Nonnative, Noninvasive Woody Species Can Enhance Urban Landscape Biodiversity

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Adhikari, Y.P.,
   2. A. Fischer, and
   3. H.S. Fischer

   . 2012a. Micro-site conditions of epiphytic orchids in a human impact gradient in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Journal of Mountain Science 9:331–342.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Adhikari, Y.P.,
   2. H.S. Fischer, and
   3. A. Fischer

   . 2012b. Host tree utilization by epiphytic orchids in different land-use intensities in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Plant Ecology 213:1393–1412.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
3. ↵
   1. Akinnifesi, F.K.,
   2. G.W. Sileshi,
   3. O.C. Ajayi,
   4. A.I. Akinnifesi,
   5. E.G. de Moura,
   6. J.F.P. Linhares, and
   7. I. Rodrigues

   . 2010. Biodiversity of the urban homegardens of So Luis City, Northeastern Brazil. Urban Ecosystems 13:129–146.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Andrade-Núñez,
   2. M.J., and
   3. T.M. Aide

   . 2010. Effects of habitat and landscape characteristics on medium and large mammal species richness and composition in northern Uruguay. Zoologia 27:909–917.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Antunes, H.A.,
   2. L.A. Nunes,
   3. J.W.P. daSilva, and
   4. L.C. Marchini

   . 2012. Native bees (Apidae: Meliponina) and their floral resources in a part of a forest located in urban areas. Magistra 24:7–14.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Atchison, K.A., and
   2. A.D. Rodewald

   . 2006. The value of urban forests to wintering birds. Natural Areas Journal 26:280–288.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Basham, R.,
   2. B. Law, and
   3. P. Banks

   . 2011. Microbats in a ‘leafy’ urban landscape: Are they persisting, and what factors influence their presence? Austral Ecology 36:663–678.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Blair, R.B.

   1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6:506–519.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Blanchon, D.,
   2. J. Pusateri,
   3. M. Galbraith, and
   4. S. Thorpe

   . 2011. Sampling indigenous ground-living beetles in a stand of nonnative tree privet (Ligustrum lucidum) in New Zealand raises new management questions. Ecological Management & Restoration 12:234–236.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Bonnington, C.,
    2. K.J. Gaston, and
    3. K.L. Evans

    . 2014. Squirrels in suburbia: Influence of urbanization on the occurrence and distribution of a common exotic mammal. Urban Ecosystems 17:533–546.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Borges Júnior, N.F.,
    2. G.A. Machado, and
    3. L.D. Battirola

    . 2011. Coprophagous Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera) in fragments of native vegetation (Cerrado) in the urban perimeter of Catalão, Goiás (Brazil). Acta Biológica Paranaense 40:73–85.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Brearley, G.,
    2. A. Bradley,
    3. S. Bell, and
    4. C. McAlpine

    . 2011. Change in habitat resources and structure near urban edges and its influence on the squirrel glider (Petaurus norfolcensis) in southeast Queensland, Australia. Austral Ecology 36:425–432.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Brown, G.W.,
    2. J.W. Dorrough, and
    3. D.S.L. Ramsey

    . 2011. Landscape and local influences on patterns of reptile occurrence in grazed temperate woodlands of southern Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 103:277–288.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Brown Júnior, K.S., and
    2. A.V.L. Freitas

    . 2002. Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: Structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 6:217–231.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Caldara Jr., V., and
    2. Y.L.R. Leite

    . 2007. Habitat use by small mammals at Parque Estadual da Fonte Grande, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Boletim do Museu de Biologia Mello Leitão 21:57–77.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Campbell, R.J., and
    2. C.W. Campbell

    . 2001. Integrating fruit trees and other nonnative plants with native plants in the Southern Florida home garden. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 114:1–2.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Catterall, C.P.,
    2. J.A. Cousin,
    3. S. Piper, and
    4. G. Johnson

    . 2010. Long-term dynamics of bird diversity in forest and suburb: Decay, turnover or homogenization? Diversity and Distributions 16:559–570.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Caughlin, T.,
    2. J.H. Wheeler,
    3. J. Jankowski, and
    4. J.W. Lichstein

    . 2012. Urbanized landscapes favored by fig-eating birds increase invasive but not native juvenile strangler fig abundance. Ecology 93:1571–1580.

    OpenUrlPubMed
19. ↵
    1. Chace, J.F., and
    2. J.J. Walsh

    . 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning 74:46–69.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
20. ↵
    1. Chen, T.C.,
    2. B.S. Shieh, and
    3. S.H. Liang

    . 2005. Associations of the community characteristics of woody plants with avian communities in the urban parks of Kaohsiung City. Plant Protection Bulletin (Taipei) 47:229–240.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Chocholoušková,
    2. Z., and
    3. P. Pyšek

    . 2003. Changes in composition and structure of urban flora over 120 years: A case study of the city of Plzeň. Flora 198:366–376.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
22. ↵
    1. Crooks, K.R.,
    2. A.V. Suarez, and
    3. D.T. Bolger

    . 2004. Avian assemblages along a gradient of urbanization in a highly fragmented landscape. Biological Conservation 115:451–462.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Daniels, G.D. and
    2. J.B. Kirkpatrick

    . 2012. The influence of landscape context on the distribution of flightless mammals in exurban developments. Landscape and Urban Planning 104:114–123.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Davis, A.,
    2. C.E. Taylor, and
    3. R.E. Major

    . 2012. Seasonal abundance and habitat use of Australian parrots in an urbanised landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 106:191–198.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Davis, M.A.,
    2. M.K. Chew,
    3. R.J. Hobbs,
    4. A.E. Lugo,
    5. J.J. Ewel,
    6. G.J. Vermeij,
    7. J.H. Brown,
    8. M.L. Rosenzweig, et al.

    2011. Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature (474):153–154.
26. ↵
    1. de Toledo, M.C.B.,
    2. R.J. Donatelli, and
    3. G.T. Batista

    . 2012. Relation between green spaces and bird community structure in an urban area in Southeast Brazil. Urban Ecosystems 15:111–131.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Delabie, J.H.C.,
    2. B. Jahyny,
    3. I.C. do Nascimento,
    4. C.S.F. Mariano,
    5. S. Lacau,
    6. S. Campiolo,
    7. S.M. Philpott,
    8. M. Leponce,
    9. G. Schroth, and
    10. C.A. Harvey

    . 2007. Contribution of cocoa plantations to the conservation of native ants (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with a special emphasis on the Atlantic Forest fauna of southern Bahia, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation 16:2359–2384.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Donnelly, R., and
    2. J.M. Marzluff

    . 2004. Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conservation Biology 18:733–745.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. Donnelly, R., and
    2. J.M. Marzluff

    . 2006. Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosystems 9:99–117.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
30. ↵
    1. Echevarria, A.L.,
    2. I.R. Lobo Allende,
    3. M.D. Juri,
    4. J.M. Chani,
    5. J.T. Dowdall, and
    6. E. Martín

    . 2011. Composition, structure and seasonal variation of the bird community in the Botanical Garden of Fundación Miguel Lillo. Acta Zoologica Lilloana 55:123–136.

    OpenUrl
31. ↵
    1. Eliasaro, S.,
    2. P.W. Veiga,
    3. C.G. Donha, and
    4. L. Nogueira

    . 2009. Inventory of epiphytic macrolichens on trees used in urban arborization in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Biotemas 22(4):1–8.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Engardio, J.P.

    2013. Spat over trees amid forest of problems. Accessed 07/14/2014. <www.sfgate.com/opinion/openforum/article/Spat-over-trees-amid-forest-of-problems-4318571.php>
33. ↵
    1. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

    . 2012. Landscaping with Native Plants. Accessed 12/08/2014. <www.epa.gov/greatlakes/greenacres/nativeplants/factsht.html#Why%20Should%20I>
34. ↵
    1. Faggi, A., and
    2. P.V. Perepelizin

    . 2006. Bird richness along an urbanization gradient in Buenos Aires city. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Nueva Serie 8:289–297.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Feldman, R.E., and
    2. P.G. Krannitz

    . 2004. Bird composition of oak ecosystem fragments in an urbanized setting: The influence of adjacent coniferous forest fragments. Ecoscience 11:338–346.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Fernández,
    2. I.C., and
    3. J.A. Simonetti

    . 2013. Small mammal assemblages in fragmented shrublands of urban areas of Central Chile. Urban Ecosystems 16:377–387.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Ferracini, C., and
    2. A. Alma

    . 2007. Evaluation of the community of native eulophid parasitoids on Cameraria ohridella Deschka and Dimic in urban areas. Environmental Entomology 36:1147–1153.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
38. ↵
    1. Fetridge, E.D.,
    2. J.S. Ascher, and
    3. G.A. Langellotto

    . 2008. The bee fauna of residential gardens in a suburb of New York City (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101:1067–1077.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. Frankie, G.W.,
    2. M. Rizzardi,
    3. S.B. Vinson, and
    4. T.L. Griswold

    . 2009. Decline in bee diversity and abundance from 1972–2004 on a flowering leguminous tree, Andira inermis in Costa Rica at the interface of disturbed dry forest and the urban environment. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 82:1–20.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Freedman, B.,
    2. S. Love, and
    3. B. O’Neil

    . 1996. Tree species composition, structure, and carbon storage in stands of urban forest of varying character in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Canadian Field-Naturalist 110:675–682.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Garden, J.G.,
    2. C.A. McAlpine, and
    3. H.P. Possingham

    . 2010. Multi-scaled habitat considerations for conserving urban biodiversity: Native reptiles and small mammals in Brisbane, Australia. Landscape Ecology 25:1013–1028.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Garden, J.G.,
    2. D.N. Jones,
    3. H.P. Possingham, and
    4. C.A. McAlpine

    . 2007. Habitat structure is more important than vegetation composition for local-level management of native terrestrial reptile and small mammal species living in urban remnants: A case study from Brisbane, Australia. Austral Ecology 32:669–685.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Gleditsch, J.M., and
    2. T.A. Carlo

    . 2011. Fruit quantity of invasive shrubs predicts the abundance of common native avian frugivores in central Pennsylvania. Diversity and Distributions 17:244–253.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Goddard, M.A.,
    2. A.J. Dougill, and
    3. T.G. Benton

    . 2010. Scaling up from gardens: Biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:90–98.

    OpenUrl
45. ↵
    1. Guthrie, R.J.,
    2. J.J. Sullivan, and
    3. H.L. Buckley

    . 2008. Patterns of host damage by the cabbage tree monophage Epiphryne verriculata Feld (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) across urban, rural and native forest habitats. New Zealand Entomologist 31:77–88.

    OpenUrl
46. ↵
    1. Hanley, M.E.,
    2. A.J. Awbi, and
    3. M. Franco

    . 2014. Going native? Flower use by bumblebees in English urban gardens. Annals of Botany 113:799–806.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
47. ↵
    1. Hasebe, M., and
    2. D.C. Franklin

    . 2004. Food sources of the Rainbow Lorikeet Trichoglossus haematodus during the early wet season on the urban fringe of Darwin, Northern Australia. Corella 28:68–74.

    OpenUrl
48. ↵
    1. Helden, A.J.,
    2. G.C. Stamp, and
    3. S.R. Leather

    . 2012. Urban biodiversity: Comparison of insect assemblages on native and nonnative trees. Urban Ecosystems 15:611–624.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
49. ↵
    1. Hennings, L.A., and
    2. W.D. Edge

    . 2003. Riparian bird community structure in Portland, Oregon: Habitat, urbanization, and spatial scale patterns. Condor 105:288–302.

    OpenUrl
50. ↵
    1. Hitchmough, J.

    2011. Exotic plants and plantings in the sustainable, designed urban landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 100:380–382.

    OpenUrl
51. ↵
    1. Hodge, S.,
    2. S.A. Marshall,
    3. H. Oliver,
    4. J. Berry,
    5. J. Marris, and
    6. I. Andrew

    . 2010. A preliminary survey of the insects collected using mushroom baits in native and exotic New Zealand woodlands. New Zealand Entomologist 33:43–54.

    OpenUrl
52. ↵
    1. Hodgkison, S.,
    2. J.M. Hero, and
    3. J. Warnken

    . 2007. The efficacy of small-scale conservation efforts, as assessed on Australian golf courses. Biological Conservation 135:576–586.

    OpenUrl
53. ↵
    1. Hudson, M.-A.R., and
    2. D.M. Bird

    . 2009. Recommendations for design and management of golf courses and green spaces based on surveys of breeding bird communities in Montreal. Landscape and Urban Planning 92:335–346.

    OpenUrl
54. ↵
    1. Ikin, K.,
    2. E. Knight,
    3. D.B. Lindenmayer,
    4. J. Fischer, and
    5. A.D. Manning

    . 2013b. The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Diversity and Distributions 19:294–306.

