Characterization of Physical, Gaseous, and Hydrologic Properties of Compacted Subsoil and its Effects on Growth and Transpiration of Two Maples Grown Under Greenhouse Conditions

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Alberty, C.A.,
   2. H.M. Pellett, and
   3. D.H. Taylor

   . 1984. Characterization of soil compaction at construction sites and woody plant response. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 2:48–53.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Arnold, H.F.

   1980. Choice of Type. In: Trees in Urban Design. Litton Educational Publishing, Inc. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. New York, New York, U.S. pp. 99–100.
3. ↵
   1. Andrade, A.,
   2. D.W. Wolfe, and
   3. E. Fereres

   . 1993. Leaf expansion, photosynthesis, and water relations of sunflower plants grown on compacted soil. Plant and Soil 149:175–184.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
4. ↵
   1. A. Klute

   1. Blake, G.R., and
   2. K.H. Hartge

   . 1986. Bulk density. In: A. Klute (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd edition. ASA-Soil Science Society of America, Monograph 9. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S. pp. 364–367.
5. ↵
   1. B.D. Soane and
   2. C. van Ouwerkerk

   1. Boone, F.R., and
   2. B.W. Veen

   . 1994. Crop responses to soil compaction. In: B.D. Soane and C. van Ouwerkerk (Eds.). Soil compaction in crop production. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Ch. 11. pp. 237–264.
6. ↵
   1. Brady, N.C., and
   2. R.R. Weil

   . 2002. In the Nature and Properties of Soils. 13th edition. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, U.S. pp. 121–218.
7. ↵
   1. Buttery, B.R.,
   2. C.S. Tan,
   3. C.F. Drury,
   4. S.J. Park,
   5. R.J. Armstrong, and
   6. K.Y. Park

   . 1998. The effects of soil compaction, soil moisture and soil type on growth and nodulation of soybean and common bean. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 78:571–576.

   OpenUrl
8. ↵
   1. Cook, A.,
   2. C.A. Marriott,
   3. W. Steel, and
   4. C.E. Mullins

   . 1996. Effects of soil mechanical impedance on root and shoot growth of Lolium perenne L., Agrostis capillaris and Trifoloium repens L. Journal of Experimental Botany 47:1075–1084.

   OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
9. ↵
   1. Coutadeur, C.,
   2. Y. Coquet, and
   3. J. Roger-Estrade

   . 2002. Variation of hydraulic conductivity in a tilled soil. European Journal of Soil Science 53:619–628.

   OpenUrlGeoRef
10. ↵
    1. Day S.D., and
    2. N.L. Bassuk

    . 1994. A review of the effects of soil compaction and amelioration treatments on landscape trees. Journal of Arboriculture 20:9–16.

    OpenUrl
11. ↵
    1. Day S.D.,
    2. N.L. Bassuk, and
    3. H. van Es

    . 1995. Effects of four compaction remediation methods for landscape trees on soil aeration, mechanical impedance and tree establishment. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 13(2):64–71.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Day, S.D.,
    2. J.R. Seiler, and
    3. N. Persaud

    . 2000. A comparison of root growth dynamics of silver maple and flowering dogwood in compacted soil at differing soil water contents. Tree Physiology 20:257–263.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    1. Fair, B.A.,
    2. J.D. Metzger, and
    3. J. Vent

    . 2012. Response of eight maple cultivars (Acer spp.) to soil compaction and effects of two rates of pre-plant nitrogen on tree establishment and aboveground growth. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 38(2):64–74.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Gebhardt, S.H.,
    2. Fleige, and
    3. R. Horn

    . 2009. Effect of compaction on pore functions of soils in a Saalean moraine landscape in north Germany. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 172:688–695.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. A. Klute

    1. Gee, G.W., and
    2. J.W. Bauder

    . 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: A. Klute (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd edition. ASA-Soil Science Society of America. Monograph 9. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S. pp. 383–411.
16. ↵
    1. Greenwood, D.J.

    1971. Soil aeration and plant growth. Reports on the progress of applied chemistry, London, Society of Chemical Industry 55:423–431.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Harrington, J.T.,
    2. J.G. Mexal, and
    3. J.T Fisher

    . 1994. Volume displacement provides a quick and accurate way to quantify new root production. Tree Planter’s Notes. Fall. 45:121–124.

    OpenUrl
18. ↵
    1. Hillel, D.

    1998. Fundamentals of Soil Physics. Academic Press, Inc., New York, New York, p. 11.
19. ↵
    1. Hussain, A.,
    2. C.R. Black,
    3. I.B. Taylor,
    4. B.J. Mulholland, and
    5. J.A. Roberts

    . 1999. Novel approaches for examining the effects of differential soil compaction on xylem sap abscisic acid concentration, stomatal conductance and growth in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant, Cell and Environment 22:1377–1388.

