Environmental Justice and Factors that Influence Participation in Tree Planting Programs in Portland, Oregon, U.S.

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Akbari, H.,
   2. D.M. Kurn,
   3. S.E. Bretz, and
   4. J.W. Hanford

   . 1997. Peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees. Energy and Buildings 25:139–148.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
2. ↵
   1. Akbari, H., and
   2. H. Taha

   . 1992. The impact of trees and white surfaces on residential heating and cooling energy use in four Canadian cities. Energy 17:141–149.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
3. ↵
   1. Anderson, L., and
   2. H.K. Cordell

   . 1988. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens Georgia (U.S.A.): A survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape and Urban Planning 15:153–164.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. City of Phoenix

   . 2010. Maryvale Village Planning Committee. Accessed on April 23, 2013. <http://phoenix.gov/district5/d5mvpcr.html>
5. ↵
   1. Culp, R.P.

   2008. Predicting days on the market: The influence of environmental and home attributes. New York Economic Review:70–82.
6. ↵
   1. Donovan, G.H., and
   2. D.T. Butry

   . 2009. The value of shade: Estimating the effect of urban trees on summertime electricity use. Energy and Buildings 41:662–668.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
7. ↵
   1. Donovan, G.H., and
   2. D.T. Butry

   . 2010. Trees in the city: Valuing street trees in Portland, Oregon. Landscape and Urban Planning 94:77–83.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
8. 1. Donovan, G.H.,
   2. D.T. Butry,
   3. Y.L. Michael,
   4. J.P. Prestemon,
   5. D. Gatziolis, and
   6. M.Y. Mao

   . 2013. The relationship between trees and health: Evidence from the spread of the emerald ash borer. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 44:139–145.

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   1. Donovan, G.H.,
   2. Y.L. Michael,
   3. D.T. Butry,
   4. A.D. Sullivan, and
   5. J.M. Chase

   . 2011. Urban trees and the risk of poor birth outcomes. Health and Place 17:390–393.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Durrant, G.B.,
    2. R.M. Groves,
    3. L. Staetsky, and
    4. F. Steele

    . 2010. Effects of Interviewer Attitudes and Behaviors on Refusal in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 74:1–36.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. Greene, C.S.,
    2. A.A. Millward, and
    3. B. Ceh

    . 2011. Who is likely to plant a tree? The use of public socio-demographic data to characterize client participants in a private urban forestation program. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 10:29–38.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Greene, W.H.

    2000. Econometric Analysis, Fourth Edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S.
13. ↵
    1. Heynen, N.,
    2. H.A. Perkins, and
    3. P. Roy

    . 2006. The political ecology of uneven urban green space: The impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Affairs Review 42:3–25.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
14. ↵
    1. Heynen, N.C., and
    2. G. Lindsey

    . 2003. Correlates of urban forest canopy cover: Implications for local public works. Public Works Management and Policy 8:33–47.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
15. ↵
    1. Hope, D.,
    2. C. Gries,
    3. W. Zhu,
    4. W.F. Fagan,
    5. C.L. Redman,
    6. N.B. Grimm,
    7. A.L. Nelson,
    8. C. Martin, and
    9. A. Kinzig

    . 2003. Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 100:8788–8792.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
16. ↵
    1. Karps, J.

    2007. Portland’s urban forest canopy: Assessment and public tree evaluation. Portland Parks and Recreation, Portland, Oregon. p. 43.
17. ↵
    1. Kuo, F.E., and
    2. W.C. Sullivan

    . 2001. Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime? Environment and Behavior 33:343–367.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
18. ↵
    1. Lovasi, G.S.,
    2. J.W. Quinn,
    3. K.M. Neckerman,
    4. M.S. Perzanowski, and
    5. A. Rundle

    . 2008. Children living in areas with more street trees have lower prevalence of asthma. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 62:647–649.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    1. Masnick, G.S.

    2002. The new demographics of housing. Housing Policy Debate 13:275–321.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. J.R. Simpson,
    3. P.J. Peper,
    4. S.E. Maco, and
    5. Q. Xiao

    . 2005. Municipal forest benefits and costs in five U.S. cities. Journal of Forestry 103:411–416.

    OpenUrlWeb of Science
21. 1. Million Trees NYC

    . 2012. About million trees NYC. Accessed 04/23/2013. <www.milliontreesnyc.org/html/about/about.shtml>
22. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. D.E. Crane, and
    3. J.C. Stevens

    . 2006. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4:155–123.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Summit, J., and
    2. E.G. McPherson

    . 1998. Residential tree planting and care: A study of attitudes and behavior in Sacramento, California. Journal of Arboriculture 24:89–96.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Szantoi, Z.,
    2. F. Escobedo,
    3. J. Wagner,
    4. J. Rodriguez, and
    5. S. Smith

    . 2012. Socioeconomic factors and urban tree cover policies in a subtropical urban forest. GIScience and Remote Sensing 49:428–449.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Troy, A., and
    2. J.M. Grove

    . 2008. Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landscape and Urban Planning 87:233–245.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. Troy, A.,
    2. J. Morgan Grove, and
    3. J. O’Neil-Dunne

    . 2012. The relationship between tree canopy and crime rates across an urban–rural gradient in the greater Baltimore region. Landscape & Urban Planning 106:262–270.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Ulrich, R.S.

    1984. View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224:420–421.

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
28. ↵
    1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    . 2012. Environmental Justice Program and Civil Rights. Accessed on April 23, 2013. <www.epa.gov/region1/ej/>