    OpenUrl
55. ↵
    1. Ikin, K.,
    2. R.M. Beaty,
    3. D.B. Lindenmayer,
    4. E. Knight,
    5. J. Fischer, and
    6. A.D. Manning

    . 2013a. Pocket parks in a compact city: How do birds respond to increasing residential density? Landscape Ecology 28:45–56.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
56. ↵
    1. Ingram, J.

    1999. When cities grow wild—Natural landscaping from an urban planning perspective. Accessed 12/08/2014. <www.wildones.org/whenciti/ingram-32.htm>
57. ↵
    1. Jodice, P.G.R., and
    2. S.R. Humphrey

    . 1992. Activity and diet of an urban-population of Big Cypress fox squirrels. Journal of Wildlife Management 56:685–692.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
58. ↵
    1. M. Johnston and
    2. G. Percival

    1. Johnston, M.,
    2. S. Nail, and
    3. S. James

    . 2012. ‘Natives versus aliens’: The relevance of the debate to urban forest management in Britain. pp. 181–191. In: M. Johnston and G. Percival (Eds.). Trees, People, and the Built Environment. Proceedings of the Urban Trees Research Conference, April 13–14, 2011, Birmingham, UK.
59. ↵
    1. Kalinowski, R.S.,
    2. M.D. Johnson,
    3. J.J. Nocera, and
    4. M.G. Betts

    . 2010. Influence of suburban habitat on a wintering bird community in coastal northern California. Condor 112:274–282.

    OpenUrl
60. ↵
    1. Kath, J.,
    2. M. Maron, and
    3. P.K. Dunn

    . 2009. Interspecific competition and small bird diversity in an urbanizing landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 92:72–79.

    OpenUrl
61. ↵
    1. Kendle, A.D., and
    2. J.E. Rose

    . 2000. The aliens have landed! What are the justifications for ‘native only’ policies in landscape plantings? Landscape and Urban Planning 47:19–31.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
62. ↵
    1. Khera, N.,
    2. V. Mehta, and
    3. B.C. Sabata

    . 2009. Interrelationship of birds and habitat features in urban greenspaces in Delhi, India. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8:187–196.

    OpenUrl
63. ↵
    1. Kirkpatrick, J.B.

    2004. Vegetation change in an urban grassy woodland 1974–2000. Australian Journal of Botany 52:597–608.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
64. 1. Kirnbauer, M.C.,
    2. W.A. Kenney,
    3. C.J. Churchill, and
    4. B.W. Baetz

    . 2009. A prototype decision support system for sustainable urban tree planting programs. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 8:3–19.

    OpenUrl
65. ↵
    1. Knapp, S.,
    2. I. Kühn,
    3. J. Stolle, and
    4. S. Klotz

    . 2010. Changes in the functional composition of a Central European urban flora over three centuries. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 12:235–244.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
66. ↵
    1. Kulfan, J.,
    2. E. Kula,
    3. P. Zach,
    4. K. Dvořačkova,
    5. J. Patočka, and
    6. B. Kršiak

    . 2010. Caterpillar assemblages on introduced blue spruce: Differences from native Norway spruce. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung 181:188–194.

    OpenUrl
67. ↵
    1. la Sorte, F.A., and
    2. W.J. Boecklen

    . 2005. Temporal turnover of common species in avian assemblages in North America. Journal of Biogeography 32:1151–1160.

    OpenUrl
68. 1. Landmann, A.

    2006. Dynamics of tree-composition and tree-densities in urban greenspaces of Innsbruck, Tyrol: Changes between 1991 and 2004. Berichte des Naturwissenschaftlich-Medizinischen Vereins in Innsbruck 93:51–71.

    OpenUrl
69. ↵
    1. Leveau, C.M., and
    2. L.M. Leveau

    . 2005. Avian community response to urbanization in the Pampean region, Argentina. Ornitologia Neotropical 16:503–510.

    OpenUrl
70. ↵
    1. Lu, Y.-W.,
    2. S.-X. Tang,
    3. H.-L. Shi,
    4. Z.-F. Ding,
    5. S.-Q. Bo, and
    6. X. He

    . 2007. Relationship between avian community and habitat in Shanghai urban woodlots in winter. Chinese Journal of Zoology 42:125–130.

    OpenUrl
71. ↵
    1. Luck, G.W.,
    2. P. Davidson,
    3. D. Boxall, and
    4. L. Smallbone

    . 2011. Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conservation Biology 25:816–826.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
72. ↵
    1. Lukas, S.B.

