An Analysis of the Field Precision of the CTLA Trunk Formula Method

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Abbot, R.E., and
   2. C. Miller

   . 1991. Utility tree claims. Journal of Arboriculture 17:113–116.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Chadwick, L.C.

   1975. ASCA recommendations for modification of the ISTC shade tree evaluation formula. Journal of Arboriculture 1:35–38.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. CTLA

   . 2000. Council of Tree & Landscape Appraisers. Guide for Plant Appraisal, ninth edition. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, U.S.
4. ↵
   1. Cullen, S.

   2007. Putting a value on trees—CTLA guidance and methods. Arboricultural Journal (Great Britain) 30:21–43.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Davis, S.H.

   1983. Tree valuation pitfalls. Journal of Arboriculture 9:164–166.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Kielbaso, J.J.

   1979. Evaluating trees in urban areas. Journal of Arboriculture 5:70–72.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Rey-Lescure,
   2. E.

   1985. The location factor when evaluating shade trees and the replacement value in appraising hedges—Two proposals. Journal of Arboriculture 11:113–136.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Tate, R.

   1989. ISA tree evaluation guide: A critical examination. Journal of Arboriculture 15:145–149.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Watson, G.

   2001. A study of CTLA Formula Values. Journal of Arboriculture 27(6):289–297.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Watson, G.

    2002. Comparing formula methods of tree appraisal. Journal of Arboriculture 28(1):11–18.

    OpenUrl