Two Hundred Years of Forest Change: Effects of Urbanization on Tree Species Composition and Structure

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Abrell, D.B., and
   2. M.T. Jackson

   . 1977. A decade of change in an old-growth beech-maple forest in Indiana. American Midland Naturalist 98:22–32.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Barr, R.C.,
   2. B.E. Hall,
   3. J.A. Wilson,
   4. C. Souch,
   5. G. Lindsey,
   6. J.A. Bacone,
   7. R.K. Campbell, and
   8. L.P. Tedesco

   . 2002. Documenting changes in the natural environment of Indianapolis-Marion County from European settlement to the present. Ecological Restoration 20:37–46.

   OpenUrlFREE Full Text
3. ↵
   1. Blewett, M.B., and
   2. J.E. Potzger

   . 1951. The forest primeval of Marion and Johnson counties, Indiana, in 1918. Butler University Botanical Studies 10:40–52.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bodenhamer, D.J., and
   2. R.D. Barrows

   . 1994. The Encyclopedia of Indianapolis. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, U.S. 1600 pp.
5. ↵
   1. Bourdo, E.A.

   1956. A review of the General Land Office Survey and of its use in quantitative studies of former forests. Ecology 37:754–768.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
6. ↵
   1. D.J. Bodenhamer and
   2. R.D. Barrows

   1. Brothers, T.S.

   1994. Flora and Fauna. pp. 583–585. In: D.J. Bodenhamer and R.D. Barrows (Eds.). The Encyclopedia of Indianapolis, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, U.S.
7. ↵
   1. Burghardt, K.T.,
   2. D.W. Tallamy, and
   3. W.G. Shriver

   . 2009. Impact of native plants on bird and butterfly biodiversity in suburban landscapes. Conservation Biology 23:219–224.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. ↵
   1. City Data

   . 2015. <www.city-data.com>
9. ↵
   1. Dwyer, J.F.,
   2. H.W. Schroeder, and
   3. P.H. Gobster

   . 1991. The significance of urban trees and forests: toward a deeper understanding of values. Journal of Arboriculture 17:276–284.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Fahey, R.T.,
    2. M.L. Bowles, and
    3. J.L. McBride

    . 2012. Origins of the Chicago urban forest: Composition and structure in relation to presettlement vegetation and modern land use. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 38:181–193.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Homoya, M.A.,
    2. D.B. Abrell,
    3. J.R. Aldrich, and
    4. T.W. Post

    . 1985. Natural Regions of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 94:245–268.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. IDNR (Indiana Department of Natural Resources)

    . 2015. Community & Urban Forestry. <www.in.gov/dnr/forestry/2854.htm>
13. ↵
    1. Ikin, K.,
    2. E. Knight,
    3. D.B. Lindenmayer,
    4. J. Fischer, and
    5. A.D. Manning

    . 2012. The influence of native versus exotic streetscape vegetation on the spatial distribution of birds in suburbs and reserves. Diversity and Distributions <doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00937.x>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
14. ↵
    1. Lovett, G.M., and
    2. M.J. Mitchell

    . 2004. Sugar maple and nitrogen cycling in the forests of eastern North America. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:81–88.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. E.J. Greenfield

    . 2012. Tree and impervious cover change in U.S. cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11:21–30.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
16. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. A.B. Cumming,
    3. D.B. Twardus,
    4. R. Hoehn, and
    5. M. Mielke

    . 2007. Monitoring Urban Forests in Indiana: Pilot Study 2002. National Forest Health Monitoring Program. NA-FR-01-07. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, U.S. 13 pp.
17. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. S.M. Stein,
    3. P.B. Randler,
    4. E.J., Greenfield,
    5. S.J. Comas,
    6. M.A. Carr, and
    7. R.J. Alig

    . 2010. Sustaining America’s Urban Trees and Forests: a Forests on the Edge Report. General Technical Report NRS-62. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, U.S. 27 pp.
18. ↵
    1. Peper, P.J.,
    2. E.G. McPherson,
    3. J.R. Simpson,
    4. K.E. Varga, and
    5. Q. Xiao

    . 2008. City of Indianapolis, Indiana municipal forest resource analysis. Technical report to: Indy Parks and Recreation Department, City of Indianapolis, Indiana. Center for Urban Forest Research, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Davis. 68 pp.
19. ↵
    1. Potzger, J.E.,
    2. M.E. Potzger, and
    3. J. McCormick

    . 1956. The forest primeval of Indiana as recorded in the original U.S. land surveys and an evaluation of previous interpretations of Indiana vegetation. Butler University Botanical Studies 13:95–111.

    OpenUrl
20. 1. Purdue University Extension

    . Emerald Ash Border in Indiana. <http://extension.entm.purdue.edu/EAB/index.php?page=ident/eab>
21. ↵
    1. Radeloff, V.C.,
    2. D.J. Mladenoff,
    3. H.S. He, and
    4. M.S. Boyce

    . 1999. Forest landscape change in the northwestern Wisconsin Pine Barrens from pre-European settlement to the present. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 29:1649–1659.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Santamour, F.S.

    1990. Trees for urban planting: diversity, uniformity and common sense. pp. 57–65. In: Proceedings of the 7th Conference of Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance (METRIA), The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, U.S.
23. ↵
    1. Schulte, L.A., and
    2. D.J. Mladenoff

    . 2001. The original US Public Land Survey records: Their use and limitations in reconstructing presettlement vegetation. Journal of Forestry 99:5–10.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. Seto, K.S.,
    2. B. Güneralp, and
    3. L.R. Hutyra

    . 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science <doi:10.1073/pnas.1211658109>

    OpenUrlCrossRef
25. ↵
    1. U.S. Census Bureau

    . 2015. <www.census.gov/geo/www/ua/uafaq.html>
26. ↵
    1. UNFPA

    . 2007. State of the World Population 2007: Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth. United Nations Population Fund, New York City, New York, U.S. 108 pp.
27. ↵
    1. USDA FIAP

    . 2015. <http://www.fia.fs.fed.us>
28. ↵
    1. USDA

    . 2006. Plant guide: sugar maple. <http://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_acsa3.pdf>
29. ↵
    1. Vellend, M.,
    2. C.D. Brown,
    3. H.M. Kharouba,
    4. J.L. McCune, and
    5. I.H. Myers-Smith

    . 2013. Historical ecology: Using unconventional data sources to test for effects of global environmental change. American Journal of Botany 100:1294–1305.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text