    2011. Evaluation of pre-emergence herbicides within a hydromulch cap to determine weed control and safety for two native Hawaiian grasses in a simulated roadside environment. MS Thesis, University of Hawaii. Accessed 07/14/2014. <www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CEIQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ctahr.hawaii.edu%2FdefrankJ%2FText%2520resources%2FMS_defrense_S_Lukas_PP_pdf_03042011%2FS_Lukas_M_S_Thesis_final._03_31_2011.pdf&ei=byv0UZaWGaS-igKspIDYAw&usg=AFQjCNGuJNOunXxSY6qCfrbv5Akcu3zv9w&sig2=1AYXaCDFPOw4-QKROVjldw&bvm=bv.49784469,d.cGE&cad=rja>
73. ↵
    1. Luther, D.,
    2. J. Hilty,
    3. J. Weiss,
    4. C. Cornwall,
    5. M. Wipf, and
    6. G. Ballard

    . 2008. Assessing the impact of local habitat variables and landscape context on riparian birds in agricultural, urbanized, and native landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation 17:1923–1935.

    OpenUrl
74. ↵
    1. MacGregor-Fors,
    2. I.

    2008. Relation between habitat attributes and bird richness in a western Mexico suburb. Landscape and Urban Planning 84:92–98.

    OpenUrl
75. ↵
    1. Mandryk, A.M., and
    2. R.W. Wein

    . 2006. Exotic vascular plant invasiveness and forest invasibility in urban boreal forest types. Biological Invasions 8:1651–1662.

    OpenUrl
76. ↵
    1. Marzluff, J.M., and
    2. K. Ewing

    . 2001. Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: A general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restoration Ecology 9:280–292.

    OpenUrl
77. ↵
    1. Matter, S.F.,
    2. J.R. Brzyski,
    3. C.J. Harrison,
    4. S. Hyams,
    5. C. Loo,
    6. J. Loomis,
    7. H.R. Lubbers,
    8. L. Seastrum,
    9. T.I. Stamper,
    10. A.M. Stein,
    11. R. Stokes, and
    12. B.S. Wilkerson

    . 2012. Invading from the garden? A comparison of leaf herbivory for exotic and native plants in natural and ornamental settings. Insect Science 19:677–682.

    OpenUrl
78. ↵
    1. McIntyre, N.E., and
    2. M.E. Hostetler

    . 2001. Effects of urban land use on pollinator (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) communities in a desert metropolis. Basic and Applied Ecology 2:209–218.

    OpenUrl
79. ↵
    1. Miller, J.R.,
    2. J.A. Wiens,
    3. N.T. Hobbs, and
    4. D.M. Theobald

    . 2003. Effects of human settlement on bird communities in lowland riparian areas of Colorado (USA). Ecological Applications 13:1041–1059.

    OpenUrl
80. ↵
    1. Molebatsi, L.Y.,
    2. S.J. Siebert,
    3. S.S. Cilliers,
    4. N. Beau,
    5. S. Dessein, and
    6. E. Robbrecht

    . 2013. Alien and indigenous plant species diversity of homegardens of a rural settlement in the eastern Kalahari, South Africa. Scripta Botanica Belgica 50:294–303.

    OpenUrl
81. ↵
    1. Moller, L.A.,
    2. A.M.T. Skou, and
    3. J. Kollmann

    . 2012. Dispersal limitation at the expanding range margin of an evergreen tree in urban habitats? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11:59–64.

    OpenUrl
82. 1. Nagendra, H., and
    2. D. Gopal

    . 2011. Tree diversity, distribution, history and change in urban parks: Studies in Bangalore, India. Urban Ecosystems 14:211–223.

    OpenUrl
83. ↵
    1. National Park Service (NPS)

    . 2005. Why use native plants? Accessed 12/08/2014. <www.nps.gov/plants/restore/pubs/in-tronatplant/whyusenatives.htm>
84. ↵
    1. New York City Council

    . 2010. A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York in order to increase biodiversity in public landscapes. Accessed 12/08/2014. <http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/View.ashx?M=F&ID=2302354&GUID=06679CDE-9B7A-4FEA-A301-38DCEBCA4FCF>
85. ↵
    1. Nielsen, A.B.,
    2. M. Annerstedt,
    3. S. Maruthaveeranand,
    4. C.C. Konijnendijk

    . 2014. Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosystems 17:305–327.

