Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Bank Banding with Morphactin to Inhibit Tree Growth

H. Hield, R.M. Sachs and R.A. Backhaus
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) March 1978, 4 (3) 58-61; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/joa.1978.4.3.58
H. Hield
University of California, Dept. of Plant Sciences. Riverside and Dept. of Environmental Horticulture. Davis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
R.M. Sachs
University of California, Dept. of Plant Sciences. Riverside and Dept. of Environmental Horticulture. Davis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
R.A. Backhaus
University of California, Dept. of Plant Sciences. Riverside and Dept. of Environmental Horticulture. Davis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A California supplemental registration now permits trunk bark banding with Maintain CF 125, a morphactin formulation, for tree growth inhibition. A band of equal width to the treated trunk or branch is sprayed or painted with a 1 % concn of Maintain CF 125 in a specific oil carrier mixture. Pine sp. and Acacia longifolia are responsive to this level of treatment. Less responsive trees are being tested at a 2% concn, with increased band width, and with more frequent applications. Calacedrus decurrens, Juglans hindsii, Platanus racemosa and Nerium oleander have not responded to increased dosage.

Line clearance from tree growth is a major expenditure of utility companies. For a number of years it has been envisioned that a growth inhibitor treatment might reduce tree growth and offer a saving on pruning costs. This has in fact occurred. Foliar sprays with MH and Maintain CF 125 are applied to reduce growth of Platanus, Juglans, Ulmus and some other tree species in California (6). Limitations result from the number of species responsive to those chemicals and from restrictions on where sprays may be applied because of hazards from spray drift.

Chemical applications by injection and trunk bark banding have been investigated (1,2,5). Both permit a safer treatment because of the elimination of the drift factor. Bark banding applications are simple and rapid.

This report describes the recent supplementary California registration of Maintain CF 125 for bark banding to reduce tree growth. It also presents current information on responsive species and possible concn adaptation to increase the number of responsive species.

Supplemental registration

A 1% concn of Maintain CF 125 in either of 2 oil mixtures is allowed. The oil fraction may be either no. 2 diesel oil or transformer oil with a 7.5% emulsifier mixture. The specified emulsifier mixture (EM) is 9 parts Span 80 and 1 part Tween 80. The alternate carrier is 70% oil and 30% toluene.

Applications is by 3 gal sprayer or brush in a complete band equal in width to the trunk or branch diameter. Treatment is cautioned on small, diseased or stressed trees.

Pine trees at treatment should be dormant and not showing a candle growth stage. Treatment during rapid growth will result in distorted new shoot and leaf growth.

Deciduous trees are required to have 4 or 5 full sized leaves on the terminals before treatment. The development of an acceptable shade cover before treatment is desired since new growth is frequently distorted and subsequent leaf size reduced. Treatment should be before shoot elongation.

Label instructions on Maintain CF 125 container must be read with precautions and directions on each label followed.

Experimental testing

Chlorflurenol-methylester (Maintain CF 125) is the only chemical shown effective for bark banding. There have been over 5 years in which effective growth inhibition treatments have been applied on pine sp. (1,4). Examples from experiments have been selected to illustrate various responses (Table 1). Statistical significance was tested except for test 3, and values without * * and * are not significantly different from the control.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Growth reduction responses of 7 tree species to trunk bark banding with chlorflurenol oil base solutions. Band width equal to trunk diameter except where specified application at twice (2x) of 4 times (4x) trunk diameter.

Test 3, a 1973 experiment with Pinus radiata, gives evidence of more than 7 months growth control from a 1 diam band with .63% CF 125 in spray oil and the Span-Tween emulsifier mixture. While generally effective the CF 125 separates in this mixture. For this reason the mixture must be prepared daily and requires frequent agitation. Otherwise a varying concn of CF 125 would be applied.

Carrier

Early in the bark banding research program (supported in part by the Electric Power Research Institute) various carrier systems were tested for ability to hold CF 1 25 in mixture. It was determined that addition of 30% toluene or benzene to the oil carrier kept the CF 125 in solution. Growth inhibition was then tested with these carriers as well as with Mor Act, a proprietary wetting agent spray oil mixture, with EM-oil mixtures and with carrier mixtures without CF 125. Test 4 shows 30% toluene or benzene plus diesel was as effective as EM plus diesel carrier for giving CF 125 inhibition. Mor Act was a less effective carrier. The carrier mixture of EM or toluene with diesel, spray or transformer oil have not caused shoot growth reduction (Tests 1,4).

Growth reductions have occurred from the Maintain CF 125 in the EM plus oil carrier but there was also difficulty in keeping the CF 125 in a uniform mixture. With the 30% toluene (preferred to benzene) oil mixture there is 1 year of successful use and it is easier to manage.

Species

Variations in growth reduction from bark banding is correlated to responsiveness of that species to spray application. Acacia, as well as pine, shows long term inhibition from 1 % concn and a 1 diam band (Tests 3, 5).

