Container Wall Porosity and Root Pruning Influence on Swietenia mahogani Root Ball Architecture and Anchorage After Planting

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Amoroso, G.,
   2. P. Frangi,
   3. R. Piatti,
   4. F. Ferrini,
   5. A. Fini, and
   6. M. Faoro

   . 2010. Effect of container design on plant growth and root deformation of littleleaf linden and field elm. HortScience 45:1829–1829.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Anonymous

   . 2009. Specification Guidelines for Container-grown Trees in California. Urban Tree Foundation, Visalia, California, U.S.
3. ↵
   1. Anonymous

   . 2014. American Standard for Nursery Stock. American Nursery Association, Washington, D.C., U.S.
4. ↵
   1. Anonymous

   . 2015. Florida Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, Florida, U.S.
5. ↵
   1. Arnold, M.A., and
   2. E. Young

   . 1991. CuCo₃-painted containers and root pruning affect apple and green ash root growth and cytokinin levels. HortScience 26:242–244.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
6. ↵
   1. Balisky, A.C.,
   2. P. Salonius,
   3. C. Walli, and
   4. D. Brinkman

   . 1995. Seedling roots and forest floor: Misplaced and neglected aspects of British Columbia’s reforestation effort. Forestry Chronicle 71:59–65.

   OpenUrl
7. ↵
   1. Burdett, A.N.,
   2. H. Coates,
   3. R. Eremko, and
   4. P.A.F. Martin

   . 1986. Toppling in British Columbia’s lodgepole pine plantations: Significance, cause, and prevention. Forestry Chronicle 62:433–439.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
8. ↵
   1. Chapman, K.A., and
   2. S.J. Colombo

   . 2006. Early root morphology of jack pine seedlings grown in different types of containers. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 21:372–379.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. E. Van Eerden and
   2. J.M. Kinghorn

   1. Chavasse, C.G.R.

   1978. The root form and stability of planted trees, with special reference to nursery and establishment practice. pp. 54–64. In: E. Van Eerden and J.M. Kinghorn (Eds.). Proceedings of the Root Form of Planted Trees Symposium British Columbia Ministry of Forests/Canadian Forest Service Joint Report No. 8.
10. ↵
    1. Coutts, M.P.,
    2. C. Walker, and
    3. A.C. Burnand

    . 1990. Effects of establishment method on root form of lodgepole pine and Sitka spruce and on the production of adventitious roots. Forestry 63:143–159.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Coutts, M.P.,
    2. C.C.N. Nielson, and
    3. B.C. Nicoll

    . 1999. The development of symmetry, rigidity, and anchorage in the structural root system of conifers. Plant and Soil 217:1–15.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Danjon F.,
    2. T. Fourcaud, and
    3. D. Bert

    . 2005. Root architecture and wind-firmness of mature Pinus pinaster. New Phytology 168:387–400.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Davis, S., and
    2. D.F. Jacobs

    . 2004. Quantifying root system quality of nursery seedlings and relationship to outplanting performance. New Forests 30:295–311.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Dumroese, R.K., and
    2. D.L. Wenny

    . 1997. An assessment of ponderosa pine seedlings grown in copper-coated polybags. Tree Planters’ Notes 48:60–64.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Fourcaud, T.,
    2. J. Ji,
    3. Z. Zhang, and
    4. A. Stokes

    . 2007. Understanding the impact of root morphology on overturning mechanisms: A modeling approach. Annals of Botany 100:1093.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F.

    2013. Anchorage influenced by production method and root pruning. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39:1-5.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. C. Harchick

    . 2014. Root system morphology influences lateral stability of Swietenia mahogani. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40:27–35.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. C. Wiese

    . 2012. Root pruning at planting and planting depth in the nursery impact root system morphology and anchorage. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 38:232–239.

    OpenUrl
19. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. F. Masters

    . 2010. Effect of tree size, root pruning and production method on root growth and lateral stability of Quercus virginiana. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36:281–291.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. M. Paz

    . 2014. Root system morphology influenced by container design, retention time, and root pruning. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 40:16–26.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Gilman, E.F., and
    2. R.C. Beeson, Jr.

    . 1995. Copper hydroxide affects root distribution of Ilex cassine in plastic containers. HortTechnology 5:48–49.

    OpenUrl
22. 1. Gilman, E.F.,
    2. M. Paz, and
    3. C. Harchick

    . 2015. Effect of eight container types and root pruning during nursery production on root architecture of Acer rubrum. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry in press.
23. ↵
    1. Graham, B.F., and
    2. F.H. Bormann

    . 1966. Natural root grafts. Botanical Reviews 32:255–292.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Hay, R.L., and
    2. F.W. Woods

    . 1968. Distribution of available carbohydrates in planed loblolly pine root systems. Forest Science 14:301–303.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. E. Van Eerden and
    2. J.M. Kinghorn

    1. Hay, R.L., and
    2. F.W. Woods

    . 1978. Carbohydrate relationships in root systems of planted loblolly pine seedlings. pp. 73–84. In: E. Van Eerden and J.M. Kinghorn (Eds.). Proceedings of the root form of planted trees symposium. British Columbia Ministry of Forests/Canadian Forest Service Joint Report 8.
26. ↵
    1. Hewitt, A., and
    2. G. Watson

    . 2009. Bare root liner production can alter tree root architecture. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 27:99–104.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Krasowski, M.J.

