Why Opt-in to a Planting Program? Long-term Residents Value Street Tree Aesthetics

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Babbie, E.R.

   2007. The basics of social research. Wadsworth Publishing. 576 pp.
2. ↵
   1. Boone, C.G.,
   2. M.L., Cadenasso,
   3. J.M. Grove,
   4. K. Schwarz, and
   5. G.L. Buckley

   . 2010. Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: Why the 60s matter. Urban Ecosystems 13(3): 255–271. doi:10.1007/s11252-009-0118-7

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Coley, R. L.,
   2. W.C. Sullivan, and
   3. F.E. Kuo

   . 1997. Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior 29(4):468–494. doi:10.1177/001391659702900402.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Dilley, J., and
   2. K.L. Wolf

   . 2013. Homeowner interactions with residential trees in urban areas. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry. 39(6):267–277.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Dillman, D.A.

   1999. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, second edition. Wiley & Sons, New York, New York, U.S. 480 pp.
6. ↵
   1. Donovan, G., and
   2. J. Mills

   . 2014. Environmental justice and factors that influence participation in tree planting programs in Portland, Oregon, U.S. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40(2):70–77.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Fabrigar, L.R.,
   2. D.T. Wegener,
   3. R.C. MacCallum, and
   4. E.J. Strahan

   . 1999. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods 4(3):272–299. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.4.3.272.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. Fink, A.

   2009. How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. SAGE. 125 pp.
9. ↵
   1. Fisher, D.R.,
   2. J.J. Connolly,
   3. E.S. Svendsen, and
   4. L.K. Campbell

   . 2011. Digging Together: Why people volunteer to help plant one million trees in New York City. Accessed 01 October 2014. <http://nrs.fs.fed.us/nyc/local-resources/downloads/Digging_Together_White_Paper.pdf>
10. ↵
    1. Grove, J.M.,
    2. A.R. Troy,
    3. J.P.M. O’Neil-Dunne,
    4. W.R.J. Burch,
    5. M.L. Cadenasso,
    6. S.T.A. Pickett, and
    7. M. Wilson,
    8. M.

    2006. Characterization of households and its implications for the vegetation of urban ecosystems. Ecosystems 9(4):578–597. doi:10.1007/s10021-006-0116-z.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
11. ↵
    1. Grove, J.M.,
    2. D.H. Locke, and
    3. J.P.M. O’Neil-Dunne

    . 2014. An Ecology of prestige in New York City: Examining the relationships among population density, socio-economic status, group identity, and residential canopy cover. Environmental Management 54(3):402–419. doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0310-2.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. ↵
    1. Jones, R.E.,
    2. K.L. Davis, and
    3. J. Bradford

    . 2012. The value of trees: Factors influencing homeowner support for protecting local urban trees. Environment and Behavior 45(5):650–676.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Kim, J., and
    2. R. Kaplan

    . 2004. Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby Orchard Village. Environment & Behavior 36(3):313–340. doi:10.1177/0013916503260236.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Kirkpatrick, J.B.,
    2. A. Davison, and
    3. G.D. Daniels

    . 2012. Resident attitudes towards trees influence the planting and removal of different types of trees in eastern Australian cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 107(2):147–158. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.015.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Kweon, B.-S.,
    2. W.C. Sullivan, and
    3. R.A. Wiley

    . 1998. Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior 30(6):832–858. doi:10.1177/001391659803000605.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
16. ↵
    1. Larsen, L., and
    2. S.L. Harlan

    . 2006. Desert dreamscapes: Residential landscape preference and behavior. Landscape and Urban Planning 78(1–2):85–100. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.06.002.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. Larson, K.,
    2. D.G. Casagrande,
    3. S.L. Harlan, and
    4. S. Yabiku

    . 2009. Residents’ yard choices and rationales in a desert city: Social priorities, ecological impacts, and decision tradeoffs. Environmental Management 44:921–937. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9353-1.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
18. ↵
    1. Locke, D.H., and
    2. G.T. Baine

    . 2014. The good, the bad, and the interested: How historical demographics explain present-day tree canopy, vacant lot and tree request spatial variability in New Haven, CT. Urban Ecosystems. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0409-5>
19. 1. Locke, D.H., and
    2. J.M. Grove

