Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

A Comparison of the Shading Effectiveness of Five Different Street Tree Species in Manchester, UK

David Armson, Mohammad Asrafur Rahman and Anthony Roland Ennos
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) July 2013, 39 (4) 157-164; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2013.021
David Armson
David Armson, Ph.D. (corresponding author), Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Mohammad Asrafur Rahman
Mohammad Asrafur Rahman, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Anthony Roland Ennos
Anthony Roland Ennos, Ph.D., Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    The mean LAI (a) and mean shade area (b) of five different street tree species in Manchester, UK, in early summer and midsummer 2011: C. laevigata (n = 12), S. arnoldiana (n = 10), Prunus ‘Umineko’ (n = 10), P. calleryana (n = 10), and Malus ‘Rudolph’ (n = 9). For LAI (a), species with the same letters are not significantly different from each other in both early and mid-summer; no significant differences were found for mean shade area (b) during either sample period.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    The mean reduction of mean radiant temperature (a) and surface temperature (b) in tree shade during early summer and mid-summer in Manchester, UK, below five different street tree species: C. laevigata (n = 12), S. arnoldiana (n = 10), Prunus ‘Umineko’ (n = 10), P. calleryana (n = 10), and Malus ‘Rudolph’ (n = 9). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences in early summer while uppercase indicate significant differences in midsummer; species with the same letters are not significantly different from each other.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    The distribution of C. laevigata (n = 12), S. arnoldiana (n = 10), Prunus ‘Umineko’ (n = 10), P. calleryana (n = 10), and Malus ‘Rudolph’ (n = 9) over the six sample locations in Manchester, UK.

    StreetDistribution of tree species over the sample area
    C. laevigataS. arnoldianaPrunus ‘Umineko’P. calleryanaMalus ‘Rudolph’Total number of trees
    Manley Road16106023
    Cringle Road4400311
    Victoria Road400408
    Granville Avenue300003
    Thorncliffe Grove000055
    Beech Range000011
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    The mean canopy height, east/west canopy spread, canopy area and aspect ratio produced by five street tree species: C. laevigata (n = 12), S. arnoldiana (n = 10), Prunus ‘Umineko’ (n = 10), P. calleryana (n = 10), and Malus ‘Rudolph’ (n = 9). For each canopy attribute, species with the same letters are not significantly different from each other.

    SpeciesMean canopy height (m) (StErr)Mean east/west canopy spread (m) (StErr)Mean canopy area (m2) (StErr)Aspect ratio (StErr)
    C. laevigata2.828bc1.915ab3.030ab1.482b
    (0.121)(0.100)(0.327)(0.072)
    S. arnoldiana3.456abc1.593bc2.062bc2.185b
    (0.169)(0.097)(0.238)(0.099)
    Prunus ‘Umineko’3.881a1.489c1.914c2.486b
    (0.337)(0.063)(0.188)(0.163)
    P. calleryana3.588ab1.554c1.983c2.301b
    (0.152)(0.076)(0.195)(0.091)
    Malus ‘Rudolph’2.796c2.076a3.377a1.360a
    (0.075)(0.083)(0.246)(0.033)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 39 (4)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 39, Issue 4
July 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comparison of the Shading Effectiveness of Five Different Street Tree Species in Manchester, UK
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
A Comparison of the Shading Effectiveness of Five Different Street Tree Species in Manchester, UK
David Armson, Mohammad Asrafur Rahman, Anthony Roland Ennos
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2013, 39 (4) 157-164; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2013.021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
A Comparison of the Shading Effectiveness of Five Different Street Tree Species in Manchester, UK
David Armson, Mohammad Asrafur Rahman, Anthony Roland Ennos
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jul 2013, 39 (4) 157-164; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2013.021
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • England
  • Human Thermal Comfort
  • Manchester
  • Mean Radiant Temperature
  • Surface Temperature
  • Tree Shade
  • United Kingdom
  • Urban Heat

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire