Impact of Landscape Tree Stabilization System and Nursery Production Method on Anchorage and Growth

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Alvey, A,
   2. P.E. Wiseman, and
   3. B. Kane

   . 2009. Efficacy of conventional tree stabilization systems and their effect on short-term tree development. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 35:157–164.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Appleton, B.L.

   2004. Tree stabilization at installation. Southern Nurseryman Association Annual Research Conference Proceedings 49:437–440.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Beeson, R.C., and
   2. E.F. Gilman

   . 1992. Water stress and osmotic adjustment during post-digging acclimatization of Quercus virginiana produced in fabric containers. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 10:208–214.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. G.W. Watson and
   2. D. Neely

   1. Dana, M.N., and
   2. S.C. Blessing

   . 1994. Post-transplant root growth and water relations of Thuja occidentalis from field and containers. In: G.W. Watson and D. Neely (Eds.). The Landscape Below Ground. Proceedings of International Workshop on Tree Root Development in Urban Soils. International Society of Arboriculture, Savoy, Illinois, U.S.
5. ↵
   1. Eckstein, R.

   2007. Evaluation of landscape tree stabilization systems in simulated wind. Master’s thesis. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.
6. ↵
   1. Gilman, E.F.

   2001. Effect of nursery production method, irrigation, and inoculation with mycorrhizae-forming fungi on establishment of Quercus virginiana. Journal of Arboriculture 27:30–39.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Gilman, E.F., and
   2. R.C. Beeson, Jr.

   . 1996. Nursery production method affects root growth. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 14:88–91.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Gilman, E.F., and
   2. F. Masters

   . 2010. Effect of tree size, root pruning, and production method on root growth and lateral stability of Quercus virginiana. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36:281–291.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Gilman, E.F.,
   2. C. Harchick, and
   3. M. Paz

   . 2010. Effect of tree size, root pruning and production method on establishment of Quercus virginiana. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36:183–190.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.

    2013. Anchorage influence by production method and root pruning. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39:1–5.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Harris, J.R., and
    2. E.F. Gilman

    . 1993. Production method affects growth and post-transplant establishment of ‘East Palatka’ holly. Journal of American Society Horticulture Science 118:194–200.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    1. Harris, R.,
    2. A.T. Leiser, and
    3. W.B. Davis

    . 1976. Staking landscape trees. University of California Agricultural Extension leaflet 2576.
13. ↵
    1. Harris, R.W., and
    2. W.D. Hamilton

    1969. Staking and pruning young Myoporum laetum trees. Journal American Society for Horticultural Science 94:359–361.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Labrosse, K.J.,
    2. R.C. Corry, and
    3. Y. Zheng

    . 2011. Effects of tree stabilization systems on tree health and implications on planting specifications. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 37:219–225.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Leiser, A.T., and
    2. J.D. Kemper

    . 1968. A theoretical analysis of a critical height of staking landscape trees. American Society for Horticultural Science 92:713–720.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Leiser, A.T.,
    2. R. Harris,
    3. P. Neel,
    4. D. Long,
    5. N. Stice, and
    6. R. Maire

    . 1972. Staking and pruning influence trunk development of young trees. Journal of American Society Horticultural Science 97:498–503.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Lindstrom, A., and
    2. G. Rune

    . 1999. Root deformation in plantations on container-grown Scots pine trees: Effects on root growth, tree stability, and stem straightness. Plant and Soil 217:29–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Marler, T.E., and
    2. F.S. Davies

    . 1987. Growth of bare-root and container grown ‘Hamlin’ orange trees in the field. Proceedings Florida State Horticulture Society 100:89–93.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Neel, P.L.

    1967. Factors influencing trunk development of landscape trees. Proceedings of the International Shade Tree Conference 43:293–303.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Robert, J.A., and
    2. B.S. Lindgren

    . 2006. Relationships between root form and growth, stability, and mortality in planted versus naturally regenerated lodgepole pine in north-central British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:2642–2653.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Stokes, A.,
    2. A.H. Fitter, and
    3. M.P. Coutts

    . 1995. Responses of young trees to wind and shading: Effects on root architecture. Journal of Experimental Botany 46:1139-1146.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Svihra, P.,
    2. D. Burger, and
    3. D. Ellis

    . 1999. Effects of three trunk support systems on growth of young Pyrus calleryana trees. Journal of Arboriculture 25:319–324.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Watson, G.W., and
    2. G. Himelick

    . 2013. The Practical Science of Planting Trees. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, U.S. 250 pp.