Estimates of the Potential Cost of Emerald Ash Borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) in Canadian Municipalities

LITERATURE CITED

1. ↵
   1. Anulewicz, A.C.,
   2. D.G. McCullough, and
   3. D.L. Cappaert

   . 2007. Emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) density and canopy dieback in three North American ash species. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33:338–349.

   OpenUrl
2. ↵
   1. Buck, J.H., and
   2. J.M. Marshall

   . 2008. Hitchhiking as a secondary dispersal pathway for emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis. The Great Lakes Entomologist 41:197–199.

   OpenUrl
3. ↵
   1. Burns, R.M., and
   2. B. H. Honkala

   , technical coordinators. 1990. Silvics of North America: 2. Hardwoods. Agriculture Handbook 654. Washington D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Vol. 2, 877 pp.
4. ↵
   1. Cappaert, D.,
   2. D.G. McCullough,
   3. T.M. Poland, and
   4. N.W. Siegert

   . 2005. Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge. American Entomologist 51:152–165.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
5. ↵
   1. Dwyer, J. F.,
   2. E.G. McPherson,
   3. H.W. Schroeder, and
   4. R.A. Rowntree

   . 1992. Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest. Journal of Arboriculture 18:227–234.

   OpenUrl
6. ↵
   1. Environmental Design and Management Ltd

   . 2006. St. John’s urban forest management master plan. City of St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada. 71 pp.
7. ↵
   1. Farrar, J.L.

   1995. Trees in Canada. Fitzhenry and Whiteside Lmt. 502 pp.
8. ↵
   1. K.A. McManus and
   2. K.W. Gottschalk

   1. Herms, D.A.,
   2. K.J.K. Gandhi,
   3. A. Smith,
   4. J. Cardina,
   5. K.S. Knight,
   6. C.P. Herms,
   7. R.P. Long, and
   8. D.G. McCullough

   . 2009a. Ecological impacts of emerald ash borer in forests of southeast Michigan. pp. 36–37. In: K.A. McManus and K.W. Gottschalk. Proceedings. 20th U.S. Department of Agriculture interagency research forum on invasive species 2009. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-51. Newtown, PA, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
9. ↵
   1. Herms, D.A.,
   2. D.G., McCullough,
   3. D.R. Smitley,
   4. C.S. Sadof,
   5. R.C. Williamson, and
   6. P.L. Nixon

   . 2009b. Insecticide options for protecting ash trees from emerald ash borer. North Central IPM Center Bulletin. 12 pp.
10. ↵
    1. Koch, F.H.,
    2. D. Yemshanov,
    3. D.W. McKenney, and
    4. W.D. Smith

    . 2009. Evaluating critical uncertainty thresholds in a spatial model of forest pest invasion risk. Risk Analysis 29:1227–1241.

    OpenUrlPubMed
11. ↵
    1. Kovacs, K.F.,
    2. R.G. Haight,
    3. D.G. McCullough,
    4. R.J. Mercader,
    5. N.W. Siegert, and
    6. A.M. Liebhold

    . 2010. Cost of potential emerald ash borer damage in U.S. communities, 2009–2019. Ecological Economics 69:569–578.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
12. ↵
    1. D.B. Lyons and
    2. T.A. Scarr

    1. Kreutzweiser, D.

    2010. Ecological implications of emerald ash borer infestations and management. pp. 18–21. In: D.B. Lyons and T.A. Scarr. Workshop Proceedings: Guiding Principles for Managing the Emerald Ash Borer in Urban Environments. Natural Resources Canada. 44 pp.
13. ↵
    1. Little, E.L. , Jr

    . 1971. Atlas of United States Trees, vol. 1: Conifers and Important Hardwoods. Washington (D.C.): U.S. Department of Agriculture. Miscellaneous publication no. 1146.
14. ↵
    1. McCullough, D.G.,
    2. T.M. Poland, and
    3. D. Cappaert

    . 2009. Attraction of the emerald ash borer to ash trees stressed by girdling, herbicide treatment or wounding. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:1331–1345.

    OpenUrl
15. ↵
    1. McKenney, D.W., and
    2. J.H. Pedlar

    . 2012. To treat or to remove: An economic model to assist homeowners in deciding the fate of ash trees threatened by emerald ash borer. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, in press.
16. ↵
    1. McKenney, D.,
    2. J.H. Pedlar,
    3. K. Lawrence,
    4. K. Campbell, and
    5. M. Hutchinson

    . 2007. Beyond traditional hardiness zones: Using climate envelopes to map plant range limits. BioScience 57:929–937.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
17. ↵
    1. McKenzie, N.,
    2. B. Helson,
    3. D. Thompson,
    4. G. Otis,
    5. J. McFarlane,
    6. T. Buscarini, and
    7. J. Meating

    . 2010. Azadirachtin: an effective systemic insecticide for control of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 103:708–717.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    1. McPherson, G.E.,
    2. J.R. Simpson,
    3. J.J. Peper,
    4. S.L. Gardner,
    5. K.E. Vargas, and
    6. Q. Xiao