There are a number of species where growth reductions have not persisted, and increased concn, increased band width, as well as repeated applications are believed to be necessary to cause long-term growth reductions. Eucalyptus. elm and ash (Tests 1. 7. 8) are species where one or more of the above alterations of banding procedure have been necessary for prolonged inhibition.

Comparisons with increased amount of CF 125, by a higher cone or by a wider band, have not shown an advantage for either procedure (Test 7, 8). The 1 % concn at a 2 or 4 diam band width has shown as great an inhibition as other combinations. A 1 % CF 125 mixture is more stable than a 2% mixture. Also, the advantage of a standardized mixture (carrier and concn) would favor increasing band width rather than concn.

However, eucalyptus and ficus are 2 of several species where a 2% concn appears to be required. Eucalyptus results (Test 1) over several years have indicated that a 2% concn at a 2 or 4 diam band width with repeat application is necessary for long term growth stoppage.

Calocedrus decurrens, Juglans hindsii, Platanus racemosa, and Nerium oleander have not responded to the 1 % concn, 1 diam band application.

Injury

Leaf curl occurs from CF 125 banding as it does from spray application. Small leaves (like pine) are less noticeably distorted than large leaves. Leaf drop sometimes occurs as the result of faster aging of older leaves. Slight canopy opening on elms has resulted from such leaf drop and the accompanying inhibition of new growth.

Bark is darkened as a result of oil application. Discoloration disappears more rapidly with warm temperatures and has not persisted longer than 3 months. Observation of 1974 tests by Davey Tree where bark bands started at ground level, leaving only 1 line of difference in bark color, led to the practice of banding from the soil line up.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Fraxinus uhdei. Tree to right shows top growth reduction 71 days after a March 31 basal banding of 2 diam width with a 2% Maintain CF 125 concn. Tree to left not treated.

Swelling of the banded zone has occurred on 4 year old Pinus radiata and Fraxinus uhdei. No evidence of increased epicormic sprouting or girdling has occurred.

An increased rate of bark aging frequently occurs on corky barked species 4 to 6 months after treatment. Bark changes without injury to the tree have occurred with treatments on juvenile and mature eucalyptus (more rapid aging), Fraxinus uhdei (uneven diameter growth and infrequent 2 cm surface splits), and Ulmus parvifolia (increased bark aging). This is supported by work of Doss et al. (1977) on Pinus radiata (3).

Some Acacia longifolia treated with CF 125 in 30% benzene in diesel oil were killed. Since death also occurred from the benzene-diesel carrier without CF 1 25, the benzene is suspect. Bark banding with Maintain CF 125 in other carriers has been repeated annually for 3 years. Foliar modifications were always outgrown and there was no bark response which damaged the tree.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Presented at the ISA Conference in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in August 1977.

  • © 1978, International Society of Arboriculture. All rights reserved.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alvarez, R.G.
    1977. Growth regulators. J. Arbor. 3(5): 94-97.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Backhaus, R.A.,
    2. R.M. Sachs and
    3. H. Z. Hield
    . 1976. Tree growth inhibition by bark application of morphactins. HortScience 11: 578-580
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Doss, R.P.,
    2. P.M. Nueman.
    3. R.A. Backhaus. and
    4. R.M. Sachs
    1977. Bark banding of Pinus radiata D. Don with morphactin (IT3456): Influence on trunk anatomy, assimilate transport and growth. Physiol. Plant. 39: 280-284.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    1. Harris. G.K.,
    2. G.B. Garrette, and
    3. D.O. Anderson
    . 1971. On turf, shrubs, vines and trees maintain success boosting growth retardants. Weeds. Trees and Turf 10(3): 20-22. 24.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    1. Himelick, E.B.
    1972. High pressure injection of chemicals into trees. Arborist’s News 37(9): 97-103.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Sachs, R.M.
    2. W.P. Hackett.
    3. R.G. Maire,
    4. T.M. Kretchum. and
    5. J. deBie
    . 1970. Chemical control of plant growth in landscapes. Calif. Agr. Exp. Stat. Bui 844.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 4, Issue 3
March 1978
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bank Banding with Morphactin to Inhibit Tree Growth
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Bank Banding with Morphactin to Inhibit Tree Growth
H. Hield, R.M. Sachs, R.A. Backhaus
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1978, 4 (3) 58-61; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1978.4.3.58

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Bank Banding with Morphactin to Inhibit Tree Growth
H. Hield, R.M. Sachs, R.A. Backhaus
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Mar 1978, 4 (3) 58-61; DOI: 10.48044/joa.1978.4.3.58
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Supplemental registration
    • Experimental testing
    • Footnotes
    • Literature Cited
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hardscape of Soil Surface Surrounding Urban Trees Alters Stem Carbon Dioxide Efflux
  • Literature Review of Unmanned Aerial Systems and LIDAR with Application to Distribution Utility Vegetation Management
  • Borrowed Credentials and Surrogate Professional Societies: A Critical Analysis of the Urban Forestry Profession
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire