Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
  • Log in
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Anchorage Influence by Production Method and Root Pruning

Edward F. Gilman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) January 2013, 39 (1) 1-5; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2013.001
Edward F. Gilman
Edward F. Gilman, Professor, Environmental Horticulture Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, U.S.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Effect of nursery production method on trunk diameter and bending stress required to pull trunks to various angles seven months after planting.

    Production methodTrunk diameterz (cm)Bending stress to 5 degrees (kN/m2)Bending stress to 10 degrees (kN/m2)Bending stress to 15 degrees (kN/m2)
    Field15.2 (0.62) ay27155 (5236) a35703 (7092) a37285 (4473) a
    Container14.8 (0.7) a20363 (1216) a23117 (1372) b23641 (2160)b
    • ↵zTrunk diameter was 14.0 cm at planting seven months earlier.

    • ↵yMeans (with S.E.) compared within columns (P < 0.05), based on three trees per treatment.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Analysis of variance of trunk diameter and bending stress required to pull trees to various trunk angles seven months after planting.

    Source of variationTrunk diameter (cm)Bending stress to 5 degrees (kN/m2)Bending stress to 10 degrees (kN/m2)Bending stress to 15 degrees (kN/m2)
    Root pruningnszns**ns
    Irrigation**nsnsns
    Root pruning × irrigationnsnsnsns
    • ↵zMean (with S.E.) for the non-significant (ns) sources of variations.

    • Note: Asterisks (**) indicate statistically significant at P < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Effect of root pruning at planting on bending stress required to pull trunks to various trunk angles seven months later.

    Root pruningBending stress to 5 degrees (kN/m2)Bending stress to 10 degrees (kN/m2)Bending stress to 15 degrees (kN/m2)
    Yes32953 (1276) az42851 (1692) a45681 (2134) a
    No29531 (1852) a37597 (1361) b41882 (2419) a
    • ↵zMeans (with S.E.) compared within a column (P < 0.03), based on 12 trees per treatment.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 39 (1)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 39, Issue 1
January 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Anchorage Influence by Production Method and Root Pruning
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Anchorage Influence by Production Method and Root Pruning
Edward F. Gilman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2013, 39 (1) 1-5; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2013.001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Anchorage Influence by Production Method and Root Pruning
Edward F. Gilman
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Jan 2013, 39 (1) 1-5; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2013.001
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Right Appraisal for the Right Purpose: Comparing Techniques for Appraising Heritage Trees in Australia and Canada
  • Urban Tree Mortality: The Purposes and Methods for (Secretly) Killing Trees Suggested in Online How-To Videos and Their Diagnoses
  • Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) in Tree Risk Assessment (TRA): A Systematic Review
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Anchorage
  • Container-grown Nursery Trees
  • Field-grown Nursery Trees
  • Landscape Planting
  • Lateral Stability
  • Root Ball Shaving

© 2025 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire