Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Effect of Eight Container Types and Root Pruning During Nursery Production on Root Architecture of Acer rubrum

Edward F. Gilman, Maria Paz and Chris Harchick
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 2016, 42 (1) 31-45; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2016.003
Edward F. Gilman
Edward F. Gilman (corresponding author), University of Florida, Environmental Horticulture, 1533 Fifield Hall, Gainesville, Florida 32611, U.S.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Maria Paz
Maria Paz, University of Florida, Environmental Horticulture, 1533 Fifield Hall, Gainesville, Florida 32611, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Harchick
Chris Harchick, University of Florida, Environmental Horticulture, 1533 Fifield Hall, Gainesville, Florida 32611, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Amoroso, G.,
    2. P. Frangi,
    3. R. Piatti,
    4. F. Ferrini,
    5. A. Fini, and
    6. M. Faoro
    . 2010. Effect of container design on plant growth and root deformation of littleleaf linden and field elm. HortScience 45:1829–1829.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Anonymous
    . 2014. American Standard for Nursery Stock. American Nursery Association, Washington D.C., U.S.
  3. ↵
    1. Anonymous
    . 2015. Florida Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.
  4. ↵
    1. Arnold, M.A., and
    2. E. Young
    . 1991. CuCO3-painted containers and root pruning affect apple and green ash root growth and cytokinin levels. HortScience 26:242–244.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Arnold, M.A., and
    2. G.V. McDonald
    . 2009. Groundcovers, organic, and inorganic mulches, and masonry surfaces differentially affect establishment and root zone characteristics of urban trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 35:232–240.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Blanusa, T.,
    2. E. Papadogiannakis,
    3. R. Tanner, and
    4. R.W.F. Cameron
    . 2007. Root pruning as a means to encourage root growth in two ornamental shrubs, Buddleja davidii ‘Summer Beauty’ and Cistus ‘Snow Fire’. Journal Horticultural Sciences and Biotechnology 82:521–528.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Danjon, F.,
    2. T. Fourcaud, and
    3. D. Bert
    . 2005. Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature Pinus piaster. New Phytologist 168:387–400.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Fare, D.
    2005. Should potting depth be a concern for container trees? pp. 25–28. In: Proceedings of Trees and Planting: Getting the Roots Right Conference. November 10. The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, U.S.
  9. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. S. Lilly
    . 2008. Best Management Practices: Tree Pruning, second edition. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, U.S.
  10. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. C. Harchick
    . 2008. Planting depth in containers affects root form and tree quality. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 26:129–134.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. C. Harchick
    . 2014. Root system morphology influences lateral stability of Swietenia mahagoni Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40:27–35.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. C. Harchick, and
    3. M. Paz
    . 2010a. Effect of container type on root form and growth of red maple. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 28:1–7.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. C. Harchick, and
    3. C. Weise
    . 2009. Root pruning effects tree quality in container-grown oaks. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 27:7–11.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. J. Miesbauer,
    3. C. Harchick, and
    4. R.C. Beeson
    . 2013. Impact of tree size at planting, mulch and irrigation on Acer rubrum L. growth and anchorage. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39:173–181.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. M. Paz
    . 2014. Root system morphology influenced by container design, retention time, and root pruning. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40:16–26.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. M. Paz, and
    3. C. Harchick
    . 2010b. Root ball shaving improves root systems on seven tree species in containers. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 28:13–18.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. M. Paz, and
    3. C. Harchick
    . 2015a. Nursery planting depth, mulch application, and root pruning at landscape planting affect tree health and anchorage. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 41:75–87.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. M. Paz, and
    3. C. Harchick
    . 2015b. Effect of container type and root pruning on growth and anchorage after planting Acer rubrum L. into landscape soil. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (in press).
  19. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. C. Wiese
    . 2012. Root pruning at planting and planting depth in the nursery impact root system morphology and anchorage. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 38:229–236.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Halter, M.R.,
    2. C.P. Chanway, and
    3. G.J. Harper
    . 1993. Growth reduction and root deformation of containerized lodgepole pine saplings 11 years after planting. Forest Ecological Management 56:131–146.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Harris, R.W.,
    2. W.B. Davis,
    3. N.W. Stice, and
    4. D. Long
    . 1971. Influence of transplanting time in nursery production. Journal American Society Horticulture Science 96:109–110.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Harris, J.R., and
    2. E.F. Gilman
    . 1991. Production system affects growth and root regeneration of Leyland cypress, laurel oak, and slash pine. Journal of Arboriculture 17:64–69.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Krasowski, M.J.
