Testing a New Approach to Quantify Growth Responses to Pruning Among Three Temperate Tree Species

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Becker, P.,
   2. F. Meinzer, and
   3. S. Wullschleger

   . 2000. Hydraulic limitation of tree height: A critique. Functional Ecology 14:4–11.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
2. ↵
   1. Bolund, P., and
   2. S. Hunhammar

   . 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29:293–301.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Canham, C.D.

   1988. Growth and canopy architecture of shade-tolerant trees: Response to canopy gaps. Ecology 69:786–795.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Chapin, F.S.,
   2. E.D. Schulze, and
   3. H. A. Mooney

   . 1990. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 21:423–447.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
5. ↵
   1. Chen, R.,
   2. E. Rosen, and
   3. P.H. Masson

   . 1999. Gravitropism in Higher Plants Plant Physiology 120:343–350.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Close, R.E.,
   2. P.V Nguyen, and
   3. J. J. Kielbaso

   . 1996. Urban vs. natural sugar maple growth: I. Stress symptoms and phenology in relation to site characteristics. Journal of Arboriculture 22:144–150.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Dahle, G., and
   2. H. Holt

   . 2006. Branch strength loss implications for silver maple (Acer saccharinum) converted from round-over to V-trim. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32:148–154.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Dwyer, J.F.,
   2. E.G. Mcpherson,
   3. H.W. Schroeder, and
   4. R.A. Rowntree

   . 1992. Assesing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18:227–234.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Goodfellow, J.W.,
   2. B. Blumreich, and
   3. G. Nowacki

   . 1987. Tree growth response to line-clearance pruning. Journal of Arboriculture 13:196–200.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Grabosky, J., and
    2. N. Bassuk

    . 1995. A new urban tree soil to safely increase rooting volumes under sidewalks. Journal of Arboriculture 4:187.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Grabosky, J., and
    2. E. Gilman

    . 2002. Measurement and prediction of tree growth reduction from tree planting space design in established parking lots. Journal of Arboriculture 30:154–164.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Gregg, J.W.,
    2. C.G. Jones, and
    3. T.E. Dawson

    . 2003. Urbanization effects on tree growth in the vicinity of New York City. Nature 424:183–187.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. ↵
    1. Heichel, G.H., and
    2. N.C. Turner

    . 1984. Branch growth and leaf numbers of red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and red oak (Quercus rubra L.): Response to defoliation. Oecologia 62:1–6.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Heilman, P.

    1981. Root Penetration of Douglas-fir Seedlings into Compacted Soil. Forest Science 27:660–666.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. King, D.A.

    2003. Allocation of above-ground growth is related to light in temperate deciduous saplings. Functional Ecology 17:482–488.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Kitajima, K.

    1994. Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees. Oecologia 98:419–429.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Kosola, K.,
    2. D. Dickmann,
    3. E. Paul, and
    4. D. Parry

    . 2001. Repeated insect defoliation effects on growth, nitrogen acquisition, carbohydrates, and root demography of poplars. Oecologia 129:65–74.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Krizek, D.T., and
    2. S.P. Dubik

    . 1987. Influence of water stress and restricted root volume on growth and development of urban trees. Journal of Arboriculture 13:47–55.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Krueger, L.M.,
    2. C.J. Peterson,
    3. A. Royo, and
    4. W.P. Carson

    . 2009. Evaluating relationships among tree growth rate, shade tolerance, and browse tolerance following disturbance in an eastern deciduous forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:2460–2469.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Kuo, F.E., and
    2. W.C. Sullivan

    . 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior 33:343–367.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
21. ↵
    1. A. Grupta and
    2. N. Kaur

    1. Magel, E.,
    2. W. Einig, and
    3. R. Hampp

    . 2000. Carbohydrates in trees. pp. 317–336. In: A. Grupta and N. Kaur (Eds.). Carbohydrate reserves in plants: Synthesis and regulation.
22. ↵
    1. McClendon, J., and
    2. G. McMillen