    OpenUrlCrossRef
20. ↵
    1. Imhoff, S.,
    2. B.D. Kay,
    3. A. Pires da Silva, and
    4. M.A. Hajabbasi

    . 2010. Evaluating responses of maize (Zea mays L.) to soil physical conditions using a boundary line approach. Soil & Tillage Research 106:303–310.

    OpenUrl
21. ↵
    1. Jackson, M.B.

    1997. Hormones from roots as signals for the shoots of stressed plants. Trends Plant Science 2:22–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
22. ↵
    1. Kay, B.D.,
    2. M.A. Hajabbasi,
    3. J. Ying, and
    4. M. Follenaar

    . 2006. Optimum versus non-limiting water content for root growth, biomass accumulation, gas exchange and the rate of development of maize (Zea mays L.). Soil & Tillage Research 88:42–54.

    OpenUrl
23. ↵
    1. Kays, S.J.,
    2. C.W. Nicklow, and
    3. D.H. Simons

    . 1974. Ethylene in relation to the response of roots to physical impedance. Plant and Soil 40:565–571.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
24. ↵
    1. A. Klute

    1. Klute, A., and
    2. C. Dirksen

    . 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: Laboratory methods. In: A. Klute (Ed.). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd edition. ASA-Soil Science Society of America Monograph 9. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S. pp. 687–733.
25. ↵
    1. Komatsu, H.,
    2. A. Katayana,
    3. S. Hirose,
    4. A. Kume,
    5. N. Higashi,
    6. S. Ogawa, and
    7. K. Otsuki

    . 2007. Reduction in soil water availability and tree transpiration in a forest with pedestrian trampling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 146:107–114.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
26. ↵
    1. H.A. Mooney

    1. Kozlowski, T.T.,
    2. P.J. Kramer, and
    3. S.G. Pallardy

    . 1991. Soil aeration, compaction, and flooding. In: The Physiological Ecology of Woody Plants. H.A. Mooney (Ed.). Academic Press, Inc. San Diego, California, U.S. pp. 303–307.
27. ↵
    1. Krümmelbein, J.,
    2. R. Horn,
    3. T. Raab,
    4. O. Beus, and
    5. R.F. Hühl

    . 2010. Soil physical parameters of a recently established agricultural recultivation site after brown coal mining in East Germany. Soil & Tillage Research 111:19–25.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Masle, J., and
    2. J.B. Passioura

    . 1987. The effect of soil strength on the growth of young wheat plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 14:643–656.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
29. ↵
    1. McLoda, N.A., and
    2. R.J. Parkinson

    . 1980. Soil Survey of Franklin County, Ohio. U.S. Dept. Agr., Soil Conservation Service, Columbus Ohio, U.S. pp. 89–90.
30. ↵
    1. Montagu, K.D.,
    2. J.P. Conroy, and
    3. B.J. Atwell

    . 2001. The position of localized soil compaction determines root and subsequent shoot growth responses. Journal of Experimental Botany 52:2127–2133.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    1. J.C. Pech,
    2. A. Latcheand, and
    3. C. Balague

    1. Morgan, P.W.,
    2. J.L. Sarquis,
    3. C. He,
    4. W.R. Jordan, and
    5. M.C. Drew

    . 1993. Regulation of ethylene biosynthesis in maize root responses to stress. In: J.C. Pech, A. Latcheand, and C. Balague (Eds.). Cellular and Molecular Aspects of the Plant Hormone Ethylene. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 232–237.
32. ↵
    1. R.E. Wilkinson

    1. Murphy, J.A.,
    2. S.L. Murphy, and
    3. H. Samaranayake

    . 2000. Soil physical constraints and plant growth interactions. In: R.E. Wilkinson (Ed.). Plant-Environment Interactions. 2nd edition. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, U.S. pp. 387–406.
33. ↵
    1. Pan, E., and
    2. N.L. Bassuk

    . 1985. Effects of soil type and compaction on the growth of Ailanthus altissima seedlings. Journal of Environmental Horticulture 3:161–167.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Scott, H.D.

    2000. Soil Physics, Agricultural and Environmental Applications. Iowa State Univ. Press. Ames, Iowa, U.S. pp. 24.
35. ↵
    1. Shierlaw J., and
    2. A.M. Alston

    . 1984. Effects of soil compaction on root growth and uptake of phosphorous. Plant and Soil 77:15–28.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
36. ↵
    1. Sydnor, T.D., and
    2. W.F. Cowen

    . 2000. Ohio Trees. Ohio State University Extension. pp. 166–167.