    2003. Root system modifications by nursery culture reflect on post-planting growth and development of coniferous seedlings. Forest Chronicle 79:882–891.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Krasowski, M.J., and
    2. J.N. Owens

    . 2000. Morphological and physical attributes of root systems and seedlings growth in three different Picea glauca reforestation stock. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:1669–1681.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Lindström,
    2. A., and
    3. G. Rune

    . 1999. Root deformation in plantations of container-grown Scots pine trees: Effects on root growth, tree stability and stem straightness. Plant and Soil 217:29–37.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
30. ↵
    1. Lindström,
    2. A.,
    3. C. Hellqvist, and
    4. E. Stattin

    . 2005. Mini seedlings: A new forest regeneration system. pp. 56–58. In: The Thin Green Line: A symposium on the state-of-the-art in reforestation. Ontario Forest Research Institute, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 1235 Queen Street East Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5.
31. ↵
    1. Lyford, W.H.

    1980. Development of the root system of northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.). Harvard Forest Paper 21, Harvard University.
32. ↵
    1. Marshall, M.D., and
    2. E.F. Gilman

    . 1998. Effects of nursery container type on root growth and landscape establishment of Acer rubrum L. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 16:55–59.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. G.W. Watson,
    2. B. Scharenbroch,
    3. L. Costello, and
    4. E.F. Gilman

    1. Neal, C.

    2009. Production systems for small trees and shrubs in New Hampshire. In: G.W. Watson, B. Scharenbroch, L. Costello, and E.F. Gilman (Eds.). Landscape Below Ground III. Morton Arboretum, October 2008. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, U.S.
34. ↵
    1. Ortega, U.,
    2. J. Majada,
    3. A. Mena-Petite,
    4. J. Sanchez-Zabala,
    5. N. Rodriguez-Itturrizar,
    6. K. Txarterina,
    7. J. Azpitarte, and
    8. M. Duñabeitia

    . 2006. Field performance of Pinus radiata D. Don produced in nursery with different types of containers. New Forests 31:97–112.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Owen, J., and
    2. H. Stoven

    . 2008. Searching for the perfect pot. Digger, March, Oregon Association Nursery. Wilsonville, Oregon, U.S.
36. ↵
    1. Rune, G.

    2003. Slits in container wall improve root structure and stem straightness of outplanted Scots pine seedlings. Silva Fenn 37:333–342.

    OpenUrl
37. ↵
    1. Salonius, P.,
    2. K. Beaton, and
    3. B. Roze

    . 2000. Effects of cell size and spacing on root density and field performance of container-reared black spruce. Information Report M-X-208E, Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre, Frederickton, New Brunswick, Canada.
38. ↵
    1. Stoven O’Connor, A.,
    2. J.E. Klett, and
    3. A.J. Koski

    . 2013. Container type and overwintering treatments affect substrate temperature and growth of chanticleer® pear (Pyrus calleryana ‘Glen’s Form’) in the Nursery. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 31:117–123.

    OpenUrl
39. ↵
    1. Watson, G.W., and
    2. G. Kupkowski

    . 1991. Effects of a deep layer of mulch on the soil environment and tree root growth. Journal of Arboriculture 17:242–245.

    OpenUrl
40. ↵
    1. Watson, G.W., and
    2. T.D. Sydnor

    . 1987. The effect of root pruning on the root system of nursery trees. Journal of Arboriculture 13:126–130.

    OpenUrl
41. ↵
    1. Weicherding, P.J.,
    2. C.P. Giblin,
    3. J.H. Gillman,
    4. D.L. Hanson, and
    5. G. Johnson

    . 2007. Mechanical root-disruption practices and their effect on circling roots of pot-bound Tilia cordata Mill. and Salix alba L. ‘Niobe’. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33:43–47.

    OpenUrl
42. ↵
    1. Wenny, D.L., and
    2. R.L. Woollen

    . 1989. Chemical root pruning improves the root system morphology of containerized seedlings. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 4:15–17.

    OpenUrl
43. ↵
    1. Wenny, D.L.,
    2. Y. Liu,
    3. R.K. Dumroese, and
    4. H.L. Osborne

    . 1988. First year field growth of chemically root pruned containerized seedlings. New Forests 2:111–118.

    OpenUrl
44. ↵
    1. Whitcomb, C.E., and
    2. J.D. Williams

    . 1985. Stair-step container for improved root growth. HortScience 20:66–67.

    OpenUrl