    OpenUrl
86. ↵
    1. Nuckols, M.S., and
    2. E.F. Connor

    . 1995. Do trees in urban or ornamental plantings receive more damage by insects than trees in natural forests? Ecological Entomology 20:253–260.

    OpenUrl
87. ↵
    1. Ochoa, J.G., and
    2. G.I. Andrade

    . 2003. The introduced flora to Machu Picchu Sanctuary: An inventory and management priorities for biodiversity conservation. Ecología en Bolivia 38:141–160.

    OpenUrl
88. ↵
    1. O’Donoghue,
    2. A., and
    3. C.M. Shackleton

    . 2013. Current and potential carbon stocks of trees in urban parking lots in towns of the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 12:443–449.

    OpenUrl
89. 1. Oneal, A.S., and
    2. J.T. Rotenberry

    . 2008. Riparian plant composition in an urbanizing landscape in southern California, U.S.A. Landscape Ecology 23:553–567.

    OpenUrl
90. ↵
    1. Oprea, M.,
    2. P. Mendes,
    3. T.B. Vieira, and
    4. A.D. Ditchfield

    . 2009. Do wooded streets provide connectivity for bats in an urban landscape? Biodiversity and Conservation 18:2361–2371.

    OpenUrl
91. ↵
    1. Ortega-Alvarez,
    2. R., and
    3. I. MacGregor-Fors

    . 2010. What matters most? Relative effect of urban habitat traits and hazards on urban park birds. Ornitologia Neotropical 21:519–533.

    OpenUrl
92. 1. Pair, J.C.

    1994. Stress tolerant trees for the southern Great Plains. Journal of Arboriculture 20:130–133.

    OpenUrl
93. ↵
    1. Palomino, D., and
    2. L.M. Carrascal

    . 2005. Birds on novel island environments. A case study with the urban avifauna of Tenerife (Canary Islands). Ecological Research 20:611–617.

    OpenUrl
94. ↵
    1. Parsons, H.,
    2. K. French, and
    3. R.E. Major

    . 2004. The influence of remnant bushland on the composition of suburban bird assemblages in Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 66:43–56.

    OpenUrl
95. ↵
    1. Pecarevic, M.,
    2. J. Danoff-Burg, and
    3. R.R. Dunn

    . 2010. Biodiversity on Broadway: Enigmatic diversity of the societies of ants (Formicidae)on the streets of New York City. PLoS One 5(10).
96. ↵
    1. Pennington, D.N.,
    2. J. Hansel, and
    3. R.B. Blair

    . 2008. The conservation value of urban riparian areas for landbirds during spring migration: Land cover, scale, and vegetation effects. Biological Conservation 141:1235–1248.

    OpenUrl
97. ↵
    1. Petrova, Y., and
    2. A. Irikov

    . 2012. Influence of vegetation on the avifauna in two urban parks in Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Ecologia Balkanica 4:25–31.

    OpenUrl
98. ↵
    1. Posa, M.R.C., and
    2. N.S. Sodhi

    . 2006. Effects of anthropogenic land use on forest birds and butterflies in Subic Bay, Philippines. Biological Conservation 129:256–270.

    OpenUrl
99. ↵
    1. Pozi, M.,
    2. M. Sorayya,
    3. M. Nur Shahidah, and
    4. H.C. Ong

    . 2013. Diversity of plants tended or cultivated in Orang Asli homegardens in Negeri Sembilan, Peninsular Malaysia. Human Ecology 41:325–331.

    OpenUrl
100. ↵
     1. Pryke, J.S., and
     2. M.J. Samways

     . 2009. Recovery of invertebrate diversity in a rehabilitated city landscape mosaic in the heart of a biodiversity hotspot. Landscape and Urban Planning 93:54–62.

     OpenUrl
101. ↵
     1. Raju, A.J.S.

     2003. The status of pollinators and biodiversity in Asia: An overview. Journal of Palynology 35/36:53–71.

     OpenUrl
102. ↵
     1. Raupp, M.J.,
     2. A.B. Cumming, and
     3. E.C. Raupp

     . 2006. Street tree diversity in eastern North America and its potential for tree loss to exotic borers. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 32:297–304.

     OpenUrl
103. ↵
     1. J. Marzluff,
     2. R.A. Bowman, and
     3. R. Donnelly

     1. Reichard, S.,
     2. L. Chalker-Scott, and
     3. S. Buchanan

     . 2001. Interactions among nonnative plants and birds, pp. 179–223. In: J. Marzluff, R.A. Bowman, and R. Donnelly (Eds.). Avian Ecology and Conservation in an Urbanizing World, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.
104. ↵
     1. Reichard, S.H., and
     2. C.W. Hamilton

     . 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conservation Biology 11:193–203.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
105. ↵
     1. Reis, E.,
     2. G.M. López-Iborra, and
     3. R.T. Pinheiro

     . 2012. Changes in bird species richness through different levels of urbanization: Implications for biodiversity conservation and garden design in Central Brazil. Landscape and Urban Planning 107:31–42.

     OpenUrl
106. ↵
     1. Roberts, D.G.,
     2. D.J. Ayre, and
     3. R.J. Whelan

     . 2007. Urban plants as genetic reservoirs or threats to the integrity of bushland plant populations. Conservation Biology 21:842–852.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
107. ↵
     1. Ryall, K.L.

     2010. Effects of larval host plant species on fecundity of the generalist insect herbivore Ennomos subsignarius (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Environmental Entomology 39:121–126.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
108. ↵
     1. Sagoff, M.

     2005. Do non-native species threaten the natural environment? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18:215–236.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
109. 1. G. Hopkins

     1. Santamour, Jr., F.S.

     1978. Developing improved cultivars for urban forests. pp. 491–499. In: G. Hopkins (Ed.). National Urban Forestry Conference Proceedings, National Urban Forestry Conference, Nov 13–16, 1978, Washington, D.C.
110. ↵
     1. Sattler, T.,
     2. M.K. Obrist,
     3. P. Duelli, and
     4. M. Moretti

     . 2011. Urban arthropod communities: Added value or just a blend of surrounding biodiversity? Landscape and Urban Planning 103:347–361.

     OpenUrl
111. ↵
     1. Schmidt, K.J.,
     2. H.H. Poppendieck, and
     3. K. Jensen

     . 2014. Effects of urban structure on plant species richness in a large European city. Urban Ecosystems 17:427–444.

     OpenUrl
112. ↵
     1. Sewell, S.R., and
     2. C.P. Catterall

     . 1998. Bushland modification and styles of urban development: Their effects on birds in south-east Queensland. Wildlife Research 25:1, 41–63.

     OpenUrl
113. ↵
     1. Shwartz, A.,
     2. S. Shirley, and
     3. S. Kark

     . 2008. How do habitat variability and management regime shape the spatial heterogeneity of birds within a large Mediterranean urban park? Landscape and Urban Planning 84:219–229.

     OpenUrl
114. ↵
     1. Smith, R.M.,
     2. K. Thompson,
     3. J.G. Hodgson,
     4. P.H. Warren, and
     5. K.J. Gaston

     . 2006. Urban domestic gardens (IX): Composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biological Conservation 129:312–322.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
115. ↵
     1. Smith, V.A.

     2013. Lower Makefield breaking ground in mandating native plants. Accessed 07/14/2014. <http://articles.philly.com/2013-07-09/news/40446013_1_native-plants-schuylkill-township-bringing-nature-home>
116. ↵
     1. Stagoll, K.,
     2. D.B. Lindenmayer,
     3. E. Knight,
     4. J. Fischer, and
     5. A.D. Manning

     . 2012. Large trees are keystone structures in urban parks. Conservation Letters 5:115–122.

     OpenUrl
117. ↵
     1. Standley, L.A.

     2003. Flora of Needham, Massachusetts: 100 years of floristic change. Rhodora 105:354–378.

     OpenUrl
118. 1. Stewart, G.H.,
     2. M.E. Ignatieva,
     3. C.D. Meurk, and
     4. R.D. Earl

     . 2004. The re-emergence of indigenous forest in an urban environment, Christchurch, New Zealand. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2:149–158.

     OpenUrl
119. ↵
     1. Strubbe, D.,
     2. E. Matthysen, and
     3. C.H. Graham

     . 2010. Assessing the potential impact of invasive ring-necked parakeets Psittacula krameri on native nuthatches Sitta europeae in Belgium. Journal of Applied Ecology 47:549–557.

     OpenUrl
120. ↵
     1. Suarez-Rubio,
     2. M., and
     3. J.R. Thomlinson

     . 2009. Landscape and patch-level factors influence bird communities in an urbanized tropical island. Biological Conservation 142:1311–1321.

     OpenUrl
121. ↵
     1. Tallamy, D.W., and
     2. K.J. Shropshire

     . 2009. Ranking lepidopteran use of native versus introduced plants. Conservation Biology 23:941–947.

     OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
122. ↵
     1. Taylor, L.,
     2. C. Taylor, and
     3. A. Davis

     . 2013. The impact of urbanisation on avian species: The inextricable link between people and birds. Urban Ecosystems 16:481–498.

     OpenUrl
123. ↵
     1. Tommasi, D.,
     2. A. Miro,
     3. H.A. Higo, and
     4. M.L. Winston

     . 2004. Bee diversity and abundance in an urban setting. Canadian Entomologist 136:851–869.

     OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
124. 1. U.S. Department of Transportation

     . ND. Roadside use of native plants. Accessed 12/08/2014. <www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/ecosystems/vegmgmt_rdsduse2.asp>
125. ↵
     1. Uno, S.,
     2. J. Cotton, and
     3. S.M. Philpott

     . 2010. Diversity, abundance, and species composition of ants in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosystems 13:425–441.

     OpenUrl
126. ↵
     1. Vallet, J.,
     2. V. Beaujouan,
     3. J. Pithon,
     4. D. Rozé, and
     5. H. Daniel

     . 2010. The effects of urban or rural landscape context and distance from the edge on native woodland plant communities. Biodiversity and Conservation 19:3375–3392.

     OpenUrl
127. ↵
     1. van Heezik, Y.,
     2. A. Smyth, and
     3. R. Mathieu

     . 2008. Diversity of native and exotic birds across an urban gradient in a New Zealand city. Landscape and Urban Planning 87:223–232.

     OpenUrl
128. ↵
     1. van Heezik, Y.,
     2. K.J.M. Dickinson,
     3. S. Porter, and
     4. C. Freeman

     . 2013. Garden size, householder knowledge, and socio-economic status influence plant and bird diversity at the scale of individual gardens. Ecosystems 16:1442–1454.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
129. ↵
     1. Village of Riverside, Illinois, U.S.

     2010. Landscaping in a landmark village. Accessed 07/14/2014. <www.riverside.il.us/verticalSites/%7BFF0B0056-4ACF-4890-985A-29B8374E9BEE%7D/uploads/%7BD808405A-6CDC-42EC-813B-0B0470A15866%7D.PDF>
130. ↵
     1. Whitmore, C.,
     2. T.E. Crouch,
     3. R.H. Slotow,
     4. M.A. McGeoch, and
     5. M.J. Samways

     . 2002. Conservation of biodiversity in urban environments: Invertebrates on structurally enhanced road islands. African Entomology 10:113–126.

     OpenUrlWeb of Science
131. ↵
     1. Wray, J.C.,
     2. E. Elle, and
     3. L.A. Neame

     . 2014. Floral resources, body size, and surrounding landscape influence bee community assemblages in oak-savannah fragments. Ecological Entomology 39:83–93.

     OpenUrl
132. ↵
     1. Yasuda, M., and
     2. F. Koike

     . 2006. Do golf courses provide a refuge for flora and fauna in Japanese urban landscapes? Landscape and Urban Planning 75:58–68.

     OpenUrl
133. ↵
     1. Yates, C.J.,
     2. S.D. Hopper, and
     3. R.H. Taphn

     . 2005. Native insect flower visitor diversity and feral honeybees on jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) in Kings Park, an urban bushland remnant. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 88:147–153.

     OpenUrl
134. ↵
     1. Yilmaz, H.,
     2. M.A. Irmak,
     3. S. Yilmaz, and
     4. S. Toy

     . 2008. Species diversity of four major urban forest types under extreme climate conditions in Erzurum, Turkey. International Journal of Biodiversity Science & Management 4:154–163.

     OpenUrl
135. ↵
     1. Yu, T.L., and
     2. Y.S. Guo

     . 2013. Effects of urbanization on bird species richness and community composition. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 45:59–69.

     OpenUrl
136. ↵
     1. Zerbe, S.,
     2. U. Maurer,
     3. S. Schmitz, and
     4. H. Sukopp

     . 2003. Biodiversity in Berlin and its potential for nature conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 62:139–148.

     OpenUrlCrossRef
137. 1. Zhu, W.-S.,
     2. Y.-B. Shen, and
     3. X.-Q. Zhang

     . 2010. Discussion on alien tree species planning in the urban greenspace ecosystem. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) 34:142–148.

     OpenUrl