    . 1982. The control of leaf morphology and the tolerance of shade by woody plants. Botanical Gazette 143:79–83.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Mediene, S.,
    2. M.O. Jordan,
    3. L. Pagès,
    4. J. Lebot, and
    5. S. Adamowicz

    . 2002. The influence of severe shoot pruning on growth, carbon and nitrogen status in young peach trees (Prunus persica). Tree physiology 22:1289–96.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Millet, J.,
    2. A. Bouchard, and
    3. C. Edelin

    . 1999. Relationship between architecture and successional status of trees in the temperate deciduous forest. Ecoscience 6:187–203.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. D.E. Crane,
    3. J.C. Stevens,
    4. R.E. Hoehn,
    5. J.T. Walton, and
    6. J. Bond

    . 2008. A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34:347–358.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act

    . 2012. Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act. Ontario Ministry of Labour.
27. ↵
    1. Ramos, G., and
    2. J. Grace

    . 1990. The effects of shade on the gas exchange of seedlings of four tropical trees from Mexico. Functional Ecology 4:667–677.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Rees, W.T.,
    2. T.C. Birx,
    3. D.L. Neal,
    4. C.J. Summerson,
    5. F.L. Tiburzi, and
    6. J.A. Thurber

    . 1994. Priority trimming to improve reliability. ISA Annual Conference. ISA, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
29. ↵
    1. Rom, C.R., and
    2. D.C. Ferree

    . 1985. Time and severity of summer pruning influences on young peach tree net photosynthesis, transpiration and dry weight distribution. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 110.
30. ↵
    1. Runkle, J.

    1992. Guidelines and sample protocol for sampling forest gaps. United States Department of Agriculture.
31. ↵
    1. Runkle, J., and
    2. T. Yetter

    . 1987. Treefalls revisited: Gap dynamics in the southern Appalachians. Ecology 68:417–424.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Ryan, M.G.,
    2. N. Phillips, and
    3. B.J. Bond

    . 2006. The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revisited. Plant, Cell, and Environment 29:367–381.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Ryan, M.G., and
    2. B.J. Yoder

    . 1997. Hydraulic limits to tree height, and tree growth: What keeps trees from growing beyond a certain height? 47:235–242.
34. ↵
    1. Sala, A., and
    2. G. Hoch

    . 2009. Height-related growth declines in ponderosa pine are not due to carbon limitation. Plant, Cell, Environment 32:22–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. ↵
    1. Saxe, H.,
    2. D. Ellsworth, and
    3. J. Heath

    . 1998. Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO₂ atmosphere. New Phytologist 139:395–436.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Searle, S.Y.,
    2. M.H. Turnbull,
    3. N.T. Boelman,
    4. W.S.F. Schuster,
    5. D. Yakir, and
    6. K.L. Griffin

    . 2012. Urban environment of New York City promotes growth in northern red oak seedlings. Tree physiology 32:389–400.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. ↵
    1. Shigo, A.L.

    1991. Modern Arboriculture: A Systems Approach to the Care of Trees and Their Associates. Shigo and Trees, Associates.
38. ↵
    1. Sperry, C.E., and
    2. W.R. Chaney

    . 1999. Phototropism: Its implication for utility forestry. Journal of Arboriculture 25:43–47.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Springmann, S.,
    2. R. Rogers, and
    3. H. Spiecker

    . 2011. Impact of artificial pruning on growth and secondary shoot development of wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). Forest Ecology and Management 261:764–769.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
40. ↵
    1. Stoll, P., and
    2. B. Schmid

    . 1998. Plant foraging and dynamic competition between branches of Pinus sylvestris in contrasting light environments. Journal of Ecology 86:934–945.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
41. ↵
    1. USDA

    . 2003. i-Tree eco user’s manual. USDA.
42. ↵
    1. Walters, M.B., and
    2. P.B. Reich

    . 1996. Are shade tolerance, survival, and growth linked? Low light and nitrogen effects on hardwood seedlings. Ecology 77:841–853.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science