Infrared Camera Measurements Reveal Diurnal Variation in the Effect of Mechanically Induced Internal Voids on Stem Temperatures of Small Trees Passively Heated by the Sun

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Adaskaveg, J.E.,
   2. R.L. Gilbertson, and
   3. R.A. Blanchette

   . 1990. Comparative studies of delignification caused by Ganoderma species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56(6):1932–1943.

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   1. Bauerle, W.L.,
   2. T.H. Whitlow,
   3. C.R. Pollock, and
   4. E.A. Frongillo

   . 2002. A laser-diode-based system for measuring sap flow by the heat pulse method. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 110:275–284.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Beall, F.C., and
   2. W.W. Wilcox

   . 1987. Relationship of acoustic emission during radial compression to mass loss from decay. Forest Products Journal 37:38–42.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Bellett-Travers, M., and
   2. S. Morris

   . 2010. The relationship between surface temperature and radial wood thickness of twelve trees harvested in Nottinghamshire. Arboricultural Journal 33:15–26.

   OpenUrl
5. ↵
   1. Brashaw, B.K.,
   2. V. Bucur,
   3. F. Divos,
   4. R. Goncalves,
   5. J. Lu,
   6. R. Meder,
   7. R.F. Pellerin,
   8. S. Potter,
   9. R.J. Ross,
   10. X. Wang

   , et al. 2009. Nondestructive testing and evaluation of wood: A worldwide research update. Forest Products Journal 59(3):7–14.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Burcham, D.C.,
   2. E.C. Leong, and
   3. Y.K. Fong

   . 2012. Passive infrared camera measurements demonstrate modest effect of mechanically induced internal voids on Dracaena fragrans stem temperature. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 11(2):169–178.

   OpenUrl
7. 1. Burcham, D.C.,
   2. E.C. Leong,
   3. Y.K. Fong, and
   4. P.Y. Tan

   . 2012. An evaluation of internal defects and their effect on trunk surface temperature in Casuarina equisetifolia L. (Casuarinaceae). Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 28(6):277–286.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Burcham, D.C.,
   2. S. Ghosh,
   3. E.C. Leong, and
   4. Y.K. Fong

   . 2011. Evaluation of an infrared camera technique for detecting mechanically induced internal voids in Syzygium grande. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 37:93–98.

   OpenUrl
9. ↵
   1. Catena, A., and
   2. G. Catena

   . 2008. Overview of thermal imaging for tree assessment. Arboricultural Journal 30:259–270.

   OpenUrl
10. ↵
    1. Catena, G.,
    2. L. Palla, and
    3. M. Catalano

    . 1990. Thermal infrared detection of cavities in trees. European Journal of Forest Pathology 20:201–210.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Deflorio, G.,
    2. C. Johnson,
    3. S. Fink, and
    4. F.W.M.R. Schwarze

    . 2008. Decay development in the sapwood of coniferous and deciduous trees inoculated with six wood decay fungi. Forest Ecology and Management 255:2373–2383.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. Deflorio, G.,
    2. E. Franz,
    3. S. Fink, and
    4. F.W.M.R. Schwarze

    . 2009. Host responses in the xylem of trees after inoculation with six wood-decay fungi differing in invasiveness. Botany 87:26–35.

    OpenUrl
13. 1. Deflorio, G.,
    2. S. Fink, and
    3. F.W.M.R. Schwarze

    . 2008. Detection of incipient decay in tree stems with sonic tomography after wounding and fungal inoculation. Wood Science and Technology 42:117–132.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Do, F., and
    2. A. Rocheteau

    . 2002. Influence of natural temperature gradients on measurements of xylem sap flow with thermal dissipation probes. 2. Advantages and calibration of a noncontinuous heating system. Tree Physiology 22:649–654.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    1. Ellison, M.

    2005. Quantified tree risk assessment used in the management of amenity trees. Journal of Arboriculture 31(2):57–65.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Evert, R.F.

    2006. Esau’s Plant Anatomy: Meristems, Cells, and Tissues of the Plant Body: Their Structure, Function, and Development, 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S. 601 pp.
17. ↵
    1. Forest Products Laboratory

    . 2010. Wood handbook: Wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S. 508 pp.
18. ↵
    1. Greene, J.C.,
    2. V.J. Caracelli, and
    3. W.F. Graham

    . 1989. Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11:255–274.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. ↵
    1. IBM, Corp.

    , 2010. IBM^® SPSS^® Statistics Version 19.0. International Business Machines Corp., NewYork, New York, U.S.
20. ↵
    1. Joel, Rayner

    . 1996. Basic Engineering Thermodynamics, 5th edition. Addison Wesley Longman, Essex, England. 647 pp.
21. ↵
    1. Johnstone, D.,
    2. G. Moore,
    3. M. Tausz, and
    4. M. Nicolas

    . 2010. The measurement of wood decay in landscape trees. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 36(3):121–127.

    OpenUrl
22. ↵
    1. Kane, B.C.P. and
    2. H.D.P. Ryan

    . 2004. The accuracy of formulas used to assess strength loss due to decay in trees. Journal of Arboriculture 30(6):347–356.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Kane, B.C.P., and
    2. H.D.P. Ryan

    . 2003. Examining formulas that assess strength loss due to decay in trees: Woundwood toughness improvement in red maple (Acer rubrum). Journal of Arboriculture 29(4):208–215.

    OpenUrl
24. ↵
    1. Köstner, B.,
    2. A. Granier, and
    3. J. Cermák

    . 1998. Sapflow measurements in forest stands: methods and uncertainties. Annals of Forest Science 55:13–27.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Larsson, B.,
    2. B. Bengtsson, and
    3. M. Gustafsson

    . 2004. Nondestructive detection of decay in living trees. Tree Physiology 24(7):853–858.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. ↵
    1. Leong, E.C.,
    2. D.C. Burcham, and
    3. Y.K. Fong

    . 2012. A purposeful classification of tree decay detection tools. Arboricultural Journal 34(2):91–115.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Matheny, N., and
    2. J. Clark

    . 1994. A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Trees in Urban Areas, 2nd edition. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, U.S. 85 pp.
28. ↵
    1. Matheny, N., and
    2. J. Clark

    . 2009. Tree risk assessment: What we know (and what we don’t know). Arborist News 18(1):28–33.

    OpenUrl
29. ↵
    1. Nicolotti, G., and
    2. P. Miglietta

    . 1998. Using high-technology instruments to assess defects in trees. Journal of Arboriculture 24(6):297–302.

    OpenUrl
30. ↵
    1. Norris, M.

    2008. Urban tree risk assessment methods: What works, what does not, can we tell? Proceedings of the 84th International Society of Arboriculture Annual Conference and Trade Show. International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois, U.S.
31. ↵
    1. Pearce, R.B.

    1996. Antimicrobial defences in the wood of living trees. New Phytologist 132:203–233.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
32. ↵
    1. Pearce, R.B., and
    2. S. Woodward

    . 1986. Compartmentalization and reaction zone barriers at the margin of decayed sapwood in Acer saccharinum L. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 19:359–369.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Schwarze, F.W.M.R.,
    2. J. Engels, and
    3. C. Mattheck

    . 2000. Fungal Strategies of Wood Decay in Trees. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. 185 pp.
34. ↵
    1. Thermoteknix

    . 2001. TherMonitor^® Reporter System User Manual. Thermoteknix Systems Limited, Cambridge, England.
35. ↵
    1. Wang, X., and
    2. R.B. Allison

    . 2008. Decay detection in red oak trees using a combination of visual inspection, acoustic testing, and resistance microdrilling. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 34(1):1–4.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Wullschleger, S.D.,
    2. F.C. Meinzer, and
    3. R.A. Vertessy

    . 1998. A review of whole-plant water use studies in trees. Tree Physiology 18:499–512.

    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science