Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Evaluation of General-Use Insecticides for Preventing Host Colonization by New Jersey Southern Pine Beetles

B.L. Strom, W.K. Oldland, J.R. Meeker and J. Dunn
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 2015, 41 (2) 88-102; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2015.010
B.L. Strom
B.L. Strom (corresponding author), Research Entomologist, Southern Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 2500 Shreveport Highway, Pineville, Louisiana 71360, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
W.K. Oldland
W.K. Oldland, Entomologist, Northeastern Area Forest Health Protection, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 180 Canfield Street, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
J.R. Meeker
J.R. Meeker, Entomologist, Region 8 Forest Health Protection, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 2500 Shreveport Highway, Pineville, Louisiana 71360, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Dunn
J. Dunn, GIS Specialist, NJ State Forestry Services, P.O. Box 420, Trenton, New Jersey 08625, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Map of counties comprising New Jersey, U.S. The shaded area are those with known SPB infestations; markers show 2012 infestations. Populations of the southern pine beetle have been in outbreak status in New Jersey since 2010.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    To attract southern pine beetles (SPB) and challenge treatments in the field, bolt sections were placed in a bucket and attached to the bottom of a baited Lindgren multiple funnel trap. Laboratory evaluations were also conducted and provided higher pressures of SPB for treatment evaluations.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Average percentage of subsamples per small bolt that was positive for Ips avulsus activity (beetle or gallery) in field bioassays in central Louisiana. Weeklong trials began at 58, 72, and 124 days posttreatment, each indicated by a different bar shade. For treatments to be considered sufficiently challenged by I. avulsus, control bolts (Con) must have 50% of subsamples with activity; all three trials met this criterion. Effective treatments are indicated by fewer than 20% of subsamples having activity (hashed horizontal line). Astro (Ast) at 58 and 72 days posttreatment (both 0 attacks) was the only effective treatment by this criterion. Sample size was two bolts per treatment per trial.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Average number of attacks (a) and average cm gallery length produced per attack (GLA) (b) by the southern pine beetle (SPB) in laboratory small-bolt assays. Each bar depicts the mean ± 1 SEM of n = 8 bolts. Treatments were: Ast = Astro, Con = control, Dom = Dominion, Onx = Onyx, and Xyt = Xytect. Bars with different letters represent means that were significantly different (Tukey’s HSD). Bolts were exposed to about 75 unsexed adult SPB in bioassay arenas for 48 hours between 72 and 124 days post-application of treatments to trees. Please note differences in the ordinate among plots.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Descriptions of individual experimental trials conducted as part of this study with the southern pine beetle (SPB) or Ips avulsus (Ips). Insecticide residue concentrations were determined from phloem collected from each untreated and imidacloprid-treated study tree after felling.

    EvaluationSiteInsect species sourceDates of trialTrial setzDays posttreatmentyValid testx
    NJ Field 11-1GlassboroSPB-NJ feralAug 3–10 2011469N
    NJ Field 11-2WinslowSPB-NJ feralAug 30–Sept 8, 2011596N
    NJ Field 1ClarksSPB-NJ feralMay 15–19, 2012162N
    NJ Field 2HardingSPB-NJ feralMay 15–20, 2012162Y
    MS Field 3HomochittoSPB-MS feralJune 5–12, 2012283Y
    NJ Lab 1LaboratorySPB-NJ boltswMay 25–27, 2012272Y
    NJ Lab 2LaboratorySPB-NJ boltswMay 31–June 2, 2012278Y
    MS Lab 3LaboratorySPB-MS boltsvJuly 16–18, 20123124Y
    LA Field 1StuartIps-LA feralMay 14–21, 2012161Y
    LA Field 2StuartIps-LA feralJune 5–12, 2012283Y
    LA Field 3StuartIps-LA feralJuly 18–25, 20123126Y
    • ↵z 1 = cut on May 11, 2012; 2 = cut on May 25, 2012; 3 = cut on July 15, 2012; 4 = cut on July 29, 2011; 5 = cut on August 24, 2011.

    • ↵y At first day of bolt’s exposure to beetles.

    • ↵x Based on attack number (SPB) or proportion of subsamples with activity (Ips avulsus) observed on control/untreated bolts.

    • ↵w Infested pitch pine from Harding site.

    • ↵v Infested loblolly pine from Homochitto National Forest.

    • Note: NJ = New Jersey; MS = Mississippi; LA = Louisiana.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 41 (2)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 41, Issue 2
March 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of General-Use Insecticides for Preventing Host Colonization by New Jersey Southern Pine Beetles
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of General-Use Insecticides for Preventing Host Colonization by New Jersey Southern Pine Beetles
B.L. Strom, W.K. Oldland, J.R. Meeker, J. Dunn
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2015, 41 (2) 88-102; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2015.010

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of General-Use Insecticides for Preventing Host Colonization by New Jersey Southern Pine Beetles
B.L. Strom, W.K. Oldland, J.R. Meeker, J. Dunn
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 2015, 41 (2) 88-102; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2015.010
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluation of Nature-Based and Traditional Solutions for Urban Soil Decompaction
  • Using the CSR Theory when Selecting Woody Plants for Urban Forests: Evaluation of 342 Trees and Shrubs
  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • bifenthrin
  • Dendroctonus frontalis
  • Imidacloprid
  • insecticide
  • Ips avulsus
  • Mississippi
  • New Jersey
  • permethrin
  • Pinus
  • Soil Drench
  • Southern Pine Beetle
  • Southern Pine Engraver
  • systemic insecticide

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire