Determining Public Values of Urban Forests Using a Sidewalk Interception Survey in Fredericton, Halifax, and Winnipeg, Canada

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Arnberger, A., and
   2. R. Eder

   . 2012. Exploring coping behaviours of Sunday and workday visitors due to dense use conditions in an urban forest. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11(4):439–449.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Balram, S., and
   2. S. Dragievi

   . 2005. Attitudes toward urban green spaces: Integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements. Landscape and Urban Planning. 71(2–4):147–162.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Bengston, D.N.

   1994. Changing forest values and ecosystem management. Society & Natural Resources 7:515–533.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Budruk, M.,
   2. H. Thomas and
   3. T. Tyrrell

   . 2009. Urban green spaces: A study of place attachment and environmental attitudes in India. Society & Natural Resources 22(9):824–839.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Chiesura, A.

   2004. The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape and Urban Planning 68(1):129–138.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. Clark, J.R.,
   2. N.P. Matheny,
   3. G. Cross, and
   4. V. Wake

   . 1997. A model of urban forest sustainability. Journal of Arboriculture 23(1):17–30.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Conway, T., and
   2. J. Hackworth

   . 2007. Urban pattern and land cover variation in the greater Toronto area. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 51(1):43–57.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Dietz, T.,
   2. A. Fitzgerald, and
   3. R. Shwom

   . 2005. Environmental values. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:335–372.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Dietz, T.,
   2. P.C. Stern, and
   3. G.A. Guagnano

   . 1998. Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 30(4):450–471.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
10. ↵
    1. Donovan, G.H., and
    2. D.T. Butry

    . 2010. Trees in the city: Valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon. Landscape and Urban Planning 94(2):77–83.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Dutcher, D.D.,
    2. J.C. Finley,
    3. A.E. Luloff, and
    4. J.B. Johnson

    . 2007. Connectivity with nature as a measure of environmental values. Environment and Behavior 39(4):474.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J.F.,
    2. E.G. McPherson,
    3. H.W. Schroeder, and
    4. R.A. Rowntree

    . 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18(5):227–227.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J.F.,
    2. H.W. Schroeder, and
    3. P.H. Gobster

    . 1991. The significance of urban trees and forests: Toward a deeper understanding of values. Journal of Arboriculture 17(10):276–284.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Fisher, R.K.,
    2. R.K. Turner, and
    3. P. Morling

    . 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68(3):643–653.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Flannigan, J.

    2005. An evaluation of residents’ attitudes to street trees in southwest England. Arboricultural Journal 28(4):219–241.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Fraser, E.D.G., and
    2. W.A. Kenney

    . 2000. Cultural background and landscape history as factors affecting perceptions of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 26(2):106–113.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Getz, D.A.,
    2. A. Karow, and
    3. J.J. Kielbaso

    . 1982. Inner city preferences for trees and urban forestry programs. Journal of Arboriculture 8(10):258–263.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Giles-Corti,
    2. B., and
    3. R.J. Donovan

    . 2002. The relative influence of individual, social, and physical environment determinants of physical activity. Social Science & Medicine 54(12):1793–1812.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Gobster, P.H., and
    2. L.M. Westphal

    . 2004. The human dimensions of urban greenways: Planning for recreation and related experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning 68(2–3):147–165.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Gorman, J.

    2004. Residents’ opinions on the value of street trees depending on tree location. Journal of Arboriculture 30(1):36–44.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Grove, M.,
    2. A.R. Troy,
    3. J.P. O’Neil-Dunne,
    4. W.R.J. Burch,
    5. M.L. Cadenasso, and
    6. S.T.A. Pickett

    . 2006. Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems 9(4):578–597.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Heberlein, T.A.

    2012. Navigating environmental attitudes. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, U.S. 240 pp.
23. ↵
    1. Hull, R.B.

    1992. How the public values urban forests. Journal of Arboriculture 18(2):98–101.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Hunter, I.R.

