Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • All Issues
  • Contribute
    • Submit to AUF
    • Author Guidelines
    • Reviewer Guidelines
  • About
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • Journal Metrics
    • International Society of Arboriculture
  • More
    • Contact
    • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Research ArticleArticles

Evaluation of Biostimulants to Control Guignardia Leaf Blotch (Guignardia aesculi) of Horsechestnut and Black Spot (Diplocarpon rosae) of Roses

Jonathan M. Banks and Glynn C. Percival
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) November 2012, 38 (6) 258-261; DOI: https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2012.035
Jonathan M. Banks
Jonathan M. Banks (corresponding author), Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, John Harborne Building, Whiteknights, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AS, UK,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Glynn C. Percival
Glynn C. Percival, Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, John Harborne Building, Whiteknights, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AS, UK,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Selected biostimulants applied to horsechestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) and Rosa “Pretty Polly” to control Guignardia leaf blotch and black spot, respectively.

    ProductActive ingredientSupplier
    Maxicrop OriginalSeaweed extractMaxicrop (UK) Ltd, Corby, UK
    ResistimBetaineMandops UK Ltd, Eastleigh, Hampshire, UK
    BioplexSeaweed + humic acid extractUnited Agri Products Ltd, Alconbury Weston, UK
    Fulcrum CRVMolassesBanks Cargill Agriculture Ltd, St Hughs, Lincoln, UK
    RedicropSeaweed (cytokinin activity)United Agri Products Ltd, Alconbury Weston, UK
    Crop SetLactobacillus fermentation product and B5 vitaminsUnited Agri Products Ltd, Alconbury Weston, UK
    SuperthriveVitimin B and Auxin (NAA)Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory, Charlotte, NC
    SysthaneMyclobutanil (triazole)Barrettine, St Ivel Way, Warmley, Bristol
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Foliar pathogen severity rating on foliar tissue of horsechestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) and Rosa “Pretty Polly.”

    TreatmentConcentration per literHorsechestnut leaf blotch severity ratingBlack spot severity rating
    Water (control)-4.9 ± 0.56a4.2 ± 0.30a
    Maxicrop Original10 ml4.7 ± 0.54a4.3 ± 0.33a
    Maxicrop Original20 ml5.1 ± 0.58a4.0 ± 0.29a
    Resistim10 ml4.8 ± 0.46a3.8 ± 0.31a
    Resistim20 ml5.2 ± 0.53a4.2 ± 0.32a
    Bioplex10 ml4.9 ± 0.52a4.0 ± 0.33a
    Bioplex20 ml4.7 ± 0.47a4.0 ± 0.27a
    Fulcrum CRV10 ml5.2 ± 0.61a3.7 ± 0.31a
    Fulcrum CRV20 ml4.8 ± 0.50a3.7 ± 0.25a
    Redicrop10 ml5.0 ± 0.56a4.4 ± 0.33a
    Redicrop20 ml4.8 ± 0.55a4.3 ± 0.37a
    Crop Set10 ml5.0 ± 0.58a4.5 ± 0.34a
    Crop Set20 ml4.6 ± 0.60a4.1 ± 0.38a
    Superthrive0.25 ml4.5 ± 0.40ab4.0 ± 0.29a
    Superthrive0.50 ml4.2 ± 0.33ab4.2 ± 0.31a
    Systhane0.3 ml1.3 ± 0.18c1.4 ± 0.04b
    Systhane0.6 ml1.0 ± 0.14c1.2 ± 0.03b
    • Note: 1 = No pathogen attack observed; 2 = less than 5% of leaf area affected; 3 = 5%–20% of leaf area affected with some chlorosis; 4 = 21%–50% of leaf area affected, significant leaf chlorosis; 5 = 51%–80% of leaf area leaves affected, severe leaf chlorosis; 6 = 81%–100% of leaf area with complete leaf chlorosis. All values mean of six plants. Values followed by the same letter are not statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05) according to LSD.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF): 38 (6)
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF)
Vol. 38, Issue 6
November 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evaluation of Biostimulants to Control Guignardia Leaf Blotch (Guignardia aesculi) of Horsechestnut and Black Spot (Diplocarpon rosae) of Roses
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Arboriculture & Urban Forestry
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Arboriculture & Urban Forestry web site.
Citation Tools
Evaluation of Biostimulants to Control Guignardia Leaf Blotch (Guignardia aesculi) of Horsechestnut and Black Spot (Diplocarpon rosae) of Roses
Jonathan M. Banks, Glynn C. Percival
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2012, 38 (6) 258-261; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2012.035

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Evaluation of Biostimulants to Control Guignardia Leaf Blotch (Guignardia aesculi) of Horsechestnut and Black Spot (Diplocarpon rosae) of Roses
Jonathan M. Banks, Glynn C. Percival
Arboriculture & Urban Forestry (AUF) Nov 2012, 38 (6) 258-261; DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2012.035
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Bookmark this article

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • LITERATURE CITED
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Evaluating the Reproducibility of Tree Risk Assessment Ratings Across Commonly Used Methods
  • London Plane Bark Exfoliation and Tree-Ring Growth in Urban Environments
  • Green Infrastructure with Actual Canopy Parameterization: A Simulation Study for Heat Stress Mitigation in a Hot-Humid Urban Environment
Show more Articles

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Aesculus hippocastanum L.
  • Bio Control
  • Biostimulant
  • Diplocarpon rosae
  • Guignardia aesculi
  • integrated pest management
  • Plant Health Care
  • Pathogen Suppression

© 2023 International Society of Arboriculture

Powered by HighWire