Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Water Scarcity and Urban Forests: Science and Public Policy Lessons from a Decade of Drought in Adelaide, Australia

Mark Brindal and Randy Stringer
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2013, 39 (3) 102-108; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2013.014
Mark Brindal
Mark Brindal, University of Adelaide, School of Agriculture, Food, and Wine, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
Randy Stringer
Randy Stringer (corresponding author), University of Adelaide, Global Food Studies, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

LITERATURE CITED

  1. ↵
    1. Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology
    . 2011. Climate Data Online. Accessed 09/23/2011. <www.bom.gov.au/climate/data>
  2. ↵
    1. Brack, C.L.
    2002. Pollution mitigation and carbon sequestration by an urban forest. Environmental Pollution 116:S195–S200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Brindal, M., and
    2. R. Stringer
    . 2009. The Value of Urban Trees: Environmental Factors and Economic Efficiency. 10th National TREENET Symposium. National Wine Centre, Adelaide, TREENET.
  4. ↵
    1. Connellan, G.
    2008. Strategies for Urban Trees in an Uncertain Environment. The 9th National TREENET Symposium: 1–9.
  5. ↵
    1. Correy, A.
    1992. Landscape design dilemma: Australian native trees and solar access conflict. Landscape Australia 2:101–104, 169.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Dwyer, J.F.,
    2. E.G. McPherson,
    3. H.W. Schrodeder,
    4. R.A. Rowntree
    . 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18:227–234.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Falkenmark, M.
    2003. Freshwater as Shared between Society and Ecosystems: From Divided Approaches to Integrated Challenges. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 3581440:2037–2049.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Fisher, P.
    2009. Why we need the Urban Forest Urban Magazine, Urban Development Institute of Australia.
  9. ↵
    1. Gómez-Muñoz M.,
    2. A. Porta-Gándara, and
    3. J.L. Fernandez
    . 2010. Effect of tree shades in urban planning in hot-arid climatic regions. Landscape and Urban Planning 94(3–4):149–157.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Government of South Australia
    . 1929. Sewerage Act of 1929. South Australia. Version: 4.9.2006.
  11. ↵
    1. Government of South Australia
    . 2004a. Natural Resources Management Act. South Australia.
    1. Government of South Australia
    . 2004b. Water Proofing Adelaide: Exploring the Issues - a discussion paper. Adelaide, South Australia.
  12. ↵
    1. Government of South Australia
    . 2009. Water for Good. Accessed 05/18/2011. <www.waterforgood.sa.gov.au>
  13. ↵
    1. Government of South Australia
    . 2010. The Thirty Year Plan for Metropolitan Adelaide DPLG. Adelaide: 224.
  14. ↵
    1. Government of South Australia
    . 2011. Waterworks Regulations 2011 under the Waterworks Act 1932.
  15. ↵
    1. Grafton, R.Q., and
    2. M.B. Ward
    2008. Prices versus rationing: Marshallian surplus and mandatory water restrictions. Economic Record 84: S57–S65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Kazemi, F.,
    2. S. Beecham, and
    3. J. Gibbs,
    4. J.
    2011. Streetscape biodiversity and the role of bioretention swales in an Australian urban environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 101(2):139–148.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Killicoat P.,
    2. E. Puzio, and
    3. R. Stringer
    . 2002. The Economic Value of Trees in Urban Areas: Estimating the Benefits of Adelaide’s Street Trees. Proceedings TREENET Symposium, 94-106, University of Adelaide.
  18. ↵
    1. Kirkpatrick, J.B.,
    2. G.D. Daniels, and
    3. A.G. Davison
    . 2011. Temporal and spatial variation in garden and street trees in six eastern Australian cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 101(3):244–252.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Ladson, A.R.,
    2. C.J. Walsh., and
    3. T.D. Fletcher
    . 2006. Improving stream health in urban areas by reducing runoff frequency from impervious surfaces. Australian Journal of Water Resources 10(1):23–33.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Laurenson, S.,
    2. A. Kunhikrishnan,
    3. N.S. Bolan,
    4. R. Naidu,
    5. J. McKay, and
    6. G. Keremane
    . 2010. Management of recycled water for sustainable production and environmental protection: A case study with Northern Adelaide Plains recycling scheme. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 1(2):177–180.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. May, P.
    2009. Can Street Trees Survive Drought? The answer lies in the soil! The 10th National Street Tree Symposium 2009:105–108.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. K.I. Scott, and
    3. J.R. Simpson
    . 1998. Estimating cost effectiveness of residential yard trees for improving air quality in Sacramento, California, using existing models. Atmospheric Environment 32(1):75–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G.,
    2. J.R. Simpson,
    3. P.J. Peper, and
    4. Q. Xiao
    . 1999. Benefit-cost analysis of Modesto’s municipal urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 25:235–248.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. J.R. Simpson
    . 2002 A comparison of municipal forest benefits and costs in Modesto and Santa Monica, California, USA. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 1:61–74.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. McPherson, E.G., and
    2. J.R. Simpson
    . 2003. Potential energy savings in buildings by an urban tree planting programme in California. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2(2):73–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Meyer, W.
    2008. Glenelg to Adelaide Parklands Recycled Water Project: Monitoring for long term success of irrigating the Parklands. Adelaide, South Australia, University of Adelaide, Earth and Environmental Sciences: 5.
  27. ↵
    1. Mibus, R., and
    2. I.J. Shepherd
    . 2004. The development of an Australian style in Australian urban landscaping. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS): 105–112.
  28. ↵
    1. Morgenroth, J., and
    2. G.D. Buchan
    . 2009. Soil Moisture and Aeration Beneath Pervious and Impervious Pavements. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 35(3):135–141.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. National Climate Centre
    . 2009. The exceptional January-February 2009 heatwave in south-eastern Australia. Special Climate Statement 17. Melbourne, Australia, Australian Government: Bureau of Meteorology: 11.
  30. ↵
    1. J. Kuser
    1. Nowak, D.J., and
    2. J.F. Dwyer
    . 2007. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems, pp. 25–46. In: J. Kuser (Ed.). Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast, Springer Science and Business Media, New York, New York, U.S.
  31. ↵
    1. Peel, M.C.,
    2. B.L. Finlayson, and
    3. T.A. McMahon
    . 2007. Updated world map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 4:439–473.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Roy, A.H.,
    2. S.J. Wenger,
    3. T.D. Fletcher,
    4. C.J. Walsh,
    5. A.R. Ladson,
    6. W.D. Shuster,
    7. H.W. Thurston, and
    8. R.R. Brown
    . 2008. Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: Lessons from Australia and the United States. Environmental Management 42(2):344–359.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Tarran, J.
    2009a. Improving Canberra’s sustainability: Why urban tree canopy and other vegetation matters. ACT PLA Bush Capital Workshop.
  34. ↵
    1. Tarran, J.
    2009b. People and Trees: Providing Benefits, Overcoming Impediments, TREENET 2009 Symposium Proceedings.
  35. ↵
    1. Tisdell, J.G., and
    2. J.R. Ward
    2003. Attitudes toward water markets: An Australian case study. Society & Natural Resources 16(1):61–75.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Wagar, J.A., and
    2. A.L. Franklin
    . 1994. Sidewalk effects on soil moisture and temperature. Journal of Arboriculture 20:237.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Ward, J.,
    2. P. Dillon, and
    3. A. Grandgirard
    . 2008. Designing tradeable rights to manage aquifer recharge according to robust separation principles. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply 8(4):427–440.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Wark, A.
    2003. Stormwater Harvesting Trial, Claremont Avenue, Netherby, City of Mitcham. Proceedings of the 4th TREENET National Street Tree Symposium: 4 and 5 September 2003.
  39. ↵
    1. Whitlow, T.H.,
    2. N.L. Bassuk, and
    3. D.L. Reichert
    . 1992. A three-year study of water relations of urban street trees. Journal of Applied Ecology 29(2):436–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  40. ↵
    1. Williams, M.
    1966. The Parkland Towns of Australia and New Zealand. Geographical Review 56(1):67–89.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 39 (3)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 39, Issue 3
May 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Water Scarcity and Urban Forests: Science and Public Policy Lessons from a Decade of Drought in Adelaide, Australia
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Water Scarcity and Urban Forests: Science and Public Policy Lessons from a Decade of Drought in Adelaide, Australia
Mark Brindal, Randy Stringer
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2013, 39 (3) 102-108; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2013.014

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Water Scarcity and Urban Forests: Science and Public Policy Lessons from a Decade of Drought in Adelaide, Australia
Mark Brindal, Randy Stringer
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) May 2013, 39 (3) 102-108; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2013.014
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • OVERVIEW OF ADELAIDE
    • INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR TREES AND WATER MANAGEMENT
    • DISCUSSION
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Contribution of Urban Trees to Ecosystem Services in Lisbon: A Comparative Study Between Gardens and Street Trees
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
  • Thiabendazole as a Therapeutic Root Flare Injection for Beech Leaf Disease Management
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Adelaide
  • Australia
  • Stormwater
  • urban forest management
  • Water Policy

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire