A Comparison of Arborists’ and Horticulturists’ Preferences of Tsuga chinensis to T. canadensis in the Urban Landscape

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. K. Gottschalk

   1. Bentz, S.E.,
   2. R.J. Griesbach,
   3. M.R. Pooler, and
   4. A.M. Townsend

   . 2006. Tsuga chinensis as a source of host resistance to the hemlock wooly adelgid. pp. 24–25. In: K. Gottschalk (Ed.). Proceedings of the 17th Annual Interagency Research Forum on Gypsy Moth and Other Invasive Species. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
2. ↵
   1. Chen T.L.,
   2. P.F. Hong,
   3. Y.C. Lin, and
   4. J.C. Huang

   . 2009. Visual image analysis of Alishan five-wood species in Taiwan. Forest Products Industries 28(1):13–26.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Childs, R.D.

   2011. Factsheet: Gypsy moth. University of Massachusetts Extension. Accessed May 2, 2014. <http://extension.umass.edu/landscape/fact-sheets/gypsy-moth>
4. ↵
   1. Del Tredici, P., and
   2. A. Kitajima

   . 2004. Introduction and cultivation of Chinese hemlock (Tsuga chinensis) and its resistance to hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae). Journal of Arboriculture 30(5):282–287.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Dirr, M.A.

   2009. Manual of woody landscape plants: Their identification, ornamental characteristics, culture, propagation, and uses, sixth edition. Stipes Publishing L.L.C., Chicago, Illinois, U.S. 1325 pp.
6. ↵
   1. Dreistadt, S.H.,
   2. D.L. Dahlsten, and
   3. G.W. Frankie

   . 1990. Urban forests and insect ecology: Complex interactions among trees, insects, and times. BioScience 40:192–198.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. Dunlap, R.E., and
   2. C.E. Beus

   . 1992. Understanding pubic concerns about pesticides: An empirical examination. Journal of Consumer Affairs 26:418–438.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Evans, A.M.

   2008. Infestation by hemlock woolly adelgid of two exotic hemlock species in a New England Forest. Journal of Sustainable Forestry Growth 26:223–240.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Field, A.

   2009. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, third edition. SAGE publications, Ltd., London, England. 690 pp.
10. ↵
    1. Gandhi, K.J.K., and
    2. D.A. Herms

    . 2010. Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biological Invasions 12:389–405.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Gilden, R.C.,
    2. K. Huffling, and
    3. B. Sattler

    . 2010. Pesticides and health risks. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 39(1):103–110.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
12. ↵
    1. R.M. Burns and
    2. B.H. Honkala

    1. Godman, R.M., and
    2. K. Lancaster

    . 1990. Tsuga canadensis (l.) Carr. pp. 604–612. In: R.M. Burns and B.H. Honkala (Eds.). Silvics of North America: Volume 1 Conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, D.C.
13. ↵
    1. Haack, R.A.,
    2. F. Hérard,
    3. J. Sun, and
    4. J.J. Turgeon

    . 2010. Managing Invasive Populations of Asian Longhorned Beetle and Citrus Longhorned Beetle: A Worldwide Perspective. Annual Review of Entomology 55:521–546.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Harper, R.W., and
    2. R.S. Cowles

    . 2013. Susceptibility of Chinese hemlock (Tsuga chinensis) to injury from autumn horticultural oil applications. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 39(1):6–10.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. Havill, N.P., and
    2. M.E. Montgomery

    . 2008. The role of arboreta in studying the evolution of host resistance to the hemlock woolly adelgid. Arnoldia 65:2–9.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Hoover, B.K.,
    2. R.K. Bates,
    3. J.C. Sellmer, and
    4. G.A. Hoover

    . 2009. Challenging Chinese hemlock (Tsuga chinensis) with hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae) ovisacs. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 35:1–4.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. B. Onken,
    2. R. Reardon, and
    3. J. Lashomb

    1. Ingram, J.B.

    2002. Hemlock landscape management. pp. 233–234. In: B. Onken, R. Reardon, and J. Lashomb (Eds.). Proceeding of hemlock woolly adelgid in the eastern United States symposium. Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, Morgantown, West Virginia, U.S.
18. ↵
    1. ISA (International Society of Arboriculture)

    . 2014. Verify an ISA Certification / Find a Tree Care Service. Accessed January 31, 2014. <www.isa-arbor.com/faca/findArborist.aspx>
19. ↵
    1. Joseph, S.V.,
    2. S.K. Braman, and
    3. J.L. Hanula

    . 2011. Effects of fertilization of four hemlock species on Adelges tsugae (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) growth and feeding preference of predators. Journal of Economic Entomology 104:288–298.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. ↵
    1. Kok, L.T.,
    2. S.M. Salom,
    3. M. Beck,
    4. R. Mays,
    5. B.M. Eisenback,
    6. T.J. McAvoy, and
    7. T. Dellinger et al.

    2013. Biological control of the hemlock woolly adelgid. Virginia Tech, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Department of Entomology. Accessed January 15, 2014. <www.ento.vt.edu/projects/kok-loke/Project9.html>
21. ↵
    1. Montgomery, M.E.,
    2. S.E. Bentz, and
    3. R.T. Olsen

    . 2009. Evaluation of hemlock (Tsuga) species and hybrids for resistance to Adelges tsugae (Hemiptera: Adelgidae) using artificial infestation. Journal of Economic Entomology 102:1247–1254.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
22. ↵
    1. B. Onken and
    2. R. Reardon

    1. Olsen, R.T., and
    2. S.E. Bentz

    . 2010. Breeding novel hemlock hybrids with resistance to hemlock woolly adelgid. In: B. Onken and R. Reardon (Eds.). Proceedings of the Fifth Symposium on Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in the Eastern United States. USDA Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, U.S.
23. ↵
    1. Onken, B.P., and
    2. R.C. Reardon

    . 2011. An overview and outlook for biological control of the hemlock woolly adelgid. Chapter 22. Implementation and status of biological control of the hemlock woolly adelgid. USDA Forest Service Bulletin FHTET-2011-04. Morgantown, WV: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team.
24. ↵
    1. Peterson, R.

    2000. Public perceptions of agricultural biotechnology and pesticides: recent understandings and implications for risk communication. American Entomologist 41:8–16.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Poland, T., and
    2. D. McCullough

    . 2006. Emerald ash borer: Invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America’s ash resource. Journal of Forestry 104:118–124.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Raaijmakers, Q.A.W.,
    2. A. van Hoof,
    3. H. ‘t Hart,
    4. T.F.M.A. Verbogt, and
    5. W.A.M. Vollebergh

    . 2000. Adolescents’ midpoint responses on Likert-type Scale Items: Neutral or Missing Values? International Journal of Public Opinion Research 12(2):208–216.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
27. ↵
    1. B. Onken and
    2. R. Reardon

    1. Raupp, M.,
    2. R. Ahern,
    3. B. Onken,
    4. R. Reardon,
    5. S. Bealmear,
    6. J. Doccola, and
    7. P. Wolf et al.

    2008. Comparing hemlock woolly adelgid and elongate hemlock scale control in ornamental and forest hemlocks. In: B. Onken and R. Reardon (Eds.). Proc. of the Fourth Symposium on Hemlock Woolly Adelgid in the Eastern United States. USDA Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, U.S.
28. ↵
    1. Ritchie, J.,
    2. J. Lewis, and
    3. G. Elam

    . 2003. Designing and selecting samples. pp. 77–108. In: Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. SAGE Publications, London, UK.
29. ↵
    1. Rotherham, I.D.

    2005. Invasive plants: Ecology, history and perception. Journal of Practical Ecology and Conservation Special Series 4:52–62.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. K.O. Britton

    1. Schlarbaum, S.E.,
    2. F. Hebard,
    3. P.C. Spaine, and
    4. J.C. Kamalay

    . 1998. Three American tragedies: Chestnut blight, butternut canker, and Dutch elm disease. In: K.O. Britton (Ed.). Exotic pests of eastern forests conference proceedings; 1997 April 8-10; Nashville, TN. U.S. Forest Service and Tennessee Exotic Pest Plant Council: 45–54. Accessed May 02, 2014. <www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja_schlarbaum002.htm>
31. ↵
    1. SPSS

    . 2009. PASW Statistics for Windows, Version 18.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
32. ↵
    1. Ward, J.S.,
    2. M.E. Montgomery,
    3. C.A.S.-J. Cheah,
    4. B.P. Onken, and
    5. R.S. Cowles

    . 2004. Eastern hemlock forests: Guidelines to minimize the impacts of hemlock woolly adelgid. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northeastern Area, State & Private Forestry, Morgantown, West Virginia, U.S.
33. ↵
    1. Weston, P.A., and
    2. R.W. Harper

    . 2009. Potential of Tsuga spp. from western North America and Asia as replacements for eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis). Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 35(1):5–9.

    OpenUrl