Urban Trees and Ecosystem Disservices—A Pilot Study Using Complaints Records from Three Swedish Cities

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Colding, J., and
   2. J. Marcus

   . 2013. Ekosystemtjänster i Stockholmsregionen: Ett underlag för diskussion och planering (Ecosystem services in Stockholm: A basis for discussion and planning). Stockholm, Tillväxt, miljö och regionplanering, Stockholms läns landsting.
2. ↵
   1. Dobbs, C.,
   2. F.J. Escobedo, and
   3. W.C. Zipperer

   . 2011. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning 99:196–206.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Escobedo, F.J.,
   2. T. Kroeger, and
   3. J.E. Wagner

   . 2011. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: Analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environmental Pollution 159:2078–2087.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. Gómez-Baggethun,
   2. E., and
   3. D.N. Barton

   . 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics 86:235–245.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Lyytimäki,
   2. J.

   2014. Bad nature: Newspaper representations of ecosystem disservices. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 13:418–424

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Lyytimäki,
   2. J., and
   3. M. Sipilä

   . 2009. Hopping on one leg—The challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban Forestry &Urban Greening 8:309–315.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. MEA

   . 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C. 160 pp.
8. ↵
   1. Östberg,
   2. J.,
   3. M. Martinsson,
   4. Ö. Stål, and
   5. A.M. Fransson

   . 2012. Risk of root intrusion by tree and shrub species into sewer pipes in Swedish urban areas. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11:65–71.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Plieninger, T.,
   2. S. Dijks,
   3. E. Oteros-Rozas, and
   4. C. Bieling

   . 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33:118–129.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
10. ↵
    1. Randrup, T.B., and
    2. B. Persson

    . 2009. Public green spaces in the Nordic countries: Development of a new strategic management regime. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 8:31–40.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Roy, S.,
    2. J. Byrne, and
    3. C. Pickering

    . 2012. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11:351–363.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. SOU

    . 2013:68. Synliggöra värdet av ekosystemtjänster: åtgärder för välfärd genom biologisk mångfald och ekosystemtjänster: betänkande (Highlight the value of ecosystem services: Measures for wellfare by means of biodiversity and ecosystem services: report). Stockholm, Fritze.
13. ↵
    1. Statistics Sweden

    . 2012. Svenskt valdeltagande under hundra år (One hundred years of Swedish voter turnout). Stockholm, Statistiska centralbyrån.
14. ↵
    1. TEEB

    . 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodivesity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.
15. ↵
    1. Villa, F.,
    2. K.J. Bagstad,
    3. B. Voigt,
    4. G.W. Johnson,
    5. I.N. Athanasiadis, and
    6. S. Balbi

    . 2014. The misconception of ecosystem disservices: How a catchy term may yield the wrong messages for science and society. Ecosystem Services 10:52–53.

    OpenUrl