    2001. What do people want from urban forestry?—The European experience. Urban Ecosystems 5(4):277–284.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Jay, M., and
    2. U. Schraml

    . 2009. Understanding the role of urban forests for migrants—Uses, perception, and integrative potential. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8(4):283–294.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Johnston, M., and
    2. L.D. Shimada

    . 2004. Urban forestry in a multicultural society. Journal of Arboriculture 30(3):185–192.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Jones, R.E., and
    2. R.E. Dunlap

    . 1992. The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time? Rural Sociology 57:28–47.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
28. ↵
    1. Jones, R.E.,
    2. K.L. Davis, and
    3. J. Bradford

    . 2013. The value of trees: Factors influencing homeowner support for protecting local urban trees. Environment and Behavior 45(5):650–676.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
29. ↵
    1. Junge, C.E.

    1974. Residence time and variability of tropospheric trace gases. Tellus 26(4):477–488.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Kalmbach, K.L., and
    2. J.J. Kielbaso

    . 1979. Resident attitudes toward selected characteristics of street tree planting. Journal of Arboriculture 5(6):124–129.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Lewis-Beck,
    2. M.S.,
    3. A.E. Bryman, and
    4. T. Futing Liao

    . 2003. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, U.S. 1528 pp.
32. ↵
    1. Liere, K.D., and
    2. R.E. Dunlap

    . 1980. The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly 44(2):181–199.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Lockwood, M.

    1999. Humans valuing nature: Synthesizing insights from philosophy, psychology, and economics. Environmental Values 8(3):381–401.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
34. ↵
    1. Lohr, V.,
    2. C. Pearson-Mims,
    3. J. Tarnai, and
    4. D. Dillman

    . 2004. How urban residents rate and rank the benefits and problems associated with trees in cities. Journal of Arboriculture 30(1):28–35.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.

    2003. A benefit-cost analysis of ten street tree species in Modesto, California, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 29(1):1–8.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. J.R. Simpson

    . 2002. A comparison of municipal forest benefits and costs in Modesto and Santa Monica, California, USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 1(2):61–74.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Mulhall, J.,
    2. R. King,
    3. S. Glina, and
    4. K. Hvidsten

    . 2008. Importance of and satisfaction with sex among men and women worldwide: Results of the global better sex survey. The Journal of Sexual Medicine 5(4):788–795.

    OpenUrl
38. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. M.H. Noble,
    3. S.M. Sisinni, and
    4. J.F. Dwyer

    . 2001. People and trees: Assessing the U.S. urban forest resource. Journal of Forestry 99(3):37–42.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. R. Hoehn, and
    3. D.E. Crane

    . 2007. Oxygen production by urban trees in the United States. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33(3):220–226.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Owen, R.J.,
    2. P.N. Duinker, and
    3. T.M. Beckley

    . 2009. Capturing old-growth values for use in forest decision-making. Environmental Management 43(2):237–248.

    OpenUrlPubMed
41. ↵
    1. Payton, S.,
    2. G. Lindsey,
    3. J. Wilson,
    4. J. Ottensmann, and
    5. J. Man

    . 2008. Valuing the benefits of the urban forest: A spatial hedonic approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51(6):717.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Peckham, S.,
    2. P.N. Duinker, and
    3. C. Ordonez

    . 2013. Urban forest values in Canada: Views of citizens in Calgary and Halifax. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12(2):154–162.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Reser, J.P., and
    2. J.M. Bentrupperbäumer

    . 2005. What and where are environmental values? Assessing the impacts of current diversity of use of ‘environmental’ and ‘World Heritage’ values. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25(2):125–146.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
44. ↵
    1. Rohan, M.J.

    2000. A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(3):255–277.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
45. ↵
    1. Rokeach, M.

    1973. The Nature of Human Values. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, U.S. 438 pp.
46. ↵
    1. Roy, S.,
    2. J. Byrne, and
    3. C. Pickering

    . 2012. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11(4):351–363.