    . 2014. Doing the Hard Work Where It’s Easiest? Examining the relationships between urban greening programs and social and ecological characteristics of Baltimore, MD and the District of Columbia. Submitted to Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy on 08 September 2014.
20. ↵
    1. Moskell, C.,
    2. S.B. Allred, and
    3. G. Ferenz

    . 2010. Examining motivations and recruitment strategies for urban forestry volunteers. Cities and the Environment (CATE) 3(1):1–28.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Rae, R.A.,
    2. G. Simon, and
    3. J. Braden

    . 2010. Public reactions to new street tree planting. Cities and the Environment (CATE) 3(1):1–21.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Roman, L.,
    2. G.E. McPherson,
    3. B. Scharenbroch, and
    4. J. Bartens

    . 2013. Identifying common practices and challenges for local urban tree monitoring programs across the United States. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39(6):292–299.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Romolini, M.,
    2. J.M. Grove, and
    3. D.H. Locke

    . 2013. Assessing and comparing relationships between urban environmental stewardship networks and land cover in Baltimore and Seattle. Landscape and Urban Planning 120:190–207. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.008.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
24. ↵
    1. Romolini, M.,
    2. W. Brinkley, and
    3. K.L. Wolf

    . 2012. What Is Urban Environmental Stewardship? Constructing a Practitioner-Derived Framework. Research Note PNW-RN-566, Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 41 pp. Accessed 01 October 2014. <www.naturewithin.info/CivicEco/pnw_rn566_USFS_3CM_Rsrch_Note.pdf>
25. ↵
    1. Saldaña,
    2. J.

    2012. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (No. 14). SAGE.
26. ↵
    1. Schroeder, H.,
    2. J. Flannigan, and
    3. R. Coles

    . 2006. Residents’ attitudes toward street trees in the UK and U.S. communities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32(5):236–246.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Schroeder, H.W., and
    2. S.R. Ruffolo

    . 1996. Householder Evaluations of Street Trees in a Chicago Suburb. Journal of Arboriculture 22(1):35–43.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Silva, P.,
    2. E. Barry, and
    3. S. Plitt

    . 2013. TreeKIT: Measuring, mapping, and collaboratively managing urban forests. Cities and the Environment (CATE). 6(1):1–19.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Silvera Seamans, G.

    2013. Mainstreaming the environmental benefits of street trees. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12(1):2–11.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Still, D.T., and
    2. H.D. Gerhold

    . 1997. Motivations and task preferences of urban forestry volunteers. Journal of Arboriculture 23:116–129.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Straka, T.J.,
    2. A.P. Marskino, and
    3. C.J. Childers

    . 2005. Individual characteristics affecting participation in urban and community forestry programs in South Carolina, U.S. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 31:31–137.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Troy, A.R.,
    2. J.M. Grove,
    3. J.P.M. O’Neil-Dunne,
    4. S.T.A. Pickett, and
    5. M.L. Cadenasso

    . 2007. Predicting opportunities for greening and patterns of vegetation on private urban lands. Environmental Management 40(3):394–412. doi:10.1007/s00267-006-0112-2.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. ↵
    1. Turner, C., and
    2. M. Mitchell

    . 2013. Planting the Spaces in Between: New York Restoration Project’s Tree Giveaway Program. Cities and the Environment (CATE). 6(1).
34. ↵
    1. URI

    . 2015. Urban Resource Initiative—Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. <http://environment.yale.edu/uri>
35. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . 2011. “Table 1. Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places Over 50,000, Ranked by July 1, 2011 Population: April 1, 2010 to July, 2011” (CSV). 2011 Population Estimates. United States Census Bureau, Population Division. Accessed 04 August 2012.
36. ↵
    1. Walsh, D.

    2013. Green Jobs for Ex-Offenders: The Urban Resource Initiative’s “GreenSkills” Program. Cities and the Environment (CATE), 6(1).
37. ↵
    1. P. Gobster

    1. Westphal L.M.

    1993. Why trees? Urban forestry volunteers values and motivations. In: P. Gobster (Ed.). Managing urban and high-use recreation settings. USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, St. Paul.
38. ↵
    1. Young, R.F., and
    2. E.G., McPherson

    . 2013. Governing metropolitan green infrastructure in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 109(1):67–75. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.09.004.

    OpenUrlCrossRef