    2003. Root system modifications by nursery culture effect on post-planting growth and development of coniferous seedlings. Forestry Chronicle 79:882–891.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Lyford, W.H., and
    2. B.F. Wilson
    . 1964. Development of the root system of Acer rubrum L. Harvard Forest Paper No. 10.
  25. ↵
    1. Malieke, R., and
    2. R.L. Hummel
    . 1990. Planting landscape plants. Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service, Puyallup, Washington. EB 1505.
  26. ↵
    1. Marler, T.E., and
    2. D. Willis
    . 1996. Chemical or air-root pruning containers improve carambola, longam, and mango seedling root morphology and initial root growth after planting. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 14:81–87.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Marshall, M.D., and
    2. E.F. Gilman
    . 1998. Effects of nursery container type on root growth and landscape establishment of Acer rubrum L. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 15:55–59.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Martin, C.A., and
    2. D.L. Ingram
    . 1988. Temperature dynamics in black poly containers. Proceedings Southern Nurseryman Association Research Conference 33:71–74.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Moore, D.
    2001. Nursery practices and the effectiveness of different containers on root development. Treenet Proceedings of the 2nd National Street Tree Symposium: Sept 6–7. ISBN 0-9775084-1-2.
  30. ↵
    1. G.W. Watson,
    2. B. Scharenbroch,
    3. L. Costello, and
    4. E.F. Gilman
    1. Neal, C.
    2009. Production systems for small trees and shrubs in New Hampshire. In: G.W. Watson, B. Scharenbroch, L. Costello, and E.F. Gilman (Eds.). The Landscape Below Ground III, Morton Arboretum, October 2008. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, U.S.
  31. ↵
    1. Nichols, T.J., and
    2. A.A. Alm
    . 1983. Root development of container-reared, nursery-growth, and naturally regenerated pine seedlings. Canadian Journal Forest Research 13:239–245.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Ortega, U.,
    2. J. Majada,
    3. A. Mena-Petite,
    4. J. Sanchez-Zabala,
    5. N. Rodriguez-Itturrizar,
    6. K. Txarterina,
    7. J. Azpitarte, and
    8. M. Duñabeitia
    . 2006. Field performance of Pinus radiata D. Don produced in nursery with different types of containers. New Forests 31:97–112.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Owen, J., and
    2. H. Stoven
    . 2008. Searching for the perfect pot. Digger, March, Oregon Association Nursery. Wilsonville, Oregon, U.S.
  34. ↵
    1. Ruter, J.M.
    1993. Growth and landscape performance of three landscape plants produced in conventional and pot-in-pot productions systems. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 11:124–127.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Ruter, J.M., and
    2. D.L. Ingram
    . 1992. High root-zone temperatures influence RuBisCO activity and pigment accumulation in leaves of ‘Rotundifolia’ holly. Journal American Society Horticultural Science 11:154–157.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. SAS Institute, Inc
    . 1992. SAS/STAT users guide, vers. 9.1.3. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina, U.S.
  37. ↵
    1. Stoven O’Connor, A.,
    2. J.E. Klett, and
    3. A.J. Koski
    . 2013. Container type and overwintering treatments affect substrate temperature and growth of Chanticleer® pear (Pyrus calleryana ‘Glen’s Form’) in the Nursery. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 31:117–123.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Tate, R.L.
    1980. Detection, description, and treatment of girdling roots on urban Norway maple trees. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 42 (1)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 42, Issue 1
January 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effect of Eight Container Types and Root Pruning During Nursery Production on Root Architecture of Acer rubrum
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Effect of Eight Container Types and Root Pruning During Nursery Production on Root Architecture of Acer rubrum
Edward F. Gilman, Maria Paz, Chris Harchick
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2016, 42 (1) 31-45; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2016.003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Effect of Eight Container Types and Root Pruning During Nursery Production on Root Architecture of Acer rubrum
Edward F. Gilman, Maria Paz, Chris Harchick
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2016, 42 (1) 31-45; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2016.003
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIAL AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Acer rubrum
  • circling roots
  • Containers
  • Descending Roots
  • Porous-Walled Containers
  • red maple
  • Root Collar
  • Shaving
  • Solid-walled Containers
  • Straight Roots

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire