21. ↵
    1. Mohamed, R.

    2006. The Economics of Conservation Subdivisions: Price Premiums, Improvement Costs, and Absorption Rates. Urban Affairs Review 41(3):376–399.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. E.G. McPherson,
    2. D.J. Nowak, and
    3. R.A. Rowntree

    1. Nowak, D.

    1994. Air pollution removal by Chicago’s urban forest. pp. 63–81 In: E.G. McPherson, D.J. Nowak, and R.A. Rowntree (Eds.). Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project., Gen. Tech. Rep NE-186. USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, Pennsylvania, U.S. 201 pp.
23. ↵
    1. Nowak, D., and
    2. D. Crane

    . 2002. Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution 116(3):381–389.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.,
    2. R. Hoehn, and
    3. D. Crane

    . 2007. Oxygen production by urban trees in the United States. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33(3):220–226.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Panduro, T.E., and
    2. K.L. Veie

    2013. Classification and valuation of urban green spaces: A hedonic house price valuation. Landscape and Urban Planning 120:119–128.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Payton, S., and
    2. J. Ottensmann

    . 2015. The implicit price of urban public parks and greenways: A spatial-contextual approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 58(3):495–512.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Payton, S.,
    2. G. Lindsey,
    3. J. Wilson,
    4. J. Ottensmann, and
    5. J. Man

    . 2008. Valuing the benefits of the urban forest: A spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51(6):717–736.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Pendall, R.

    2003. Sprawl without growth: The upstate paradox. Report of The Brookings Institution/Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, D.C. 11 pp.
29. ↵
    1. Rossi, L., and
    2. R. Hari

    . 2007. Screening procedure to assess the impact of urban stormwater temperature to populations of brown trout in receiving water. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 3(3):383–392.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Sander, H.

    2016. Assessing impacts on urban greenspace, waterways, and vegetation in urban planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 59(3):461–479.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Sander, H.,
    2. S. Polasky, and
    3. R. Haight

    . 2010. The value of urban tree cover: A hedonic property price model in Ramsey and Dakota Counties, Minnesota, USA. Ecological Economics 69(8):1646–1656.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Thériault,
    2. M.,
    3. Y. Kestens, and
    4. F. Des Rosiers

    . 2002. The impact of mature trees on house values and on residential location choices in Quebec City. In: International Environmental Modelling and Software Society. Integrated Assessment and Decision Support. 1st biennial meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society. University of Lugano, Switzerland. Vol 1. pp. 478–483.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Xiao, Q., and
    2. E. McPherson

    . 2002. Rainfall interception by Santa Monica’s municipal urban forest. Urban Ecosystems 6(4):291–302.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
34. ↵
    1. Young, R.

    2011. Planting the living city. Journal of the American Planning Association 77(4):368–381.

    OpenUrl