    OpenUrl
47. ↵
    1. Ruckelshaus, M.,
    2. E. McKenzie,
    3. H. Tallis,
    4. A. Guerry,
    5. G. Daily,
    6. P. Kareiva,
    7. S. Polasky,
    8. T. Ricketts,
    9. N. Bhagabati,
    10. S.A. Wood, and
    11. J. Bernhardt

    . 2013. Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecological Economics (in press).
48. ↵
    1. Satterfield, T.

    2001. In search of value literacy: Suggestions for the elicitation of environmental values. Environmental Values 10(3):331–359.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. ↵
    1. Schroeder, H.,
    2. J. Flannigan, and
    3. R. Coles

    . 2006. Residents’ attitudes toward street trees in the UK and U.S. communities. Journal of Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32(5):236–246.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Schroeder, H.W.

    1984. Environmental perception rating scales a case for simple methods of analysis. Environment and Behavior 16(5):573–598.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
51. ↵
    1. Schroeder, H.W., and
    2. S.R. Ruffolo

    . 1996. Householder evaluations of street trees in a Chicago suburb. Journal of Arboriculture 22(1):35–43.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. P. Schmuck and
    2. P.W. Schultz

    1. Schultz, P.W.

    2002. Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. pp. 61–78. In: P. Schmuck and P.W. Schultz (Eds.). The psychology of sustainable development. Kluwer, New York, New York, U.S. 327 pp.
53. ↵
    1. Schwartz, S.H.

    1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25(1):1–65.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Schwartz, S.H., and
    2. W. Bilsky

    . 1990. Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58(5):878–891.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
55. ↵
    1. Sinclair, J.A.,
    2. J. Diduck, and
    3. P.N. Duinker

    . 2014. Elicitation of urban forest values from residents of Winnipeg, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44(8):922–930.

    OpenUrl
56. ↵
    1. Sommer, R.,
    2. H. Guenther, and
    3. P.A. Barker

    . 1990. Surveying householder response to street trees. Landscape Journal 9(2):79–85.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
57. ↵
    1. Sommer, R.O.,
    2. P.A. Barker,
    3. H. Guenther, and
    4. K. Kurani

    . 1989. Householder evaluation of two street tree species. Journal of Arboriculture 15(4):99–102.

    OpenUrl
58. ↵
    1. Statistics Canada

    . 2006. Population and dwelling counts for Canada and census subdivisions (municipalities), 2006 and 2001 censuses—100% data. Statistics Canada. Accessed 30 December 2013. <www12.statcan.ca/english/census06/data/popdwell/Table.cfm?T=301&S=3&O=D2010>
59. ↵
    1. Statistics Canada

    . 2012. Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census—Census subdivision of Halifax, RGM, Nova Scotia. Statistics Canada. Accessed 30 December 2013. <www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/fogs-spg/Facts-csd-eng.cfm?LANG=Eng&GK=CSD&GC=1209034>
60. ↵
    1. Strauss, A.L., and
    2. J. Corbin

    . 2008. Basics of qualitative research, third edition. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California, U.S. 312 pp.
61. ↵
    1. Treiman, T., and
    2. J. Gartner

    . 2005. What do people want from their community forests? Results of a public attitude survey in Missouri, U.S. Journal of Arboriculture 31(5):243–250.

    OpenUrl
62. ↵
    1. Tyrväinen,
    2. L.,
    3. K. Mäkinen, and
    4. J. Schipperijn

    . 2007. Tools for mapping social values of urban woodlands and other green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 79(1):5–19.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
63. ↵
    1. Ulrich, R.S.

    1986. Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 13:29–44.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
64. ↵
    1. van Wassenaer, P.J.E.,
    2. L. Schaeffer, and
    3. W.A. Kenney

    . 2000. Strategic planning in urban forestry: A 21st century paradigm shift for small town Canada. Forestry Chronicle 76(2):241–246.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Zhang, Y., and
    2. B. Zheng

    . 2011. Assessments of citizen willingness to support urban forestry: An empirical study in Alabama. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 37(3):118–125.

    OpenUrl