Effects of Retention Time in Nursery Containers and Root Pruning at Planting on Landscape Establishment and Anchorage of Three Tree Taxa

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Balisky, A.C.,
   2. P. Salonius,
   3. C. Walli, and
   4. D. Brinkman

   . 1995. Seedling roots and forest floor: Misplaced and neglected aspects of British Columbia’s reforestation effort? Forestry Chronicle 71:59–65.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Burdett, A.N.

   1978. Control of root morphogenesis for improved stability in container-grown lodgepole pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 8:483–486.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Burns, R.M., and
   2. B.H. Honkala

   . 1990. Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C. vol. 2. 877 pp.
4. ↵
   1. Coutts, M.P.

   1983. Root architecture and tree stability. Plant and Soil 71:171–188.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Coutts, M.P.,
   2. C. Walker, and
   3. A.C. Burnand

   . 1990. Effects of establishment method on root form of lodgepole pine and Sitka spruce and on the production of adventitious roots. Forestry 63:143–159.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Dunn, G.M.,
   2. J.R. Huth, and
   3. M.J. Lewty

   . 1997. Coating nursery containers with copper carbonate improves root morphology of five native Australia tree species used in agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems 37:143–155.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Fourcaud, T.,
   2. X. Zhang, and
   3. A. Stokes

   . 2008. Understanding the impact of root morphology on overturning mechanisms: A model approach. Annals of Botany 101:1267–1280.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   1. Gilman E.F.,
   2. M. Paz, and
   3. C. Harchick

   . 2016. Effect of container type and root pruning on growth and anchorage after planting Acer rubrum L. into landscape soil. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 42:73–83.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Gilman, E.F., and
   2. C. Harchick

   . 2014. Root system morphology influences lateral stability of Swietenia mahagoni. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40:27–35.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. C. Wiese

    . 2012. Root pruning at planting and planting depth in the nursery impact root system morphology and anchorage. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 38:232–239.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. M.E. Kane

    . 1990. Root growth of red maple following planting from containers. HortScience 25:527–528.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. 1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. J. Miesbauer,
    3. C. Harchick, and
    4. R.C. Beeson

    . 2014. Impact of tree size and container volume at planting, mulch, and irrigation on Acer rubrum L. growth and anchorage. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39:173–181.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. M. Paz, and
    3. C. Harchick

    . 2010. Root ball shaving improves root systems on seven tree species in containers. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 28:13–18.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. M. Paz, and
    3. C. Harchick

    . 2015a. Nursery planting depth, mulch application, and root pruning at landscape planting affect tree health and anchorage. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 41:75–87.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. M. Paz, and
    3. C. Harchick

    . 2015b. Retention time in three nursery container volumes impacts root architecture. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 41:146–154.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. M. Paz, and
    3. C. Harchick

    . 2015c. Container and landscape planting depth and root ball shaving affects Magnolia grandiflora root architecture and landscape performance. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 41:260–269.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Harris, J.R., and
    2. S. Day

    . 2010. Planting depth at onset of container production and subsequent root ball remediation at transplanting of pin oak and linden. HortScience 45:1793–1797.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. ↵
    1. Harris, R.W.,
    2. W.B. Davis,
    3. N.W. Stice, and
    4. D. Long

    . 1971. Root pruning improves nursery tree quality. Journal American Society Horticulture Science 96:105–108.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Krasowski, M.J.

    2003. Root system modifications by nursery culture reflect on post-planting growth and development of coniferous seedlings. Forestry Chronicle 79:882–891.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. E. Van Eerden and
    2. J.M. Kinghorn

    1. Lindgren, O., and
    2. G. Örlander

    . 1978. A study on root development and stability of 6- to 7-year old container plants. pg. 142–144. In: E. Van Eerden and J.M. Kinghorn (Eds.). Proceedings of the Root Form of Planted Trees Symposium, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 16–19 May 1978. Canadian Forest Service, B.C., Joint Report No. 8.
21. ↵
    1. Lindström,
    2. A., and
    3. G. Rune

    . 1999. Root deformation in plantations of container-grown Scots pine trees: Effects on root growth, tree stability, and stem straightness. Plant and Soil 217:29–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Lindström,
    2. A.,
    3. C. Hellqvist, and
    4. E. Stattin

    . 2005. Mini Seedlings—A New Forest Regeneration System. pp. 56–58. In: The Thin Green Line: A symposium on the state-of-the-art in reforestation. Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 1235 Queen Street East Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5.
23. ↵
    1. Marshall, M.D., and
    2. E.F. Gilman

    . 1998. Effects of nursery container type on root growth and landscape establishment of Acer rubrum L. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 16:55–59.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Ortega, U.,
    2. J. Majada,
    3. A. Mena-Petite,
    4. J. Sanchez-Zabala,
    5. N. Rodriguez-Itturrizar,
    6. K. Txarterina,
    7. J. Azpitarte, and
    8. M. Duñabeitia

    . 2006. Field performance of Pinus radiata D. Don produced in nursery with different types of containers. New Forests 31:97–112.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Robert, J.A., and
    2. B.S. Lindgren

    . 2006. Relationships between root form and growth, stability, and growth in planted versus naturally regenerated lodgepole pine in north-central British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:2642–2653.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Salonius, P.,
    2. K. Beaton, and
    3. B. Roze

    . 2000. Effects of cell size and spacing on root density and field performance of container-reared black spruce. Information Report M-X-208E, Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre, Frederickton, New Brunswick, Canada.
27. ↵
    1. Spomer, A.

    1980. Container soil water relations: production, maintenance, and transplanting. Journal of Arboriculture 6:315–320.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Stokes, A.

    1999. Strain distribution during anchorage failure of Pinus pinaster Ait. at different ages and tree growth response to wind-induced root movement. Plant and Soil 217:17–27.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Struve, D.K.,
    2. L. Burchfield, and
    3. C. Maupin

    . 2000. Survival and growth of transplanted large- and small-caliper red oaks. Journal of Arboriculture 26:162–169.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Tate, R.L.

    1980. Detection, description and treatment of girdling roots on urban Norway maple trees. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan.
31. ↵
    1. Watson, G.W.

    1985. Tree size affects root regeneration and top growth after transplanting. Journal of Arboriculture 11:37–40.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Watson, G.W., and
    2. S. Clark

    . 1993. Regeneration of girdling roots after removal. Journal of Arboriculture 19:278–280.

    OpenUrl