    . 2007. Northeast community tree guide: benefits, costs, and strategic planting. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-202. Albany, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. 106 pp.
19. ↵
    1. Mercader, R.J.,
    2. N.W. Siegert,
    3. A.M. Liebhold, and
    4. D.G. McCullough

    . 2009. Dispersal of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis in newly-colonized sites. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 11:421–424.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Nowak, D.J.,
    2. R.E. Hoehn , III,
    3. D.E. Crane,
    4. J.C Stevens, and
    5. C.L. Fisher

    . 2010. Assessing urban forest effects and values, Chicago’s urban forest. Resour. Bull. NRS-37. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 27 pp.
21. 1. OMNR

    . 2010. Annual Report on Forest Management 2008/09. Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
22. ↵
    1. Pallisade Corporation

    . 2002. Guide to using @Risk version 4.5: advanced risk analysis for spreadsheets. Pallisade Corporation, Newfield, New York, U.S.
23. ↵
    1. Portney P.R., and
    2. J.P. Weyant

    . 1999. Discounting and intergenerational equity. Resources for the Future. 186 pp.
24. ↵
    1. Prasad, A.M.,
    2. L.R. Iverson,
    3. M.P. Peters,
    4. J.M. Bossenbroek,
    5. S.N. Matthews,
    6. T. Sydnor, and
    7. M.W. Schwartz

    . 2010. Modeling the invasive emerald ash borer risk of spread using a spatially explicit cellular model. Landscape Ecology, 25:353–369.

    OpenUrl
25. ↵
    1. Rebek, E.J.,
    2. D.A. Herms, and
    3. D.R. Smitley

    . 2008. Interspecific variation in resistance to emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) among North American and Asian ash (Fraxinus spp.). Environmental Entomology 37:242–246.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. ↵
    1. Sadof, C.S.,
    2. L. Purcell,
    3. F.J. Bishop,
    4. C. Quesada, and
    5. Z. Zhang

    . 2011. Evaluating restoration capacity and costs of managing the emerald ash borer with a web-based cost calculator in urban forests. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 37:74–83.

    OpenUrl
27. ↵
    1. Schwan, T.D., and
    2. K.A. Elliott

    . 2010. Effects of diameter-limit by-laws on forestry practices, economics, and regional wood supply for private woodlands in southwestern Ontario. The Forestry Chronicle 86:623–635.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Smitley, D.R.,
    2. T. Davis, and
    3. E.J. Rebek

    . 2008. Progression of ash canopy thinning and dieback outward from the initial infestation of emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in southeastern Michigan. Journal of Economic Entomology 101:1643–1650.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
29. ↵
    1. K.A. McManus and
    2. K.W. Gottschalk

    1. Smith, E. L.,
    2. A.J. Storer, and
    3. B.K. Roosien

    . 2009. Emerald ash borer infestation rates in Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana. p. 96. In: K.A. McManus and K.W. Gottschalk. Proceedings. 20th U. S. Department of Agriculture interagency research forum on invasive species 2009. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-51. Newtown, PA, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
30. ↵
    Statistics Canada. 2007. Community Profiles. 2006 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 92-591-XWE. <www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/prof/92-591/index.cfm?Lang=E>
31. ↵
    1. Sydnor, T.D.,
    2. M. Bumgardner, and
    3. A. Todd

    . 2007. The potential economic impacts of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) on Ohio, U.S., communities. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 33:48–54.

    OpenUrl
32. ↵
    1. Sydnor, T.D.,
    2. M. Bumgardner, and
    3. S. Subburayalu

    . 2011. Community ash densities and economic impact potential of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) in four midwestern states. Agriculture & Urban Forestry 37:84–89.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Taylor, R.A.J.,
    2. L.S. Bauer,
    3. T.M. Poland, and
    4. K.N. Windell

    . 2010. Flight performance of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) on a flight mill and in free flight. Journal of Insect Behavior 23:128–148.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    USDA-APHIS. 2011. Emerald ash borer quarantine map. Accessed 06/14/2011. <www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/emerald_ash_b/downloads/multistateeab.pdf>
35. ↵
    1. Weitzman, M.

    1994. On the “environmental” discount rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26:200–209.

    OpenUrl
36. ↵
    1. Woodall, C.W.,
    2. C.M. Oswalt,
    3. J.A. Westfall,
    4. C.H. Perry,
    5. M.D. Nelson, and
    6. A.O. Finley

    . 2009. An indicator of tree migration in forests of the eastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 257:1434–1444.

    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
37. ↵
    1. Yemshanov, D.,
    2. F.H. Koch,
    3. D.W. McKenney,
    4. M.C. Downing, and
    5. F.F. Sapio

    . 2009a. Mapping invasive species risks with stochastic models: A cross-border United States-Canada application for Sirex noctilio Fabricius. Risk Analysis 29:868–884.

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. ↵
    1. Yemshanov, D.,
    2. D.W. McKenney,
    3. P. de Groot,
    4. D. Haugen,
    5. D. Sidders, and
    6. B. Joss

    . 2009b. A bioeconomic approach to assess the impact of an alien invasive insect on timber supply and harvesting: A case study with Sirex noctilio in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:154–168.

    OpenUrl